M982 Excalibur
M982 Excalibur | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Type | Guided artillery shell |
Place of origin | Sweden, United States |
Service history | |
Used by | India, Canada, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, United States |
Production history | |
Manufacturer | BAE Systems AB, Raytheon Missile Systems |
Unit cost | US$112.8k (FY2021 President's Budget Request) |
Specifications | |
Mass | 48 kg (106 lb)[1] |
Length | 100 cm (39.2 in) |
Diameter | 155 mm |
Caliber | 155 mm |
Effective firing range | Increment Ia-1: 23 km (14 mi) Increment Ia-2/Ib: 40 km (25 mi)[2] newest test: 70 km[3] |
Warhead | PBXN-9 |
Warhead weight | 22 kg[4] |
Guidance system | GPS, inertial navigation |
Accuracy | 5–20 m |
The M982 Excalibur (previously XM982) is a 155 mm extended range guided artillery shell developed during a collaborative effort between the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) and the United States Army Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC).[5] The Excalibur was manufactured by prime contractor Raytheon Missile Systems and BAE Systems AB. It is a GPS- and inertial-guided munition capable of being used in close support situations within 75–150 meters (250–490 ft) of friendly troops or in situations where targets might be prohibitively close to civilians to attack with conventional unguided artillery fire. In 2015 the United States planned to procure 7,474 rounds with a FY2015 total program cost of US$1.9341 billion at an average cost of US$258,777 per unit.[6] By 2016, unit costs were reduced to US$68,000 per round.[7] Versions that add laser-guidance capability and are designed to be fired from naval guns began testing in 2015.[6][8][9] As of October 2018, over 1,400 rounds had been fired in combat.[10]
Description[]
Excalibur was developed as a longer-ranged alternative to conventional artillery shells, with GPS guidance for improved accuracy.[11] Excalibur has a range of approximately 40 to 57 kilometers (25 to 35 mi) depending on configuration, with a circular error probable (CEP) of around 5 to 20 meters (16 to 66 ft).[12][13][14][15][16] The extended range is achieved through the use of folding glide fins, which allow the projectile to glide from the top of a ballistic arc towards the target.
The munition was co-developed by United States-based Raytheon Missile Systems (guidance system) and the Swedish BAE Systems Bofors (body, base, ballistics and payload).[11] Excalibur is used to minimize collateral damage, for targets beyond the range of standard munitions, for precise firing within 150 meters (490 ft) of friendly troops, or when firing in a straight line from the launching cannon is limited by terrain.[11][17] It has a multi-function fuze that can be programmed to explode in the air, once it hits a hard surface, or after it penetrates inside a target.[18] One Excalibur projectile can accurately hit an intended target that would require the use of between 10 and 50 unguided artillery rounds.[19]
Initial combat experience with Excalibur in Iraq in the summer of 2007 was highly successful, with 92% of rounds falling within 4 meters (13 ft) of their targets. Its performance was so impressive that the U.S. Army planned to increase production to 150 rounds per month from the previous 18 rounds per month.[20][21] In 2012, Excalibur rounds reached new record ranges in combat of 36 kilometers.[22] In December 2020, the round was successfully tested out to a range of 43.5 mi (70 km) using a supercharged propellant out of a 58-caliber gun tube.[23][24]
Guns compatible with the Excalibur projectile are the British AS-90 SPG, Swedish Archer Artillery System, South African G6 howitzer, United States M198, M777 Lightweight and M109A6 Paladin self-propelled 155 mm howitzers, and the German Panzerhaubitze 2000.[25]
The U.S. Navy had considered using the Excalibur in the Zumwalt-class destroyer's Advanced Gun System following the cancellation of the Long Range Land Attack Projectile, but the plan was later abandoned.[26]
Variants[]
There are three versions of the system. Initial development effort was towards Increment I; Milestone C decisions will be made on Increment II and III in FY2013 with a demonstration of those capabilities by 2020.[2]
- Increment I has a unitary penetrating warhead for use against stationary targets.
