Reputation.com

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reputation.com, Inc.
TypePrivate
IndustryOnline reputation management
Founded2006
FoundersMichael Fertik
Headquarters
Redwood City, California
,
U.S.
Key people
Joe Fuca, CEO
Websitereputation.com

Reputation.com is a business-to-business online reputation management and customer experience management company headquartered in Redwood City, California. The company claims its software-as-a-service platform helps businesses monitor and respond to online reviews, social media, and surveys; analyze customer sentiment; and collaborate to make operational improvements.

History[]

Reputation.com was founded as ReputationDefender by Michael Fertik[1] in 2006.[2] In January 2011, the company changed its name from ReputationDefender to Reputation.com as its focus changed to enterprise services.[3] The business-to-consumer product line continued to be sold under the ReputationDefender name. In 2018, the business-to-consumer subsidiary was sold, along with related assets and liabilities. Joe Fuca, former DocuSign vice president and FinancialForce president, was named as CEO in August 2018.[4]

Sale of ReputationDefender Business[]

In 2018 the company sold the ReputationDefender business line and related assets and liabilities to the Stagwell Group. The sale included all consumer-related businesses, including its privacy- and reputation-related services for individuals.[5]

In March 2020, Reputation.com announced the appointment of Rebecca Biestman as the company's new CMO.[6]

Services[]

Reputation.com is an online reputation management company, which according to author Lori Andrews charges clients to remove items about them from the Internet with "no guarantee of success." Early cases where Reputation.com sought to remove photographs from the Internet, for example, removed about two thirds of the copies from the web, but could not remove the remainder. Websites like Spokeo are compensated for individuals they direct towards Reputation.com who become Reputation.com clients. The founder of Reputation.com has stated that this arrangement put Spokeo in a position that it was capable of profiting from adding negative material about those with profiles on their site.[7][8] In other cases it will generate websites and social media profiles that are intended to rank higher in searches than negative results. It may also refer some clients to lawyers.[9] The company often begins by writing to the operators of websites hosting negative content about the client, asking them to remove the information.[1] According to The Wall Street Journal, the letters "don't make threats... but instead try to appeal to recipients' sense of fairness."[1] Reputation.com charges for increases in the severity of the language used.[7] It generally cannot remove newspapers or court records.[10]

The company initially charged about fifteen dollars per client, and has asked for at least $1,000 a year for its services.[7][11] In 2007 it introduced a $10,000 service for executives.[12] Some of the company’s software includes scoring systems used to identify consumer information and generate reputation scores for individuals.[13] It has software that locates websites where an individual’s personal data is unknowingly listed and attempt to get it de-listed. It can also track online reviews and contact customers to solicit for positive reviews, but can also hide legitimate criticisms about a company, which the company's founder has stated is a legitimate criticism of its business model.[14] Public reports indicate that the company serves industries including healthcare, retail, automotive, restaurants, and property management. Significant publicly-disclosed clients include Banner Health, BMW, Ford Motor Company, Hertz, General Motors, Sutter Health, US Bank and approximately 750 other enterprise customers in 77 industry verticals.[15][16]

Reception[]

In 2012, BusinessWeek noted that "Reputation.com scam" was an autocompleted phrase when typing the company's name into the Google search engine and that many unfavorable search results were hidden on the second page of search results for the keyword "Reputation.com". The autocompleted phrase is a tactic for Reputation.com to hide any reviews about the company that label it a scam, even if legitimate.[8]

According to The New York Times, Reputation.com is popular, but controversial, due to its efforts to remove negative information that may be of public interest.[17] According to Susan Crawford, a cyberlaw specialist from Cardozo Law School, most websites will remove negative content when contacted to avoid litigation.[2] The Wall Street Journal noted that in some cases writing a letter to a detractor can have unintended consequences, though the company makes an effort to avoid writing to certain website operators that are likely to respond negatively.[1] The company's CEO says it respects the First Amendment and does not try to remove "genuinely newsworthy speech." It generally cannot remove major news stories from established publications or court records.[2]

In 2008, former AutoAdmit administrator Anthony Ciolli filed a lawsuit against Reputation.com, among other defendants.[18][19] The suit was in response to a lawsuit brought against Ciolli by two Yale Law School students for being defamed on the Internet message board, which is a forum for current and prospective law school students.[20] Ciolli claims to have lost a job offer as a result of negative publicity from the original suit.[20]

