Paleodictyon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Palaeodictyon
Temporal range: Cambrian–Recent
Paleodictyon P.San García Algeciras I03.JPG
Paleodictyon imperfectum in Oligocene-Miocene sandrock
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Animalia
Genus:
Paleodictyon

Paleodictyon is a trace fossil, usually interpreted to be a burrow, which appears in the geologic marine record beginning in the Precambrian/Early Cambrian[1] and in modern ocean environments.[2][3][4] Paleodictyon were first described by Giuseppe Meneghini in 1850.[1] The origin of the trace fossil is enigmatic and numerous candidates have been proposed.

Paleodictyon minimum.

Description[]

Paleodictyon consist of thin tunnels or ridges that usually form hexagonal or polygonal-shaped honeycomb-like network.[1] Both irregular and regular nets are known throughout the stratigraphic range of Paleodictyon, but it is the striking regular honeycomb pattern of some forms such as P. carpathecum and P. nodosum which make it notable and widely studied.

Individual mesh elements may be millimeters to centimeters, usually from 1-1.5 to 2-3 cm, and entire mesh patterns can cover areas up to a square meter. The edges or threads that make up the mesh are usually cylindrical or ellipsoid in cross-section, and some forms have vertical tubes connecting the mesh upwards to the sediment-water interface. Dolf Seilacher proposed in 1977 that it may be a trap for food, a mechanism for farming, or a foraging path.[5] Alternatively, it has been suggested that it may be a cast of a xenophyophoran protist.[2][6]

History of study[]

Much modeling work has been done on Paleodictyon. Roy Plotnick, trace fossils researcher at University of Illinois at Chicago, modeled the form as resulting from the iterative modular growth of an unknown organism.[7] Garlick and Miller modeled it as a burrow with a relatively simple burrow algorithm.[8]

Hypotheses about origin[]

Paleodictyon from Miocene of Fiume Savio

The question is whether these patterns are burrows of marine animals such as worms[1] or fossilized remains of ancient organisms (sponges or algae).[9] Observations on Paleodictyon using Euler graph theory suggest that it cannot be an excavation trace fossil, and that it must therefore be an imprint, body fossil or be of abiotic origin.[10]

The xenophyophore Occultammina has been suggested as a possible identity for the maker of Paleodictyon, but this remains controversial.

It has been suggested that Paleodictyon may represent a body fossil of a xenophyophore, a type of giant foraminifera. The infaunal xenophyophore Occultammina does bear some physical resemblance to Paleodictyon and the abyssal habitat of modern xenophyophores is indeed similar to the inferred paleoenvironment where fossil graphoglyptids are found; however, the large size (up to 0.5m) and regularity of many graphoglyptids as well as the apparent absence of collected sediment particles (known as xenophyae) in their fossils casts doubt on the possibility. Further, modern xenophyophores lack the regular hexagonal symmetry common to Paleodictyon.[11] Modern examples of Paleodictyon have been discovered; however, examination failed to reveal stercomares, a hardened test, protoplasm, or xenophyophore DNA. The trace may alternately represent a burrow or a glass sponge.[12]

The search for a living animal[]

The IMAX film Volcanoes of the Deep Sea describes the search for a living animal that produces the Paleodictyon, using the deep-water submersible DSV Alvin near volcanic vents that lie 3,500 metres (11,500 ft) underwater in the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. They found and took samples from many of the Paleodictyon nodosum honeycomb burrows. However, no creatures were found in any of them. They theorized that the burrows were being used for cultivating/trapping bacteria by whichever creature created them.[1][13]

References[]

  1. ^ a b c d e KU Ichnology - Studying the Traces of Life IBGS Research Group
  2. ^ a b Swinbanks, D. D., 1982: Paleodictyon: the traces of infaunal xenophyophores? Science, v. 218, 47-49.
  3. ^ Ksiazkiewicz, M., 1970: Observations on the ichnofauna of the Polish Carpathians, in Crimes, T. P., and Harper, J. C., eds. Trace Fossils, Geological Journal, Special Issue 3, 283-322.
  4. ^ Ekdale, A. A., 1980: Graphoglyptid burrows in modern deep-sea sediment: Science 207, 304-306.
  5. ^ Seilacher, A., 1977: Pattern analysis of Paleodictyon and related trace fossils in Crimes, T. P., Harper, J. C., Trace Fossils 2: Geological Journal, Special Issue 9, 289-334.
  6. ^ Hermann Ehrlich . Paleodictyon Honeycomb Structure in Biological Materials of Marine Origin (Springer Netherlands) 1: 137-141. ISSN 2211-0593.
  7. ^ Plotnick, R. 2003: Ecological and L-system based simulations of trace fossils. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 192, 45-58.
  8. ^ Garlick, G. D., and Miller, W., 1993: Simulations of burrowing strategies and construction of Paleodictyon: Journal of Geological Education 41, 159-163.
  9. ^ William J. Broad Diving Deep for a Living Fossil
  10. ^ Honeycutt, CE, and Plotnick, RE. 2005. Mathematical analysis of Paleodictyon: a graph theory approach. Lethaia 38:345–350.
  11. ^ Levin, Lisa A. (February 1994). "Paleoecology and Ecology of Xenophyophores". PALAIOS. 9 (1): 32–41. Bibcode:1994Palai...9...32L. doi:10.2307/3515076. JSTOR 3515076.
  12. ^ Rona, Peter A.; Seilacher, Adolf; de Vargas, Colomban; Gooday, Andrew J.; Bernhard, Joan M.; Bowser, Sam; Vetriani, Costantino; Wirsen, Carl O.; Mullineaux, Lauren; Sherrell, Robert; Frederick Grassle, J. (September 2009). "Paleodictyon nodosum: A living fossil on the deep-sea floor". Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 56 (19–20): 1700–1712. Bibcode:2009DSRII..56.1700R. doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2009.05.015.
  13. ^ Rona, P. A.; Seilacher, A.; Luginsland, H.; Seilacher, E.; de Vargas, C.; Vetriani, C.; Bernhard, J. M.; Sherrell, R. M.; Grassle, J. F.; Low, S.; Lutz, R. A. Paleodictyon, a Living Fossil on the Deepsea Floor American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2003

External links[]

Retrieved from ""