Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Deforestation in Bolivia, in June 2016
Deforestation in the Maranhão state, Brazil, in July 2016

The Amazon rainforest is the largest rainforest in the world, covering an area of 6,000,000 km2 (2316612.95 square miles). It represents over half of the planet's rainforests, and comprises the largest and most biodiverse tract of tropical rainforest in the world. This region includes territory belonging to nine nations. The majority of the forest is contained within Brazil, with 60%, followed by Peru with 13%, Colombia with 10%, and with minor amounts in Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Guyana, Suriname and French Guiana.

The cattle sector of the Brazilian Amazon, incentivized by the international beef and leather trades,[1] has been responsible for about 80% of all deforestation in the region,[2][3] or about 14% of the world's total annual deforestation, making it the world's largest single driver of deforestation.[4] The vast majority of agricultural activity resulting in deforestation was subsidized by government tax revenue.[5] By 1995, 70% of formerly forested land in the Amazon, and 91% of land deforested since 1970 had been converted to cattle ranching.[6][7] Much of the remaining deforestation within the Amazon has resulted from farmers clearing land (sometimes using the slash-and-burn method) for small-scale subsistence agriculture[8] or mechanized cropland producing soy, palm, and other crops.[9]

More than one-third of the Amazon forest belongs to more than 3,344 formally acknowledged indigenous territories. Until 2015, only 8% of Amazonian deforestation occurred in forests inhabited by indigenous peoples, while 88% of occurred in the less than 50% of the Amazon area that is neither indigenous territory nor protected area. Historically, the livelihoods of indigenous Amazonian peoples have depended on the forest for food, shelter, water, fibre, fuel and medicines. The forest is also interconnected with their identity and cosmology. For this reason the deforestation rates are lower in indigenous territories, despite pressures encouraging deforestation being stronger.[10]

According to 2018 satellite data compiled by a deforestation monitoring program called Prodes, deforestation has hit its highest rate in a decade. About 7,900 km2 (3,050 sq miles) of the rainforest was destroyed between August 2017 and July 2018. Most of the deforestation occurred in the states of Mato Grosso and Pará. The BBC reported the environment minister, Edson Duarte, as saying illegal logging was to blame, but critics suggest expanding agriculture is also encroaching on the rainforest.[11] It is suggested that at some point the forest will reach a tipping point, where it will no longer be able to produce enough rainfall to sustain itself.[12]

History[]

Suriname was already destroying the Amazon in 1900

In the pre-Columbian era, parts of the Amazon rainforest were densely populated regions with open agriculture. After the European colonization occurred in the 16th century due to the hunt for gold and later the rubber boom, the Amazon rainforest was depopulated due to European diseases and slavery, so the forest grew larger.[13]

Prior to the 1970s, access to the forest's largely roadless interior was difficult, and aside from partial clearing along rivers the forest remained intact.[14] Deforestation accelerated greatly following the opening of highways deep into the forest, such as the Trans-Amazonian highway in 1972.

In parts of the Amazon, the poor soil made plantation-based agriculture unprofitable. The key turning point in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon was when colonists began to establish farms within the forest during the 1960s. Their farming system was based on crop cultivation and the slash-and-burn method. However, the colonists were unable to successfully manage their fields and the crops due to the loss of soil fertility and weed invasion due to this method.[15]

In indigenous areas of the Peruvian Amazon such as the Urarina's Chambira River Basin,[16] the soils are productive for only relatively short periods of time, therefore causing indigenous horticulturalists like the Urarina to move to new areas and clear more and more land.[15] Amazonian colonization was ruled by cattle raising because ranching required little labor, generated decent profits, and land under state ownership to private companies, without term limits on the property rights.[17] While the law was promoted as a "reforestation" measure, critics claimed the privatization measure would in fact encourage further deforestation of the Amazon,[18] while surrendering the nation's rights over natural resources to foreign investors and leaving uncertain the fate of Peru's indigenous people, who do not typically hold formal title to the forestlands on which they subsist.[19][20] Law 840 met widespread resistance and was eventually repealed by Peru's legislature for being unconstitutional.[19]

In 2015 illegal deforestation of the Amazon was on the rise again for the first time in decades; this was largely a result of consumer demand for products like palm oil.[21] As consumer pressure increases, Brazilian farmers clear their land to make more space for crops like palm oil, and soy.[22] Also, studies done by Greenpeace showed that 300 billion tons of carbon, 40 times the annual greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels, are stored in trees.[23] In addition to the carbon release associated with deforestation, NASA has estimated that if deforestation levels proceed, the remaining world's forests will disappear in about 100 years.[23] The Brazilian government adopted a program called RED (United Nations Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation Program) in order to help prevent deforestation.[24] The RED program has helped more than 44 countries across Africa with the development of education programs and has donated more than $117 million to the program.[24]

As of January 2019, the president of Brazil – Jair Bolsonaro – has made an executive order that allows the agriculture ministry to oversee some of the land in the Amazon.[25] Cattle ranchers and mining companies favor the president's decision. The Brazilian economic policy is influencing the government to condone development on tribal territory in order to accumulate exports and increase economic growth. That has been criticized because taking away tribal land will endanger the indigenous people who live there now. The deforestation of the Amazon leads the acceleration of climate change, increasing the relative contribution of Brazil to climate change.

