Starship HLS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Starship HLS
Starship HLS Moon landing.jpg
Artist's concept of Starship HLS unloading astronauts and cargo on the Moon
ManufacturerSpaceX
Country of originUnited States
OperatorSpaceX
ApplicationsCrewed reusable lunar lander
Specifications
Launch mass~1,320 t (2,910,000 lb)
RegimeCislunar space
Dimensions
Length50 m (164 ft 1 in)
Width9 m (29 ft 6 in)
Capacity
Payload to Moon
Mass100–200 t (220,000–440,000 lb)[1]:17:40
Production
StatusIn development
Maiden launchNET 2023
EnginesRaptor, RCS thruster bank
PropellantCH
4
 / LOX

Starship HLS is a lunar lander variant of the Starship spacecraft. Starship itself has been in privately-funded development by SpaceX since the mid-2010s, but the HLS (Human Landing System) variant is being developed under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The initial contracted design work started in May 2020, with selection and funding for full-development occurring in April 2021, when Starship HLS was selected by NASA to land "the first woman and the next man" on the Moon as part of the Artemis program, potentially as early as 2024.

NASA signed a US$2.89 billion contract with SpaceX to develop and manufacture Starship HLS,[2] and to conduct two flights — an uncrewed demonstration mission, and a crewed lunar landing.[3][4] It is also planned to conduct landings for future Artemis missions. Starship HLS is intended to dock in a NRHO lunar orbit with either the NASA Orion spacecraft or NASA lunar Gateway space station, in order to take on passengers before descending to the lunar surface and return them after ascent.

Since Starship HLS will not return to Earth like other versions of the Starship spacecraft, it has neither a heat shield nor body flaps used on other versions of Starship for reentry into Earth's atmosphere. To land on the Moon, Starship HLS is equipped with a complement of landing thrusters used upon final descent and takeoff from the lunar surface.

History[]

Starship HLS builds on the SpaceX Starship system by adding a new spacecraft variant, also called Starship HLS. This spacecraft will be used in conjunction with the Starship booster (called Super heavy) and one or more additional Starship spacecraft variants that were already being planned prior to the HLS contract.

Starship system history[]

The SpaceX Starship design was initially conceived in the early 2010s as a spacecraft that would be principally built for the Mars colonization effort that SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has advocated since 2011,[5] with the first colonists arriving no earlier than the middle of the 2020s.[6]

By 2016, the scope became somewhat broader, when Musk realized the high-level design SpaceX had been working on for the Starship vehicle allowed for variants that would be suitable for interplanetary travel more generally, and could work both on planets with and without an atmosphere.[7] Lunar destination flights, however, were not generally emphasized by Musk, and he specifically stated that the Moon was not a necessary step on the path to Mars.[8][9]

By late 2018, SpaceX had specified the primary construction material for Starship to be stainless steel[10]— after approximately a year of building manufacturing pathfinder hardware out of carbon composite materials—and manufacture of the initial test article including pressure vessel construction for the liquid methane and liquid oxygen tanks began in early 2019.[11]

Between July 2019 and July 2021, seven Starship prototype vehicles, each with different vehicle design configurations and varied test objectives, flew a total of eight atmospheric test flights, all launched from the SpaceX South Texas launch site at Boca Chica, Texas.[12]

Starship HLS history[]

Starship HLS, with HLS being an acronym for Human Landing System, was first revealed to the public when it was initially selected by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in April 2020 for a design study as part of their Artemis program, which aims to land humans on the Moon. SpaceX was one of three teams selected to develop company-specific lunar lander designs for the Artemis program over a year-long[13] period starting in May 2020.[13] The other landers in consideration were Dynetics HLS, developed by aerospace manufacturer Dynetics, and the Integrated Lander Vehicle, developed with Blue Origin as the primary contractor and designer of the "descent element", but with Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Draper as well.[14] NASA intended to later select and fund at most two of these landers to continue to initial demonstration flights.[15][16]

On 16 April 2021, NASA selected only Starship HLS for crewed lunar lander development[2] plus two lunar demonstration flights — one uncrewed and one crewed — no earlier than 2024. The contract is valued at US$2.89 billion over a number of years.[3][4] Two NASA Artemis astronauts are to land on the first crewed Starship HLS landing.[17] NASA had previously stated that it preferred multiple Human Landing System proposals with dissimilar capabilities; however, "only one design was selected for an initial uncrewed demonstration and the first crewed landing, due to significant budget constraints" for the human landing system program imposed by US Congress. NASA stated that the unselected proposals — Dynetics HLS and Blue Origin ILV — as well as landers from other companies would be eligible for later lunar landing contracts.[4]

