Space diplomacy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The International Space Station, representing the collaboration of multiple nations in the exploration of space.

Science diplomacy and space, or Space diplomacy refers to the integration of the collaboration of the knowledge, technology, and legislation involved in science diplomacy with the expanded exploration of space. As diplomatic relationships are integral to the mitigation of various health, scientific, natural or technological issues across nations, space diplomacy is a growing field in which various nations can come to a consensus on what is fair when it comes to the exploration and commercialization of space travel.[1] Space travel is a necessary resource for people around the world, especially when considering the use of satellites in areas like research or telecommunications.[1] With the human exploration of space, there are growing issues, such as environmental concerns and pollution or the monopolization of space travel. Science diplomacy in the area of space allows for such concerns to be taken into account, as country officials, scientists, environmental activists, and private corporations can come together and allow for both national and private space exploration to prosper in countries around the world.

International Space Law[]

Established international laws and regulations[]

Outer space is one of the four identified "global commons", along with the ocean, the atmosphere, and Antarctica.[2] Though the definition of what is a global domain is changing with time and inclusivity, these four domains represent aspects of the environment are the "common heritage of mankind," and are resources that should be shared with all members of Earth; in other words, no nation has claim and that the resources associated with these domains should be preserved for everyone.[2] Current international regulations to protect space as a global common and for space travel have been set by the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, which governs that space exploration and the use of celestial bodies remain used for “peaceful purposes” and for scientific research, as established in Resolution 2222 (XXI).[3] The treaty states that no country will be able to achieve sovereign control on regions of space.[4] Consequently, the treaty requires that the use of space should be carried out as a resource of all people.[5] Space law itself is relatively new as a branch of international law, encompassing the need to designate the access and freedom to explore space.[4] Especially with the establishment of the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) in 1959, participating countries within the United Nations have worked throughout the years to establish five main international treaties to regulate further human expansion into space.[4] These treaties include the rescue agreement, the international liability for damage, the registrations of whatever is sent into space, and the moon agreement, which regulates the activities done on celestial bodies.[6] Other agreements aside from the main five were also established in efforts to avoid the use of military weapons of mass destruction in space, such as the, the Partial Test Ban Treaty of 1963, which bans the testing of nuclear based weapons on domains such as space, water, and the atmosphere.[7]

Rising pressure to reform space law treaties and principles[]

As the Outer Space Treaty was signed in 1967 as a consequence of the space race between the United States and the Soviet Union, continuous updates to the international agreement to space accounts for the great expansion of space travel in the past 20 years.[8][9] Despite the attempts of preserving space as a global common, demands due to technological and science advancements in space, including space exploration and private spaceflight, like the other global commons domains, have been threatening the guidelines set by the Outer Space Treaty.[2] The “NewSpace” sector of private industry, which refers to the civilian space activities funded by companies such as SpaceX, has been an increasingly competitive entity in the exploration and commercialization of space travel.[9] Representing a contemporaneous space race, the growing network of privatized space flight requires legislation that would facilitate the union between both the public and private sectors of space travel and research across nations.[9] Coupled with growing orbital and suborbital launches across the world, there is a growing need to reform the established legislation set by the United Nations.[8] Another consideration for law reformation is the increase in space trash and debris as a result of international orbital launches and exploration.[10]

The Outer Space Treaty and other principles of space law bans the use or testing of weapons of mass destruction, such as nuclear warheads, including in stations in the Earth's orbit.[3] Yet, it is still possible for a nation to participate in space military activities, such as the launching of a nuclear missile through space.[10] Aside from private spaceflight or rover launches in the field of research, nations around the world have recognized the potential to use the domain of space for military defense.[9] For example, the United States and Russia, a couple of the main actors in the current space race, have not signed the Moon Agreement, and so have not agreed to the stipulations of the peaceful treatment of celestial bodies.[4][11] Signed under the Trump administration in December 2019, the Space Force represents a new branch of the Defense Department and served to establish formal military jurisdiction in the Earth's orbit.[12] The release of the 2020 Defense Space Strategy represents another effort by the United States to expand the national military and defense into space.[13] Other nations have also been involved in security considerations, such as the effort by the nations within the European Union to establish its own policies towards space security.[14] This collaboration of European countries builds upon current shared policies while prioritizing sustainability and security of space travel.

