Administrative hearing of William McAndrew

On August 29, 1927, Superintendent of Chicago Public Schools William McAndrew was suspended from his position by the Chicago Board of Education pending an administrative hearing by the board, being charged with "insubordination" for opposing a school board action that he believed would amount to reviving patronage in the school system. The administrative hearing, which was widely dubbed a "trial", was to determine whether he was guilty, and should therefore be removed from his office. The administrative hearing, which attracted great media fascination and derision, took place over the course of several months, and saw McAndrew tried for counts of insubordination, and an additional count of conduct incompatible with and in violation of his duty (stemming from allegations of unpatriotic actions). After the first several weeks of the administrative hearing, McAndrew and his legal team refused to attend any further hearings, and he was tried in absentia. The school board found McAndrew guilty by an 8–2 vote on March 21, 1928. In December 1929, the Superior Court of Cook County voided this, ruling that McAndrew had not been insubordinate, and that the school board had no authority to charge McAndrew for being "unpatriotic".

The administrative hearing came following a reshaping of the Board of Education with appointments made by William Hale Thompson in the months after he took office in 1927. During his successful campaign against then-incumbent mayor William Emmett Dever in the 1927 Chicago mayoral election, Thompson had promised to oust McAndrew, making allegations that McAndrew was a British agent sent by King George as part of a grand conspiracy to manipulate the minds of American children and set the groundwork for the United Kingdom to repossess the United States, with Dever being in on this alleged plot. Thompson's allegations came amid a national wave of anglophobic attacks on textbooks. After Thompson was elected mayor, he sought to quickly oust McAndrew, who had nine months left before his contract as superintendent expired. State law stated that the Chicago Board of Education could only dismiss McAndrew after an administrative hearing before the board.

Background[]

William McAndrew[]

McAndrew circa 1924

William McAndrew had been appointed superintendent of Chicago Public Schools in 1924 by a Chicago Board of Education that had been reshaped by reform-minded mayor William Emmett Dever's appointees.^[1][2] During his tenure, McAndrew was a polarizing figure, facing tense criticism from teacher's unions and others for some of the reforms he fought to implement, but also receiving national praise.^[3]

1920s wave of anglophobic textbook controversies[]

In the 1920s, the United States experience a wave of anglophobic criticisms in the of textbooks being "pro-British" and "unamerican".^{[4][5][6][7][8]} Among the leading forces of this was the Knights of Columbus.^[8]

William Hale Thompson's attacks on McAndrew during 1927 mayoral election[]

William Hale Thompson

Full-page campaign ad in support of Thompson baring language attacking McAndrew. This full-page ad was run March 30, 1927^[9]

During his successful 1927 campaign against incumbent Democratic mayor William Emmett Dever, Republican nominee William Hale Thompson alleged that McAndrew was a British agent sent by King George as part of a grand conspiracy to manipulate the minds of American children and set the groundwork for the United Kingdom to repossess the United States, and accused the "left-handed Irishman" Dever of being part of the plot.^[10][2][11] Thompson based these claims on McAndrew being critical of such artworks as Archibald Willard's The Spirit of '76 and allowing the use in schools of textbooks which Thompson alleged were unpatriotic and full of, "treason tainted histories".^[2][10][12]

Thompson accused McAndrew of conspiring with the University of Chicago's Charles Hubbard Judd and Charles Edward Merriam to, "destroy the love of America in the hearts of children by encouraging teachers to attend special classes at 'Chicago University' at which the text was used which pictured George Washington as a rebel and a great disloyalist."^[13]

Thompson was not a lone actor in publicly painting McAndrew as unpatriotic. In 1926, the "Citizens' Committee on School Histories", a group led by far-right ex-United States congressman John J. Gorman (and consisting largely of members of German and Irish descent), published a document that denounced three United States history textbooks that were in use in Chicago Public Schools as pro-British, and argued that heroes of other nationalities had been overlooked by the books in numerous instances. It also demanded that McAndrew remove from the school curriculum a list of books they alleged were "pro-British". While Mayor Dever brought this document to McAndrew's attention, McAndrew did not give it any concern.^[4][13] In 1927, Thompson would add the report published by this group to his campaign literature.^[12] Additionally, at the City Council's first meeting after McAndrew made a remark criticizing Archibald Willard's The Spirit of '76 for not being an accurate picture of war, Alderman John Coughlin denounced McAndrew's comments as being traitorous, and proposed an ordinance to denounce McAndrew. However, Alderman William D. Meyering, a decorated veteran of World War I, stood up and stated that he actually agreed with McAndrew's statement, which served to quash the momentum of Coughlin's ordinance.^[13]

Among the textbooks that Thompson criticized as unpatriotic were A History of the United States by Willian Fiske Gordy, Our United States by William Backus Guitteau, and The Silent Reader by Albert Lindsay Lewis and William D. Rowland.^[14] Former president of the Chicago Board of Education Charles Moderwell, who had served during the earlier part of Dever's mayoralty, argued that textbooks which Thompson attacked as being unpatriotic had actually been approved by the school board Thompson had appointed during his previous mayoralty.^[13] Indeed, the school's history textbooks had not been chosen by McAndrew but had rather been chosen by his predecessor.^[12]