On 26 April 2021, Blue Origin and Dynetics separately protested the award to SpaceX at the US Government Accountability Office (GAO).[18] On 30 July 2021, the GAO rejected the protests and found that "NASA did not violate procurement law" in awarding the contract to SpaceX, who bid a much lower cost and more capable human and cargo lunar landing capability for NASA Artemis.[18][19] Soon after GAO rejected the appeal, NASA made the initial $300 million contract payment to SpaceX.[20] The protest action delayed NASA from authorizing work on the contract, and thus delayed the start of work by SpaceX for 95 days.[21]

On 13 August,[22] Blue Origin filed a lawsuit in the US Court of Federal Claims challenging "NASA’s unlawful and improper evaluation of proposals."[21][23] Blue Origin asked the court for an injunction to halt further spending by NASA on the existing contract with SpaceX,[24] and NASA stopped work on the contract on 19 August, after SpaceX had been allowed to work on the NASA-specific parts of Starship HLS for just three weeks since the work had been previously halted in April.[22] Reaction to the lawsuit was mostly negative in the space community, at NASA, and among Blue Origin employees according to space journalist Eric Berger.[25][26]

Description[]

Mockup of the lander's nose section at Starbase

Since the design of Starship HLS is optimized to operate exclusively in the vacuum of space after its initial launch from Earth, both the heat shield and air‑brakes — integral parts of the main Starship design — have been omitted on Starship HLS. Starship HLS uses the same stern-mounted Raptor engines as other Starship variants as its primary propulsion system except when very near the lunar surface. However, the variant will use high‑thrust oxygen- and methane-fueled thrusters located mid‑body on Starship HLS during the final "tens of meters" of the terminal lunar descent and landing to avoid plume impingement problems with the lunar regolith.[27][28] SpaceX intends to use the same high‑thrust RCS thrusters for liftoff from the lunar surface.[27]:50:30 Starship HLS is supplied with electrical power by a band of solar panels around the circumference of the vehicle.[citation needed]

Starship HLS requires in-orbit propellant transfer in its mission profile. Prior to the launch of the HLS vehicle from Earth, a Starship propellant depot would be launched into low Earth orbit, and partially or fully refilled by anywhere from four to fourteen[a] Starship tanker vehicles carrying propellant.[29] The Starship HLS vehicle would then launch and rendezvous with the already-loaded propellant depot and refuel before transiting from Earth orbit to Lunar orbit.[4]

Starship HLS incorporates the following design characteristics:[4]

  • approximately 24 midbody oxygen-methane thrusters for use in landing on the lunar surface
  • 100-day loiter capability in lunar orbit
  • lunar upmass and downmass that far exceed NASA requirements
  • support for a greater number of EVAs on the lunar surface than the minimum required by NASA in the 2020 solicitation
  • excess-propellant margin can be applied to expedite an emergency ascent from the Moon

Within the Artemis lunar landing architecture as of April 2021,[4] a NASA Orion spacecraft is planned to be launched by a Space Launch System rocket and rendezvous with a waiting Starship HLS lander in a near-rectilinear halo orbit around the Moon. The crew of Orion would then dock with, and transfer to Starship HLS, which would subsequently depart and descend to the lunar surface. After lunar surface operations, Starship HLS will lift-off from the Moon and return to lunar orbit to rendezvous with Orion. The crew then transfers back to Orion and departs for Earth. Although not confirmed yet, Starship HLS could, in theory, be refueled in orbit to carry more crews and cargo to the surface.[14][16]

In September 2020, Musk stated on Twitter there was no need to bring early cargo ships back, and suggesting they could be used to serve as a moonbase.[28]

Notes[]

  1. ^ In the documentation of SpaceX's HLS bid, a conservative figure of 14 tanker flights is used. Musk has stated that with a tanker payload mass of 150 tons, four to eight tanker flights would be necessary, depending on the payload mass on Starship HLS itself.

References[]

