Remote Video Inspection System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
RVIS in use at the Orient, Maine, port of entry in January 1997

The Remote Video Inspection System (RVIS) was deployed by United States in the late 1990s at select low-traffic border entry points from Canada. The system allowed passport and customs inspections to be conducted remotely, so that low-risk travelers could enter the country during hours that the border station did not have on-site staff. The system was successfully deployed at a number of entry points, in six different states. RVIS was discontinued following the September 11 attacks.

Conception[]

In the early 1990s, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) was interested in finding ways to enable low-risk travelers to enter the United States from Canada at small ports of entry after inspection services had ended for the day. INS commissioned its contractor EDS, as well as the Department of Transportation John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center and its contractors Labblee Inc. and Bishop Systems to develop and deploy a system that transmitted audio, video and data to an inspector at a nearby 24-hour port of entry. The system was originally named "Remote Inspection Communicator And Remote Document Observer" (RICARDO), but the name was changed to Remote Video Inspection System (RVIS) prior to its first deployment.

Deployment[]

RVIS consisted of a series of pan–tilt–zoom cameras (PTZ), an amplified speakerphone, a card reader and a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD).[1] There were vehicle sensors at the Canada–United States border that initiated the system, and exit sensors that alerted operators that a drive-by had occurred. There were also area lights, a text display and a traffic signal. Some ports of entry had electronic gates for traffic management. Inspectors at the remote location could control the PTZ cameras, and conduct a verbal interview with the driver and passengers.

The first two RVIS sites were at the border crossings of Forest City and Orient in Maine in 1996.[2][3] By 2000, RVIS systems had been deployed at 18 of 22 planned locations:[4]

RVIS at the Pittsburg–Chartierville Border Crossing
U.S. state U.S. location Border crossing
Maine Easton Easton - River de Chute Border Crossing
Forest City Forest City Border Crossing
Monticello Monticello - Bloomfield Border Crossing
Orient Orient – Fosterville Border Crossing
Minnesota Noyes Noyes–Emerson East Border Crossingdagger
Pinecreek Pinecreek–Piney Border Crossing
Montana Scobey Scobey–Coronach Border Crossing
Whitetail Whitetail–Big Beaver Border Crossingdouble-dagger
Whitlash Whitlash-Aden Border Crossing
New Hampshire Pittsburg Pittsburg–Chartierville Border Crossing
North Dakota Ambrose Ambrose–Torquay Border Crossing
Carbury Carbury–Goodlands Border Crossing
Hannah Hannah–Snowflake Border Crossing
Hansboro Hansboro–Cartwright Border Crossing
Maida Maida–Windygates Border Crossing
Northgate Northgate Border Crossing
Washington Ferry Ferry-Midway Border Crossing
Nighthawk Nighthawk-Chopaka Border Crossing
dagger Closed since 2006
double-dagger Closed since 2013

RVIS was planned for the Morses Line Border Crossing in Vermont, but local residents opposed its installation.[5] However, in 2016, the Canadian side implemented a similar system. [6]

Decommission[]

The RVIS system never achieved its full potential because its deployment pre-dated the rollout of high speed data networking at all ports of entry, which caused the video transmission to be slow and cumbersome.[citation needed] Its usage was suspended following the September 11 attacks,[7] and the RVIS system was officially decommissioned on November 1, 2002.[8][9]

See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ "Automated Port-of-Entry Opens in Pittsburgh, New Hampshire". INS Communiqué. Immigration and Naturalization Service. March 1999. p. 9. Retrieved July 12, 2020 – via Google Books.
  2. ^ Brown, Wayne (March 17, 1996). "Border hopping simplified". Bangor Daily News. Bangor, Maine. p. 17. Retrieved July 13, 2020 – via newspapers.com.
  3. ^ Brown, Wayne (September 25, 1997). "Bill seeks to clarify murky immigration law". Bangor Daily News. Bangor, Maine. p. 12. Retrieved July 13, 2020 – via newspapers.com.
  4. ^ "Alternative Inspection Services Program" (PDF). Canada-United States Accord on Our Shared Border: Update 2000. Citizenship and Immigration Canada. 2000. pp. 29–31. ISBN 0-662-29359-2. Retrieved July 13, 2020 – via publicsafety.gc.ca.
  5. ^ Cowperthwait, Richard (September 17, 1997). "Residents criticize federal plans at Morses Line port". The Burlington Free Press. Burlington, Vermont. p. 13. Retrieved July 12, 2020 – via newspapers.com.
  6. ^ Woods, Allan (2016-09-18). "Eyes on this border crossing are 700 kilometres away". Toronto Star. Retrieved 2016-09-21.
  7. ^ Seghetti, Lisa M. (May 18, 2004). "Border Security: Immigration Issues in the 108th Congress" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. p. CRS-12. Retrieved July 12, 2020 – via FAS.org.
  8. ^ "U.S. Customs Project to Enhance Security at Border Crossings" (Press release). U.S. Customs and Border Protection. November 1, 2002. Archived from the original on September 6, 2009 – via Wayback Machine.
  9. ^ Department of Homeland Security Appropriations for 2004: Titles I and II. United States Government Printing Office. 2003. p. 422. Retrieved July 12, 2020 – via Google Books. That is one of the reasons that on October 31, 2002, Commissioner Bonner approved a recommendation by the Office of Field Operations to terminate the RVIS program and incorporate the existing RVIS equipment into the Northern Border Security Project.

Further reading[]

Retrieved from ""