Renaissance 2010

This article's factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (September 2011)

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources:  –  ·  ·  · scholar · JSTOR (August 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

This article is part of a series about Richard M. Daley
Daley family Electoral history Tenure in Illinois State Senate Tenure as Cook County State's Attorney 1980 election 1984 election 1988 election Mayoralty Elections 1983 primary 1989 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2002–03 renovation of Soldier Field 2016 Summer Olympics bid Block 37 Demolition and closure of Meigs Field Hired Truck Program Crisis management Establishment of CDFM Chicago flood 1995 Chicago heat wave Events hosted by city 1994 FIFA World Cup opening ceremony 1996 DNC 2006 Gay Games Law enforcement and crime Civil unrest Chicago Bulls Championship riots CPD CAPS CLEAR Operation Virtual Shield CPD torture allegations Graffiti Blasters Parks and recreation projects Chicago Riverwalk Navy Pier revamp Northernly Island Millennium Park Park Grill controversy Museum Campus Ping Tom Memorial Park Public schools Renaissance 2010 Takeover of CPS control Transit Establishment of CDOT O'Hare Airport modernization and reconfiguration CTA Orange Line CTA Pink Line 2003–04 Chicago Skyway rehab Unrealized transit proposals Clinton Street Subway Airport Express Mid-City Transitway Lake Calumet Airport Privatization of Midway Airport
v t

Renaissance 2010 was a program of the Chicago Public Schools school district of Chicago, Illinois, United States. Pushed by for-profit education companies, Renaissance 2010 initiative was announced in June 2004 by the Chicago Public Schools and the City of Chicago. Renaissance 2010 called for 100 new schools by 2010. Under Renaissance 2010, the Chicago Public Schools closed over 80 public schools, and sought to create 100 charter schools by 2010. These schools were to be held accountable for test score performance through 5-year contracts while following one of three governance structures: charter, contract, or performance.

Renaissance 2010 Schools Types[]

There are three different types of Renaissance schools, a charter school, a contract school, and a performance school.

• Charter – Charter Schools are independent public schools. Free from many state laws, district initiatives, and board policies, charter teachers are employees of the nonprofit governing board or an education management organization hired by the board. Charters are operated pursuant to Illinois Charter Law (ILCS 5/27A).
• Contract – Contract Schools are a newly created public school model established as a part of Renaissance 2010. Contracts are managed by independent nonprofit organizations in accordance with Performance Agreements. Contract schoolteachers will be employees of the nonprofit. Contract schools are operated pursuant to Illinois School Code.
• Performance – Performance Schools employ CPS staff and are CPS schools that have freedom from and flexibility on many district initiatives and policies.

List of Renaissance 2010 Schools[]

This list is incomplete; you can help by . (September 2011)

Despite legislation that capped Chicago charters at 30, CPS schools chief Arne Duncan and Mayor Daley allowed many new charter schools to open under the auspices of a single charter within the Renaissance 2010 initiative. For example, private charter operator Chicago International was allowed to operate 12 charter schools under its single charter.

Contract schools[]

Performance schools[]

Charter schools[]

Criticisms[]

In 2005, the Chicago Teachers' Union's president, Marilyn Stewart, was uniformly negative in her assessment of Renaissance 2010, stating that "Chicago's charter schools had scores that were in the basement. [...] All Chicago-based charter schools had scores below the statewide average in third-grade reading, third-grade math, fifth-grade reading and eighth-grade math".^[1] A 2009 study by University of Chicago researcher Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach found more mixed results, that "test scores in the Renaissance schools slightly lagged those of students with similar backgrounds who attended neighborhood schools — though not to a statistically significant degree. But results were far from homogeneous, with some Renaissance schools posting decidedly stronger test scores compared to others." Schanzenbach further notes that new schools generally have higher hurdles to face than established ones, and that the best practices used in the Renaissance schools were "on the right track.”^[2] Another study released in 2009 by SRI International, a California-based independent research institute, indicated that Renaissance 2010 schools have performed about on par with Chicago Public School-owned schools, with potential for further improvements. Demonstrating the divisive nature of the Renaissance 2010 plan, proponents have used this study to argue that the new schools are solid foundations for better education, while opponents have used this same study to claim that the new schools provide little to no gain for their cost and social disruption.^[3]

See also[]

• Chicago Public Schools

References[]

External links[]

• http://www.fairtest.org/ChicagoReportExecSum2007.html
• Lipman, Pauline; Haines, Nathan (2007). "From Accountability to Privatization and African American Exclusion: Chicago's 'Renaissance 2010'". Educational Policy. 21 (3): 471–502. doi:10.1177/0895904806297734. S2CID 146562404.
• Renaissance 2010's Official Website
• District 299 The Unofficial Chicago Public Schools Blog