Omotic languages

show This article may be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in Swedish. (November 2018) Click [show] for important translation instructions. Machine translation like DeepL or Google Translate is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia. Consider adding a topic to this template: there are already 1,017 articles in the main category, and specifying|topic= will aid in categorization. Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary Content in this edit is translated from the existing Swedish Wikipedia article at [[:sv:]]; see its history for attribution. You should also add the template {{Translated page}} to the talk page. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation.

Omotic
Geographic distribution	Ethiopia
Linguistic classification	Afro-Asiatic Omotic
Subdivisions	North Omotic South Omotic
ISO 639-5	omv
Glottolog	None
Omotic languages:   South Omotic   Mao   Dizoid   Gonga (Kefoid) Gimojan languages:   Yemsa   Bench (Gimira)   Chara   Ometo Neighboring languages:   Nilo-Saharan   Afro-Asiatic

The Omotic languages are a group of languages spoken in southwestern Ethiopia. The Ge'ez script is used to write some of the Omotic languages, the Latin script for some others. They are fairly agglutinative and have complex tonal systems (for example, the Bench language). The languages have around 6.2 million speakers. The group is generally classified as belonging to the Afroasiatic language family, but this is disputed by some.

Four separate "Omotic" groups are accepted by Glottolog 4.0 and Güldemann (2018): Ta-Ne-Omotic, Dizoid (Maji), Mao, and Aroid ("South Omotic").^[1]

Languages[]

The North and South Omotic branches ("Nomotic" and "Somotic") are universally recognized, with some dispute as to the composition of North Omotic. The primary debate is over the placement of the Mao languages. Bender (2000) classifies Omotic languages as follows:

• South Omotic / Aroid (Hamer-Banna, Aari, Dime, Karo)
• North Omotic / Non-Aroid
  • Mao
    • Bambassi
    • West Mao (Hozo, Seze, Ganza)
  • Dizoid (Dizi, Sheko, Nayi)
  • Gonga–Gimojan
    • Gonga/Kefoid (Boro, Anfillo, Kafa, Shekkacho)
    • Gimojan
      • Yemsa
      • Ometo–Gimira
        • Bench
        • Chara
        • Ometo languages

Apart from terminology, this differs from Fleming (1976) in including the Mao languages, whose affiliation had originally been controversial, and in abolishing the "Gimojan" group.^{[clarification needed]} There are also differences in the subclassification of Ometo, which is not covered here.

A depiction of the classificiation of Cushitic and Omotic languages

Hayward (2003)[]

Hayward (2003) separates out the Mao languages as a third branch of Omotic and breaks up Ometo–Gimira:

• South Omotic
• Mao
• North Omotic
  • Dizoid
  • Ta–Ne languages
    • Gonga
    • Gimojan
      • Yemsa
      • Bench
      • Ometo–Chara

Blench (2006)[]

Blench (2006) gives a more agnostic classification:^[2]

• South Omotic
• North Omotic
  • Mao
  • Dizoid
  • Gonga (Kefoid)
  • Yem
  • Gimira
  • Ometo (?Chara)

Bosha† is unclassified; Ethnologue lists it as a dialect of Kafa but notes it may be a distinct language.

Classification[]

Omotic is generally considered the most divergent branch of the Afroasiatic languages. Greenberg (1963) had classified it as the Western branch of Cushitic. Fleming (1969) argued that it should instead be classified as an independent branch of Afroasiatic, a view which Bender (1971) established to most linguists' satisfaction,^[3] though a few linguists maintain the West Cushitic position^[4] or that only South Omotic forms a separate branch, with North Omotic remaining part of Cushitic. Blench (2006) notes that Omotic shares honey-related vocabulary with the rest of Afroasiatic but not cattle-related vocabulary, suggesting that the split occurred before the advent of pastoralism. A few scholars have raised doubts that the Omotic languages are part of the Afroasiatic language family at all,^[5][6] and Theil (2006) proposes that Omotic be treated as an independent family.^[7] However, the general consensus, based primarily on morphological evidence, is that membership in Afroasiatic is well established.^[8][9][10]

Glottolog[]

Hammarström, et al. in Glottolog does not consider Omotic to be a unified group, and also does not consider any of the "Omotic" groups to be part of the Afroasiatic phylum. Glottolog accepts the following as independent language families.

• Ta-Ne-Omotic
• Dizoid (Maji)
• Mao
• Aroid (Ari-Banna; "South Omotic")

These four families are also accepted by Güldemann (2018), who similarly doubts the validity of Omotic as a unified group.^[1]

Reconstruction[]

Bender (1987: 33–35)^[11] reconstructs the following proto-forms for Proto-Omotic and Proto-North Omotic, the latter which is considered to have descended from Proto-Omotic.

Comparative vocabulary[]

Sample basic vocabulary of 40 Omotic languages from Blažek (2008):^[12]

See also[]

• Languages of Ethiopia

Notes[]

Sources cited[]

• Bender, M. Lionel. 2000. Comparative Morphology of the Omotic Languages. Munich: LINCOM.
• Fleming, Harold. 1976. Omotic overview. In The Non-Semitic Languages of Ethiopia, ed. by M. Lionel Bender, pp. 299–323. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
• Newman, Paul. 1980. The classification of Chadic within Afroasiatic. Universitaire Pers Leiden.

General Omotic bibliography[]

• Bender, M. L. 1975. Omotic: a new Afroasiatic language family. (University Museum Series, 3.) Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.
• Blench, Roger. 2006. Archaeology, Language, and the African Past. AltaMira Press
• Hayward, Richard J., ed. 1990. Omotic Language Studies. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.
• Hayward, Richard J. 2003. Omotic: the "empty quarter" of Afroasiatic linguistics. In Research in Afroasiatic Grammar II: selected papers from the fifth conference on Afroasiatic languages, Paris 2000, ed. by Jacqueline Lecarme, pp. 241–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Lamberti, Marcello. 1991. Cushitic and its classification. Anthropos 86(4/6):552-561.
• Zaborski, Andrzej. 1986. Can Omotic be reclassified as West Cushitic? In Gideon Goldenberg, ed., Ethiopian Studies: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference pp. 525–530. Rotterdam: Balkema.
• Zuckermann, Ghil'ad (2012). Burning Issues in Afro-Asiatic Linguistics. Cambridge Scholars. ISBN 978-1-4438-4070-5.

External links[]

• Is Omotic Afro-Asiatic? by Rolf Theil