Thompson made the campaign promise of appointing, "a patriotic school board...who will rid the city of Superintendent McAndrew," and "his pro-English 'yes' men and women".^[2] He faulted Dever and Democratic political boss George E. Brennan as responsible for McAndrew's hiring.^[2]

Thompson also complained of there being a large number of pro-British books populating the city's libraries, and urged the residents to pillage the libraries and burn such books.^[15]

Possible motives[]

While it is not clear why Thompson chose to single-out McAndrew for such attacks, in a 1980 journal article, Dennis F. Thompson speculated that Thompson might have chosen him as an enemy, in part, due to McAndrew being a force against political patronage in schools, as well as due to McAndrew's ties to Dever^[12] Another aspect that Dennis F. Thompson speculated may have been a factor was McAndrews unpopularity with teachers.^[12] Dennis F. Thompson argued that there is strong evidence that teachers, indeed, very actively backed Thompson's candidacy in hopes of ousting McAndrew.^[12] Additionally, Thompson had, in the past, already appealed to the city's German and Irish populations by positioning himself as anti-British.^[16] A 1968 report by Robert J. Havighurst expressed the belief that Thomposon was taking advantage of the situation created by McAndrew's combative relationship with teachers unions and the Chicago Federation of Labor.^[17]

The Chicago Tribune speculated that Thompson had removed McAndrew in order to clear the way for his political corruption to extend into the city's schools, writing in December 1929,

"the superintendent was the one obstacle to the invasion of the school treasury by the Thompson machine. Furthermore, he was an impassable obstacle. So long as McAndrew remained in charge of the educational system the school funds would be administered properly. McAndrew must go or there would be no loot."^[18]

Developments in initial months of Thompson's mayoralty[]

Having won the 1927 mayoral election, Thompson was sworn in as mayor on April 18, 1927.^[19] In his inaugural address, Thompson declared,

"I will proceed vigorously to oust Superintendent McAndrew from the schools of Chicago, and restore to the school children the true history of George Washington and the other fathers and heroes of our country, and expose the treason and propaganda which insidiously have been injected into our schools and other educational institutions."^[19]

At the time, McAndrew still had nine months left in his contract as superintendent.^[20] Thompson was impatient to get rid of McAndrew.^[20] On April 27, a private group with close connections to Thompson offered McAndrew $15,000 if he would resign as superintendent, but McAndrew refused to on principle.^[12] State law stated that McAndrew could only be dismissed by the Chicago Board of Education after an administrative hearing by the board, which would need to be held no less than thirty days after charges would be brough against him.^[21]

On May 25, was elected by the Chicago Board of Education as the board's new president. Coath was Thompson's personally-backed candidate for the job. Coath, as a board member, had spent months as a top foe to McAndrew. The board voted to select Coath by a 6–3 vote, with 3 of the votes in Coath's favor coming from board members that had originally been appointed by Dever (the three votes against his appointment also came from Dever appointees). However, the three Dever appointees who voted in support of electing Coath president of the board made it known that they would not back ousting McAndrew as superintendent.^[22] In July, Coath stated that the "bunk shooting educator" McAndrew was barely grasping onto his position and was promising that he would be ousted before the start of the new school year in September.^[12]

After becoming mayor, Thompson appointed former U.S. congressman John J. Gorman as a special assistant corporation counsel, with the assignment of looking through school textbooks for lies and distortions. Gorman, who was considered to have been an anglophobe, would reach the conclusion that books used by Chicago Public Schools were "poisoned" with British dogma, and that the British were taking over America, "not by shot and shell, but by a rain of propaganda."^[23]

On the Chicago Board of Education, member Otto L. Schmidt was made chairman of a committee to investigate the history textbooks taught in the city's schools.^[24]

McAndrew's suspension by Chicago Board of Education, pending an administrative hearing[]

By August, reshaped by appointments Thompson had made to it, the Chicago Board of Education was moving under Thompson's influence.^[20] Thompson had been able to gain control so quickly due to the resignations of a number of board members, as well as threats made to remaining members.^[12] A majority vote against McAndrew had been assured in August by the switch of Dever appointee Theophilus Schmid to an anti-McAndrew position.^[21]

Since 1909, the Chicago Public Schools' school clerks had simply been certified teachers who were assigned clerical duties. However, in April 1927, the Board of Education's attorney, at the urging of a Thompson-allied board member, rendered an opinion that the school clerks must be selected by the City Civil Service Commission, pointing to an opinion that the Illinois Appellate Courts had rendered in March 1927, which found that the schools' janitors and engineers needed to be selected by that commission. On August 3, 1927, the Chicago Board of Education adopted a resolution that would dismiss all 350 of the school system's school clerks, and have them be replaced with Civil Service Commission appointees. McAndrew was outraged by this, seeing it as an attempt by Thompson to return patronage to the education system, and resisted this order.^[20][25] McAndrew assisted the school clerks in preparing to file an injunction against their dismissal. He appeared as a witness to argue for the injunction, testifying that an injunction against the Board should be granted and that the school board attorney had signed his name to papers without his knowledge.^[25]