Prevention of the militarization of space[]

The members of the UN have been discussing provisions to the Outer Space Treaty since the 1980s.[15] In 1981, the Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space was presented by the UN general assembly and has been discussed during the Conference on Disarmament as a resolution that reestablishes the principles of peace outlined in the original Outer Space Treaty.[15] However, due to the clash between the priorities of the UN members, discussions for a Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space initiative have never come to full fruition.[15] In 2008, both China and Russia drafted and proposed the Prevention of an Arms Race in Space Treaty, which would serve to reaffirm the principles of the Other Space Treaty, while also preventing the militarization of space.[16]

Space Privatization[]

Over the past few decades, the space environment dramatically changed as private companies entered the space exploration domain as opposed to the sector being preserved solely by the government and its space agencies such as NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA). Unlike the space race that occurred between the United States and Russia, this new era of the space race is accelerated by the competition of customers. Private companies in many nations have been involved in the satellite market for many years and their efforts have paved the way for many entrepreneurs to develop their own vision and contribution to space exploration.

Privatization in the United States[]

The US space industry is composed of four sectors: (1) defense (2) intelligence, (3) commercial, and (4) civil space sectors.[17] Space privatization is associated with the commercial space sector. For the most part, the US national launch infrastructure has been privatized or leased to companies such as SpaceX, Blue Origin, Virgin Galactic, Bigelow Aerospace, Sierra Nevada Corporation.[18] These competitors are focused on reducing the cost of access to space, through reuse of launchers and spacecraft, making space accessible to people and not just trained astronauts.[19]

SpaceX[]

SpaceX was created in 2002 by entrepreneur, engineer, and inventor Elon Musk with the mission of taking humans to Mars and revolutionizing space technology.[20] Within the past couple of decades, the company specialized in the manufacture and launch of rockets that directly competed with the United Launch Alliance, the contract holder for the launch of NASA and Department of Defense rocket launches.[20] SpaceX was the first private company to dock a ship at the International Space Station (ISS) with the development of the Falcon 9 launch and Dragon spacecraft.[19] SpaceX designed the Falcon Heavy to not only launch future satellites into space and carry cargo, but to launch people to destinations like the moon, or even Mars.[20] SpaceX's ability to design a successful orbital transport system and Falcon 9 launch success at one-third the price of a traditional NASA-contracted launch demonstrates the private-sector capability to fulfill many current NASA functions at a fraction of the cost.[19] Such achievement frees up NASA to concentrate on its core research and exploration missions in space and allows the private sector to invest in self-sustaining space-based industry.

Blue Origin[]

Blue Origin was founded by Amazon's CEO, Jeff Bezos, in September 2000, with the goal of making space travel more accessible and cheaper through reusable launch systems.[21] Unlike SpaceX, Blue Origin wishes to target the space tourism industry. The company development a vertical launch vehicle, called the New Shepard, that could reach an altitude of 100 km and descend back to Earth by landing vertically.[21] Blue Origin has also created The New Glenn rocket which is a reusable heavy-lift launch vehicle that can carry payload to orbit.[21] Both innovations by Blue Origin demonstrate the competition that is occurring in the private sector. Similar to Elon Musk's intention with SpaceX, Bezos wishes to make innovations that will allow future generations to inhabit space. Specifically, Blue Origin's goal is to promote future generations to construct a space station in orbit around Earth, perpetually in motion to produce artificial gravity, where humans would re-create cities, national parks, even famous sites.[21]

Virgin Galactic[]

Founded by technology and retail entrepreneur Richard Branson in 2004, Virgin Galactic is a private space company that describes itself as “the world’s first commercial space line.”[22] Virgin Galactic planned to carry six passengers at a time into sub-orbital space and provide them six minutes of weightlessness in the course of a two and a half our flight.[18] The technology differed from SpaceX and Blue Origin because the launch into space was not from the ground, but from a jet airplane.[18] This ship flies to an altitude of about 18 km and releases a smaller, rocket powered spacecraft called SpaceShip Two which is propelled to an altitude of about 100 km.[23] Like SpaceX and Blue Origin, Virgin Galactic wishes to transform the space sector by making space exploration easier for people.[18]

Bigelow Aerospace[]

