Type 69 RPG

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Norinco Type 69 RPG
Type 69 RPG @ PA 122nd Anniversary Caravan.jpg
A Type 69 RPG
TypeAnti-tank, anti-personnel, RPG
Place of originChina
Service history
In service1970–present
Used bySee Operators
WarsMozambican War of Independence
Sino-Vietnamese War
Lebanese Civil War
Soviet–Afghan War
Iran–Iraq War
Sri Lankan Civil War
Somali Civil War
War in North-West Pakistan
Iraq War
Cambodian–Thai border dispute
Kivu conflict[1]
Sudanese conflict in South Kordofan and Blue Nile
Ethnic violence in South Sudan
Boko Haram insurgency
Syrian Civil War
Production history
DesignerNorinco
Designed1970
ManufacturerNorinco
Produced1970–present
VariantsType 69-I
Specifications
Mass5.6 kg (12.3 lb)
Length910 mm (35.8 in)
Crew1 or 2, depending on situation
Cartridge40 mm (1.57") barrel
85mm warhead
Effective firing range200 m (656 ft)
Maximum firing range600 m (1,968 ft)
Feed systemone round per shot
SightsIron sights. Infrared and night vision sights possible

The Type 69 85mm RPG ( Ручной Противотанковый Гранатомёт, 'Hand Anti Tank Grenade Launcher' ), made by Norinco, is a Chinese variant of the Soviet RPG-7. First introduced in 1972,[2] the Type 69 is a common individual anti-tank weapon in service with the PLA. More advanced grenade rounds were developed in the 1980s and 1990s to meet the requirements of modern battlefields. Eventually, the aging Type 69 RPG family was replaced by modern anti-tank weapon systems developed by China such as Type 89 and Type 08.

Origin[]

History[]

China first obtained the RPG-2 85mm anti-tank RPG in the early 1950s, and began to build Chinese copies in 1956 under the designation Type 56.[3] However, the rapid development of the new generation main battle tanks (MBTs) in the early 1960s posed new threats to the PLA, which was later proven in the 1969 Sino-Soviet border conflict. Because the Type 56 was unable to penetrate the armour of the new generation Soviet tanks such as the T-62, the PLA desperately needed a new individual anti-tank weapon to replace the aging Type 56.[2]

Reverse-engineering of the RPG-7 began in the early 1960s, and demonstrations were made to senior PLA officials in 1964. The Chinese copy of the RPG-7, designated Type 69, received its design certificate in 1970. The weapon entered service with the PLA in the mid-1970s, and took part in the 1979 Sino-Vietnam border conflict to provide platoon-level anti-personnel and anti-obstacle fire support. Its performance was highly praised by the troops.[2]

As well as being equipped by the PLA, the Type 69 has also been exported in significant numbers to many foreign customers, including the Mujahideen in Afghanistan under the covert co-operations between China and the CIA in the 1980s against the Soviet Union.[4]

Status[]

The production of the Type 69 RPG stopped in the mid-1980s when an advanced version, Type 69-I was introduced by Norinco. As the weapon became less effective in modern land battlefield, the Type 69 RPG is being gradually replaced by the PF-89 80mm anti-tank grenade launcher.[5]

RPG rounds[]

Afghan National Police officer fires a Type 69 RPG round at a special mission conducted by U.S. Army

Although the design of the grenade launcher has not changed significantly since it was introduced in the 1970s, many new types of grenade rounds have been developed over the years to provide enhanced capabilities, including:[6]

Type 69 high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT): basic grenade introduced in the PLA during the 1970s with the Type 69. Phased out of PLA service.

Type 69-I hollow charge high-explosive anti-tank: standard HEAT grenade developed for the PLA in the 1980s. The hollow warhead was created with improved armour-piercing capabilities.

Type 69-II HEAT: the same as the Type 69-I HEAT grenade, except that it is improved to defeat modern armoured vehicles that are equipped with anti-tank missile plating.

Type 69-III HEAT: the same as the Type 69-II, increased range and further improved armour-piercing abilities.

Type 84 HEAT: made in the 1980s as a lighter warhead with the ability to be fired from long range with claims that the rocket is not affected by side winds. Usable with both Type 69 and 69-I rocket launchers.