Causes of deforestation[]

Deforestation in Colombia
One consequence of forest clearing in the Amazon: thick smoke that hangs over the forest

Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest can be attributed to many different factors at local, national, and international levels. The rainforest is seen as a resource for cattle pasture, valuable hardwoods, housing space, farming space (especially for soybeans), road works (such as highways and smaller roads), medicines and human gain. Trees are usually cut down illegally.

A 2004 World Bank paper and a 2009 Greenpeace report found that the cattle sector in the Brazilian Amazon, supported by the international beef and leather trades, was responsible for about 80% of all deforestation in the region,[3][2] or about 14% of the world's total annual deforestation, making it the largest single driver of deforestation in the world.[4] According to a 2006 report by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 70% of formerly forested land in the Amazon, and 91% of land deforested since 1970, is used for livestock pasture.[6][26]

Additional deforestation in the Amazon has resulted from farmers clearing land for small-scale subsistence agriculture[8] or for mechanized cropland. Scientists using NASA satellite data found in 2006 that clearing for mechanized cropland had become a significant force in Brazilian Amazon deforestation. This change in land use may alter the region's climate. Researchers found that in 2004, a peak year of deforestation, more than 20 percent of the Mato Grosso state's forests were converted to cropland.[9] In 2005, soybean prices fell by more than 25 percent and some areas of Mato Grosso showed a decrease in large deforestation events, suggesting that the rise and fall of prices for other crops, beef and timber may also have a significant impact on future land use in the region.[9]

Until 2006, a major driver of forest loss in the Amazon was the cultivation of soy, mainly for export and production of biodiesel and animal feed;[27] as soybean prices have risen, soy farmers pushed northwards into forested areas of the Amazon.[28] However, a private sector agreement referred to as the Soy Moratorium has helped drastically reduce the deforestation linked to soy production in the region. In 2006, a number of major commodity trading companies such as Cargill agreed to not purchase soybeans produced in the Brazilian Amazon in recently deforested areas. Before the moratorium, 30 percent of soy field expansion had occurred through deforestation, contributing to record deforestation rates. After eight years of the moratorium, a 2015 study found that although soy production area had expanded another 1.3 million hectares, only about 1 percent of the new soy expansion had come at the expense of forest. In response to the moratorium, farmers were choosing to plant on already cleared land.[28] The needs of soy farmers have been used to validate some controversial transportation projects that have developed in the Amazon.[14] The first two highways, the Belém-Brasília (1958) and the Cuiaba-Porto Velho (1968), were the only federal highways in the Legal Amazon to be paved and passable year-round before the late 1990s. These two highways are said to be "at the heart of the 'arc of deforestation'", which at present is the focal point area of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. The Belém-Brasília highway attracted nearly two million settlers in the first twenty years. The success of the Belém-Brasília highway in opening up the forest was reenacted as paved roads continued to be developed, unleashing the irrepressible spread of settlement. The completion of the roads was followed by a wave of resettlement; these settlers had a significant effect on the forest as well.[29]

A 2013 paper found that the more rainforest is logged in the Amazon, the less precipitation reaches the area and so the lower the yield per hectare becomes. Thus for Brazil as a whole, there is no economic gain to be made by logging and selling trees and using the logged land for pastoral purposes.[30]

A September 2016 Amazon Watch report concludes that imports of crude oil by the US are driving rainforest destruction in the Amazon and releasing significant greenhouse gases.[31][32]

The European Union–Mercosur Free Trade Agreement, which would form one of the world's largest free trade areas, has been denounced by environmental activists and indigenous rights campaigners.[33][34] The fear is that the deal could lead to more deforestation of the Amazon rainforest as it expands market access to Brazilian beef.[35]

In August 2019 the Amazon experienced a forest fire that lasted for months. The forest fire became another major reason for deforestation since the summer of 2019. The Amazon shrunk by 519 square miles (1,345 square kilometers) that summer.[36]

Under the Jair Bolsonaro government, some environmental laws have been weakened and there has been a cut in funding and personnel at key government agencies[37] and a firing of the heads of the agency's state bodies.[38] Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.[39][40] According to Brazil's National Institute for Space Research (INPE), deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon rose more than 50% in the first three months of 2020 compared to the same three-month period in 2019.[41]

Loss rates[]

Illegal gold mining in the Amazon in Madre de Dios, Peru, 2019
Amazon over time.png

