1900–1901 Cisleithanian legislative election

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cisleithanian Imperial Council election, 1900–01

← 1897 12 December 1900 to 18 January 1901 1907 →

All 425 seats in the Imperial Council
213 seats needed for a majority
  First party Second party Third party
  No image.svg Otto Steinwender (1847-1921).jpg Karel Kramář.jpg
Leader Otto Steinwender Karel Kramář
Party PPK DVP NSS
Alliance Bohemian Club
Leader since 1896 1897
Last election 46 seats, 2.47% 31 seats, 4.53% 53 seats, 6.09%
Seats won 54 51 50
Seat change Increase 8 Increase 20 Decrease 3
Popular vote 25,381 70,540 60,919
Percentage 2.36% 6.56% 5.66%
Swing Decrease 0.11% Increase 2.03% Decrease 0.43%

  Fourth party Fifth party Sixth party
  No image.svg Josef Baernreither (1845-1925).jpg No image.svg
Leader Josef Maria Baernreither
Party
Alliance
Leader since 1885
Last election 50 seats, 7.79% 23 seats, 0.23% 14 seats, 0.67%
Seats won 35 29 28
Seat change Decrease 15 Increase 6 Increase 14
Popular vote 75,190 2,257 8,037
Percentage 7.19% 0.23% 0.80%
Swing Decrease 0.60% Steady Increase 0.13%

Minister-President of Cisleithania before election

Ernest von Koerber

Elected Minister-President of Cisleithania

Ernest von Koerber

Legislative elections to elect the members of the 10th Imperial Council were held in Cisleithania, the northern and western ("Austrian") crown lands of Austria-Hungary, from December 12, 1900 to January 18, 1901.[1]

Electoral system[]

The elections were held according to the parameters set in 1896 Badeni electoral reform which classified voters according to their status and wealth into five curiae:

  1. Landowners (85 seats)
  2. Trade and industry chambers (21 seats)
  3. Large and medium farmers (129 seats)
  4. Male city residents who were annually paying at least 5 guilders worth of taxes (118 seats)
  5. All men older than 24 (72 seats)

The votes for the Farming and Men over 24 curiae were also classified into 2 different categories, direct votes and electoral votes. Electoral votes carried a lot more weight than direct votes, and so the parties that won these seats generally did not get seats based on their total vote counts.

Only 6% of the adult population of Cisleithania had a right to vote. Voting took place in stages, with the last elections being held in 1st curiae in Lower Austria.[2]

Results[]

Party Votes % Seats +/-
Croatian Nation
Croatian National Party 3,695 0.34 6 Increase 4
Party of Rights 528 0.05 3 New
Croatian Clerical Party 378 0.03 0 New
Croatian Radical Party 14 0.00 0 Decrease 3
Czech Nation
Young Czech Party 60,919 5.66 50 Decrease 3
Czech National Social Party 5,404 0.50 4 New
Czech National Party 4,675 0.44 2 Increase 2
2,271 0.21 1 New
Czech Compromise Candidates 1,890 0.18 1 Decrease 3
Czech Clerical Party 1,541 0.14 2 New
Common-Czechs Party 1,411 0.13 0 New
Bohemian Agrarian Party 1,009 0.09 2 New
Czech Radical Constitutionalist Party 666 0.07 0 New
Czech Radical Progressive Party 601 0.06 0 New
Czech Independents 428 0.04 0 New
Czech Trading Party 400 0.04 0 New
Christian Reform Party 177 0.02 0 New
Old Czech Party 42 0.00 0 Steady
German Nation
Christian Social and Anti-Semitic Party 295,354 27.45 25 Decrease 14
Social Democratic Party 251,652 23.39 12 Decrease 2
German-National Party 78,941 7.34 22 Increase 10
75,190 7.19 35 Decrease 15
German People's Party 70,540 6.56 51 Increase 20
German Compromise Candidates 18,370 1.84 1 Steady
German Clerical and Conservative Party 8,037 0.80 28 Increase 14
Social Politicians 5,042 0.47 1 Steady
German Independents 3,478 0.32 0 Decrease 1
Agrarian Party 3,096 0.29 3 Increase 2
Catholic People’s Party 2,292 0.21 0 Decrease 5
German Farmers' Party 1,275 0.12 1 Increase 1
Clerical Independents 622 0.06 0 New
Catholic Conservative Party 599 0.06 0 Decrease 14
Italian Nation
Italian Liberal Party 21,107 1.96 12 Decrease 2
Italian Conservative Party 2,214 0.21 3 Increase 2
Italian Autonomist Party 1,095 0.10 0 Steady
Italian Radical Party 1,056 0.09 2 New
Italian Clerical Party 450 0.04 0 Decrease 4
Italian Democratic Party 25 0.00 0 New
Landowner Candidates
Constitutionalist Landowners 2,257 0.23 29 Increase 6
Conservative Landowners 896 0.09 4 Decrease 5
Bohemian Centre Party–Moravian Centre Party 512 0.05 4 Increase 1
Bohemian Conservative Landowners 335 0.03 19 Steady
Polish-Armenian Landowners 81 0.01 1 New
Polish Nation
Polish Conservative Party 25,381 2.36 54 Increase 8
Polish Democratic Party 9,340 0.87 6 Steady
Polish Anti-Semitic Party 6,720 0.60 1 New
Polish Liberal Party 5,621 0.51 3 Decrease 2
Polish National Party 3,282 0.30 1 New
Polish People's Party 2,744 0.26 4 Increase 1
Polish Radical Party 854 0.08 1 Steady
Polish Farmers' Party 656 0.06 0 New
Polish Clerical Party 11 0.00 0 Decrease 1
Romanian Nation
Old Romanian Party 724 0.07 5 Steady
Conservative Romanian Party 347 0.03 0 New
Young Romanian Party 274 0.03 0 New
Moderate Romanian Party 198 0.02 0 New
Romanian People’s Party 25 0.00 0 New
Radical Romanian Party 14 0.00 0 New
Ruthenian Nation
Ruthenian Radical Party 4,407 0.41 2 Increase 1
Old Ruthenian Party 1,361 0.12 3 Increase 2
Ruthenian Moderate Party 1,350 0.13 3 Steady
National Ruthenian Party 505 0.05 0 New
Young Ruthenian Party 462 0.05 1 Decrease 5
Ruthenian People’s Party 277 0.03 0 Steady
Moderate Young Ruthenian Independents 220 0.02 0 New
Conservative Ruthenian Party 129 0.01 0 Steady
Serbian Nation
Serb People's Party 186 0.02 2 Steady
Slovenian Nation
Slovenian Clerical Party 56,895 5.29 11 Increase 3
Slovenian Liberal Party 20,492 1.91 5 Increase 2
Slovenian National Party 10,989 1.02 0 Decrease 2
Slovenian Progressive Agrarian Party 1,649 0.15 0 New
Slovenian Conservative Party 557 0.05 0 Decrease 2
Slovenian Christian Social Party 171 0.01 0 New
Slovenian Pro-German Party 47 0.00 0 New
Unknown/split votes 7,904 0.74 -
Total 1,075,984 100 425
Source: ANNO 1907 & ANNO 1901