Bigelow Aerospace was founded by hotel magnate Robert Bigelow in 1999.[24] The company wanted to provide low-cost living, low earth orbit space station that is accessible to the commercial sectors.[24] To accomplish this, the company started to create habitats that can expand after being deployed in space. The places would provide some protection from solar and cosmic radiation, space debris, and other elements.[25] Biglelow first licensed an expandable module technology from NASA after the agency canceled a project called TransHab that had developed it.[24] The company then launched two spacecraft, Genesis 1 in 2006 and Genesis 2 in 2007, on Dnepr rockets from Russia to demonstrate that expandable module technology.[24] The spacecraft demonstrated that the modules were stable and maintained air pressure.[25] In 2013, the company signed a contract with NASA to build a similar expandable module, called the Bigelow Expandable Activity Module (BEAM), and install it on the ISS.[24] In April 2016, this module was successfully deployed outside the International Space Station.[24] The company is currently developing another module called the B330 with the hope to create outposts in Earth orbit, lunar orbit, and surface of the moon which could be visited by paying customers.[25] In March 2020, however, Bigelow Aerospace laid off its workforce and more it yet to know about the company's future ambitions.[25]

Sierra Nevada Corporation[]

Founded in 1963 by John Chisholm, Sierra Nevada Corporation (SNC) is a privately held electronic systems provider and systems integrator specializing in microsatellites, telemedicine, and commercial orbital transportation services.[26] SNC is notable for its Dream Chaser, a planned commercial crew spacecraft, which will ferry up to seven astronauts and cargo to and from the International Space Station.[26] SNC was able to transition from small satellites to crewed spacecraft by partnering with companies such as Draper Laboratory, NASA's Langley Research Center, Boeing, and United Launch Alliance.[26] Nevertheless, SNC hopes to use this mini shuttle, the Dream Chaser, to take a lead in pace tourism and commerce real estate.[27] In 2021, SNC will use the United Launch Alliance’s Vulcan Centaur rocket as the launch vehicle for Dream Chaser’s cargo configuration.[27]  Furthermore, other products created by SNC includes spacecraft actuators that power the Mars rovers and hybrid rocket technologies that powered the first commercial astronaut to space.[26]

International Space Privatization[]

Not only is space privatization becoming prominent in the United States, competition amongst space programs in Russia, Europe, Japan, India, and China has been growing significantly. The European Space Agency was established before the alliance between Russia and US in 1975, following many years of independent aeronautical engineering research by individual nations.[28] Similarly, Chinese, Japanese and Indian space agencies began in the 1960s.[28] A number of smaller countries including the United Arab Emirates also are participating in the space competition.

China became the third nation to independently launch a human into orbit in 2003 and its capabilities have since grown.[28] China's visions include sending people to the moon and building a space station as well as creating its own robotic explorer.[28] Meanwhile, India launched its first unmanned mission to Mars in late 2013, and its probe entered Mars's orbit in September 2014.[28] Since then, the Indian Space Research Organization has reached an agreement with NASA on subsequent explorations of Mars.[28] China and the United Arab Emirates successfully sent spacecraft to orbit Mars in February 2021, which was when NASA landed its rover there.[28]

The advancements of transportation infrastructure by both national and international private players have created an environment to develop space-based industries that use commerce to greatly increase the quality of life and decrease the cost of living.[18] Examples of space-based activities that have commercial potential include, but are not limited to, tapping space-based clean energy sources, mining asteroids for useful raw materials, developing safe venues for scientific experiments, upcycling/sequestering hazardous but valuable debris currently in space, tapping sources of water already in space, to decouple into oxygen and hydrogen for space fuels and oxidizers, to provide radiation shielding mass, and so forth.[17] Collaboration between both public and private space companies in which the private sector develops the space industry and government parties and agencies, like NASA, buy transport and other key services, such as on-orbit facilities, as customers of the private providers.[29] NASA, as an example, has already begun buying some space transportation in this manner. Such actions are leading to comprehensive advancement in space.

Environmental Consequences[]

Due to the lack of established international space laws that create boundaries and define the regulation of space, space exploration and private ownership of space impose probable negative consequences to the environment of the Earth and to space itself. Rocket and space launches have been steady since the space race starting from 1955. However, the recent space race between Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Richard Branson have significantly increased the amount of space launches. In 2019 alone, there were 443 launches.[30] Space launches provide in-depth knowledge of space, creation of markets, and space diplomacy; however, an increase in launches at such high rates can have negative effects on the Earth.