The annual rate of deforestation in the Amazon region dramatically increased from 1991 to 2003.[14] In the nine years from 1991 to 2000, the total area of Amazon rainforest cleared since 1970 rose from 419,010 to 575,903 km2 (161,781 to 222,357 sq mi),[42] comparable to the land area of Spain, Madagascar or Manitoba. Most of this lost forest was replaced by pasture for cattle.[43]

Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest continued to accelerate in the early 2000s, reaching an annual rate of 27,423 km2 of forest loss in the year 2004. The annual rate of forest loss generally slowed between 2004 and 2012, though rates of deforestation jumped again in 2008,[44] 2013[45] and 2015.[46]

Today the loss of remaining forest cover appears to be accelerating again. Between August 2017 and July 2018, 7,900 square kilometres (3,100 sq mi) were deforested in Brazil – a 13.7% rise over the previous year and the largest area cleared since 2008.[47] Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon rainforest rose more than 88% in June 2019 compared with the same month in 2018,[48][49][50] and more than doubled in January 2020 compared with the same month in 2019.[51]

In August 2019, 30,901 individual forest fires were reported, three times the number a year earlier. The number dropped by a third in September, and by October 7 the number was down to about 10,000. Deforestation is said to be worse than burning. Brazil's satellite agency, National Institute for Space Research (INPE), estimated that at least 7,747 km2 of Brazilian Amazon rainforest were cleared during early and mid-2019.[52] INPE subsequently reported that deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon reached a 12-year high between August 2019 and July 2020.[53]

In Brazil, the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE, or National Institute of Space Research) produces deforestation figures annually. Their deforestation estimates are derived from 100 to 220 images taken during the dry season in the Amazon by the Landsat satellite, and may only consider the loss of the Amazon rainforest – not the loss of natural fields or savannah within the Amazon biome.[54]

Estimated loss by year[]

Period[42] Estimated remaining forest cover
in the Brazilian Amazon (km2)
Annual forest
loss (km2)
Percent of 1970
cover remaining
Total forest loss
since 1970 (km2)
Pre–1970 4,100,000
1977 3,955,870 21,130 96.5% 144,130
1978–1987 3,744,570 211,300 91.3% 355,430
1988 3,723,520 21,050 90.8% 376,480
1989 3,705,750 17,770 90.4% 394,250
1990 3,692,020 13,730 90.0% 407,980
1991 3,680,990 11,030 89.8% 419,010
1992 3,667,204 13,786 89.4% 432,796
1993 3,652,308 14,896 89.1% 447,692
1994 3,637,412 14,896 88.7% 462,588
1995 3,608,353 29,059 88.0% 491,647
1996 3,590,192 18,161 87.6% 509,808
1997 3,576,965 13,227 87.2% 523,035
1998 3,559,582 17,383 86.8% 540,418
1999 3,542,323 17,259 86.4% 557,677
2000 3,524,097 18,226 86.0% 575,903
2001 3,505,932 18,165 85.5% 594,068
2002 3,484,281 21,651 85.0% 615,719
2003 3,458,885 25,396 84.4% 641,115
2004 3,431,113 27,772 83.7% 668,887
2005 3,412,099 19,014 83.2% 687,901
2006 3,397,814 14,285 82.9% 702,186
2007 3,386,163 11,651 82.6% 713,837
2008 3,373,252 12,911 82.3% 726,748
2009 3,365,788 7,464 82.1% 734,212
2010 3,358,788 7,000 81.9% 741,212
2011 3,352,370 6,418 81.8% 747,630
2012 3,347,799 4,571 81.7% 752,201
2013 3,341,908 5,891 81.5% 758,092
2014 3,336,896 5,012 81.4% 763,104
2015 3,330,689 6,207 81.2% 769,311
2016 3,322,796 7,893 81.0% 777,204
2017 3,315,849 6,947 80.9% 784,151
2018 3,308,313 7,536 80.7% 791,687
2019 3,298,551 9,762 80.5% 801,449
2020 3,290,125 8,426 80.3% 809,875
2021 3,279,649 10,476 80,1% 820,351

Impacts[]

Amazon rainforest fire in Brazil's indigenous territory in 2017

Deforestation and loss of biodiversity have led to high risks of irreversible changes to the Amazon's tropical forests. It has been suggested by modelling studies that the deforestation may be approaching a "tipping point", after which large-scale "savannization" or desertification of the Amazon will take place, with catastrophic consequences for the world's climate, due to a self-perpetuating collapse of the region's biodiversity and ecosystems.[55]

In order to retain high biodiversity, research supports a threshold of 40% forest cover in the Amazon.[56]

Impact on global warming[]

Climate change disturbances of rainforests.[57]

Deforestation like other ecosystem destruction (such as peatbog degradation) can both reduce the carbon sink value of land while increasing emissions through wildfires, land-use change, and reduced ecosystem health, causing stress in normal carbon absorbing ecosystem process. Historically the Amazon Basin has been one of the largest sinks of CO2, absorbing 1/4 of terrestrial land captured carbon.[58]

