Canadian labour law

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Canadian labour law is that body of law which regulates the rights, restrictions, and obligations of trade unions, workers, and employers in Canada.

Regulatory Framework[]

The federal, provincial, and territorial governments regulate labour and employment law in Canada. The constitution[1] gives exclusive federal jurisdiction over employment as a component of its regulatory authority for specific industries, including banking, radio and TV broadcasting, inland and maritime navigation and shipping, inland fishing, as well as any form of transportation that crosses provincial boundaries. Employment outside of federally regulated industries falls under provincial authority for most civil (including contract) law.[2] Territories generally have similar powers as provinces but by federal statute (not constitutional), often less extensive in scope, and differing by jurisdiction (often accruing over time) and Inuit, Métis and First Nations government areas. Unless federal, laws of the province or territory where the employment takes place. Indigenous nations, treaty-/land-based rights, government and infrastructure also structure labour law, in addition to economic, historial, cultural variation—Northern Canada's distinction sharpest.

More importantly, widely varying natural environmental, geologic, geographic, economic, demographic, cultural, linguistic, historical and other factors shape labour, industrial and other economic activity, relationships and norms.

In areas of exclusive provincial jurisdiction, each province (and increasingly each territory) has authority to regulate . So, for example, education (except education on First Nation reserves) and municipal government are both subject to provincial legislation (the territories excepted).

While Quebec's statutory environment is considerably different in many respects, most provinces and the federal Code all follow the standard of enterprise-based bargaining structures. They also share a certification process (the details of which differ somewhat from province to province) through which unions are recognized by the state as having the support of a majority of workers in a narrowly defined workplace.

One feature common to all provincial and federal labour laws is the "Rand Formula". This legal concept allows employees in unionized workplaces to decline union membership, but requires them to pay the equivalent of basic union dues even if they decide not to be union members.

Strikes[]

The right of workers to strike and picket against their employer is constitutionally protected in Canada, according to a 2015 Supreme Court of Canada ruling.[3]

Picketing[]

The law concerning the granting of injunctions that limit picketing during strikes varies from province to province, and is largely case law rather than statutory.[4]

British Columbia[]

In 2002, the British Columbia government changed the Employment Standards Branch, replacing the investigation system that used to reply to labour law violations with an 18-page "Self-Help Kit" and mediation process. However, this has been criticized as changing the government's role "from enforcers of labour standards to being wage dispute resolvers."[5]

See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ The Constitution Act, 1867 (U.K.), 30 & 31 Victoria, c. 3., §§91, 92A, 94A, 95.
  2. ^ The Constitution Act, 1867 (U.K.), 30 & 31 Victoria, c. 3., §92.
  3. ^ Saskatchewan Federation of Labour v. Saskatchewan (SCC Case Information: 35423)] : "The right to strike is an essential part of a meaningful collective bargaining process in our system of labour relations... This crucial role in collective bargaining is why the right to strike is constitutionally protected by s. 2 (d). [of the Canadian Constitution]."
  4. ^ Stephen Gleave et al, 2011. "The Labour Injunction in Canada".
  5. ^ Johnson, C. J. (March 3, 2004). "Ripe for Abuse". The Tyee.
  6. ^ Health Services and Support—Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn. v. British Columbia, 2007 SCC 27, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 391.
  7. ^ Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser, 2011 SCC 20, [2011] 2 S.C.R.  3.
Retrieved from ""