Revolutionary spontaneity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Part of a series on
Left communism
Liste 1924 - 19.svg
hide
Concepts
Movements
People
Organizations
Related topics
  • Symbol-hammer-and-sickle.svg Communism portal
  • Red flag II.svg Socialism portal
  • A coloured voting box.svg Politics portal
  • v
  • t

Revolutionary spontaneity, also known as spontaneism, is a revolutionary socialist tendency that believes the social revolution can and should occur spontaneously from below by the working class itself, without the aid or guidance of a vanguard party and that it cannot and should not be brought about by the actions of individuals such as professional revolutionaries or political parties who might attempt to foment such a revolution.

In his work What Is to Be Done? (1902), Vladimir Lenin argued fiercely against revolutionary spontaneity as a dangerous revisionist concept that strips away the disciplined nature of Marxist political thought and leaves it arbitrary and ineffective.[1] Rosa Luxemburg and the Spartacist League which had attempted to overturn capitalism during the 1919 German Revolution would become main targets of Lenin's attacks after World War I.[2]

Spontaneism remained a popular theory in opposition to the Third International's democratic centralism and influenced the autonomist movement in the 1970s. Its influences can be felt in some parts of today's alter-globalization movement.[citation needed]

Mao-Spontex[]

The term Mao-Spontex refers to a political movement in the Marxist and libertarian movements in Western Europe from 1960 to 1970. The neologism is composed of Maoist and revolutionary spontaneity/spontaneist. Thus, the complete and accurate writing of this term would be Mao-spontaneity.[citation needed]

Mao-Spontex came to represent an ideology promoting the ideas of Maoism, along with some ideas from Marxism and Leninism, but rejecting the total idea of Marxism–Leninism. Lenin's work What Is to Be Done? especially is criticized as dated and Lenin's critique of spontaneity is rejected. Lenin's idea of democratic centralism is supported as a way to organize a party, but a party must also have constant conflict inside of it to remain revolutionary. The revolutionary party discussed must also always be from a mass worker's movement.[3]

See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ Lenin, Vladimir (1901). What Is to Be Done?. "The Spontaneity of the Masses and the Consciousness of the Social Democrats". Marxists Internet Archive. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
  2. ^ Kurasje Council Communism. "Spontaneity and Organisation". Marxists Internet Archive. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
  3. ^ "Investigation into the Maoists in France". Marxists Internet Archive. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
Retrieved from ""