However, a 2021 scientific review article found that current evidence shows the Amazon basin is currently emitting more greenhouse gases than it absorbs overall.[57] Climate change impacts and human activities in the area – mainly wildfires, current land-use and deforestation – are causing a release of forcing agents that were found to likely result in a net warming effect overall as of 2021.[59][57] Warming temperatures and changing weather also cause physiological responses in the forest preventing further absorption of CO2.[57]

Impacts on water supply[]

The deforestation of the Amazon rainforest has had a significant negative impact on Brazil's freshwater supply, harming, among others, the agricultural industry that has contributed to the clearing of the forests. In 2005, parts of the Amazon basin experienced the worst drought in more than a century.[60] This has been the result of two factors:

1. The rainforest provides much of the rainfall in Brazil, even in areas far from it. Deforestation increased the impacts of the droughts of 2005, 2010, and 2015–2016.[61][62]

2. The rainforest, by inducing rainfall and helping with water storage, provides freshwater to the rivers that give water to Brazil and other countries.[63][64]

Impact on local temperature[]

In 2019, a group of scientists published research suggesting that in a "business as usual" scenario, the deforestation of the Amazon rainforest will raise the temperature in Brazil by 1.45 degrees. They wrote: "Increased temperatures in already hot locations may increase human mortality rates and electricity demands, reduce agricultural yields and water resources, and contribute to biodiversity collapse, particularly in tropical regions. Furthermore, local warming may cause shifts in species distributions, including for species involved in infectious disease transmissions." The authors of the paper say that deforestation is already causing a rise in the temperature.[65]

Impact on indigenous people[]

Members of an uncontacted tribe encountered in the Brazilian state of Acre in 2009

More than one-third of the Amazon forest belongs to over 4,466 formally acknowledged Indigenous Territories. Until 2015, only eight percent of Amazonian deforestation occurred in forests inhabited by indigenous peoples, while 88% occurred in the less than 50% of the Amazon area that is neither indigenous territory nor protected area. Historically, the livelihoods of indigenous Amazonian peoples have depended on the forest for food, shelter, water, fibre, fuel and medicines. The forest is also interconnected with their identity and cosmology. For this reason, the deforestation rates are lower in Indigenous Territories, despite pressures encouraging deforestation being stronger.[10]

The native tribes of the Amazon have often been abused during the Amazon's deforestation. Loggers have killed natives and encroached onto their land.[66] Many uncontacted peoples have come out of the jungles to mingle with mainstream society after threats from outsiders.[67] Uncontacted peoples making first contact with outsiders are susceptible to diseases to which they have little immunity. Entire tribes can easily be decimated.[68][69]

For many years, there has been a battle to conquer the territories that indigenous people live on in the Amazon, primarily from the Brazilian government. The demand for this land has originated partly from a desire to improve Brazil's economic status. Many people, including ranchers and land swindlers from the southeast, have wanted to claim the land for their own financial gain. At the beginning of 2019, the new president of Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro, made an executive order for the agriculture ministry to regulate the land that tribal members inhabit in the Amazon.[25]

In the past, mining locations were allowed to be constructed in the territory of an isolated tribal group called Yanomami. Because of the conditions that these indigenous people were subjected to, many of them developed health problems, including tuberculosis. If their land is used for new development, many of the tribal groups will be forced out of their homes and many may die. On top of the mistreatment of these people, the forest itself will be taken advantage of and many of the indigenous peoples' resources for daily life will be stripped from them.[70]

Rainforest destruction[]

Without the protection of nature, we humans cannot survive. Forests play an enormous role in our survival. They absorb and store carbon, fertilise the soil and water. Forests also protect us from floods, as well as playing an important role in our food, health and climate. If we were to lose the tropical rainforests, it would be particularly harmful to the Earth. This is because they are considered home to over half of the Earth's wildlife and at least two-thirds of its plant species. They also store over half of the Earth's rainwater and over a quarter of modern medicines come from tropical forest plants. This makes forests vital for human health as well.

Rainforests are considered more valuable than other types of forests. The reason for this is that they are seen as key to regulating the world's oxygen and precipitation. It is estimated that the Amazon rainforests alone produce 20 per cent of the earth's oxygen.

Regardless of whether they are in the tropics or not, the destruction of forests is a problem. Deforestation is proceeding at an alarming rate worldwide. Forests and land remove almost a quarter of the CO2 emissions that humans put into the atmosphere. So when we destroy forests, we not only emit carbon, but we also prevent carbon from being removed from the atmosphere.[71]

Future of the Amazon rainforest[]

Using the 2005 deforestation rates, it was estimated that the Amazon rainforest would be reduced by 40% in two decades.[72] The rate of deforestation has slowed since the early 2000s, but the forest has continued to shrink every year, and analysis of satellite data shows a sharp rise in deforestation since 2018.[73][74][75]

Norwegian prime minister Jens Stoltenberg announced on September 16, 2008, that Norway's government would donate US$1 billion to the newly established Amazon fund. The money from this fund would go to projects aimed at slowing down the deforestation of the Amazon rainforest.[76]