Carbon dioxide emission[]

Space launches pose a problem to the environment because it can emit an unequivocal amount of carbon dioxide, depending on the size of the spacecraft or rocket, into the environment. Carbon dioxide does occur naturally in the atmosphere however significantly increased amount of CO2 pollutes the air and traps in the radiation and heat from the sun.[31] The build up of carbon dioxide prevents the Earth from cooling at night and results in compounded issues for the Earth. The Falcon 9 launched by SpaceX in 2018, burned 112,184 Kilograms of kerosene which released 336,552 kg of carbon dioxide into the Earth's atmosphere.[32] In 2020 alone, there were a total of 104 successful space launches with each launch adding remarkably to the CO2 buildup.[33] Furthermore, because there are not strict space regulations on environmental maintenance, the amount of carbon dioxide emitted is left unregulated causing environmental issues such as greenhouse gas pollution.[34] However, there is a surge of space companies being aware of the issues at hand and are actively innovating ways to combat the large emission. For example, Virgin Galactic will burn fuel for only 60 seconds to limit the environmental effect.[30]

Black carbon accumulation[]

Another environmental consequence is that launching rockets and spaceships that are kerosene-fueled adds black carbon, also known as soot, to the upper layer of the atmosphere. Black carbon is a particle that absorbs solar energy and in comparison to carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, it absorbs energy more than one million times of CO2.[35] The accumulation of black carbon that absorbs solar energy in the atmosphere can warm the atmosphere and can significantly increase the rate of global warming. Black carbon also does not only stay in the atmosphere but precipitate back into the Earth while lowering the reflecting power of surfaces.[36] The reflecting power of surfaces is important to maintain a cool temperature but with the accumulation of black carbon, that reflection is replaced with absorption. The increased absorption targets snow covered regions such as arctic ice caps.[37] Because of the absorbance of solar energy in the ice, the arctic ice cap is melting at an alarming rate. The sea levels are rising as a consequence which threaten many cities and countries from becoming underwater.[38] However, space companies, such as Orbex, plan on cutting out black carbon in order to be more space conscious.[30]

Space junk[]

There is also an issue in the amount of space junk in space. Space junk is human made and are the remnants of rockets and spaceships. There are 4,000 active and inactive satellites in space which are in danger of being struck by space debris.[39] Additionally, these satellites can accelerate towards earth and harm the Earth's environment and people.[40] There is still a problem in removing such space junk because with the increasing amount of space equipment put out by numerous countries, it would be difficult to know if one space junk removed was another country's active space property. Although the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs developed a space debris mitigation guidelines where space launches should have a proper plan to remove the junk within 25 years, it is only voluntary and is followed by 40% of all space missions.[41] Additionally, there is no international agreement on the best way to remove space junk.

See also[]

External links[]

References[]