At the August 26, 1927 conference of the Chicago Board of Education members, President J. Lewis Coath declared it was time to oust McAndrew, saying, "you all know my position concerning Superintendent McAndrew. Recent developoments have made it advisable to take action at once. Get started."^[21] That same day, McAndrew was also attacked by a Dever appointee on the Board, Charles J. Vopicka, for rejecting Vopicka's foreign language education plan, indicating McAndrew to be in even weaker standing than before with the Chicago Board of Education.^[21] The following day, the Chicago Tribune reported that McAndrew's only apparent remaining supporters on the board were Helen M. Hefferan, James Mullenbach, Walter J. Raymer, and Otto L. Schmidt.^[21]

On August 29, 1927, James Todd, the attorney of the Chicago Board of Education, presented charges against McAndrew of insubordination (due to his support of the school clerks) and "conduct incompatible and inconsistent with, and in direct violation" of his duties. Todd had been directed by the board's president, J. Lewis Coath to prepare such charges against McAndrew. That same day, by a 6–5 vote, the board voted to suspend McAndrew and charge him with insubordination pending a public administrative hearing to be held before the board for the purposes of deciding whether to remove McAndrew from office.^{[20][26][27][28][29][30]} In suspending him, they installed William J. Bogan in August as acting superintendent to carry out the duties during his suspension.^[31][26]

McAndrew refused to resign, by which means he could have avoided an administrative hearing.^[20] He declared, "They'll fire me alright, but they'll have to stage a burlesque show to do it."^[20] On September 29, 1927, the day the administrative hearing was set to begin, the school board added additional charges that McAndrew had contaminated the school curriculum with British propaganda.^[27] McAndrew's lawyers protested these charges, and requested thirty days to study them before the administrative hearing.^[27] This request was denied by Chicago Board of Education president J. Lewis Coath, and the administrative hearing began that day as scheduled.^[27] He was read sixteen charges of insubordination, including a charge stemming from allegations of unpatriotic actions at his arraignment, and pleaded not guilty to any acts which would be grounds for his removal.^[32][33]

This was not the first time that Thompson or a school board composed of his appointees had conspired to oust a superintendent. An ouster of Charles Ernest Chadsey had occurred during Thompson's first mayoralty, which would result in several school board members being charged in Cook County Circuit Court of conspiracy.^[34]

Details of the formal motion to suspend McAndrew[]

The formal motion to suspend McAndrew had originated with Board of Education Trustee James A. Hemingway,^[35] whose resolution read,

I, James A. Hemingway, a citizen of the city of Chicago and a member of the board of education, hereby prefer against William McAndrew, superintendent of schools, charges of insubordination and conduct incompatible with and inconsistent with, and in direct violation of, his duties as superintendent of schools, an executive officer of the board of education of the city of Chicago."^[35]

This was followed by a list of charges related to McAndrew's testmony as a witness for the teachers.^[35] The principal clause read,

"The said William McAndrew, in total disregard of the directions and instructions imposed upon him by the board of education, has omitted, failed, neglected, and refused to comply with the provision of the resolution (ordering techer-clerks placed under the civil service) and herinbefore set forth, directing him to forthwith arrange for the transfer to instructional work of all members of the teaching force who had been assigned to any other line of work, and further directing the superintendnent of schools to forthwith make requisition for the certification by the civil service commission of such employees as might be neccessary to carry on all clerical and business administrative activities of the educational department."^[35]

The motion did not include any mention of the allegations of pro-British propaganda. This came after James Todd threatened to drop his charges, "if any of that bunk is brought up."^[35]

Vote[]

Sixteen counts of indictment[]

The sixteen counts of indictment leveled against McAndrew were:^[46]

1. That William McAndrew recommended history textbooks which contained pro-British propaganda and which omitted the names and exploits of many foreign and native born heroes of the American revolutionary war, and which were recommended by the said William McAndrew for the purpose of promoting propaganda for the English Speaking union. That said textbooks teach the continental congress was a collection of quarrelcome, petty-fogging lawyers and mechanics.
2. That the said William McAndrew caused the text books to be recommended for the purpose of causing the Declaration of Independence to be regarded as old fashioned.
3. That he, for the purpose of perverting and distorting the ideals and patriotic instincts of the school children of Chicago, caused to be removed from the walls of the schools the picture "The Spirit of '76"
4. That he refused to recommend to the board that the school children be permitted to donate small amounts of money for the purpose of reconditioning the famous American battleship, "Old Ironsides"
5. The he enterred into conspiracy with Charles E. Merriam, Charles H. Judd (professor of history at the University of Chicago) and others to destroy love of America in the hearts of children by encouring teachers to attend special classes at the University of Chicago at which a textbook was used which pictured George Washinton as a rebel and a great disloyalist. That said teachers would mold these pro-British ideals into the souls of the children they instructed.
6. That he was insubordinate, insolent, and domineering in his attitude toward the members of the board, particularly in that he disregarded the board's orders regarding the nomination of a member to the board of examiners.
7. That he refused to call meetings of the teachers' councils.
8. That he hindered the withdrawal of a text book written by a member of the Chicago school system, and used in violation of law in Chicago schools.
9. That he delayed the transfer of Genevieve Cook, a teacher.
10. That he repeatedly absented himself from duty without leave.
11. That he left his office frequently to go on lecture tours, for which he was paid $100 a day and expenses.
12. That he acted as editor of educational publications which are subsidized by a certain firm of school book publishers, and thereby deeply obligated himself to publishers interested in getting their textbooks approved for school use.
13. That he introduced a program of education which caused confusion and impaired morale of teachers.
14. That he rejected all plans which were not his own invention.
15. That he employe various persons without holding of examinations
16. That he frequently refused to comply with exact and implicit orders of the board.