- Increment Ia-1: Accelerated development, reduced range round. Entered service in 2007.[27] (XM982)[28]
- Increment Ia-2: Extended range round with resistance to GPS jamming. (M982)[28]
- Increment Ib: Full-capability, reduced-cost, mass-production round. (M982A1)[28]
- Excalibur S: In June 2013, Raytheon initiated an internally funded program to upgrade the Excalibur Ib with a semi-active laser targeting capability. The SAL seeker will allow the shell to attack moving targets or those that have re-positioned after firing, and to change the impact point to avoid collateral damage.[29]
- Excalibur N5: Version of the Excalibur S downsized into a 127 mm (5.0 in) shell to give naval guns mounted on destroyers and cruisers the ability to fire extended range guided projectiles.[30] Raytheon is also considering a millimeter wave seeker for fire-and-forget operations.[7]
- Excalibur EST: Excalibur Shaped Trajectory, allows the shell to make its final approach at an angle; demonstrated in August 2018 and deployed shortly thereafter.[10]
- Increment II "Smart" projectile for moving and time-sensitive targets.[2] May carry either 65 DPICM or two SADARM submunitions.[11]
- Increment III "Discriminating" projectile "to search, detect, and selectively engage individual vehicles by distinguishing specific target characteristics".[2]
History[]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/XM982ExcaliburRound.jpg/220px-XM982ExcaliburRound.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c8/CheckExcalibur_conv.jpg/220px-CheckExcalibur_conv.jpg)
Excalibur started as a development program in 1992. The Operational Requirements Document (ORD) of May 1997 called for 200,000 rounds of an unguided munition with increased range at an estimated cost of $4,000/round, and Texas Instruments was awarded the initial EMD contract on 23 January 1998. In November 2001 the volume was cut to 76,677 rounds and soon after this was further reduced to 61,483,[31] but the developers were encouraged by the Indian experience of using Russian Krasnopol guided shells against Pakistani bunkers in the Kargil War of 1999.[32]
In March 2004 the program was merged with a Swedish/U.S. program to create Trajectory Correctable Munitions, reflected in a new ORD in September 2004 which removed the Dual-Purpose Improved Conventional Munition "cluster bomb" variant in favor of the discriminating munition variant. Later that year the U.S. Army reduced its planned order to 30,000 rounds. Low-rate production of 500 rounds was approved in May 2005 and Raytheon was awarded a contract to produce 165 rounds in June 2005,[31] worth $22.1 million.[33] In September of that year, the round was successfully demonstrated at Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona.[34] Raytheon was awarded a $42.7 million contract for production of 335 Excalibur projectiles and related test articles and services in June 2006 for that fiscal year.[35]
In August 2006, technical problems relating to environmental sensitivity and GPS signal lock were discovered, pushing the expected in-service date to spring 2007.[27][36] Testing in September demonstrated an actual average CEP of 5 m (20 ft) or better.[37]
Increment Ia-1 completed testing in early 2007 and in April that year the U.S. Army approved an Urgent Material Release to allow deployment to Iraq.[2] The Excalibur was first operationally fired in Iraq in May 2007.[38] Increment Ia-2 achieved a 40 kilometers (25 mi) range in a live-fire demonstration in April 2007 and in July the Army Acquisition Executive approved the Milestone C decision for Ia-2 to enter low-rate production.[2] The munition was developed with US$55.1 million in financial assistance from Sweden, which expected to receive service rounds in 2010. The Excalibur debuted in Afghanistan in February 2008.[18] The Australian Army ordered US$40 million of Excalibur rounds in October 2007, an order revised in April 2008 to an estimated US$58 million.[39][40] In 2008 unit cost was US$85,000.[41]
In September 2008 both Raytheon and Alliant Techsystems were awarded competitive development contracts for Increment Ib mass production,[31] but Raytheon secured the final manufacturing contract in August 2010.[42] Test firings of Increment Ia-1 rounds in March 2009 revealed that the Honeywell inertial measurement unit was not up to standard, and it was replaced by a unit from Atlantic Inertial Systems. In April 2010 the U.S. Army's planned order was cut further, from 30,000 rounds to 6,264, which increased the unit cost sufficiently that it triggered an investigation under the Nunn–McCurdy Amendment. Normally a Nunn-McCurdy breach signals a program in trouble, but a 2012 RAND report concluded that the unit cost increases were caused by the cuts in procurement numbers: fewer shells were needed for the same effect, due to the improved accuracy of modern artillery.[31]