Type 69 75mm airburst anti-personnel high-explosive (HE): created for anti-personnel purposes. This is mostly meant to combat against entrenched forces since the rocket, after gaining impact on the ground, bounces to a height of around 2m then airbursts over the target area, scattering about 800 anti-personnel steel balls over a lethal radius of 15m.

HE/HEAT: used for anti-armour and anti-personnel combat. Even though it has 1,500 prefabricated fragments which scatter over a 20m radius on detonation, the rocket retains its anti-tank capabilities.

Anti-personnel high-explosive incendiary (HEI): created for use in certain environments such as jungles and mountains, it has 900 steel balls and 2,000 to 3,000 incendiary pellets that scatter over a 15m radius on detonation.

Tandem-warhead anti-tank grenade: thought to have been used in the 1990s, it is meant to penetrate vehicles with explosive reactive armor. Even though it can not defeat most modern vehicles, lighter vehicles such as APCs and AFVs can be destroyed with this rocket.

Illumination grenade: equipped with a small parachute to suspend it in mid air while being used, its effective range is 600m with the braking ring and 1,500m without it.

Operators[]

Map with Type 69 RPG operators in blue

See also[]

  • Yasin - RPG developed by Hamas.
  • Bazalt – Russian manufacturer of the RPG-7 & RPG-29.
  • PF-89 and DZJ-08 next generation man-portable rocket launcher and recoilless gun developed by China, successing Type 69.

Notes[]

  1. ^ Jump up to: a b Small Arms Survey (2015). "Waning Cohesion: The Rise and Fall of the FDLR–FOCA" (PDF). Small Arms Survey 2015: weapons and the world (PDF). Cambridge University Press. p. 202.
  2. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Rottman 2010, p. 36.
  3. ^ Rottman 2010, p. 19.
  4. ^ Jump up to: a b c Rottman 2010, p. 64.
  5. ^ Rottman 2010, p. 37.
  6. ^ Type 69 Grenade Variants Archived 2007-06-10 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on March 18, 2007.
  7. ^ Small Arms Survey (2011). "Larger but Less Known: Authorized Light Weapons Transfers" (PDF). Small Arms Survey 2011: States of Security. Oxford University Press. p. 29.
  8. ^ "UN Under Pressure to Show It Can Help End Burundi Violence". VOA News. Reuters. 2016-02-22. Retrieved 2017-06-25.
  9. ^ Berman, Eric G.; Lombard, Louisa N. (December 2008). The Central African Republic and Small Arms: A Regional Tinderbox (PDF). Small Arms Survey. pp. 82, 94. ISBN 978-2-8288-0103-8.
  10. ^ "Every Chinese Infantry Platoon Have This Recoilless Rocket Launcher". 2 June 2019.
  11. ^ Jump up to: a b c Arms and ammunition captured from SAF in Blue Nile (PDF). Sudan Human Security Baseline Assessment (HSBA). Small Arms Survey. November 2011.
  12. ^ "Tehnika - Granaadiheitja M-69". Eesti Kaitsevägi (in Estonian). Archived from the original on 3 March 2008.
  13. ^ Jump up to: a b Rottman 2010, p. 38.
  14. ^ Agius, Matthew (14 July 2018). "Personnel reveal shortcomings inside Maltese armed forces". Malta Today.
  15. ^ Abbott, Peter (2005). Modern African Wars (2): Angola and Mozambique 1961–1974. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-85045-843-5.
  16. ^ Savannah de Tessières (January 2018). At the Crossroads of Sahelian Conflicts: Insecurity, Terrorism, and Arms Trafficking in Niger (PDF) (Report). Small Arms Survey. p. 24. ISBN 978-2-940548-48-4.
  17. ^ "Air Burst Anti Personnel Rocket Calibre 40 mm RGP-7AP". Archived from the original on 2013-08-24.
  18. ^ "40 MM Heat P1 MK1 (RPG-7P)". Archived from the original on 2012-12-08.
  19. ^ Small Arms Survey (2014). "Weapons tracing in Sudan and South Sudan" (PDF). Small Arms Survey 2014: Women and guns (PDF). Cambridge University Press. p. 227.
  20. ^ Keegan, John (1983). World Armies (Second ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. p. 488. ISBN 978-0333340790.
  21. ^ Hussein, Solomon (1988). Towards a Common Defence and Security Policy in the Southern African Development Community. Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa. pp. 109–111. ISBN 978-0798301749.

References[]

External links[]

Retrieved from ""