In a 2009 paper in the Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, law professor Ann Bartow said Reputation.com exploited the harassment of women on the Internet for media attention.[21]

Two months after the company was founded, ReputationDefender was hired to remove online images of 18-year-old Nikki Catsouras's lethal car accident, which police said was leaked by an officer. The company was able to get the images taken down on about 300 out of 400 websites. The New York Post said their effort was "surprisingly effective" but raised concerns that its polite letters were resulting in censorship of material offensive to their clients.[7][22] Newsweek said it was ineffective. ReputationDefender said removing the images was an "unwinnable battle".[23]

Jon Ronson, author of So You've Been Publicly Shamed, says that the company has helped some people who became agoraphobic due to public humiliation from online shaming, but that it was an expensive service that many could not afford.[24]

References[]

  1. ^ a b c d Lavallee, Andrew (June 13, 2007). "Firms Tidy up Clients' Bad Online Reputations". The Wall Street Journal.
  2. ^ a b c Gilbertson, Scott (7 November 2006). "Delete Your Bad Web Rep". Wired. Wired. Retrieved 2011-01-20.
  3. ^ "ReputationDefender Changes Name To Reputation.com". Dow Jones & Company, Inc. January 14, 2011. Retrieved March 30, 2014.
  4. ^ "Reputation.com hires former DocuSign, FinancialForce exec as CEO to help with shift to enterprise model". www.bizjournals.com.
  5. ^ "Term Sheet - Thursday April 5". Fortune. Retrieved 2019-11-07.
  6. ^ Inc, Reputation com (2020-03-11). "Reputation.com Welcomes Rebecca Biestman as Chief Marketing Officer". GlobeNewswire News Room. Retrieved 2020-03-11.
  7. ^ a b c d Lori Andrews (10 January 2012). I Know Who You Are and I Saw What You Did: Social Networks and the Death of Privacy. Simon and Schuster. p. 42. ISBN 978-1-4516-5051-8.
  8. ^ a b Tom McNichol (2012-02-02). "Fixing the Reputations of Reputation Managers". Businessweek.
  9. ^ Greenburg, Andy (May 15, 2008). "Covering the worlds of data security, privacy and hacker culture". Forbes.
  10. ^ "Internet Sheriff". Harvard magazine. Retrieved April 2011. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  11. ^ Hindman, Nate (February 2, 2012). "Google Problems? BrandYourself Helps You Control Search Results of Your Name". Huffington Post. Retrieved March 30, 2014.
  12. ^ "Web Attack". Bloomberg Businessweek. April 6, 2007. Retrieved March 30, 2014.
  13. ^ "A Vault for Taking Charge of Your Online Life", The New York Times, December 8, 2012.
  14. ^ "Reputation.com spots, cleans up online blemishes". Biz Journals. July 13, 2012. Retrieved March 30, 2014.
  15. ^ Barkholz, David (January 24, 2015). "Reputation.com managing online reputation for Ford dealers". AutoNews.com. Automotive News. Retrieved August 5, 2018.
  16. ^ Wang, Shirley (June 25, 2017). "What Doctors Are Doing About Bad Reviews Online". WSJ.com. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved August 5, 2018.
  17. ^ Singer, Natasha (December 8, 2012). "A Vault for taking charge of your online life". The New York Times. Retrieved March 30, 2014.
  18. ^ "IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA" (PDF). Dmlp.org. Retrieved 17 February 2015.
  19. ^ Jones, Leigh (10 April 2009). "Former AutoAdmit Exec's False-Suit Claim Lives On". The National Law Journal. Retrieved 9 July 2014.
  20. ^ a b Nolan, Christan (26 March 2008). "Yale Law School Defamation Case Explores Anonymous Web Site Users' Free Speech Rights". The Connecticut Law Tribune. Retrieved 9 July 2014.
  21. ^ Bartow, Ann. "Internet Defamation as Profit Center" (PDF). Harvard Journal of Law & Gender. pp. 383–430.
  22. ^ Callahan, Maureen (February 16, 2007). "Untangling a Web of Lies". New York Post. Retrieved March 30, 2014.
  23. ^ "One Family's Fight Against Grisly Web Photos". Newsweek. p. 3. Retrieved 2009-04-28.
  24. ^ "Jon Ronson And Public Shaming". onthemedia.

External links[]

Retrieved from ""