ICC Men's T20I Team Rankings

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ICC Men's T20I Team Rankings
AdministratorInternational Cricket Council
Creation2011
Number of teams85
Current top ranking England (277 rating)
Longest cumulative top ranking Sri Lanka (35 months)
Longest continuous
top ranking
 Pakistan (27 months)
Highest rating Pakistan (286 rating)
Last updated on: 3 May 2021.

The ICC Men's T20I Team Rankings is an international Twenty20 cricket rankings system of the International Cricket Council.[1] After every T20I match, the two teams involved receive points based on a mathematical formula. The total of each team's points total is divided by the total number of matches to give a rating, and all teams are ranked on a table in order of rating.[2] According to the ICC website, "teams will need to play six matches against other teams in the previous three to four years to remain in the rankings table."[3]

England currently leads the ICC Men's T20I Team Rankings as of 1 December 2020.[4]

Current rankings[]

ICC Men's T20I Team Rankings
Rank Team Matches Points Rating
1  England 28 7,786 278
2  India 26 7,456 266
3  Pakistan 34 8,883 261
4  New Zealand 28 7,192 257
5  South Africa 29 7,208 249
6  Bangladesh 26 6,259 241
7  Australia 33 7,923 240
8  Afghanistan 12 2,826 236
9  West Indies 29 6,792 234
10  Sri Lanka 21 4,849 231
11  Zimbabwe 27 5,140 190
12  Ireland 26 4,930 190
13    Nepal 19 3,556 187
14  Scotland 11 2,035 185
15  United Arab Emirates 11 2,023 184
16  Papua New Guinea 14 2,501 179
17  Netherlands 20 3,504 175
18  Oman 10 1,732 173
19  Namibia 14 2,204 157
20  Singapore 12 1,678 140
21  Qatar 11 1,422 129
22  Canada 10 1,263 126
23  Hong Kong 13 1,572 121
24  Jersey 13 1,481 114
25  Kenya 8 894 112
26  Italy 6 663 111
27  Kuwait 8 866 108
28  Saudi Arabia 4 428 107
29  Bermuda 6 568 95
30  Denmark 9 849 94
31  Germany 14 1,232 88
32  Malaysia 20 1,723 86
33  Uganda 10 847 85
34  United States 8 644 81
35  Botswana 10 786 79
36  Nigeria 5 375 75
37  Guernsey 9 645 72
38  Romania 17 1,158 68
39  Norway 10 667 67
40  Belgium 17 1,048 62
41  Austria 13 775 60
42  Spain 8 457 57
43  Bahrain 4 227 57
44  Tanzania 3 167 56
45  Sweden 10 536 54
46  Philippines 5 241 48
47  France 7 333 48
48  Mexico 7 313 45
49  Cayman Islands 3 132 44
50  Vanuatu 10 435 44
51  Belize 5 209 42
52  Portugal 9 374 42
53  Argentina 5 206 41
54  Luxembourg 16 607 38
55  Peru 5 179 36
56  Fiji 3 105 35
57  Finland 9 313 35
58  Malawi 9 312 35
59  Panama 5 162 32
60  Hungary 5 159 32
61  Samoa 5 159 32
62  Costa Rica 4 126 32
63  Japan 4 126 32
64  Ghana 7 209 30
65  Thailand 7 175 25
66  Malta 20 436 22
67  Czech Republic 19 396 21
68  South Korea 4 78 20
69  Mozambique 9 175 19
70  Isle of Man 4 77 19
71  Greece 5 94 19
72  Bulgaria 16 233 15
73  Bhutan 4 47 12
74  Maldives 7 65 9
75  Saint Helena 6 55 9
76  Rwanda 8 70 9
77  Brazil 5 39 8
78  Chile 5 19 4
79  Myanmar 3 1 0
80  Gibraltar 9 0 0
81  Serbia 5 0 0
82  China 4 0 0
83  Turkey 3 0 0
84  Eswatini 3 0 0
85  Lesotho 3 0 0
86  Indonesia 3 0 0
References: ICC T20I rankings, ESPNcricinfo, Updated on 13 September 2021
"Matches" is the number of matches played in the 12-24 months since the May before last, plus half the number in the 24 months before that.

