FIVB Senior World Rankings

The FIVB Senior World Rankings is a ranking system for men's and women's national teams in volleyball. The teams of the member nations of Fédération Internationale de Volleyball (FIVB), volleyball's world governing body, are ranked based on their game results with the most successful teams being ranked highest. A points system is used, with points being awarded based on the results of all FIVB-recognised full international matches. The rankings are used in international competitions to define the seeded teams and arrange them in pools. Specific procedures for seeding and pooling are established by the FIVB in each competition's formula, but the method usually employed is the serpentine system.

The ranking system has been revamped in 2020, responding to criticism that the preceding calculation method did not effectively reflect the relative strengths of the national teams. The old version of the ranking system was finally used on 31 January 2020.

As of 28 June 2021, the highest ranked team in the men's category is Brazil, while in the women's category is the United States.

Previous calculation method[]

The system of point attribution for the selected FIVB World and Official Competitions below is as follows:^[1]

• Olympic Games final and qualifying tournaments: included for 4 years and points are also granted for the qualification matches, to the best non-qualified teams.
• World Championship final and qualifying tournaments: included for 4 years and points are also granted for the qualification matches, to the best non-qualified teams.
• World Cup: included for 4 years
• World Grand Prix: included for 1 year
• World League: included for 1 year

Current calculation method[]

In 2019, FIVB collaborated with Hypercube Business Innovation of the Netherlands to design a new world ranking platform. The previous calculation method had a problem of circularity in the international volleyball calendar: only countries who participate in the major volleyball events can earn ranking points, whilst the number of ranking points of countries also determines seeding and access of teams for major events. This unfair principle does not contribute to the sporting and commercial quality of volleyball.^[2]

On 1 February 2020, the new ranking system will be implemented and will take into account all results from 1 January 2019.^[3] The system will be consistently updated to reflect the latest results and performances. The new World Ranking considers the match results from all official competitions:

• Olympic Games final and qualifying tournaments
• FIVB World Championship final and qualifying tournaments
• FIVB World Cup
• FIVB Volleyball Nations League and Challenger Cup
• Confederations' Championship final and qualifying tournaments
• FIVB recognised full international matches of the tournament with a minimum of four participating teams.

The rankings outcome of each match depends on two main factors:

• The playing strength of the teams competing
• The actual match performance or final result of the match

Ranking Procedure[]

It is based on the zero-sum system, like CONCACAF Ranking Index, and after each game points will be added to or subtracted from a team's rating according to the formula:^[4]

${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}=S_{\text{before}}+{K(R-E) \over 8}}$

where:

• ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}}$ – the team's number of World Ranking scores after the game
• ${\displaystyle S_{\text{before}}}$ – the team's number of World Ranking scores before the game
• ${\displaystyle K}$ – the match importance:
  • 10.0 – FIVB recognised international events
  • 17.5 – Confederations' Championship qualifying
  • 20.0 – FIVB Challenger Cup
  • 22.5 – FIVB World Championship qualifying
  • 25.0 – Olympic Games qualifying (excluding Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games)
  • 35.0 – FIVB World Cup and Confederations' Championship
  • 40.0 – FIVB Nations League
  • 45.0 – FIVB World Championship
  • 50.0 – Olympic Games (excluding Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games)
• ${\displaystyle R}$ – the result of the game depended on match and sets won (3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 2-3, 1-3 or 0-3)
• ${\displaystyle E}$ – the expected result of the game has the value between -2 and +2. If the match is completely balanced, the expected result is 0. The bigger the surprise, the more points are transferred.