In September 2015, Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff told the United Nations that Brazil had effectively reduced the rate of deforestation in the Amazon by 82 percent. She also announced that over the next 15 years, Brazil aimed to eliminate illegal deforestation, restore and reforest 120,000 km2 (46,000 sq mi), and recover 150,000 km2 (58,000 sq mi) of degraded pastures.[77]

In August 2017, Brazilian president Michel Temer abolished an Amazonian nature reserve the size of Denmark in Brazil's northern states of Pará and Amapá.[78]

In April 2019, a court in Ecuador stopped oil exploration activities in 1,800 square kilometres (690 sq mi) of the Amazon rainforest.[79]

In May 2019, eight former environment ministers in Brazil warned, "We're facing the risk of runaway deforestation in the Amazon", as rainforest destruction increased in the first year of Jair Bolsonaro's presidency.[80] In September 2019, Carlos Nobre, expert on the Amazon and climate change, warned that at the current rates of deforestation, we are 20 to 30 years off from reaching a tipping point that could turn big parts of the Amazon forest into a dry savanna, especially in the southern and northern Amazon.[81][82][12]

Bolsonaro has rejected attempts by European politicians to challenge him over the rainforest deforestation, referring to this as Brazil's domestic affairs.[83] Bolsonaro has stated that Brazil should open more areas to mining, including in the Amazon, and that he has spoken with US president Donald Trump about a future joint development program for the Brazilian Amazon region.[84]

The Brazilian Economy Minister, Paulo Guedes, has stated that he believes that other countries should pay Brazil for the oxygen that is produced in Brazil and used elsewhere.[85]

At the end of August 2019 after an international outcry and warning from experts that fires can increase even more, the Brazilian government of Jair Bolsonaro began to take measures to stop the fires. The measures include:

  • 60 day ban for clearing forest with fires.
  • Sending 44,000 soldiers to fight the fires.
  • Accepting 4 planes from Chile for battling the fires.
  • Accepting 12 million dollars of aid from the United Kingdom government
  • Softening his position about aid from the G7.
  • Appealing for a Latin America conference to preserve the Amazon[86][87]

See also[]

Fauna[]

  • Panthera onca onca
  • Peruvian jaguar
  • Southern jaguar

Bibliography[]

  • Bradford, Alina. "Deforestation: Facts, Causes, & Effects." Live Science. Deforestation: Facts, Causes & Effects. March 4, 2015. Web. July 16, 2017.
  • Monbiot, George (1991). Amazon watershed: the new environmental investigation. London, UK: Michael Joseph. ISBN 978-0-7181-3428-0.
  • Scheer, Roddy, and Moss, Doug. "Deforestation and its Extreme Effects on Global Warming." Scientific America. Deforestation and Its Extreme Effect on Global Warming. 2017. Web. July 16, 2017.
  • Tabuchi, Hiroko, Rigby, Claire, and White, Jeremy. "Amazon Deforestation, Once Tamed, now Comes Roaring Back." The New York Times. Amazon Deforestation, Once Tamed, Comes Roaring Back. Feb 24, 2017. Web. July 16, 2017.

References[]