Points calculations[]

Time period[]

Each team scores points based on the results of their matches over the last 3−4 years − all matches played in the 12–24 months since the May before last, plus all the matches played in the 24 months before that, for which the matches played and points earned both count half.[5] Each May, the matches and points earned between 3 and 4 years ago are removed, and the matches and points earned between 1 and 2 years ago switch from 100% weighting to 50% weighting. For example, at May 2014, the matches played between May 2010 and May 2011 were removed, and the matches played between May 2012 and May 2013 switched to 50% weighting (the matches from May 2011 to April 2012 would have already been at 50% following the previous rerating). This happens overnight, so can result in teams changing positions in the ranking table despite not playing.

May 2010 May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015
Between May 2013 and May 2014: Results that were achieved during
this period have 50% weighting
Results that were achieved during
this period have 100% weighting
Between May 2014 and May 2015: Results that were achieved during
this period have 50% weighting
Results that were achieved during
this period have 100% weighting

Find the points earned from a match[]

Each time two teams play another match, the rankings table is updated as follows, based on the ratings of the teams immediately before they played. To determine the teams' new ratings after a particular match, first calculate the points earned from the match:

If the gap between the ratings of the two teams before the match was less than 40 points, then points will be as follows:

Match result Points earned
Win Opponent's rating + 50
Tie Opponent's rating
Lose Opponent's rating − 50

If the gap between the ratings of the two teams before the match was at least 40 points, then points will be as follows:

Match result Points earned
Stronger team wins Own rating + 10
Weaker team loses Own rating − 10
Stronger team ties Own rating − 40
Weaker team ties Own rating + 40
Stronger team loses Own rating − 90
Weaker team wins Own rating + 90

Example[]

Suppose Team A, with an initial rating of 100, plays Team B. The table shows the points awarded to the two teams for 9 different initial ratings for B (ranging from 20 to 160), and the three possible match results.

Initial ratings Scenario Team A wins & Team B loses.
Points earned:
Match tied.
Points earned:
Team A loses & Team B wins. Points earned: Total initial ratings Total points earned (All 3 results)
Team A Team B Team A Team B Team A Team B Team A Team B
100 20 Initial ratings at least 40 points apart Stronger team wins: Own rating + 10 110 Weaker team loses: Own rating − 10 10 Stronger team ties: Own rating − 40 60 Weaker team ties: Own rating + 40 60 Stronger team loses: Own rating − 90 10 Weaker team wins: Own rating + 90 110 120 120
100 40 110 30 60 80 10 130 140 140
100 60 110 50 60 100 10 150 160 160
100 70 Initial ratings less than 40 points apart Win: Opponent's rating + 50 120 Lose: Opponent's rating − 50 50 Tie: Opponent's rating 70 Tie: Opponent's rating 100 Lose: Opponent's rating − 50 20 Win: Opponent's rating + 50 150 170 170
100 90 140 50 90 100 40 150 190 190
100 110 160 50 110 100 60 150 210 210
100 130 180 50 130 100 80 150 230 230
100 140 Initial ratings at least 40 points apart Weaker team wins: Own rating + 90 190 Stronger team loses: Own rating − 90 50 Weaker team ties: Own rating + 40 140 Stronger team ties: Own rating − 40 100 Weaker team loses: Own rating − 10 90 Stronger team wins: Own rating + 10 150 240 240
100 160 190 70 140 120 90 170 260 260

This illustrates that:

  • The winning team earns more points than the losing team. (Unless the ratings are more than 180 apart and the weaker team wins − highly unlikely.)
  • Winning always earns a team 100 points more than losing, and 50 more than tying.
  • The total points earned by the two teams is always the same as the total initial ratings of the two teams.
  • The points earned by a winning team increases as the initial rating (quality) of the opposition increases, within the constraints of earning at least its own initial rating + 10, and no more than its own initial rating + 90. A winning team therefore always earns more points than its initial rating, increasing its overall average rating.
  • The points earned by a losing team increases as the initial rating (quality) of the opposition increases, within the constraints of earning at least its own initial rating − 90, and no more than its own initial rating − 10. A losing team therefore always earns fewer points than its initial rating, decreasing its overall average rating.
  • In a tie, the weaker team usually earns more points than the stronger team (unless the initial ratings are at least 80 apart), reflecting the fact that a tie is a better result for the weaker team than the stronger team. Also, the stronger team will earn fewer points than its initial rating, decreasing its average, and the weaker team more points that its initial rating, increasing its average.
  • For a given result, the rule of how the two teams' points are calculated changes as the initial ratings change, from being based on teams' own ratings when one team is far stronger, to being based on the opponent's ratings when the teams are closely matched, back to being based on own ratings when the other team is far stronger. However, despite these sudden changes in the rule, the number of points awarded for each result changes smoothly as the initial ratings change.