Hearing schedule[]

27 hearings were held over the course of months.^[27][23] In mid-December, during the fourteenth week of the hearing, the Chicago Board of Education moved to allow nighttime sessions of the hearing to be held.^[47]

Legal counsel[]

McAndrew's attorneys were (former Chicago corporation counsel) and Angus Roy Shannon (former attorney for the Chicago Board of Education). Frank S. Righeimer served as the Chicago Board of Education's representative in the administrative hearing.^[48][49][50]

Opening of hearing[]

In every roll call vote held by the board on the opening day of the administrative hearing, at least six members (Barndenburg, Coath, Durante, English, Schmid, and Hemingway) voted against every action favored by McAndrew and his attorneys, with a seventh (Vopicka) rotating between sides. Four, (Hefferan, Mullenbach, Raymer, and Schmidt) voted in support of McAndrew's side on these votes.^[46] McAndrew's team pushed for an expedient hearing process, with daily hearings, but were denied this, with the next hearings being postponed until October 6, 1927.^[46] McAndrew's lawyers argued that Coath's past statements were prejudicial, and made him unfit to preside or be a party to the trial. However, the board members voted Coath fit to preside.^[46] Similarly, McAndrew's lawyers argued that Board of Education trustee Hemingway was unfit to try the charges, as he had been the one to present them. The board also voted him fit to try the charges.^[46] On the opening day, McAndrew opted not to speak once. Even when asked to how he pled, McAndrew remained silient, having his lawyers plead "not guilty" on his behalf.^[46]

McAndrew's attendance/absence[]

During the first weeks of proceedings, McAndrew sat, often reading a newspaper.^[48][20] On October 24, 1927, a hearing was canceled when McAndrew failed to show. Before the proceedings were canceled, Chicago Board of Education attorney Righeimer asked "what is the superintendent doing that is more important than this trial", to which McAndrew's attorney Shannon retorted, "anything is more important than this trial". It would be revealed the following day that McAndrew had been out of the city for a speaking engagement.^[49][51] On November 23, 1927, after six weeks, a fed-up McAndrew stood and asked whether the board would actually address the specific charge they had brought against him. Receiving no answer, he left, declaring that he would return if the Board desired to dismiss the charges.^{[52][20][48][53]} He issued the ultimatum that he would not return until the board took up the specific charges made against him.^[53] The administrative hearing would go on with McAndrew in absentia.^[52][20] McAndrew's lawyers joined him in refusing to attend the hearings.^[54]

During the final hearing date he attended (November 23, 1927),^[53] McAndrew attempted to have the Board read a statement he had written.^[32] The statement, in part, read,

"It is now seven months since the new mayor in his official inaugural address declared his intention, though he has no proper jurisdiction over the schools, to proceed to oust the superintendent...It is now nearly five months since your president and five members voted to charge me with insubordination and improper conduct in having entered into an unlawful confederacy with certain employees of the board, designated as extra teachers....Instead of trying me on the alleged misdemeanor for which I was suspended, you have permitted to be added a host of irrelevant allegations....The repeated published assertion of your president that he will put the superintendent out, the degradation of your school system in the eyes of the entire country by editorial condemnation of the trial as a farce and vaudeville; the cloud of aspersion you permit to remain upon you best teachers that they recommended to the superintendent the adoption of poisoned books; the effect on your school children of the continued characterization of your proceedings as a travesty on justice; the repeated and uncontradicted editorial designation of his trial as before a packed jury and an admittedly prejudicial judge, all lead me to desire to escape being a party to the continuance of what is almost universally regarded as a burlesque."^[55]

Arguments[]

British propaganda allegations[]

Much of the trial's testimony was centered on the allegations that McAndrew placed British propaganda in the city's schools.^[56] Witnesses alleged that British propagandists had effectively taken over the Chicago educational system under McAndrew.^[52] Witnesses criticized the use of texts, including texts written by Arthur M. Schlesinger Sr.^[12] Among the witnesses that testified in the administrative hearing were three pseudo-historians, who each went on long rants attacking history textbooks in use in Chicago schools. The textbooks attacked by these three witnesses, however, were standard fare, and were widely utilized in schools across the United States.^[48] At the November 16, 1927 hearing session, McAndrew refused to provide an answer when Righeimer asked him to confirm or deny whether he or not he had recommended a textbook by Edward F. McLaughlin which had been characterized during the trial as portraying a British viewpoint on the American Revolution.^[57]

