Zakopane bid for the 2006 Winter Olympics

Bids for the
2006 (2006) Winter Olympics and Paralympics

Overview
XX Olympic Winter Games IX Paralympic Winter Games
Winner: Turin Runner-up: Sion Shortlist: Helsinki · Klagenfurt · Poprad-Tatry · Zakopane
Details
City	Zakopane, Poland
NOC	Polish Olympic Committee (POL)
Previous Games hosted
None
Decision
Result	Not shortlisted

Part of a series on
2006 Winter Olympics
Bid process Venues Mascots Torch relay Opening ceremony (flag bearers) Medal table (medalists) Event calendar Chronological summary Closing ceremony Paralympics (medal table) IOC CONI
v t

Zakopane 2006 was an unsuccessful bid by Zakopane, Poland, and the Polish Olympic Committee to host the 2006 Winter Olympics. It was one of six candidates, but failed to be short-listed.

Venues[]

The proposed venues concept comprised:^[1][2]

Zakopane Cluster[]

• Zakopane – main Olympic village, medal ceremonies, speed skating, men's ice hockey
• Wielka Krokiew – ceremonies, ski jumping, Nordic combined
• Kasprowy Wierch – alpine skiing (downhill, super-G, giant slalom), snowboard (giant slalom)
• Nosal – alpine skiing (slalom), freestyle skiing (moguls)
• Poronin – freestyle skiing (aerials), snowboard (halfpipe)
• Kościelisko:

- Kiry - biathlon
- Siwa Polana - cross-country skiing
- Witów - luge, bobsleigh and skeleton

Kraków Cluster[]

• University School of Physical Education - olympic village, men's ice hockey final, figure skating, short-track speed skating
• Cracovia Ice Hall - curling

Nowy Targ[]

• Municipal Ice Hall - women's ice hockey

Kraków

Nowy Targ

Zakopane

Venues plan

Wielka Krokiew, planned for ceremonies, ski jumping and Nordic combined

Evaluation[]

The proposed sports concept was considered as good with the most of the venues in the vicinity of Zakopane, close to the main Olympic village.^[3] The IOC evaluation report praised the support by both Polish government and the Zakopane residents (in a 1997 referendum held in Zakopane 82.6% replied positively to the question of organising the Games, and 61.6% as its financial implications). Other issues rated favorably were: sufficient experience of Poland's security forces, and winter sports traditions resulted in a good legacy and post-use of the planned venues.

However, the evaluation report listed some problems that might have occurred. The construction of certain facilities, particularly the skiing venues, to be located totally or partially in the Tatra National Park, could have been a big challenge due to its special international ecological status. The most problematic issue was using Kasprowy Wierch as a downhill, super-G, and giant slalom slope. The snowmaking facilities, cable car, lift and spectator capacities were considered insufficient and access to the stadium was non-existent. The proposed men’s downhill course was not approved by International Ski Federation. There were objections among non-governmental organisations, the scientific and intellectuals community to the proposed venues placed in the Biosphere Reserve.^[4]

Furthermore, the Evaluation Commission believed that there was a shortage in accommodation facilities and the general standard of accommodation had to be upgraded. The road between Kraków and Zakopane was rated as insufficient for Games-related traffic. The International Ice Hockey Federation was concerned with the logistics of holding the men’s ice hockey final in Kraków.

Aftermath[]

During the 109th IOC meeting held in Seoul the final presentation was headed by Irena Szewińska.^[5] The Zakopane bid missed the shortlist.

After selection, Zakopane didn't bid for Olympics, but Kraków bid for 2022 Games included Zakopane as venue for snow sports.^[6]

References[]

Notes