  1. ^ Elon Musk and Peter Diamandis LIVE on $100M XPRIZE Carbon Removal, retrieved 22 April 2021
  2. ^ Jump up to: a b Foust, Jeff (16 April 2021). "NASA selects SpaceX to develop crewed lunar lander". SpaceNews. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
  3. ^ Jump up to: a b Berger, Eric (16 April 2021). "NASA selects SpaceX as its sole provider for a lunar lander - "We looked at what's the best value to the government."". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 17 April 2021.
  4. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Burghardt, Thomas (20 April 2021). "After NASA taps SpaceX's Starship for first Artemis landings, agency looks to on-ramp future vehicles". NASASpaceflight.com. Retrieved 21 April 2021.
  5. ^ "Elon Musk: I'll Put a Man on Mars in 10 Years". Market Watch. New York: The Wall Street Journal. 22 April 2011. Archived from the original on 1 December 2011. Retrieved 1 December 2011.
  6. ^ "Huge Mars Colony Eyed by SpaceX Founder". Discovery News. 13 December 2012. Archived from the original on 15 November 2014. Retrieved 25 September 2016.
  7. ^ Berger, Eric (18 September 2016). "Elon Musk scales up his ambitions, considering going "well beyond" Mars". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 20 September 2016. Retrieved 19 September 2016.
  8. ^ Knapp, Alex. "SpaceX Billionaire Elon Musk On The Business And Future Of Space Travel". Forbes. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  9. ^ "Elon Musk on the future of space travel and exploration". 8 July 2011.
  10. ^ D'Agostino, Ryan (22 January 2019). "Elon Musk: Why I'm Building the Starship out of Stainless Steel". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 30 May 2019.
  11. ^ Ralph, Eric (9 March 2019). "SpaceX's Starship prototype moved to launch pad on new rocket transporter". Teslarati. Archived from the original on 6 January 2020. Retrieved 22 March 2019.
  12. ^ "Starship SN8 12.5-Kilometer hop". Retrieved 5 December 2020.
  13. ^ Jump up to: a b NextSTEP H: Human Landing System Archived 8 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine, NASA, 27 January 2021, retrieved 31 January 2021.
  14. ^ Jump up to: a b "NASA Selects Blue Origin, Dynetics, and SpaceX Human Landers for Artemis". NASASpaceFlight.com. 1 May 2020. Archived from the original on 15 May 2020. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
  15. ^ "SpaceX, Blue Origin and Dynetics will build human lunar landers for NASA's next trip back to the Moon". techcrunch.com. Archived from the original on 2 September 2020. Retrieved 1 May 2020.
  16. ^ Jump up to: a b Potter, Sean (30 April 2020). "NASA Names Companies to Develop Human Landers for Artemis Missions". NASA. Archived from the original on 11 May 2020. Retrieved 15 May 2020. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  17. ^ Brown, Katherine (16 April 2021). "As Artemis Moves Forward, NASA Picks SpaceX to Land Next Americans on Moon". NASA.gov. Archived from the original on 16 April 2021. Retrieved 16 April 2021.
  18. ^ Jump up to: a b Foust, Jeff (30 July 2021). "GAO denies Blue Origin and Dynetics protests of NASA lunar lander contract". SpaceNews. Retrieved 2 August 2021.
  19. ^ "Statement on Blue Origin-Dynetics Decision". 30 July 2021.
  20. ^ "Despite Of Competitor Protests NASA Pays SpaceX $300 Million To Continue Developing A Starship Lunar Lander". 14 August 2021.
  21. ^ Jump up to: a b "Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin sues NASA, escalating its fight for a Moon lander contract". The Verge. 16 August 2021. Retrieved 16 August 2021. protest prevented SpaceX from starting its contract for 95 days while the GAO adjudicated the case.
  22. ^ Jump up to: a b Foust, Jeff (19 August 2021). "Blue Origin suit stops work on NASA HLS contract with SpaceX". SpaceNews. Retrieved 20 August 2021.
  23. ^ Sheetz, Michael (16 August 2021). "Bezos' Blue Origin takes NASA to federal court over award of lunar lander contract to SpaceX". CNBC. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  24. ^ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/08/16/blue-origin-spacex-rivalry-lawsuit-nasa/
  25. ^ Berger, Eric (16 August 2021). "Here's why Blue Origin thinks it is justified in continuing to protest NASA". Ars Technica.
  26. ^ Sheetz, Michael (20 August 2021). "Top talent departs Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin as NASA lander fight escalates". CNBC. Retrieved 21 August 2021.
  27. ^ Jump up to: a b Cummings, Nick (11 June 2020). Human Landing System: Putting Boots Back on the Moon. American Astronautical Society. Event occurs at 35:00–36:02. Retrieved 12 June 2020 – via YouTube. for the terminal descent of Starship, a few tens of meters before we touch down on the lunar surface, we actually use a high-thrust RCS system, so that we don't impinge on the surface of the Moon with the high-thrust Raptor engines. ... uses the same methane and oxygen propellants as Raptor.
  28. ^ Jump up to: a b Musk, Elon. "Forward thrusters are to stabilize ship when landing in high winds. If goal is max payload to moon per ship, no heatshield or flaps or big gas thruster packs are needed. No need to bring early ships back. They can serve as part of moon base alpha". twitter.com. Archived from the original on 2 September 2020.
  29. ^ @elonmusk (11 August 2021). "16 flights is extremely unlikely. Starship payload to orbit is ~150 tons , so max of 8 to fill 1200 ton tanks of lunar Starship. Without flaps & heat shield, Starship is much lighter. Lunar landing legs don't add much (1/6 gravity). May only need 1/2 full, ie 4 tanker flights" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
Retrieved from ""