On one occasion, Helen Hefferan, a Chicago Board of Trustee supporting McAndrew, held up a 1921 newspaper during the trial which featured an article alleging a conspiracy to litter textbooks with British propaganda. This was an effort by her to highlight that such charges were made in 1921, while Thompson was serving in his first tenure as mayor, and that Thompson took no action nor complained about this until much later. Hefferan was scolded by Coath, accused her of acting in "very bad taste" and making "prejudicial statements".^[58]

During the early weeks of the administrative hearing, which McAndrew and his lawyers attended, the board read a letter written to them by Thompson, naming a number of Polish, German, and other ethnic "heroes" that he demanded to be taught in the city's schools.^[48] A moment which drew national attention during the administrative hearing saw Righeimer yell at McAndrew, "and you left out of the schools the name of that great hero, Ethan Allen, who said he had only one life to give for his country!" In response to this, Busch remarked, "It was Nathan Hale who said it."^[59] This exchange elicited laughter in the courtroom and ridicule, not only due to Righeimer's misattribution of a quote associated with Hale to Allen, but also because many were unfamiliar with Allen, and did not see him as the high-stature historical figure Righeimer was implying him to be.^[48][59]

Figures from fictitious organizations such as the "Anti-British Citizens Committee on School Histories" testified in the administrative hearing.^[48]

McAndrew was accused, in his indictment and during the course of the administrative hearing, of nefariously conspiring with the English-Speaking Union.^[46][48] McAndrew was a member of the English-Speaking Union.^[60]

Allegations were levied by Thompson allies that McAndrew was conspiring with Charles Edward Merriam and others at the University of Chicago (decried as a "stronghold of King George") to, "destroy love of America in the hearts of children".^[23] During the administrative hearing, it was revealed that Thompson had, during his campaign, hired a court reporter to pose student and spy on a University of Chicago professor who was teaching a history class that had been recommended for public school teachers.^[12] This spy reported that the professor had called George Washington a "rebel" and referred to the Boston Tea Party as a "vandal raid".^[12]

The American Library Association, which had been headed by a Canadian, was accused of being a distributor of British propaganda.^[12][23] The Chicago Public Library's association with the Association became of issue in the administrative hearing.^[12] Also of issue was the fact that Great Britain had once donated books to Chicago in the aftermath of the 1871 Great Chicago Fire.^[23]

Allegations were levied that Cecil Rhodes, who had founded the Rhodes Scholarship program, was conspiring to unite all English-speaking people under the control of Britain.^[23] Some witnesses even speculated of an impending war between Britain and the United States.^[23] Other organizations invoked and attacked in the course of the administrative hearing included Columbia University and the Carnegie Corporation.^[12]

Alleged unpatriotic actions of McAndrew[]

From the start of the administrative hearing, witnesses were brought before the board to testify about McAndrew, regularly testifying of his supposed "un-Americanism".^[52][20] Among the allegations made wasthat McAndrew had made derisive comments about the Boston Tea Party and that he ordered the removal of prints of The Spirit of '76 from schools.^[20]

McAndrew was painted as anti-American for disallowing fundraising in the city's schools for the restoration of the USS Constitution.^[20] In May 1926, McAndrew had denied a request by the United States Navy to allow them to fundraise for the restoration of the USS Constitution by soliciting contributions from students in the schools. The Chicago Tribune editorial board, at the time, had praised McAndrew for this decision on the grounds that they believed that financial solicitations of any kind had no place in the city's public schools.^[61]

Allegations of misconduct by McAndrew[]

When questioned under oath by Righeimer on October 6, 1927, McAndrew admitted to having removed some documents from the Chicago Board of Education's files in order to prepare his defense. Coath another other McAndrew foes claimed that his removal of documents was an outright indicator of guilt. Harry T. Baker, an executive assistant to the office of the superintendent of schools, admitted in his testimony to giving some files to McAndrew (the following day Baker would see retribution from the Chicago Board of Ecuation by being installed principal of the city's southernmost school, Mount Greenwood, which was considered an undesirable job). It became known that anyone seen as giving McAndrew aid or comfort could see retribution from Coath.^[58]

McAndrew critics, during the early weeks of the trial, called McAndrew's regular refusal to answer questions (on advice of his counsel) as greatly improper, as they argued he was defying superior officers (the trustees of the Chicago Board of Education) since he was still the superintendent of schools.^[58] Righeimer warned, "this trial board has no right to punish you for contempt, Mr. McAndrew, but it certainly will consider your conduct in refusing to give important information when the time comes to pass on your case.^[58]

Witnesses corroborated the charges that McAndrew made out of town trips to deliver lectures.^[58] They also testified that, while he was on these trips, McAndrew had instructed office employees to mislead those attempted to reach him by telephone by claiming the reason he was not in the office was that he was, "out in the schools".^[58]

Two stenographers testified that McAndrew had had them perform work on during office hours for a magazine he was editing.^[58]

McAndrew was accused of fraud, with several principals alleging that he had disregarded the results of examinations for high positions, and instead appointed those he personally favored.^[62]

Other allegations[]

Even mundane attacks were taken against McAndrew. One teacher spent to time testify that McAndrew had poor grammar, occasionally punctuating sentences with the exclamations "I betcha" and "O, Lord".^[63]

Witness testimonies[]

