Yuman–Cochimí languages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yuman–Cochimí
Yuman
Geographic
distribution		Colorado River basin and Baja California
Linguistic classificationHokan ?
  • Yuman–Cochimí
Subdivisions
Glottologcoch1271
Yuman–Cochimí map.svg
Pre-contact distribution of Yuman–Cochimí languages

The Yuman–Cochimí languages are a family of languages spoken in Baja California, northern Sonora, southern California, and western Arizona. Cochimí is no longer spoken as of the late 18th century, and most other Yuman languages are threatened.

Classification[]

There are approximately a dozen Yuman languages. The dormant Cochimí, attested from the 18th century, was identified after the rest of the family had been established, and was found to be more divergent. The resulting family was therefore called Yuman–Cochimí, with Yuman being the extra-Cochimí languages.

  • Cochimí † (Northern Cochimí and Southern Cochimí may have been distinct languages)
  • Kiliwa
  • Core Yuman
    • Delta–California Yuman
      • Ipai (a.k.a. 'Iipay, Northern Diegueño)
      • Kumeyaay (a.k.a. Central Diegueño, Campo, Kamia)
      • Tipai (a.k.a. Southern Diegueño, Huerteño, Ku'ahl)
      • Cocopah (a.k.a. Cucapá; cf. Kahwan, Halyikwamai)
    • River Yuman
      • Quechan (a.k.a. Yuma)
      • Maricopa (a.k.a. Pii-Paash; cf. also Halchidhoma)
      • Mojave
    • Pai
      • Yavapai
      • Havasupai-Hualapai (a.k.a. Northern Yuman)
        • Hualapai dialect (a.k.a. Walapai)
        • Havasupai dialect
      • Paipai (a.k.a. Akwa'ala; possibly distinct from the Upland Yuman language only at the dialect level)

Cochimí is now dormant. Cucapá is the Spanish name for the Cocopa. Diegueño is the Spanish name for Ipai–Kumeyaay–Tipai, now often referred to collectively as Kumeyaay. Upland Yuman consists of several mutually intelligible dialects spoken by the politically distinct Yavapai, Hualapai, and Havasupai.

Proto-language[]

Proto-Yuman
Reconstruction ofYuman languages
Lower-order reconstructions
  • Proto-Yuman

Urheimat[]

of the University of Utah points to a relative lack of reconstructable Proto-Yuman terms for aquatic phenomena as evidence against a coastal, lacustrine, or riverine Urheimat.[1]

Reconstruction[]

Proto-Yuman reconstructions by Mixco (1978):[2]

gloss Proto-Yuman
be *wi/*yu
be located (sg) *wa
belly *pxa; *p-xa
big *tay
bird *č-sa
body hair *mi(ʔ)
bone *ak
breasts *ñ-maːy
cat *-mi(ʔ)
causative *x-
chief man *-pa/*(ma)
chief, lord *-pa/*ma
cold *x-čur
cry *mi(ʔ)
dance *-ma(ʔ)
daughter *p-čay
die *pi
die (sg) *pi
do *wi/uːy
do; make *wi/*uy
dog *(č)-xat
dove *k-wi(ʔ)
drink *(č)-si; *si ?
ear *ṣma(k)l ~ *ṣmal(k)
earth, place *ʔ-mat
eat (hard food) *č-aw
eat (soft food) *ma
extinguish *spa
eye *yu(w)
face *yu(w) (p)-xu
fall *-nal
father *n-ʔay; *-ta; *-ku ?
feather *-waR
fire *ʔ-ʔa(ː)w
give *wi; *ʔi
he *ña/*ya-
head *ʔi(y)
hear *kʷi(ː)
heaven, sky *ʔ-ma(ʔ)y
horn *kʷa ?
hot *paR
house *ʔ-wa(ʔ)
husband *miːy
imperative prefix *k-
irrealis *-x(a)
kill *pi
leaf *ṣmak; *smaR
lie (be prone) *yak
locative *wa-l
locative (illative) *-l
locative (thither) *-m
man, male *-miː(y); *maː(y)
man, person *-pa/*ma
mother *-tay; *-siy
mountain lion *-miʔ tay
mountain sheep *ʔ-mu(w)
mouth *(y-)a
name *maR
navel *-pu
neck/nape *iː-(m)puk ?
non-present aspect *t
nose *(p-)xu
object, plural *pa
object, unspec. (anim.) *ñ-
perceive *kʷi
possessive prefix (inal.) *ñ
prefixes (trans.) *-, *m, *Ø
priest *maː(y)
pronominal prefixes (stative) *ñ, *m-, *w-
pronominal subject *ʔ-, *m-, *Ø
rabbit *pxar
reed *xta
relative pronoun *ña-/*ya
relativizer *kʷ-
salt *-ʔiR (< *s-ʔiR)
say *ʔi
shaman *-maː(y)
sit *waː
skunk *-xʷiw
sleep *ṣma
son (w.s.) *s-ʔaːw ?
star *xmṣi
subject suffix *-č; *-m
sun, day *paR
that *-ña/*-ya
there *ña/*ya
thing, something *ʔ-č
third person *ña-/*ya
this *p-u
thorn *ʔ-ta(ː)t
three *x-muk
to blow *p-č/sul
tongue *ʔimpal; *(y)pal; *-paR
two *x-wak
water *-xa(ʔ); *si
we *ña-p
wife *ku/*ki
wing *waR
woman *ki/*ku; *siñʔak
word *maR
yes *xaː

References[]

  1. ^ Laylander, Don (2010). "Linguistic Prehistory and the Archaic-Late Transition in the Colorado Desert". Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology. 30 (2): 141–155. ISSN 0191-3557.
  2. ^ Mixco, Mauricio J. 1978. Cochimí and proto-Yuman: lexical and syntactic evidence for a new language family in Lower California. (Anthropological Papers / University of Utah, 101.) Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

Bibliography[]

  • Campbell, Lyle. (1997). American Indian Languages: The Historical Linguistics of Native America. Oxford University Press.
  • Goddard, Ives. (1996). "Introduction". In Languages, edited by Ives Goddard, pp. 1–16. Handbook of North American Indians, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, Vol. 17. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
  • Kendall, Martha B. (1983). "Yuman languages". In Southwest, edited by Alfonso Ortiz, pp. 4–12. Handbook of North American Indians, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, Vol. 10. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
  • Langdon, Margaret. (1990). "Diegueño: how many languages?" In Proceedings of the 1990 Hokan–Penutian Language Workshop, edited by James E. Redden, pp. 184–190. Occasional Papers in Linguistics No. 15. University of Southern Illinois, Carbondale.
  • Mithun, Marianne. (1999). The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-23228-7 (hbk); ISBN 0-521-29875-X.
  • Mixco, Mauricio J. (2006). "The indigenous languages". In The Prehistory of Baja California: Advances in the Archaeology of the Forgotten Peninsula, edited by Don Laylander and Jerry D. Moore, pp. 24–41.

External links[]

Retrieved from ""