The Excalibur gives U.S. brigade commanders a precision weapon that is locally available, regardless of weather conditions (unlike bombs dropped from aircraft). Because the M982 is so accurate, the risks of friendly-fire casualties and collateral damage are no longer deterrents to using gun artillery in urban environments, and the Excalibur is sometimes called in only 50 m (160 ft) away from friendly infantrymen. In February 2012, a U.S. Marine Corps M777 howitzer in Helmand province, Afghanistan, fired a single Excalibur round that killed a group of insurgents at a Marine-record range of 36 kilometers (22 mi).[43]
In December 2012, Raytheon received a $56.6 million contract for low-rate initial production of Excalibur Ib projectiles.[44] On 10 September 2013, Raytheon received a $54 million contract for a second lot of Excalibur Ib artillery rounds. The Excalibur Ib has improved reliability and lower unit cost than the previous Excalibur Ia-1 and Ia-2. At the time of the award, over 690 Excalibur projectiles had been fired in theater.[45] In February 2014, the U.S. Army and Raytheon fired 30 Excalibur Ib shells at test targets to confirm the performance and reliability of the configuration before full-rate production. Projectiles were fired from Paladin and M777 howitzers at ranges from 7 to 38 km (4.3 to 24 mi), each hitting within an average of 1.6 m (5 ft 3 in) from the target.[19]
On 3 April 2014, the last Excalibur Ia projectile was assembled, signaling the transition to Increment Ib focus. Over 6,500 Ia shells were delivered to the U.S. Army and Marine Corps as well as several international customers.[46] Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) for the Excalibur Ib was completed in May 2014, moving the projectile closer to full-rate production. Testing of the Excalibur Ib averaged a miss distance of less than 2 m (6.6 ft).[47] On 31 July 2014, Raytheon received a $52 million contract to begin full-rate production of the Excalibur Ib shell.[48]
In June 2014, Raytheon successfully test-fired its Excalibur S shell with a dual-mode GPS/SAL guidance system. The variant incorporates a laser spot tracker (LST) into the Excalibur Ib shell. The test was to validate the LST's ability to survive being fired from a howitzer and was initialized with GPS coordinates, then a laser designator guided the round to the target.[49] In February 2020, Raytheon announced the Excalibur S had been successfully tested against a moving target using its laser seeker.[50]
Excalibur N5[]
In September 2015, Raytheon conducted a live fire guided test flight of the Excalibur N5, a company-funded initiative to reduce the 155 mm Excalibur shell to 127 mm (5") for use with naval guns mounted on destroyers and cruisers.[8] The Excalibur Ib and N5 have 70% commonality, 99% identical software, and the same guidance & navigation unit (GNU). Its primary uses would be to allow warships to accurately fire shells against land targets in support of troops ashore and inexpensively destroy fast attack craft (FAC) at longer ranges.[7]
Unguided 127 mm (5.0 in) shells from Mark 45 naval guns have a range of 13 nmi (15 mi; 24 km), but can deliver accurate fire only out to 8 nmi (9.2 mi; 15 km), while small cruise missile-carrying attack boats can launch from 15–20 nmi (17–23 mi; 28–37 km) away. Like the land-based version, the Excalibur N5's guidance fins pop out after launch to glide the round out to longer ranges before turning nose-down and diving to the target, extending range to 20–26 nmi (23–30 mi; 37–48 km) depending on gun barrel length; although range would be greater with rocket assistance, cost would also be greater. Alternative seekers will be added to hit maneuvering targets, such as laser guidance that requires a spotter to designate it, and millimeter wave radar that needs no outside guidance.[7]
Operators[]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7c/M982_operators.png/400px-M982_operators.png)
Current operators[]
India
Australia
Canada
Jordan[51]
Netherlands – Royal Netherlands Army: First ordered in 2015, qualified to enter service in October 2018.[52][53]
Sweden
United States – U.S. Army and U.S. Marine Corps
Future or pending operators[]
Norway – pending FMS request.