Strength difference between the teams[]

${\displaystyle \Delta ={8(S_{\text{teamA}}-S_{\text{teamB}}) \over 1000}}$

where:

• ${\displaystyle S_{\text{teamA}}}$ – the team A's number of World Ranking scores before the game
• ${\displaystyle S_{\text{teamB}}}$ – the team B's number of World Ranking scores before the game

Probability of outcomes[]

Team A win 3–0

${\displaystyle P_{\text{1}}=\sim N(0,1)(C_{\text{1}}+\Delta )}$

Team A win 3–1

${\displaystyle P_{\text{2}}=\sim N(0,1)(C_{\text{2}}+\Delta )-\sim N(0,1)(C_{\text{1}}+\Delta )}$

Team A win 3–2

${\displaystyle P_{\text{3}}=\sim N(0,1)(C_{\text{3}}+\Delta )-\sim N(0,1)(C_{\text{2}}+\Delta )}$

Team A lose 2–3

${\displaystyle P_{\text{4}}=\sim N(0,1)(C_{\text{4}}+\Delta )-\sim N(0,1)(C_{\text{3}}+\Delta )}$

Team A lose 1–3

${\displaystyle P_{\text{5}}=\sim N(0,1)(C_{\text{5}}+\Delta )-\sim N(0,1)(C_{\text{4}}+\Delta )}$

Team A lose 0–3

${\displaystyle P_{\text{6}}=1-\sim N(0,1)(C_{\text{5}}+\Delta )}$

where:

• ${\displaystyle C_{\text{n}}}$ – the cut-points in the normal distribution that represent the average outcome of a match between two equal strength opponents derived from the actual match results of the past decade

Expected match result[]

${\displaystyle E=R_{\text{1}}P{\text{1}}+R_{\text{2}}P{\text{2}}+R_{\text{3}}P{\text{3}}+R_{\text{4}}P{\text{4}}+R_{\text{5}}P{\text{5}}+R_{\text{6}}P{\text{6}}}$ where: ${\displaystyle R_{\text{n}}}$ – the actual result or set score variant ${\displaystyle n=1}$ – A win 3–0 ${\displaystyle n=2}$ – A win 3–1 ${\displaystyle n=3}$ – A win 3–2 ${\displaystyle n=4}$ – A lose 2–3 ${\displaystyle n=5}$ – A lose 1–3 ${\displaystyle n=6}$ – A lose 0–3

Match Result ${\displaystyle R_{\text{n}}}$ ${\displaystyle P{\text{n}}}$ A win 3–0 +2 ${\displaystyle P{\text{1}}}$ A win 3–1 +1.5 ${\displaystyle P{\text{2}}}$ A win 3–2 +1 ${\displaystyle P{\text{3}}}$ A lose 2–3 -1 ${\displaystyle P{\text{4}}}$ A lose 1–3 -1.5 ${\displaystyle P{\text{5}}}$ A lose 0–3 -2 ${\displaystyle P{\text{6}}}$

Examples[]

There are the examples of the new ranking procedure.

Before the match at the FIVB Volleyball World Championship (K = 45), Brazil (Team A) is ranked number 1 with a 415 WR score and Japan (Team B) is ranked number 11 with a 192 WR score.

Strength difference between Brazil and Japan

${\displaystyle \Delta ={8(415-192) \over 1000}=1.784}$

Expected match result

The cut-points in the normal distribution based on head-to-head between two equal strength teams. ${\displaystyle C_{\text{1}}=-1.060}$ ${\displaystyle C_{\text{2}}=-0.364}$ ${\displaystyle C_{\text{3}}=0.000}$ ${\displaystyle C_{\text{4}}=0.364}$ ${\displaystyle C_{\text{5}}=1.060}$

The cut-points in the normal distribution based on head-to-head between two teams after considering a strength difference. ${\displaystyle P_{\text{1}}=\sim N(0,1)(-1.060+1.784)}$ ${\displaystyle P_{\text{2}}=\sim N(0,1)(-0.364+1.784)-\sim N(0,1)(-1.060+1.784)}$ ${\displaystyle P_{\text{3}}=\sim N(0,1)(0.000+1.784)-\sim N(0,1)(-0.364+1.784)}$ ${\displaystyle P_{\text{4}}=\sim N(0,1)(0.364+1.784)-\sim N(0,1)(0.000+1.784)}$ ${\displaystyle P_{\text{5}}=\sim N(0,1)(1.060+1.784)-\sim N(0,1)(0.364+1.784)}$ ${\displaystyle P_{\text{5}}=1-\sim N(0,1)(1.060+1.784)}$

