Nonpartisanism

The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may , discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (May 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Part of the Politics series
Party politics
show Political spectrum Left-wing Far-left Centre-left Centre Centre-left Radical centre Centre-right Right-wing Centre-right Far-right
show Platform Anarchist Christian Democratic Communist Conservative Democratic Environmentalist Fascist Fundamentalist Globalist Green Internationalist Liberal Libertarian Nationalist Populist Progressive Regionalist Republican Social democratic Socialist Syncretic
show Types Elite party Cartel party Catch-all party Entrepreneurial party Mass party Ruling party Opposition party Official party status Single-issue party
show Organization Backbencher Caucus Caucus chair Floor leader Frontbencher Lead candidate Leader of the Opposition Majority leader Minority leader Parliamentary group Parliamentary leader Party chair Party leader Party spokesperson Secretary Shadow cabinet Whip
show Internal democracy Conscience vote Crossing the floor Leadership election Party conference Party discipline Party line Party-line vote Party switching Primary election
show Party system One-party Dominant-party Two-party Multi-party Non-partisan
show Coalition Coalition government Confidence and supply Grand coalition Hung parliament Majority government Minority government National unity government Rotation government
show Lists Ruling parties by country Political parties by region Political ideologies
Politics portal
v t

Nonpartisanism is a lack of affiliation with, and a lack of bias toward, a political party.^[1]

While an Oxford English Dictionary definition of partisan includes adherents of a party, cause, person, etc.,^[2] in most cases, nonpartisan refers specifically to political party connections rather than being the strict antonym of "partisan".^[3][4][5]

Canada[]

In Canada, the Legislative Assembly of the Northwest Territories and the Legislative Assembly of Nunavut are the only bodies at the provincial/territorial level that are currently nonpartisan; they operate on a consensus government system. The autonomous Nunatsiavut Assembly operates similarly on a sub-provincial level.

India[]

In India, the Jaago Re! One Billion Votes campaign was a non-partisan campaign initiated by Tata Tea, and Janaagraha to encourage citizens to vote in the 2009 Indian general election.^{[citation needed]} The campaign was a non-partisan campaign initiated by .

Philippines[]

In the Philippines, barangay elections (elections for positions in the barangay or village) are nonpartisan. The certificates of candidacies, which the candidates sign under oath, say that they are not a member of any political party.^[6] The nonpartisanism of barangay elections have been challenged lately, though, as some candidates are members of political parties.^[7]

Barangay Captains and Sangguniang Kabataan (SK, youth councils) chairmen in a municipality or city elect among themselves their representative to the local legislature. In deadlocked or hung legislatures, votes from the nominally nonpartisan representatives of barangay captains and SK chairmen hold the balance of power.

United States[]

Historian Sean Wilentz argues that from the days of George Washington's farewell address, to Senator Barack Obama's speech at the Democratic national convention in 2004, politicians have called upon Americans to move beyond parties. Wilentz calls this the post-partisan style, and argues that "the antiparty current is by definition antidemocratic, as political parties have been the only reliable electoral vehicles for advancing the ideas and interests of ordinary voters".^[8] However, nonpartisan elections are quite common at the local level, primarily in an effort to keep national issues from being mixed up with local issues.^[9]

Today, nonpartisan elections are generally held for municipal and county offices, especially school board, and are also common in the election of judges. The unicameral Legislature of Nebraska is the only state legislature that is entirely officially nonpartisan; additionally, the bicameral Fono of American Samoa is the only territorial legislature that is officially nonpartisan.

Although elections may be officially nonpartisan, in some elections (usually involving larger cities or counties, as well as the Nebraska unicameral) the party affiliations of candidates are generally known, most commonly by the groups endorsing a particular candidate (e.g., a candidate endorsed by a labor union would be generally affiliated with the Democratic Party, while a candidate endorsed by a business coalition would be generally affiliated with the Republican Party).^[10]

Churches and other 501(c)(3) organizations[]

Churches and charities in the United States are mainly formed under US Internal Revenue Service tax code 501(c)(3) non-profit organization regulations. To maintain that tax-exempt status, and the ability for donors to take a tax deduction, they are required to remain nonpartisan.^[11]

This has caused some to question the ability of organizations that have the appearance of partisanship.

The Brookings Institution is a Washington, D.C. think tank and 501(c)(3) non-profit, nonpartisan organization. Since its founding in 1916, it has had both identifiable Republicans and Democrats among its leadership. Owing to leadership changes such as this, some argue that it is a good example of a nonpartisan organization. The New York Times has at times listed the organization as being liberal, liberal-centrist, centrist, and conservative.^{[12][13][14][15][16]} In 2008, The New York Times published an article where it referred to the "conservative Brookings Institution".^[12]

Nonpartisan League[]

In the Progressive Era, the Nonpartisan League was an influential socialist political movement, especially in the Upper Midwest, particularly during the 1910s and 1920s. It also contributed much to the ideology of the former Progressive Party of Canada. It went into decline and merged with the Democratic Party of North Dakota to form the North Dakota Democratic–NPL Party in 1956.

Milwaukee[]

In the history of Milwaukee, the "Nonpartisans" were an unofficial but widely recognized coalition of Republicans and Democrats who cooperated in an effort to keep Milwaukee's Sewer Socialists out of as many offices as possible, including in elections which were officially non-partisan, but in which Socialists and "Nonpartisans" were clearly identified in the press.^[17] (Such candidates were sometimes called "fusion" candidates.^[18]) This lasted from the 1910s^[19] well into the 1940s. (The similar effort in 1888 to prevent Herman Kroeger's election as a Union Labor candidate had been conducted under the banner of a temporary "Citizen's Party" label.^[20]) During the period of Socialist-Progressive cooperation (1935–1941), the two sides were called "Progressives" and "Nonpartisans".^[21]

See also[]

• Apolitical
• Decline to state
• Independent politician
• Independent voter
• Non-partisan democracy

References[]

Citations[]

Bibliography[]

• William Safire (2008-03-31). Safire's political dictionary. ISBN 9780195343342. Retrieved 2012-01-25.
• Charles Edward Russell (1920). The story of the Nonpartisan League: a chapter in American evolution. Harper & Brothers. Retrieved 2012-01-25 – via Internet Archive. Nonpartisan.
• Albert Breton (1998-09-28). Competitive Governments: An Economic Theory of Politics and Public Finance. ISBN 9780521646284. Retrieved 2012-01-25.
• Joan Campbell (1944-06-03). European labor unions. ISBN 9780313263712. Retrieved 2012-01-25.
• Leon D. Epstein (1980). Political parties in Western democracies. ISBN 9781412831178. Retrieved 2012-01-25.