  1. ^ Siegle, Lucy (9 August 2015). "Has the Amazon rainforest been saved, or should I still worry about it?". The Guardian. Retrieved 21 October 2015.
  2. ^ Jump up to: a b Adam, David (May 31, 2009). "British supermarkets accused over destruction of Amazon rainforest". The Guardian. Retrieved October 21, 2015.
  3. ^ Jump up to: a b Liotta, Edoardo (August 23, 2019). "Feeling Sad About the Amazon Fires? Stop Eating Meat". Vice. Retrieved August 25, 2019.
  4. ^ Jump up to: a b "Slaughtering the Amazon". Greenpeace. June 1, 2009. Retrieved October 21, 2015.
  5. ^ "Government Subsidies for Agriculture May Exacerbate Deforestation, says new UN report". Sustainable Development Goals. UN. 3 September 2015.
  6. ^ Jump up to: a b Steinfeld, Henning; Gerber, Pierre; Wassenaar, T. D.; Castel, Vincent (2006). Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. ISBN 978-92-5-105571-7. Retrieved August 19, 2008.
  7. ^ Margulis, Sergio (2004). Causes of Deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon (PDF). World Bank Working Paper No. 22. Washington D.C.: The World Bank. p. 9. ISBN 0-8213-5691-7. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 10, 2008. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
  8. ^ Jump up to: a b Butler, Rhett (July 9, 2014). "Deforestation in the Amazon". Mongabay.com. Retrieved October 19, 2015.
  9. ^ Jump up to: a b c "Growth in Amazon Cropland May Impact Climate and Deforestation Patterns". NASA - Goddard Space Flight Center - News. September 19, 2006. Retrieved October 21, 2015.
  10. ^ Jump up to: a b Josse, Carmen. "Indigenous peoples are key stakeholders". D+C, Development and cooperation.
  11. ^ "Amazon deforestation 'worst in 10 years'". 2018-11-24. Retrieved 2019-05-10.
  12. ^ Jump up to: a b Lovejoy, Thomas E.; Nobre, Carlos (2019-12-20). "Amazon tipping point: Last chance for action". Science Advances. 5 (12): eaba2949. Bibcode:2019SciA....5A2949L. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba2949. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 6989302. PMID 32064324.
  13. ^ Simon, Romero (January 14, 2012). "Once Hidden by Forest, Carvings in Land Attest to Amazon's Lost World". The New York Times.
  14. ^ Jump up to: a b c Kirby, Kathryn R.; Laurance, William F.; Albernaz, Ana K.; Schroth, Götz; Fearnside, Philip M.; Bergen, Scott; M. Venticinque, Eduardo; Costa, Carlos da (2006). "The future of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon". Futures. 38 (4): 432–453. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.573.1317. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2005.07.011.
  15. ^ Jump up to: a b Watkins and Griffiths, J. (2000). Forest Destruction and Sustainable Agriculture in the Brazilian Amazon: a Literature Review (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Reading, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 15–17
  16. ^ Dean, Bartholomew 2009 Urarina Society, Cosmology, and History in Peruvian Amazonia, Gainesville: University Press of Florida ISBN 978-0-8130-3378-5 [1]
  17. ^ Vittor, Luis (January 30, 2008). "The law of the jungle, to sell the Amazon basin" Archived 2009-06-02 at the Wayback Machine. Agencia Latinoamericana de información.
  18. ^ "Peru: Government intent on privatizing the Amazon for implementing tree plantations" Archived 2009-04-21 at the Wayback Machine. World Rainforest Movement, Bulletin 129. April 2008.
  19. ^ Jump up to: a b Polk, James (April 14, 2009). "Time to Strengthen Ties with Peru" Archived 2009-06-16 at the Wayback Machine. Foreign Policy In Focus.
  20. ^ Salazar, Milagros (February 5, 2008). "ENVIRONMENT-PERU: 'For Sale' Signs in Amazon Jungle" Archived 2008-10-19 at the Wayback Machine. Inter Press Service.
  21. ^ Bradford, Alina. "Deforestation: Facts, Causes, & Effects." Live Science. https://www.livescience.com/27692-deforestation.html. March 4, 2015. Web. July 16, 2017,
  22. ^ Tabuchi, Hiroko, Rigby, Claire, and White, Jeremy. "Amazon Deforestation, Once Tamed, now Comes Roaring Back." The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/24/business/energy-environment/deforestation-brazil-bolivia-south-america.html
  23. ^ Jump up to: a b Bradford, Alina. "Deforestation: Facts, Causes, & Effects." Live Science. https://www.livescience.com/27692-deforestation.html. March 4, 2015. Web. July 16, 2017.
  24. ^ Jump up to: a b Scheer, Roddy, and Moss, Doug. "Deforestation and its Extreme Effects on Global Warming." Scientific America. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/deforestation-and-global-warming/. 2017. Web. July 16, 2017.
  25. ^ Jump up to: a b Phillips, Dom (January 2, 2019). "Jair Bolsonaro Launches Assault on Amazon Rainforest Protections". The Guardian.
  26. ^ Margulis, Sergio (2004). Causes of Deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon (PDF). World Bank Working Paper No. 22. Washington D.C.: The World Bank. ISBN 978-0-8213-5691-3. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