See also[]
- M712 Copperhead
- M1156 Precision Guidance Kit
- XM395 Precision Guided Mortar Munition
- Krasnopol (weapon system)
References[]
- ^ "Development of the XM982 Excalibur Fuzing System" (PDF). 7 April 2005. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 February 2016. Retrieved 18 September 2013.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f "Excalibur XM982 Precision Engagement Projectiles" (PDF). Office of the Director, Operational Test & Evaluation. 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 January 2016. Retrieved 29 August 2012.
- ^ https://vocus.cc/sophist4ever/5fe3e4ddfd897800018eb92b
- ^ http://www.military-today.com/artillery/m982_excalibur.htm
- ^ Lyons, John W. "Some Recent Sensor-Related Army Critical Technology Events". Defense Technical Information Center. National Defense University. Archived from the original on 20 June 2017. Retrieved 22 June 2018.
- ^ Jump up to: a b "GAO-15-342SP DEFENSE ACQUISITIONS Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs" (PDF). US Government Accountability Office. March 2015. p. 79. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 15 July 2015. Program cost is $1,934.1m (FY15) of which $790.4m is procurement cost, for 7,474 rounds for the US Army
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d Excalibur Goes To Sea: Raytheon Smart Artillery Shoots Back Archived 1 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine - Breakingdefense.com, 12 January 2016
- ^ Jump up to: a b "Raytheon's combat-proven Excalibur moves closer to sea-based application." Archived 2 October 2015 at the Wayback Machine - Raytheon news release, 30 September 2015
- ^ [1] Archived 27 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine - Raytheon news release, February 16 2016. Contract amount was $31.8 million for 464 rounds.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Raytheon, US Army upgrade Excalibur precision guided projectile Archived 11 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine. Army Recognition. 9 October 2018.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d "XM982 Excalibur 155mm Precision Guided Extended Range Artillery Projectile". Globalsecurity.org. Archived from the original on 4 September 2006. Retrieved 27 May 2007.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 September 2012. Retrieved 18 June 2012.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^ "Raytheon Company: Excalibur". Raytheon.com. Archived from the original on 2 October 2012. Retrieved 6 July 2012.
- ^ Clark, Colin (27 October 2010). "Excalibur Use Rises In Afghanistan". DoD Buzz. Archived from the original on 12 October 2011. Retrieved 6 July 2012.
- ^ John Pike. "XM982 Excalibur 155mm Precision Guided Extended Range Artillery Projectile". Globalsecurity.org. Archived from the original on 1 March 2012. Retrieved 6 July 2012.
- ^ "Raytheon-BAE Systems Bofors' Excalibur Closer to Fielding". Spacewar.com. 19 September 2006. Archived from the original on 28 September 2012. Retrieved 6 July 2012.
- ^ "Big Guns". MichaelYon.com. Archived from the original on 9 June 2010. Retrieved 10 June 2010.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Picatinny's GPS-guided Excalibur artillery round deemed 'amazingly accurate' by troop Archived 28 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine - Army.mil, 11 September 2008
- ^ Jump up to: a b US. Army and Raytheon successfully fired 30 GPS-guided Excalibur projectiles during firing test Archived 5 March 2014 at the Wayback Machine - Armyrecognition.com, 8 February 2014
- ^ Aviation Week & Space Technology, 2007-09-03, page 20
- ^ Swedish missile among U.S. Army's favourites in Iraq Archived 26 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine The Local, 2008-08-22
- ^ "US Marines fire Excalibur from record range in Afghanistan." Archived 17 June 2012 at the Wayback Machine Space War, 13 June 2012.
- ^ Judson, Jen (21 December 2020). "Army long-range cannon gets direct hit on target 43 miles away". Defense News. Retrieved 24 December 2020.
- ^ New Army Cannon Hits Target 43 Miles Away in Test. Military.com. 23 December 2020.
- ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 10 August 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^ Navy Studying Hyper Velocity Projectile, Other Ammo for Zumwalt Guns Archived 25 January 2019 at the Wayback Machine. USNI News. 21 January 2019.