In total, over the course of the 27 hearings, more than 100 witnesses tesified.^[27][23] This amounted to more than 6,000 pages of testimony.^[23] Those who testified included more than 80 principals, teachers, and school officials.^[48] Many of the witnesses were recruited by Thompson to strengthen his charges of propaganda.^[27] Much of the testimony was centered on the allegations that McAndrew placed British propaganda in the city's schools.^[56] From the start of the administrative hearing, witnesses were brought before the board to testify about McAndrew, regularly testifying of his supposed "un-Americanism".^[52][20] They also alleged that British propagandists had effectively taken over the Chicago educational system under McAndrew.^[52]

John J. Gorman[]

John J. Gorman

Thompson-appointed special corporation counsel and ex-congressman John J. Gorman testified over the course of the administrative hearing as one of its chief witnesses against McAndrew.^[64]

As a witness accusing McAndrew of placing British propaganda in the school curriculum, John J. Gorman attacked McAndrew for the use of books written by Herbert B. Cornish, David B. Corson, David Saville Muzzey, and Arthur M. Schlesinger Sr.^[27][65][60] Gorman specifically issued cticicisms of Muzzey's book American History and Schesinger's New Viewpoints of American History.^[64][60] Gorman alleged that all but one history textbook used in Chicago Public Schools was pro-British, and alleged that McAndrew had directly approved all of these textbooks.^[66]

Gorman also alleged that the English-Speaking Union had played a role in McAndrew's appointment as superintendent in Chicago, and his earlier placement in a leadership position in New York City Public Schools.^[65]

John J. Gorman accused the University of Chicago of being a "hotbed of un-American and pro-British teachings".^[12] Two weeks later, he further testified that the university was a "British cast" and a stronghold for pro-British propaganda.^[12]

Gorman also alleged that McAndrew had been conspiring with King George since his previous tenure working in New York City Public Schools.^[65] He named the Rhodes Scholarship program and the Carnegie Foundation as programs which were in on the conspiracy. He even attempted to draw a supposed link from the fact that King George, the late Andrew Carnegie, and McAndrew all had facial hair.^[65]

Trustees of the Chicago Board of Education that supported McAndrew questioned Gorman's credentials as, "an expert".^[66]

Frederick Bausman[]

On October 20, 1927, , a former justice of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, testified as the chief witness.^[67][60][68] In his testimony, Bausman did not once mention McAndrew's name.^[60] Bausman also declared, "I know nothing of your local school books."^[60] He did not mention of McAndrew or Chicago schools, outside of praising the stance taken by Mayor Thompson.^[69] Instead of focusing on McAndrew and Chicago schools, Bausman's testimony instead focused on alleging British propaganda was of great threat to the United States in general.^[60][69] He accused the American Library Association of being an agent of propaganda, alleging that its Canadian president George Locke had been the director of propaganda for the British Government during World War I.^[60] Bauman also attacked the English-Speaking Union.^[60] Bausman stated that, "wealthy classes in Europe have tremendous influence at Columbia and Princeton universities," implying that wealthy Europeans had led an effort that saw pro-British textbooks written at these American universities.^[69]

Bausman attacked the United Kingdom for having "beguiled" the United States into entering World War I.^[60][69] Rigeimer, in examining Bausman, got Bausman to state that he was born in Pittsburgh and had a British mother, in an effort to assuade any allegations that Bausman was a German sympathizer.^[67][60]

Charles Grant Miller[]

Charles Grant Miller, the president of the Patriotic League of the Preservation of American History, was the sole witness at the November 14, 1927 hearing date. Miller substantiated John J. Gorman's allegations that British propaganda had infiltrated the city's history curriculum.^[70]

On November 14, Miller also made allegations that the framing histories related to the relations of Great Britain and the United States were heavily altered between 1918 and 1921, when new an updated textbooks were published to include World War I.^[70] Miller claimed that, in 1921, historians such as Andrew C. McLaughlin (head of the University of Chicago's American history department), Carlton J. H. Hayes (of Columbia University), David S. Muzzey, and Willis M. West dined together at the Savoy Hotel in London, England, claiming that they and 100 other history authors had been, "wined and dined at the expense of the British Government in such a degree of gratitude as to provoke proteste in Parliament at the extravagance."^[70]

In his November 30, 1927 testimony, Miller made Rupert Hughes a new focus of attack.^[71]

Charles Edward Russell[]

Charles Edward Russell^[71] On November 16, 1927, Russell delivered testimony which the Chicago Tribune as a as a three-hour lecture.^[57] In his testimony, Russell alleged that the English-Speaking Union was the "most dangerous organization in the world", claiming, "the world is threatened now with the greatest menace–the advance of the Anglo-Saxon".^[23][57] Russell declared that the push for a closer alliance between the United States and United Kingdom, "is drawing the world into two hostile camps, the Anglo-Saxon and the Latin. By foolishly listening we have already alienated nearly all of South America.^[57] In his testmony that day, Russell, at great length, also attacked numerous history texts.^[57]

Media coverage and public reaction[]