  27. ^ "U.S. ethanol may drive Amazon deforestation". mongabay.com. May 17, 2007. Archived from the original on July 13, 2012. Retrieved October 29, 2009.
  28. ^ Jump up to: a b Kelly April Tyrrell (January 22, 2015). "Study shows Brazil's Soy Moratorium still needed to preserve Amazon". the University of Wisconsin-Madison News. Retrieved on October 21, 2015.
  29. ^ Williams, M. (2006). Deforesting the Earth: From Prehistory to Global Crisis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  30. ^ "Research paper of Leydimere Oliveira on the Amazon". Archived from the original on August 3, 2013.
  31. ^ Milman, Oliver (28 September 2016). "US drives rainforest destruction by importing Amazon oil, study finds". The Guardian. London, UK. Retrieved 2016-09-28.
  32. ^ Zuckerman, Adam; Koenig, Kevin (September 2016). From well to wheel: the social, environmental, and climate costs of Amazon crude (PDF). Oakland, CA, USA: Amazon Watch. Retrieved 2016-09-28.
  33. ^ "EU urged to halt trade talks with S. America over Brazil abuses". France24. 18 June 2019.
  34. ^ "EU and Mercosur agree huge trade deal after 20-year talks". BBC News. 28 June 2019.
  35. ^ "We must not barter the Amazon rainforest for burgers and steaks". The Guardian. 2 July 2019.
  36. ^ Woodward, Aylin. "The Amazon Rainforest is burning. Here's why there are so many fires and what it all means for the planet". business insider.
  37. ^ Amazon Deforestation in Brazil Rose Sharply
  38. ^ Brazil guts environmental agencies, clears way for unchecked deforestation
  39. ^ "Deforestation of Amazon rainforest accelerates amid COVID-19 pandemic". ABC News. 6 May 2020.
  40. ^ "Deforestation of the Amazon has soared under cover of the coronavirus". NBC News. 11 May 2020.
  41. ^ "Scientists fear deforestation, fires and Covid-19 could create a 'perfect storm' in the Amazon". CNN. 19 June 2020.
  42. ^ Jump up to: a b Butler, Rhett A. "Calculating Deforestation Figures for the Amazon". rainforests.mongabay.com, sourced from INPE and FAO figures.
  43. ^ Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) (2004)
  44. ^ "Amazon Deforestation Rate Escalates". The Real Truth. February 7, 2008. Archived from the original on September 5, 2008. Retrieved August 19, 2008.
  45. ^ "Amazon deforestation jumps 29%". The Guardian. 11 September 2014. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  46. ^ "Amazon deforestation jumps in Brazil, but remains historically low". Mongabay Environmental News. Retrieved 2016-03-08.
  47. ^ "Brazil records worst annual deforestation for a decade". theguardian.com. 24 November 2018. Retrieved 2018-11-23.
  48. ^ Reuters (2019-07-03). "Brazil: huge rise in Amazon destruction under Bolsonaro, figures show". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-07-03.
  49. ^ "Deforestation in Brazil has rocketed since Bolsonaro became president". www.newscientist.com. 22 July 2019. Retrieved 2019-08-17.
  50. ^ "Brazil deforestation soars in July, threatening EU trade deal". Reuters. 2019-07-19. Retrieved 2019-08-17.
  51. ^ "Amazon deforestation for January hits record". phys.org. 2020-02-08. Retrieved 2020-02-10.
  52. ^ Hughes, Roland (11 October 2019). "Amazon fires: What's the latest in Brazil?". BBC World News. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
  53. ^ Darlington, Shasta (1 December 2020). "Deforestation in Brazilian Amazon surges to 12-year high". CNN. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
  54. ^ National Institute for Space Research (INPE) (2005). The INPE deforestation figures for Brazil were cited on the WWF website in April 2006.
  55. ^ A. Nobre, Carlos; Sampaio, Gilvan; Borma, Laura; Carlos Castilla-Rubio, Juan; S. Silva, José; Cardoso, Manoel (September 27, 2016). "Land-use and climate change risks in the Amazon and the need of a novel sustainable development paradigm". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 113 (39): 10759–10768. Bibcode:2016PNAS..11310759N. doi:10.1073/pnas.1605516113. PMC 5047175. PMID 27638214.
  56. ^ Decaëns, Thibaud; Martins, Marlúcia B.; Feijoo, Alexander; Oszwald, Johan; Dolédec, Sylvain; Mathieu, Jérôme; Arnaud De Sartre, Xavier; Bonilla, Diego; Brown, George G.; Cuellar Criollo, Yeimmy Andrea; Dubs, Florence; Furtado, Ivaneide S.; Gond, Valérie; Gordillo, Erika; Le Clec'h, Solen; Marichal, Raphaël; Mitja, Danielle; De Souza, Izildinha Miranda; Praxedes, Catarina; Rougerie, Rodolphe; Ruiz, Darío H.; Otero, Joel Tupac; Sanabria, Catalina; Velasquez, Alex; Zararte, Luz Elena M.; Lavelle, Patrick (December 2018). "Biodiversity loss along a gradient of deforestation in Amazonian agricultural landscapes" (PDF). Conservation Biology. 32 (6): 1380–1391. doi:10.1111/cobi.13206. PMID 30113727. S2CID 52011503.