Expected match result for Brazil:

${\displaystyle E=76.5\%(+2)+15.2\%(+1.5)+4.5\%(+1)+2.2\%(-1)+1.2\%(-1.5)+0.2\%(-2)=+1.76}$

Expected match result for Japan:

${\displaystyle E=0.2\%(+2)+1.2\%(+1.5)+2.2\%(+1)+4.5\%(-1)+15.2\%(-1.5)+76.5\%(-2)=-1.76}$

World and Continental Rankings[]

The five Continental Rankings filter the World Ranking points won and lost in matches played between teams from the same Continental Confederation.

• Intercontinental Tournaments – calculated in World Rankings, but some matches can be calculated in Continental Rankings
  • Olympic Games final and intercontinental qualification tournaments
  • FIVB World Championship final and intercontinental qualification tournaments
  • FIVB World Cup
  • FIVB Volleyball Nations League and Challenger Cup
  • some Continental Cups: Pan-America
  • some FIVB recognised international events, e.g. Pan American Games, Montreux Volley Masters

• Continental Tournaments – calculated in World and Continental Rankings
  • Olympic Games continental qualification tournaments
  • FIVB World Championship continental qualification tournaments
  • FIVB Challenger Cup qualification tournaments
  • Continental Championships: Asia (AVC), Africa (CAVB), Europe (CEV), North America (NORCECA), and South America (CSV)
  • some Continental Cups: Asia (both AVC Cup and Challenge Cup)
  • Zonal Championships, e.g. Eastern Asia, ASEAN, Central America
  • some FIVB recognised international events, e.g. African Games, Asian Games, European Games

Examples

Japan (Asian Volleyball Confederation) vs Italy (Confédération Européenne de Volleyball)
The points calculated in FIVB World Rankings.

Japan (Asian Volleyball Confederation) vs South Korea (Asian Volleyball Confederation)
The points calculated in FIVB World Rankings, and AVC Continental Rankings.

FIVB World Rankings[]

Top ranked men's national teams[] Top 20 rankings as of 20 September 2021[5] Rank Change* Team Points 1  Brazil 399 2  Poland 384 3  Russia 352 4  France 341 5  Italy 312 6  Argentina 304 7  United States 286 8  Slovenia 286 9  Serbia 276 10  Iran 267 11  Japan 244 12  Canada 233 13  Cuba 210 14  Tunisia 189 15  Netherlands 189 16  Germany 188 17  Mexico 177 18  Turkey 169 19  Egypt 167 20  Qatar 166 *Change from 19 September 2021

Men's rank leaders[] For historical men's FIVB rankings from October 2005 to present.[6]

Top ranked women's national teams[] Top 20 rankings as of 20 September 2021[7] Rank Change* Team Points 1  United States 379 2  Brazil 366 3  China 350 4  Turkey 331 5  Serbia 306 6  Italy 304 7  Dominican Republic 303 8  Russia 278 9  Japan 266 10  Netherlands 265 11  Germany 233 12  Poland 231 13  Belgium 230 14  South Korea 226 15  Bulgaria 191 16  Colombia 183 17  Puerto Rico 178 18  Canada 177 19  Thailand 172 20  Cameroon 161 *Change from 19 September 2021

Women's rank leaders[] For historical women's FIVB rankings from September 2005 to present.[8]

See also[]

• FIVB Senior Continental Rankings
• FIVB Youth and Junior World Rankings

Notes and references[]

• Fédération Internationale de Volleyball (FIVB). "FIVB World Rankings". Retrieved 2011-05-30.