The administrative hearing attracted both national and international attention from the media, being treated as a ridiculous example of Chicago's messy politics.^[52][20][72] It was viewed by many as a ridiculous spectacle, in a similar vein to the Scopes Trial.^[52][23] Time characterized the Chicago Board of Education as, "a partial set of false teeth in Mayor William Hale Thompson's capable mouth", writing that they had, "orders to chew up Superintendent McAndrew".^[32] W.A.S. Douglas of The Baltimore Sun dubbed the administrative hearing, "Chicago's great serial comedy-drama".^[65] The press referred to Mayor Thompson in derisive terms, dubbing him a "clown", "buffoon", and a "braying jackass".^[73] At a November 1927 state convention of school board officials, a speech written by McAndrew (read in his absence) received significant applause in support of McAndrew.^[57]

In a January 1928 article, the Chicago Tribune wrote that the administrative hearing was setting precedents in Chicago, "that no superintendent of schools may, with security, get in the way of politics. If he obstruct a politician's path he will be in trouble," and, "that no superintendent who cares for his peace and his tenure of office will put his ideas of teaching and school management in opposition to the ideas of the principals and teachers." The Chicago Tribune found both of these to be, "to the detriment of the schools".^[74]

During the administrative hearing, McAndrew lacked the support of the unionized teachers, as they did not approve of the strict rules that he, as superintendent, had put in place for teachers.^[52] The Women's City Club supported McAndrew, having adopted a resolution demanding his reinstatement as superintendent.^[46] On October 27, they adopted another resolution which demanded that McAndrew be provided an immediate trial of the specific charge for which he was suspended.^[75]

In December 1929, the Chicago Tribune reflected on the administrative hearing, writing,

"a trial was conceived and conducted under a buffoon judge, J. Lewis Coath. The result was never in doubt. The disreputable members of the board had pledged their votes against McAndrew, so that the school should be restored to the Thompson feed box. Two honorable members voted for McAndrew, while eight voted at Thompson's behest. Immediately after the expulsion of the distinguished superintendent the great raid upon the schools was started. Appointments to the educational and administrative departments were dictated by Thompson's precinct captains. Capable abd experienced members of the school system were dismissed to make room for wretched election huslers......Now the school system is bankrupt. With McAndrew out of the way they took everything in sight and are now confessing helplessness to carry on the education of the children."^[18]

Coinciding developments[]

During the administrative hearing, Chicago City Solicitor wrote Chicago Board of Education member a letter demanding that he resign due to his defense of McAndrew. Peska declared that Raymer did not represent the attitude of the Polish residents living in Peska's ward of the city.^[76]

In response to John J. Gorman's written report to the mayor and his testimony during the administrative hearing about textbooks authored by David Saville Muzzey, Muzzey filed a $100,000 damage/libel lawsuit against Gorman in United States District Court in October 1927, accusing Gorman of "widedly and maliciously" making an effort to expose him to public hatred, contempt, and disparagement in his testimony.^[50][64][76]

In reaction to the allegations brought against the University of Chicago in the administrative hearing, on November 11, 1927, J. Lewis Coath banned articles written by University of Chicago faculty from being published in the Chicago Board of Education's publication, Chicago Schools Journal, and the following month's edition of the publication would feature a title page promoting an "America First" campaign.^[12]

In November, 1927, officials of the Chicago Board of Education announced that the purchase of history textbooks for students was being halted until it could be ensured that books of proper patriotism could be purchased.^[57] Soon after, Coath proposed the possibility of the Chicago Board of Education publishing its own history books.^[77]

In December 1927, exporter John F. McKeon alleged that the anti-British campaign of Thompson had lost manufacturers and exporters in the city of Chicago $1.5 million in business from Australia.^[76]

Chicago Public Library censorship effort[]

On October 21, 1927, the day after Frederick Bausman's testimony included attacks on the American Library Association, Thompson made a request to the board of the Chicago Public Library's board that they take a look at U.S. history books in the library, writing, "I would like to have you make a careful inventory of Chicago's Public Library to determine if there are pro-British propaganda books in the library."^[68] While the library board attempted to descretely refer the matter to a subcommittee, the city press learned of it. Thompson, who enjotyed publicity, seized on the news reports, and promised reporters he would burn books that were "unamerican".^[68] Thompson tasked Urbine J. "Sport" Herrmann (a close friend of Thompson's and appointee of his to the board of the Chicago Public Library) with examining the library's books for "pro-British" works.^[12][23][48] During the administrative hearing, Hermann announced that he would conduct a book burning of pro-British books on the city's lakefront.^[78] Thompson joined in, threatening to burn any book in the library found to have a single passage of "pro-British propaganda" in a lakefront bonfire. These plans were faced with two injunctions.^[49]

The threat of book burning had received criticism from notable individuals, such as Clarence Darrow, who called it, "probably the most infinitely stupid thing ever suggested".^[23][68] A public backlash arose to the idea of book burning and general censorship.^[12] However, some supported it. The state chapter of the Ku Klux Klan applauded the book censorship efforts of Thompson, and encouraged him to expand this to a full effort against books related to Catholics and Jews.^[12] Fredrick Rex, the head of the city's Municipal Reference Library, agreed to clear his collection of "pro-British" books, and claimed that his library had previously been the recipient of such propaganda from both the English-Speaking Union and the Carnegie Corporation and that he would hand over such works to Herrmann immediately. Days later, Rex claimed that he had destroyed all the books, pamphlets, and letters in the library's collection that were of a pro-British nature.^[12]