- ^ Jump up to: a b "Strategy Page - Excalibur Delayed Again". Archived from the original on 31 October 2006. Retrieved 21 September 2006.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c Precision Strike Association Excalibur Overview Archived 22 December 2014 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Raytheon Unveils Excalibur with Dual GPS and Semi-Active Laser Guidance Archived 6 June 2014 at the Wayback Machine - Deagel.com, 20 June 2013
- ^ Excalibur S artillery shell can change course in flight Archived 6 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine - Defensesystems.com, 16 June 2014
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d Blickstein, Irv; Drezner, Jeffrey A.; et al. (2012), Root Cause Analyses of Nunn-McCurdy Breaches, Volume 2 - Excalibur Artillery Projectile and the Navy Enterprise Resource Planning Program, with an Approach to Analyzing Complexity and Risk, RAND Corporation, ISBN 9780833076434, archived from the original on 3 October 2012, retrieved 29 August 2012
- ^ ""One Shot, One Kill" May Not Be Worth It". StrategyWorld.com. 7 February 2006. Archived from the original on 14 December 2012. Retrieved 29 August 2012.
- ^ "Raytheon Receives $22.1M to Deliver Excalibur GPS Shells Ahead of Schedule". Defense Industry Daily. 30 June 2005. Archived from the original on 21 October 2012. Retrieved 29 August 2012.
- ^ Troops could have new Picatinny-developed smart artillery munition by March - RDECOM Magazine Archived 19 June 2006 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "XM982 Excalibur - Deagel". Archived from the original on 25 September 2006. Retrieved 21 September 2006.
- ^ "Strategy Page - Excalibur Freeze Out". Archived from the original on 1 November 2006. Retrieved 21 September 2006.
- ^ "Successful Safety Testing of GPS-Guided Artillery Projectile Puts Raytheon-BAE Systems Bofors' Excalibur Closer to Fielding - Raytheon". Archived from the original on 14 July 2009. Retrieved 31 May 2019.
- ^ "America's First Team first-ever to fire Excalibur precision munition in combat". Archived from the original on 26 February 2012.
- ^ Defense Security Cooperation Agency, 1 October 2007 Archived 18 July 2009 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Defense Security Cooperation Agency, April 2008 Archived 18 July 2009 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Cannot Get Enough Excalibur". Archived from the original on 29 August 2008. Retrieved 29 August 2008.
- ^ Brannen, Kate (27 August 2010). "Raytheon Beats ATK to Win Excalibur Job". Archived from the original on 21 January 2013.
- ^ Lamothe, Dan (30 June 2012). "Long shot: Artillery battery sets lethal record". Marine Corps Times. Archived from the original on 12 October 2013. Retrieved 11 October 2013.
- ^ Raytheon's new precision artillery ready for low-rate initial production Archived 4 March 2013 at the Wayback Machine - Raytheon press release, 20 February 2013
- ^ US Army awards Raytheon $54 million for Excalibur Ib Archived 23 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine - PRNewswire.com, 10 September 2013
- ^ Picatinny completes Excalibur 1a-2 production, transitions to 1b Archived 23 May 2014 at the Wayback Machine - Pica.Army.mil, 14 April 2014
- ^ Excalibur Ib Completes US Army's Initial Operational Test and Evaluation Archived 24 May 2014 at the Wayback Machine - Deagel.com, 20 May 2014
- ^ Excalibur Ib Enters Full Rate Production Archived 23 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine - Deagel.com, 31 July 2014
- ^ Raytheon conducts first live fire test of Excalibur S Archived 4 August 2014 at the Wayback Machine - Raytheon news release, 15 June 2014
- ^ Raytheon’s advanced Excalibur weapon hits moving targets in test. Defense News. 6 February 2020.
- ^ https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1019147.pdf
- ^ "Netherlands buys Raytheon Excalibur Ib projectiles". Army Recognition. 9 September 2015. Archived from the original on 16 February 2018. Retrieved 20 October 2018.
- ^ Fiorenza, Nicholas (19 October 2018). "Netherlands qualifies Excalibur precision-guided round". IHS Jane's 360. London. Archived from the original on 20 October 2018. Retrieved 20 October 2018.
Bibliography[]
- Jane's Ammunition Handbook 2003–2004
Further reading[]
- 2012 RAND report goes into detail on the progress of the project
External links[]
![]() |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to M982 Excalibur. |
- Artillery shells
- Military equipment introduced in the 2000s