Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.

Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued November 30, 1994 Decided April 18, 1995
Full case name	Ed Plaut, et ux., et al., petitioners v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., et al.
Citations	514 U.S. 211 (more) 115 S. Ct. 1447; 131 L. Ed. 2d 328; 1995 U.S. LEXIS 2843
Case history
Prior	789 F. Supp. 231 (E.D. Ky. 1992), affirmed, 1 F.3d 1487 (6th Cir. 1993); cert. granted, 511 U.S. 1141 (1994).
Holding
A statute that requires federal courts to reopen final judgments entered before its enactment is unconstitutional.
Court membership
Chief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy David Souter · Clarence Thomas Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
Majority	Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas
Concurrence	Breyer
Dissent	Stevens, joined by Ginsburg
Laws applied
U.S. Const. art. III

Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U.S. 211 (1995), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that Congress may not retroactively require federal courts to reopen final judgments.^[1] Writing for the Court, Justice Scalia asserted that such action amounted to an unauthorized encroachment by Congress upon the powers of the judiciary and therefore violated the constitutional principle of separation of powers.

See also[]

• Bank Markazi v. Peterson
• United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians
• List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 514
• List of United States Supreme Court cases
• Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
• List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court

References[]

External links[]

• Text of Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U.S. 211 (1995) is available from: Cornell  CourtListener  Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress  Oyez (oral argument audio) 

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by .

• v
• t