In an effort to prevent the burning of books, head librarian Carl B. Roden (who had recently been elected president of the American Library Association) made the suggestion of the books labeled "pro-British" being placed in a cage, only to be read under the supervision of "mature" historians.^[12][23][68] Roden's proposed compromise was endorsed by a pro-Thompson newspaper, but was mocked and decried by other newspapers, such as the Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Evening Post.^[68] The New York World called Roden's response to Thompson and Urbine as, "spineless," and, "particularly timid and uninspiring".^[68]

Ultimately, it would take court injunctions to put an end to the Chicago Public Library's censorship activities.^[12] Two local lawyers had successfully sued, noting that Chicago's city code named damaging library books a felony.^[68] While the promised lakefront bonfire never took place, this episode gave Chicago a period of notoriety as being perceived as, what the Chicago Tribune would retrospectively describe as, "the book-burning capital of the free world".^[23]

While he was facing backlash and legal challenges for his efforts to burn books, Thompson denied that he had ever promised to burn books, and disavowed book burning. He declared that he was an emphatic defender of free speech.^[49] During the October 27, 1927 hearing, John J. Gorman testified that Thompson found it regrettable that the mayor's "America First" message had been sullied by the "false reports" about book burnings.^[79] Despite this, he continued to send letters to the library's board objecting to "pro-British" materials in the Chicago Public Library's collection.^[49]

Verdict[]

McAndrew's contract as superintendent expired January 9, 1928, and was not renewed.^[80][81] However, Chicago Board of Education President J. Lewis Coath stated that the administrative hearing would continue.^[82] On March 21, 1928, already two months after McAndrew's term as superintendent had expired, the board found him guilty.^[20] The vote to convict him was 8–2, with one member absent (Otto L. Schmidt, who had been anticipated to vote against conviction).^[27][56][83]

The resolution adopted to convict McAndrew was twenty-pages long, and claimed that proof had been presented, "of what William Hale Thompson originally brought to the attention of the public, evidence that there is organized pro-British and anti-American propaganda of stupendous proprtions in our country with deep ramification extending to and thru schools and colleges." The resolution made the recommendation that school boards across the United States, "investigate the text books under their jurisdiction to the end that treason tainted textbooks and those responsible for them may be eliminated from the public school systems of the country." The resolution stated that the propaganda is traceable to the English-Speaking Union, Cecil Rhodes Scholarship Foundation, and the Andrew Carnegie Foundation.^[56][84]

Vote by member[]

Post-hearing developments[]

Verdict voided in Superior Court of Cook County[]

McAndrew's lawyers immediately petitioned for a writ of certiorari to review the administrative hearing.^[27] McAndrew also filed lawsuits against the Board of Education for salary lost and Thompson for libel and slander (suing Thompson for the amount of $250,000).^[20][54] Less than two years after the administrative hearing, in December 1929, Judge Hugo Pam of the Superior Court of Cook County ruled the decision by the Board of Education void.^[52][20][27] Pam ruled that McAndrew had not been insubordinate, and that the school board lacked the authority to have tried him for the additional charge stemming from the allegations of pro-British propaganda.^[27] Pam dubbed the allegations of pro-British conduct levied against McAndrew, "improper".^[23] After this, McAndrew dropped his two lawsuits.^[52][20][27]

Other developments[]

Author David Saville Muzzey also filed a lawsuit against Thompson and the Chicago Board of Education.^[84]

On October 11, 1929, John J. Gorman wrote an apology letter David Saville Muzzey admitting that he had never actually read his textbook American History (which he had attacked during the administrative hearing), and that the sworn statements he had made were, in fact, written by someone else. He claimed to have been misled, and to have now realized there was nothing to criticize in Muzzey's textbooks.^{[27][64][86][87]} After Gorman issued this apology, Muzzey withdrew his libel lawsuit against Gorman.^[64] However, soon after John J. Gorman wrote his apology letter to Muzzey, Chicago Board of Education member James Mullenbach read the letter into the Board's official record and introduced a resolution that would have seen the Chicago Board of Education apologize to Chicagoans for wasting their money on McAndrew's "so-called trial", to Muzzey for the accusations the Board of Education raised against him, and to Charles H. Judd and Charles E. Merriam for accusing them of conspiring against the city's children. However, this resolution was buried in committee.^[86][87] Mullenbach also called for the Cook County state's attorney and the Chicago Bar Association to take note that Gorman had admitted to perjury.^[87] Ultimately, in December 1931, the Supreme Court of Illinois disbarred Gorman.^[86]

References[]

Works cited[]

• Counts, George S. (1928). School and Society in Chicago (1978 reprint ed.). Arno Press , Inc. ISBN 040503704X.
• Herrick, Mary J. (1971). The Chicago Schools: A Social and Political History. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications. ISBN 080390083X.
• Tarvardian, Arthur Norman (1992). "Battle Over the Chicago Schools: The Superintendency of William Mcandrew". Loyola University Chicago. Retrieved March 11, 2020.