  1. ^ a b "Key Topics – Office of Space Affairs". United States Department of State. Retrieved 2021-04-21.
  2. ^ a b c "Global governance and governance of the global commons in the global partnership for development beyond 2015" (PDF). United Nations. January 2013.
  3. ^ a b "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies". www.unoosa.org. Retrieved 2021-04-21.
  4. ^ a b c d Murthi, K. R. Sridhara; Gopalakrishnan, V.; Datta, Partha Sarathi (2007). "Legal environment for space activities". Current Science. 93 (12): 1823–1827. ISSN 0011-3891. JSTOR 24102074.
  5. ^ "2222 (XXI). Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies". www.unoosa.org. Retrieved 2021-04-21.
  6. ^ "Space Law Treaties and Principles". www.unoosa.org. Retrieved 2021-04-21.
  7. ^ "Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in The Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water" (PDF). Inventory of International Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes.
  8. ^ a b KrauseKRAUSE, Jason (2017). "Rocket Law: The Outer Space Treaty Turns 50. Can It Survive A New Space Race?". ABA Journal. 103 (4): 44–51. ISSN 0747-0088. JSTOR 26516031.
  9. ^ a b c d Sadat, Mir (2020). "Space: New Threats, New Service, New Frontier An Interview with Mir Sadat". Strategic Studies Quarterly. 14 (4): 6–17. ISSN 1936-1815. JSTOR 26956150.
  10. ^ a b Peperkamp, Lonneke (2020). "An Arms Race in Outer Space?". Atlantisch Perspectief. 44 (4): 46–50. ISSN 0167-1847. JSTOR 48600572.
  11. ^ "Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies". www.unoosa.org. Retrieved 2021-04-21.
  12. ^ Mack, Eric. "US Space Force: Everything you need to know on its first anniversary". CNET. Retrieved 2021-04-21.
  13. ^ "Defense Space Strategy Summary June 2020" (PDF). www.defense.gov/.
  14. ^ Pellegrino, Massimo; Stang, Gerald (2016). "Executive Summary". European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS): 7–12.
  15. ^ a b c Pellegrino, Massimo; Stang, Gerald (2016). "International Cooperation for Space Security". European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS): 53–68.
  16. ^ "Proposed Prevention of an Arms Race in Space (PAROS) Treaty | Treaties & Regimes | NTI". www.nti.org. Retrieved 2021-04-21.
  17. ^ a b "The Economics of Space: An Industry Ready to Launch". Reason Foundation. 2019-06-05. Retrieved 2021-04-21.
  18. ^ a b c d e Cater, Carl (2019-01-01), "History of Space Tourism", Space Tourism, Tourism Social Science Series, Emerald Publishing Limited, 25, pp. 51–66, doi:10.1108/S1571-504320190000025003, ISBN 978-1-78973-495-9, retrieved 2021-05-12
  19. ^ a b c Grady, Monica. "Private companies are launching a new space race – here's what to expect". The Conversation. Retrieved 2021-04-21.
  20. ^ a b c jenarangnow (2019-01-06). "How the Privatization of Space Exploration Will Positively Effect Humanity". Jena Rangnow. Retrieved 2021-05-12.
  21. ^ a b c d Duffy, Kate. "After Amazon, Jeff Bezos will devote his time to building multi-billion dollar rockets. Here's how his space company, Blue Origin, hopes to colonize the solar system". Business Insider. Retrieved 2021-05-12.
  22. ^ "Virgin Galactic". www.virgingalactic.com. Retrieved 2021-05-12.
  23. ^ "To the NYSE and beyond: Virgin Galactic becomes first public space tourism company". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2021-05-12.
  24. ^ a b c d e f "Bigelow Aerospace - Who We Are". Bigelow Aerospace. Retrieved 2021-05-12.
  25. ^ a b c d March 2020, Mike Wall 24. "Bigelow Aerospace lays off all employees: Report". Space.com. Retrieved 2021-05-12.
  26. ^ a b c d "Company History & Timeline | Sierra Nevada Corporation | SNC". www.sncorp.com. Retrieved 2021-05-12.
  27. ^ a b "Why Sierra Nevada's owners are betting big on Dream Chaser". SpaceNews. 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2021-05-12.
  28. ^ a b c d e f g Hobe, Stephan (2010-08-01). "The Impact of New Developments on International Space Law (New Actors' Commercialisation' Privatisation' Increase in the Number of "Space-faring Nations")". Uniform Law Review. 15 (3–4): 869–881. doi:10.1093/ulr/15.3-4.869. ISSN 2050-9065.
  29. ^ Crawford, Ian A. (2016-08-01). "The long-term scientific benefits of a space economy". Space Policy. 37: 58–61. arXiv:1607.04901. Bibcode:2016SpPol..37...58C. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2016.07.003. ISSN 0265-9646. S2CID 58899967.
  30. ^ a b c Verbeek, David (January 30, 2020), Can we get to space without damaging the Earth through huge carbon emissions?
  31. ^ Rogers, Chris (January 9, 2018). "The Effects of Carbon Dioxide on Air Pollution". Sciencing.
  32. ^ Alter, Lloyd (November 14, 2019). "A SpaceX Launch Puts Out as Much CO2 as Flying 341 People Across the Atlantic". Treehugger.
  33. ^ Clark, Stephen (January 5, 2021). "U.S. companies, led by SpaceX, launched more than any other country in 2020". Spaceflightnow.
  34. ^ Ross, Martin (September 24, 2019). "The coming surge of rocket emissions". Eos. 100. doi:10.1029/2019EO133493.
  35. ^ Zimmer, Carl (January 16, 2013). "Black Carbon and Warming: It's Worse than We Thought". e360.yale.edu.
  36. ^ Cho, Renee (March 22, 2016), The Damaging Effects of Black Carbon
  37. ^ Bond, T. C. (2013). "Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 118 (11): 5380–5552. Bibcode:2013JGRD..118.5380B. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50171. hdl:2027.42/99106.
  38. ^ Fierce, Laura (2020). "Radiative absorption enhancements by black carbon controlled by particle-to-particle heterogeneity in composition". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (10): 5196–5203. Bibcode:2020PNAS..117.5196F. doi:10.1073/pnas.1919723117. PMC 7071900. PMID 32098848.
  39. ^ Garcia, Mark (September 26, 2013). "Space Debris and Human Spacecraft". nasa.
  40. ^ Matthews, Robert (2021). "What are the chances of being hit by falling space junk?". Science Focus.
  41. ^ Davey, Melissa (25 March 2017), We've left junk everywhere': why space pollution could be humanity's next big problem
Retrieved from ""