Find the new ratings[]

  • Each team's rating is equal to its total points scored divided by the total matches played. (Series are not significant in these calculations).
  • Add the match points scored to the points already scored (in previous matches as reflected by the table), add one to the number of matches played, and determine the new rating.
  • Points earned by teams depend on the opponent's ratings, therefore this system needed to assign base ratings to teams when it started.

Historical rankings[]

This table lists the teams that have historically held the highest rating since the T20I rankings was introduced.[citation needed]

Country Start End Duration Cumulative Highest Rating
 England 24 October 2011[6] 7 August 2012 [7] 289 days 289 days 140
 South Africa 8 August 2012 11 September 2012 35 days 35 days 137
 England 12 September 2012 21 September 2012 10 days 299 days 130
 South Africa 22 September 2012 28 September 2012 7 days 42 days 134
 Sri Lanka 29 September 2012 27 March 2014 545 days 545 days 134
 India 28 March 2014 2 April 2014 6 days 6 days 130
 Sri Lanka 3 April 2014 3 April 2014 1 day 546 days 131
 India 4 April 2014 5 April 2014 2 days 8 days 132
 Sri Lanka 6 April 2014 30 April 2014 25 days 571 days 133
 India 1 May 2014 6 September 2014 129 days 137 days 131
 Sri Lanka 7 September 2014 9 January 2016 490 days 1061 days 135
 West Indies 10 January 2016 30 January 2016 21 days 21 days 118
 India 31 January 2016 8 February 2016 9 days 146 days 120
 Sri Lanka 9 February 2016 11 February 2016 3 days 1064 days 121
 India 12 February 2016 3 May 2016 82 days 228 days 127
 New Zealand 4 May 2016 31 October 2017 546 days 546 days 132
 Pakistan 1 November 2017 3 November 2017 3 days 3 days 124
 New Zealand 4 November 2017 6 November 2017 3 days 549 days 124
 Pakistan 7 November 2017 2 January 2018 57 days 60 days 124
 New Zealand 3 January 2018 27 January 2018 25 days 574 days 128
 Pakistan 28 January 2018 30 April 2020 824 days 884 days 286
 Australia 1 May 2020 5 September 2020 128 days 128 days 278
 England 6 September 2020 7 September 2020 2 days 301 days 273
 Australia 8 September 2020 30 November 2020 84 days 212 days 275
 England 1 December 2020 Present 278
Last updated 1 September 2021

The summary of teams that have held the highest rating by days, are:

Team Total Days Highest Rating
 Sri Lanka 1064 135
 Pakistan 884 286
 England 576 278
 New Zealand 574 132
 India 228 132
 Australia 212 278
 South Africa 42 137
 West Indies 21 118

See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ "Twenty20 rankings launched with England on top". 24 October 2011. Retrieved 24 October 2011.
  2. ^ "David Richardson previews the release of the Reliance ICC T20I Rankings". Retrieved 24 October 2011.
  3. ^ "ICC unveils Global Men's T20I Rankings Table featuring 80 teams". Retrieved 3 May 2019.
  4. ^ "South Africa v England: Dawid Malan & Jos Buttler share 167 as tourists win series 3-0". BBC Sport. 1 December 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
  5. ^ "FAQs on ICC T20I Team Rankings". Qn4,5, ICC. Retrieved 16 March 2016.
  6. ^ "ICC rankings - ICC Test, ODI and Twenty20 rankings". 25 October 2011. Archived from the original on 25 October 2011. Retrieved 16 December 2018.
  7. ^ "England rise to No.1 in ODIs". ESPNcricinfo.

External links[]

Retrieved from ""