By parliamentary grouping[]

The largest groups after the election were the Polish Club, the Young Czech Party and the German People's Party, which together had 164 seats.[3]

The elections did not significantly alter relations in the Imperial Council and maintained the highly fragmented political spectrum. The Young Czech Party saw some weakening due to the formation of independent political parties such as Czech Agrarian Party and the Czech National Social Party. Czech National Socials represented a new trend in voter preferences, strengthening the nationalist forces. Significantly, they succeed Pan-German Association.[clarification needed] These elections led to the weakening of the social democratic parties, with the Social Democrats gaining only 10 seats.[4]

Compared with previous elections, turnout fell. In the 5th curia, under 30% of eligible voters voted. Historian Otto Urban interprets this as a result of the declining influence of the Council in Austrian political life. At the same time it was a more general change of attitude towards the elected legislative bodies.[5]

The elections had no impact on the Government because the Cabinet of Ernest von Koerber had a mandate from its election in 1900 until 1904.

In early February 1901, the Imperial Council had 20 political groups:[6][7]

Grouping Seats +/-
Poland Club 65 Increase 6
Bohemian Club 44 Decrease 16
Association of German People's Parties 42 Increase 1
Union of Constitutionalist Landowners 30 Steady
Centre Club 29 Increase 23
German Progressive Union 27 Decrease 16
Christian Social Union 25 Decrease 1
Slavic Association 25 New
Group of Bohemian Conservative Landowners 19 Steady
Italian Union 18 New
Association of Social Democrats 11 Decrease 4
German Agrarian Parties 9 New
Free Association of Pan-Germans 8 New
Ruthenian Club 8 New
Union of Unaligned Bohemians 8 New
Club of Bohemian Agrarians 6 New
Yugoslavian Progressive Club 6 New
Polish People's Parties 5 Increase 2
Romanian Club 5 Steady
Moravian Center Parties 3 New
Independents 32 Increase 15
Total 425 Steady
Source: ANNO

References[]

  1. ^ Československé dějiny v datech. Prag : Svoboda, 1987. ISBN 80-7239-178-X. p. 327–328. (in Czech)
  2. ^ Urban, Otto: Česká společnost 1848–1918. Prag : Svoboda, 1982. p. 510–511. (in Czech)
  3. ^ Československé dějiny v datech. Prag : Svoboda, 1987. ISBN 80-7239-178-X. p. 328. (in Czech)
  4. ^ Urban, Otto: Česká společnost 1848-1918. Praha : Svoboda, 1982. p. 510-511. (in Czech)
  5. ^ Urban, Otto: Česká společnost 1848-1918. Praha : Svoboda, 1982. p. 511. (in Czech)
  6. ^ Marjan Diklić: Dvije pobjede don Ive Prodana na izborima za Carevinsko vijeće u Beču, Rad. Zavoda povij. znan. HAZU Zadru, sv. 45/2003., p. 388 (in Croatian)
  7. ^ Československé dějiny v datech. Prag : Svoboda, 1987. ISBN 80-7239-178-X. p. 327–328. (in Czech)
Retrieved from ""