  57. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Covey, Kristofer; Soper, Fiona; Pangala, Sunitha; Bernardino, Angelo; Pagliaro, Zoe; Basso, Luana; Cassol, Henrique; Fearnside, Philip; Navarrete, Diego; Novoa, Sidney; Sawakuchi, Henrique; Lovejoy, Thomas; Marengo, Jose; Peres, Carlos A.; Baillie, Jonathan; Bernasconi, Paula; Camargo, Jose; Freitas, Carolina; Hoffman, Bruce; Nardoto, Gabriela B.; Nobre, Ismael; Mayorga, Juan; Mesquita, Rita; Pavan, Silvia; Pinto, Flavia; Rocha, Flavia; de Assis Mello, Ricardo; Thuault, Alice; Bahl, Alexis Anne; Elmore, Aurora (2021). "Carbon and Beyond: The Biogeochemistry of Climate in a Rapidly Changing Amazon". Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 4. doi:10.3389/ffgc.2021.618401. ISSN 2624-893X. CC-BY icon.svg Available under CC BY 4.0.
  58. ^ Society, National Geographic (2016-11-30). "Amazon Deforestation and Climate Change". National Geographic Society. Retrieved 2021-05-28.
  59. ^ Fox, Alex. "The Amazon Rainforest Now Emits More Greenhouse Gases Than It Absorbs". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 19 April 2021.
  60. ^ "Amazon Drought Worst in 100 Years". ENS Newswire. 24 October 2005. Retrieved 14 May 2019.
  61. ^ Welch, Craig (19 November 2018). "How Amazon forest loss may affect water—and climate—far away". National Geographic Magazine. Retrieved 19 April 2019.
  62. ^ Loomis, Ilima (August 4, 2017). "Trees in the Amazon make their own rain". Science. doi:10.1126/science.aan7209. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
  63. ^ McCarthy, Joe; Sanchez, Erica. "World's Water Could Become Scarce if the Amazon Rainforest Is Destroyed". Global Citizen. Retrieved 19 April 2019.
  64. ^ Larson, Christina; Savarese, Mauricio. "Scientists warn new Brazil president may smother rainforest". Fhys.org. Science X Network. Retrieved 19 April 2019.
  65. ^ A. Prevedello, Jayme; R. Winck, Gisele; M. Weber, Marcelo; Nichols, Elizabeth; Sinervo, Barry (March 20, 2019). "Impacts of forestation and deforestation on local temperature across the globe". PLOS ONE. 14 (3): e0213368. Bibcode:2019PLoSO..1413368P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213368. PMC 6426338. PMID 30893352.
  66. ^ "Uncontacted Indians killed by loggers". Survival International. Retrieved June 20, 2018.
  67. ^ "Amazon tribe under threat". CNN. Retrieved January 27, 2015.
  68. ^ Wilson, E.O.; Peter, F.M., eds. (1988). Chapter 15, Deforestation and Indians in Brazilian Amazonia. National Academies Press (US).
  69. ^ "Amazon Deforestation Falls Where Land Is under Indigenous Control". Scientific American. Retrieved 24 November 2020.
  70. ^ "The Brazilian Indians". Survival. 2019.
  71. ^ "Rainforest Destruction: Why It's Worse Than Regular Forest Loss". May 18, 2021. Retrieved May 31, 2021.
  72. ^ Wallace, Scott (January 2007) "Last of the Amazon". National Geographic magazine. pp. 40–71.
  73. ^ INPE figures August to July.
  74. ^ Rowlatt, Justin (January 2, 2012) Saving the Amazon: Winning the war on deforestation. BBC
  75. ^ "Desmatamento na Amazônia em junho é 88% maior do que no mesmo período de 2018". G1 (in Portuguese). Retrieved 2019-07-28.
  76. ^ "NOK 5.8 billion to the Amazon fund". The Norwegian Mail. September 17, 2008.
  77. ^ Megan Rowling (September 30, 2015). "How to stop deforestation? Make 'good stuff' cheaper". Reuters. Retrieved on October 19, 2015.
  78. ^ "Brazil abolishes huge Amazon reserve in 'biggest attack' in 50 years". The Guardian. 24 August 2017.
  79. ^ "Ecuador Amazon tribe win first victory against oil companies". Devdiscourse. 27 April 2019. Retrieved 28 April 2019.
  80. ^ Casado, Letícia; Londoño, Ernesto (2019-07-28). "Under Brazil's Far Right Leader, Amazon Protections Slashed and Forests Fall". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-07-28.
  81. ^ Montaigne, Fen (2019-09-04). "Will Deforestation and Warming Push the Amazon to a Tipping Point?". Yale E360. Retrieved 2019-10-05.
  82. ^ Lovejoy, Thomas E.; Nobre, Carlos (2018-02-01). "Amazon Tipping Point". Science Advances. 4 (2): eaat2340. Bibcode:2018SciA....4.2340L. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat2340. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 5821491. PMID 29492460.
  83. ^ Tom Phillips (2019-08-07). "Bolsonaro rejects 'Captain Chainsaw' label as data shows deforestation 'exploded'". The Guardian. Retrieved 2019-08-12.
  84. ^ Eduardo Simões (2019-04-08). "Brazil's Bolsonaro wants U.S. to join development plan for the Amazon". Reuters. Retrieved 2019-08-12.
  85. ^ Dorah Feliciano (2019-07-28). "Bolsonaro Favors Developing Parts of Amazon Forest, Even Selling its Oxygen". riotimesonline.com. Retrieved 2019-08-12.
  86. ^ Rosane, Olivia (August 30, 2019). "Brazil Announces 60-Day Ban on Clearing Land With Fire". Ecowatch. Retrieved 1 September 2019.
  87. ^ Darlington, Shasta (August 29, 2019). "Bolsonaro bans land-clearing fires in Amazon for 60 days". CNN. Retrieved 1 September 2019.

External links[]

Retrieved from ""