Artemis Accords

Artemis Accords
The Artemis Accords: Principles For Cooperation In The Civil Exploration And Use Of The Moon, Mars, Comets, And Asteroids For Peaceful Purposes
Signatory Nation	Statement of Intent
Type	Space Law
Signed	13 October 2020
Parties	Australia; Brazil; Canada; Isle of Man; Italy; Japan; South Korea; Luxembourg; New Zealand; Ukraine; United Arab Emirates; United Kingdom; United States;
Languages	English
	Artemis Accords at Wikisource

The Artemis Accords are a political commitment between governments participating in the Artemis Program, an American-led effort to return humans to the Moon by 2024, and to ultimately expand and deepen space exploration.^[6] Additional signatories to the Accords may not directly be involved in the Artemis Program, but have nevertheless committed to the principles set out in the Accords.

Drafted under the auspices of U.S. space agency, NASA, and the U.S. Department of State, the Accords establish a framework for cooperation in the civil exploration and peaceful use of the Moon, Mars, and other astronomical objects.^[7] They are explicitly grounded in the United Nations Outer Space Treaty of 1967, which signatories are obliged to uphold, and cite most of the major UN-brokered conventions constituting space law^[8]^[9] (except the Moon Treaty, despite Australia having ratified it).^[10]^[11]

The Accords were signed on 13 October 2020 by the directors of the national space agencies of eight countries: Australia, Canada, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States and some ministerial-level officials (eg Japan).^[12] Since then, Brazil, South Korea, New Zealand, and Ukraine have also become signatories, and the Accords remain open for signature indefinitely, as other nations are expected^{[according to whom?]} to join.^{[not verified in body]}

History[]

On 5 May 2020, Reuters published an exclusive report that the Trump administration was drafting a new international agreement for mining on the Moon, which would draw from the 1967 Outer Space Treaty.^[13]^[14] Ten days later, NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine officially announced the Artemis Accords, a series of bilateral agreements with partner nations aimed at establishing a governing framework for exploring and mining the Moon.^[15]

The Accords originated from the eponymous Artemis Program, an American plan launched in 2017 to send the first woman and the next man to the Moon by 2024.^[16] Bridenstine stated that the agreements were intended to create a uniform set of guidelines for countries to avoid potential conflict or misunderstanding in future space endeavors; governments that sign the Accords may formally take part in the Artemis Program.^[16]

The Accords were drafted by NASA in collaboration with the U.S. Department of State and the newly re-established National Space Council; a draft was released to several governments for consultation before the final document was announced in May 2020.^[15]^[13]

On 13 October 2020, in a recorded and livestreamed ceremony, the Accords were signed by the directors of the national space agencies of the United States, Australia, Canada, Japan, Luxembourg, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United Arab Emirates.^[17]^[18] The head of the Ukrainian national space agency signed the Accords exactly one month later.^[19]^[20]

On 24 May 2021, South Korea became the tenth country to sign the Accords,^[21]^[22] with New Zealand joining a week later.^[23] The following June, Brazil became the first country in Latin America to join the Artemis Accords,^[24] after previously indicating its intent to sign in 2020.^[1]^[25]

Accords[]

Although a prerequisite for taking part in the Artemis Program, the Accords have been interpreted as codifying key principles and guidelines for exploring space generally.^[26] Their stated purpose is to "provide for operational implementation of important obligations contained in the Outer Space Treaty and other instruments." The Accords are a single document, signed by each country that commits to the Accords' principles. Bilateral agreements between space agencies for specific operations on the Moon and beyond are expected to reference the Accords and implement them in particular projects.

The provisions:^[27]

Affirm that cooperative activities under these Accords should be exclusively for peaceful purposes and in accordance with relevant international law.
Confirm a commitment to transparency and to share scientific information, consistent with Article XI of the Outer Space Treaty.
Call for a commitment to use reasonable efforts to utilize current interoperability standards for space-based infrastructure, and to establish standards when they do not exist or are inadequate.
Call for a commitment to take all reasonable efforts to render necessary assistance to personnel in outer space who are in distress and according to their obligations under the Rescue and Return Agreement.
Specify responsibility for the registration of objects in space, as required by the Registration Convention
Call for a commitment to publicly share information on their activities and to the open sharing of scientific data. While doing so, signatories agree to coordinate with each other to provide appropriate protection for any proprietary and/or export-controlled information, and this provision does not extend to private sector operations unless conducted on behalf of a signatory.
Include an agreement to preserve outer space heritage, which they consider to comprise historically significant human or robotic landing sites, artifacts, spacecraft, and other evidence of activity, and to contribute to multinational efforts to develop practices and rules to do so.
Include an agreement that extraction and utilization of space resources should be conducted in a manner that complies with the Outer Space Treaty and in support of safe and sustainable activities. The signatories affirm that this does not inherently constitute national appropriation, which is prohibited by the Outer Space Treaty. They also express an intent to contribute to multilateral efforts to further develop international practices and rules on this subject.
Reaffirm the signatories commitment to the Outer Space Treaty's provisions relating to due regard and harmful interference with other nations activities, and to provide information regarding the location and nature of space-based activities. Signatories express an intention to contribute to multilateral efforts to further develop international practices, criteria, and rules to assure this. To implement this, the Accords provide for the announcement of "safety zones", where other operations or an anomalous event could reasonably cause harmful interference. The size and scope of these safe zones should be based on the nature and environment of the operations involved and determined in a reasonable manner leveraging commonly accepted scientific and engineering principles. Within their safety zones, the signatories commit to respect the principle of free access to all areas of celestial bodies by others and all other provisions of the Outer Space Treaty.
Include a commitment to mitigate space debris and to limit the generation of new, harmful space debris in the normal operations, break-up in operational or post-mission phases, and accidents.

Response[]

The Artemis Accords have generally been welcomed for advancing international law and cooperation in space.^[28] Observers note that the substance of the Accords is "uncontentious" and represent a "significant political attempt to codify key principles of space law" for governing nations' space activities.^[28] International legal scholars also credit the agreement with helping influence space exploration in the direction of uniform standards of cooperation and peaceful use.^[29]

Criticism[]

The Accords have also been criticized for allegedly being too centered on American and commercial interests. Russia has condemned them as a blatant attempt to create international space law that favors the United States.^[30] Two researchers writing in Science magazine's Policy Forum have called on countries to speak up about their objections, and argued that the United States should go through the United Nations treaty process in order to negotiate on space mining. They were concerned NASA's bilateral agreements, if accepted by many nations, would enable the Accords' interpretation of the Outer Space Treaty to prevail.^[30] Acceptance of the Artemis Accords is a prerequisite for participation in NASA's Artemis lunar program.^[30]

Critics also contend that since the Outer Space Treaty expressly forbids nations from staking claim to another planetary body, the Accords violate space law by allowing signatories to lay claim to any resources extracted from celestial objects.^[31] Frans von der Dunk of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln claims the Accords strengthen "the US interpretation of the Outer Space Treaty", namely "the basic right for individual States to allow the private sector to become engaged" in commercial activities. The weakened alternative interpretation is that "unilateral approval of commercial exploitation is not in compliance with the Outer Space Treaty, and that only an international regime, notably—presumably—including an international licencing system, could legitimise such commercial exploitation."^[32]^[33]