Inclosure Acts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Inclosure Acts,[a] which use an archaic spelling of the word now usually spelt "enclosure", cover enclosure of open fields and common land in England and Wales, creating legal property rights to land previously held in common. Between 1604 and 1914, over 5,200 individual enclosure acts were passed, affecting 28,000 km2.[1]

History[]

Before the enclosures in England, a portion of the land was categorized as "common" or "waste".[b] "Common" land was under the control of the lord of the manor, but certain rights on the land such as pasture, pannage, or estovers were held variously by certain nearby properties, or (occasionally) in gross by all manorial tenants. "Waste" was land without value as a farm strip – often very narrow areas (typically less than a yard wide) in awkward locations (such as cliff edges, or inconveniently shaped manorial borders), but also bare rock, and so forth. "Waste" was not officially used by anyone, and so was often farmed by landless peasants.[3]

The remaining land was organised into a large number of narrow strips, each tenant possessing a number of disparate strips throughout the manor, as would the manorial lord. Called the open-field system, it was administered by manorial courts, which exercised some collective control.[3] What might now be termed a single field would have been divided under this system among the lord and his tenants; poorer peasants (serfs or copyholders, depending on the era) were allowed to live on the strips owned by the lord in return for cultivating his land.[4] The system facilitated common grazing and crop rotation.[4]

Any individual might possess several strips of land within the manor, often at some distance from one another. Seeking better financial returns, landowners looked for more efficient farming techniques.[5] Enclosure acts for small areas had been passed sporadically since the 12th century, but advances in agricultural knowledge and technology in the 18th century made them more commonplace. Because tenants, or even copyholders, had legally enforceable rights on the land, substantial compensation was provided to extinguish them; thus many tenants were active supporters of enclosure, though it enabled landlords to force reluctant tenants to comply with the process.

With legal control of the land, landlords introduced innovations in methods of crop production, increasing profits and supporting the Agricultural Revolution; higher productivity also enabled landowners to justify higher rents for the people working the land. In 1801, the Inclosure (Consolidation) Act was passed to tidy up previous acts. In 1845, another General Inclosure Act instituted the appointment of Inclosure Commissioners, who could enclose land without submitting a request to Parliament.

The powers granted in the Inclosure Act of 1773 of the Parliament of the Kingdom of Great Britain were often abused by landowners: the preliminary meetings where enclosure was discussed, intended to be held in public, often took place in the presence of only the local landowners, who regularly chose their own solicitors, surveyors and Commissioners to decide on each case. In 1786 there were still 250,000 independent landowners, but in the course of only thirty years their number was reduced to 32,000.[6]

The tenants displaced by the process often left the countryside to work in the towns. This contributed to the Industrial Revolution – at the very moment new technological advances required large numbers of workers, a concentration of large numbers of people in need of work had emerged; the former country tenants and their descendants became workers in industrial factories within cities.[7]

A poem from the 18th century reads as a protest against the inclosure acts:

They hang the man and flog the woman

Who steals the goose from off the common

Yet let the greater villain loose

That steals the common from the goose

The law demands that we atone

When we take things we do not own

But leaves the lords and ladies fine

Who take things that are yours and mine

The poor and wretched don't escape

If they conspire the law to break

This must be so but they endure

Those who conspire to make the law

The law locks up the man or woman

Who steals the goose from off the common

And geese will still a common lack

Till they go and steal it back

List of acts[]

The Inclosure Acts 1845 to 1882 mean:[8]

The (8 & 9 Vict. c. 118)
The (9 & 10 Vict. c. 70)
The (10 & 11 Vict. c. 111)
The (11 & 12 Vict. c. 99)
The (12 & 13 Vict. c. 83)
The (14 & 15 Vict. c. 53)
The (15 & 16 Vict. c. 79)
The (17 & 18 Vict. c. 97)
The (20 & 21 Vict. c. 31)
The (22 & 23 Vict. c. 43)
The (31 & 32 Vict. c. 89)
The (39 & 40 Vict. c. 56)
The (41 & 42 Vict. c. 56)
The (42 & 43 Vict. c. 37)
The (45 & 46 Vict. c. 15)

See also[]

Notes[]

  1. ^ "Inclosure"
  2. ^ The Domesday Book records various manors as waste (Latin: vasta, wasta). Holdings described as waste or not in use paid no tax.[2]

Citations[]

  1. ^ "Enclosing the Land". www.parliament.uk. Retrieved 12 December 2013.
  2. ^ "Waste". Hull Domesday project. Retrieved 22 August 2019.
  3. ^ a b Clark, Gregory; Anthony Clark (December 2001). "Common Rights to Land in England". The Journal of Economic History. 61 (4): 1009–1036. doi:10.1017/S0022050701042061. S2CID 154462400. Retrieved 12 December 2013.
  4. ^ a b "open-field system". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. Retrieved 12 December 2013.
  5. ^ Motamed, Mesbah J.; Raymond J. G. M. Florax; William A. Masters (October 31, 2013). "Agriculture, Transportation and the Timing of Urbanization: Global Analysis at the Grid Cell Level" (PDF): 4. Retrieved 12 December 2013. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  6. ^ https://libcom.org/files/Rocker%20-%20Anarcho-Syndicalism%20Theory%20and%20Practice.pdf, p. 36.
  7. ^ "Enclosing the Land". Retrieved 12 December 2013.
  8. ^ The Short Titles Act 1896, section 2(1) and second schedule

References[]

Further reading[]

  • Chambers, Jonathan D. "Enclosure and labour supply in the industrial revolution", Economic History Review 5.3 (1953): 319–343 in JSTOR
  • Linebaugh, Peter. The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and Commons for All. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008.

External links[]

Retrieved from ""