Spiked (magazine)

The lead section of this article may need to be rewritten. Use the lead layout guide to ensure the section follows Wikipedia's norms and is inclusive of all essential details. (March 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Spiked

Type of site	Politics
Created by	Mick Hume
Editor	Brendan O'Neill
URL	spiked-online.com
Commercial	No
Registration	No
Launched	2000

Spiked (also written as sp!ked) is a British Internet magazine focusing on politics, culture and society. The magazine was founded in 2000 with the same editor and many of the same contributors as Living Marxism, which had closed in 2000 after losing a case for libel brought by ITN.^[1][2]

There is general agreement that Spiked is libertarian, with the majority of specialist academic sources identifying it as right-libertarian, and some non-specialist sources identifying it as left-libertarian.^{[3][4][5][6][7][8]} Activists associated with Spiked, sometimes described as part of "the Spiked network", took part in the Brexit Party as candidates or publicists,^[9][10] while disagreeing with Nigel Farage on many domestic issues.

Editors and contributors[]

Spiked is edited by Brendan O'Neill,^[11] who self identifies as a Libertarian Marxist,^[12][13] following Mick Hume's departure in January 2007.^{[citation needed]}

The magazine also produces a number of podcasts, with contributors including Christopher Snowdon.^{[citation needed]}

Origin[]

The magazine was founded in 2000 after the bankruptcy of its predecessor, the Revolutionary Communist Party's Living Marxism (LM).^[14][1][15]

LM closed after losing a libel case brought against it by the broadcasting corporation ITN.^[16][2] The case centered around ITN coverage of Fikret Alić and other Bosnian Muslims standing behind a barbed-wire fence at the Trnopolje camp during the Bosnian war. LM claimed to oppose Western intervention on traditional anti-imperialist grounds, and published an article titled "The Picture that Fooled the World"^[17] which claimed that ITN's coverage was deceptive, the barbed-wire did not enclose the camp and the Muslims were in fact "refugees, many of whom went there seeking safety and could leave again if they wished." During the court case, evidence given by the camp doctor led LM to abandon its defence. ITN was awarded damages and costs, estimated to be around £1 million.^[14][18][19]

Content[]

This section relies too much on references to primary sources. Please improve this section by adding secondary or tertiary sources. (September 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Environmentalists such as George Monbiot^[20][9] and Peter Melchett have suggested that the group of writers associated with LM, several of whom went on to form the core editorial group at Spiked, continue to constitute a 'LM Network' pursuing an ideologically motivated 'anti-environmentalist' agenda under the guise of promoting humanism.^[21][22] In a 2007 interview in Spiked, Frank Furedi referred to these critics as "a network of McCarthyites".^[23] Monbiot described the views of Living Marxism as having, "less in common with the left than with the fanatical right."^[24] In 2018, Monbiot wrote that, "Its [Spiked's] articles repeatedly defend figures on the hard right or far right: Katie Hopkins, Nigel Farage, Alex Jones, the Democratic Football Lads' Alliance, Tommy Robinson, Toby Young, Arron Banks, Viktor Orbán".^[25]

Activists associated with Spiked, sometimes described as part of 'the Spiked network', were active in campaigning for the UK to leave the European Union, with a number of its activists being involved in Nigel Farage's Brexit Party as candidates or publicists.^{[26][27][28][29][9][10]} Those who joined the Brexit Party largely disagreed with Farage on domestic policies, and sought to build a left-wing faction inside the party.^[27]

In 2018 Monbiot wrote that "Spiked's writers rage against exposures of dark money. It calls The Observer's Carole Cadwalladr, who has won a string of prizes for exposing the opaque spending surrounding the Brexit vote, 'the closest thing the mainstream British media has to an out-and-out conspiracy theorist'".^[9]

Spiked opposed the post-9/11 invasions of Afghanistan and of Iraq and Western interference in developing nations in general.^[30][31][32]

Frank Furedi, interviewed in Spiked in 2007, said that the stance of LM and Spiked originates from the "anti-Stalinist left".^[23]

In July 2020, an exposé by The Daily Beast reported that Spiked was one of several mainly conservative websites that had inadvertently published articles attributed to non-existent experts on the Middle East. This network of fake journalists promoted the United Arab Emirates and pushed for harsher treatment of that country's opponents. Spiked did not remove the two articles, instead leaving an editorial note mentioning the articles' questionable authorship.^[33][3][5]

The Daily Beast, as well as Paul Mason of the New Statesman, have described the site as libertarian.^[33][3][34] A study in Policy & Internet by Heft et al. described Spiked as populist, saying that it has "roots in the radical left‐wing scene, but now oppose the political establishment from a position on the right side of the spectrum."^[35] According to Tim Knowles, the technology correspondent for The Times, Spiked is right-wing and libertarian,^[5] while Evan Smith, a historian who has written on Spiked in the context of its free speech campaigns, has noted its "right-libertarian and iconoclastic style".^[36] By contrast, digital media scholar Jean Burgess and James Bowman of the (conservative) Ethics and Public Policy Center have referred to the site as left-libertarian.^[37][38]

Projects[]

In May 2007 Spiked launched the Spiked Review of Books as a monthly online literary criticism feature. This coincided with controversy in the United States following the scaling back of newspaper book review sections.^[39]

Spiked produces annual "free speech rankings" of UK universities.^[40][41]

Funding[]

A joint investigation between DeSmog UK and The Guardian revealed that Spiked US Inc. received funding from the Charles Koch Foundation between 2016 and 2018 to develop live campus events connected with The Toleration and Free Speech program sponsored by the Charles Koch Foundation.^[42][25][43] The writer George Monbiot suggested that this was due to the online magazine's attacks on left-wing politics, its support of hard right or far right figures, and the many articles it publishes by writers supported by the Institute of Economic Affairs and the Koch-funded Cato Institute.^[9][44]

References[]

External links[]

• Official website