Good agricultural practice

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good agricultural practice (GAP) is a certification system for agriculture, specifying procedures (and attendant documentation) that must be implemented to create food for consumers or further processing that is safe and wholesome, using sustainable methods. While there are numerous competing definitions of what methods constitute good agricultural practice there are several broadly accepted schemes that producers can adhere too.

Motivation[]

Introduction of GAP is particularly desirable when there is chronic overuse and misuse of agricultural pesticides. Governments seek to reduce the use of pesticides ("sustainability") by introducing alternative methods of pest management, while at the same time ensuring a steady production of safe and wholesome food.[1]

Organizations[]

Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) of the United Nations GAP[]

The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) uses good agricultural practice as a collection of principles to apply for on-farm production and post-production processes, resulting in safe and healthy food and non-food agricultural products, while taking into account economical, social and environmental sustainability.

GAPs may be applied to a wide range of and at different scales. They are applied through sustainable agricultural methods, including economically and efficiently produce being sufficient (food security), safe (food safety), and making sure that the food is nutritious (food quality).[2]

GAPs require maintaining a common database on integrated production techniques for each of the major agro-ecological area (see ecoregion). They collect, analyze and disseminate information of good practices in relevant geographical contexts.

United States Department of Agriculture GAP/GHP Program[]

The United States Department of Agriculture marketing service operates an audit/certification program to verify that farms use good agricultural practice or good handling practice. It is a voluntary program typically utilized by growers and packers to satisfy contractual requirements with retail and food service buyers. The program was implemented in 2002 after the New Jersey Department of Agriculture petitioned USDA-AMS to implement an audit-based program to verify conformance to the 1998 Food & Drug Administration publication entitled, "Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables."

The program has been updated several times since 2002, and includes additional certification programs such as commodity specific audit programs for mushrooms, tomatoes, leafy greens, and cantaloupes. In 2009, USDA-AMS participated in the GAPs Harmonization Initiative which "harmonized" 14 of the major North American GAP audit standards, which in 2011 resulted in the release and implementation of the Produce GAPs Harmonized Food Safety Standard.

Recommendations[]

Soil[]

Further information: Compost, Mulch, Potting soil, and Organic fertilizer
  • Reducing erosion by wind and water through hedging and ditching.
  • Application of fertilizers at appropriate moments and in adequate doses (i.e., when the plant needs the fertilizer), to avoid run-off
  • Maintaining or restoring soil organic content, by manure application, use of grazing, crop rotation
  • Reduce soil compaction issues (by avoiding using heavy mechanical devices)
  • Maintain soil structure, by limiting heavy tillage practices[4]
  • In situ green manuring by growing pulse crops like cowpea, horse gram, sunn hemp etc.

Water[]

  • Practice scheduled irrigation, with monitoring of plant needs, and soil water reserve status to avoid water loss by drainage
  • Prevent soil salinization by limiting water input to needs, and recycling water whenever possible
  • Avoid crops with high water requirements in a low availability region
  • Avoid drainage and fertilizer run-off
  • Maintain permanent soil covering, in particular in winter to avoid nitrogen run-off
  • Manage carefully water table, by limiting heavy output of water
  • Restore or maintain wetlands (see marshlands)
  • Provide good water points for livestock[4]
  • Harvest water in situ by digging catch pits, crescent bunds across slope

Animal production, health and welfare[]

  • Respect of animal well-being (freedom from hunger and thirst; freedom from discomfort; freedom from pain, injury or disease; freedom to express normal behavior; and freedom from fear and distress)
  • Avoid nontherapeutic mutilations, surgical or invasive procedures, such as tail docking and debeaking;
  • Avoid negative impacts on landscape, environment and life: contamination of land for grazing, food, water and air
  • Check stocks and flows, maintain structure of systems
  • Prevent chemical and medical residues from entering the food chain
  • Minimize non-therapeutic use of antibiotics or hormones
  • Avoid feeding animals with animal wastes or animal matter (reducing the risk of alien viral or transgenic genes, or prions such as mad cow disease),
  • Minimize transport of live animals (by foot, rail or road) (reducing the risk of epidemics, e.g., foot and mouth disease)
  • Prevent waste run-off (e.g. nitrate contamination of water tables from pigs), nutrient loss and greenhouse gas emissions (methane from cows)
  • Prefer safety measures standards in manipulation of equipment
  • Apply traceability processes on the whole production chain (breeding, feed, medical treatment...) for consumer security and feedback possibility in case of a food crisis (e.g., dioxin).[4]

Healthcare and public health[]

Smallholder productivity[]

Demand for agricultural crops is expected to double as the world's population reaches 9.1 billion by 2050. Increasing the quantity and quality of food in response to growing demand will require increased agricultural production. Good agricultural practices, often in combination with effective input use, are one of the best ways to increase smallholder productivity. Many agribusinesses are building sustainable supply chains to increase production and improve quality.[6]

See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ Schreinemachers, Pepijn; Schad, Iven; et al. (12 June 2012). "Can public GAP standards reduce agricultural pesticide use? The case of fruit and vegetable farming in northern Thailand". Agriculture and Human Values. 29 (4): 519–529. doi:10.1007/s10460-012-9378-6.
  2. ^ Research that works for developing countries and Australia. Retrieved 25 November 2007.
  3. ^ Moya, Berta; Parker, Alison; Sakrabani, Ruben (2019). "Challenges to the use of fertilisers derived from human excreta: The case of vegetable exports from Kenya to Europe and influence of certification systems". Food Policy. 85: 72–78. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.05.001.
  4. ^ Jump up to: a b c "FOOD SAFETY AND GOOD PRACTICE CERTIFICATION". FAO. Retrieved 6 June 2019.
  5. ^ Máthé, A.; I. Máthé. "Quality assurance of cultivated and gathered medicinal plants". Retrieved 23 May 2009., World Health Organization (2003). "WHO guidelines on good agricultural and collection practices (GACP) for medicinal plants" (PDF). Retrieved 23 May 2009.
  6. ^ International Finance Corporation. Working with Smallholders: A Handbook for Firms Building Sustainable Supply Chains. http://www.farms2firms.org Archived 3 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine

Further reading[]

External links[]

Retrieved from ""