We are the 99%

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the slogan. For the movement, see Occupy movement.
"We are the 99%" poster referencing the Polish Solidarity movement
Occupy Wall Street Poster
Protesters with the "99%" T-shirts at Occupy Wall Street on November 17, 2011 near the New York City Hall.

We are the 99% is a political slogan widely used and coined during the 2011 Occupy movement. The phrase directly refers to the income and wealth inequality in the United States, with a concentration of wealth among the top-earning 1%. It reflects an opinion that "the 99%" are paying the price for the mistakes of a tiny minority within the upper class.

According to the Economic Policy Institute, as of 2018, all households with incomes less than $737,697 belonged to the lower 99% of wage earners.[1] However, the 1% is not necessarily a reference to top 1% of wage earners, but a reference to the top 1% of individuals by net worth, of which earned wages are only a fraction of the many factors that contribute to their wealth.[2]

Origin[]

Mainstream accounts[]

The slogan "We are the 99%" became a unifying slogan of the Occupy movement in August 2011[3][4] after a Tumblr blog "wearethe99percent.tumblr.com" was launched in late August 2011 by a 28-year-old New York activist going by the name of "Chris" together with Priscilla Grim.[5][6]

Chris credited an August 2011 flyer for the NYC assembly "We The 99%" for the term.[7][8] A 2011 Rolling Stone article attributed to anthropologist David Graeber the suggestion that the Occupy movement represented the 99%.[9] Graeber was sometimes credited with the slogan "We are the 99%" but attributed the full version to others.[10]

Joseph Stiglitz
Graph by sociologist Lane Kenworthy showing changes in real US incomes in top 1%, middle 60%, and bottom 20% from 1979 through 2007, tracking household income but not individual incomes.[11]

Mainstream media sources trace the origin of the phrase to economist Joseph Stiglitz's May 2011 article "Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%" in Vanity Fair, in which he was criticizing the economic inequality present in the United States.[12]: 241  In the article Stiglitz spoke of the damaging impact of economic inequality involving 1% of the U.S. population owning a large portion of economic wealth in the country, while 99% of the population hold much less economic wealth than the richest 1%:

[I]n our democracy, 1% of the people take nearly a quarter of the nation's income … In terms of wealth rather than income, the top 1% control 40% … [as a result] the top 1% have the best houses, the best educations, the best doctors, and the best lifestyles, but there is one thing that money doesn't seem to have bought: an understanding that their fate is bound up with how the other 99% live. Throughout history, this is something that the top 1% eventually do learn. Too late.[13]

Earlier uses of the term "the one percent" to refer to the wealthiest people in society include the 2006 documentary The One Percent (film) about the growing wealth gap between the wealthy elite compared to the overall population, and a 2001 opinion column in the MIT student newspaper The Tech (newspaper).[14]

Other published accounts[]

More than one publication dates the concept back much further. For instance, Gore Vidal spoke of "the one percent who own the country, whose power is increasing, not decreasing" in a 1987 interview with Playboy magazine.[15] The one percent and the 99 percent were explained in a February 1984 article titled "The USA: Who Owns It? Who Runs It?" in Black Liberation Month News, published in Chicago and available online as of 2020.[16]

Even further back, historian Howard Zinn used this concept in "The Coming Revolt of the Guards", the final chapter in the first edition of his book A People's History of the United States published in 1980.[17] "I am taking the liberty of uniting those 99 percent as 'the people'. I have been writing a history that attempts to represent their submerged, deflected, common interest. To emphasize the commonality of the 99 percent, to declare deep enmity of interest with the 1 percent, is to do exactly what the governments of the United States, and the wealthy elite allied to them-from the Founding Fathers to now-have tried their best to prevent."[18]

The 1960 novel Too Many Clients by Rex Stout, part of the Nero Wolfe mystery series, refers to the top two percent: "I know a chairman of the board of a billion-dollar corporation, one of the 2 per cent, [sic] who never gets his shoes shined and shaves three times a week."[19]

The first mention of the concept may very well be found in a poster (circa 1935) advertising the newspaper created by the populist Louisiana politician Huey Long called The American Progress. The second paragraph mentioned the one percent and the ninety-nine percent: "With 1% of our people owning nearly twice as much as all the other 99%, how is a country ever to have permanent progress unless there is a correction of this evil?" [20]

Variations on the slogan[]

  • "We are the 1 percent; we stand with the 99 percent": by members of the "one percent" who wish to express their support for higher taxes, such as nonprofit organizations Resource Generation and Wealth for the Common Good.[21][22]
  • "We are the 99.9%": by Nobel Prize–winning economist Paul Krugman in an op-ed in The New York Times arguing that the original slogan sets the bar too low when considering recent changes in distribution of income. In particular, Krugman cited a 2005 Congressional Budget Office report indicating that between 1979 and 2005 the inflation-adjusted income for the middle of the income distribution rose 21%, while for the top 0.1% it rose by 400%.[23]
  • "We are the 53%": by conservative RedState.com blogger Erick Erickson along with Josh Treviño, communications director for the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and filmmaker Mike Wilson[24] launched in October 2011, in response to the 99% slogan. Erikson referred to the 53% of American workers who pay federal income taxes, and criticizing the 47% of workers who do not pay federal income tax for what Erikson describes as being "subsidized" by those who pay taxes. The Tax Policy Center at the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution both reported that roughly half of the workers who do not pay Federal income tax earn below the tax threshold while the other half pay no income tax due to "provisions that benefit senior citizens and low-income working families with children."[25]
  • "We are the 48%": by those who supported the United Kingdom remaining in the European Union after the 2016 referendum on membership, highlighting the relatively even split between supporters of remaining in and withdrawing from the EU.[26]
  • "We are the 87%" (German language: "Wir Sind 87 Prozent") : by the German people who did not vote for the far-right Alternative for Germany party in the 2017 German federal election.[27]

Economic context[]

Main article: Income inequality in the United States
Occupy protesters in Oakland holding "We are the 99%"-themed signs

"We are the 99%" is a political slogan and an implicit economic claim of "Occupy" protesters. It refers to the increased concentration of income and wealth since the 1970s among the top 1% of income earners in the United States.[28]

It also reflects an opinion that the "99%" are paying the price for the mistakes of a tiny minority within the upper class.[29][30]

Studies by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the US Department of Commerce, and Internal Revenue Service show that income inequality has grown significantly since the late 1970s,[31][32][33][34][35] after several decades of stability.[36][37] Between 1979 and 2007, the top earning 1 percent of Americans have seen their after-tax-and-benefit incomes grow by an average of 275%, compared to around 40–60% for the lower 99 percent.[38][39] Since 1979 the average pre-tax income for the bottom 90% of households has decreased by $900, while that of the top 1% increased by over $700,000. This imbalance became further exacerbated by changes making federal income taxes less progressive. From 1992-2007 the top 400 income earners in the U.S. saw their income increase 392% and their average tax rate reduced by 37%.[40] In 2009, the average income of the top 1% was $960,000 with a minimum income of $343,927.[35][41][42] In 2007 the top 1% had a larger share of total income than at any time since 1928.[35] This is in stark contrast with surveys of US populations that indicate an "ideal" distribution that is much more equal, and a widespread ignorance of the true income inequality and wealth inequality.[43] In 2007, the richest 1% of the American population owned 34.6% of the country's total wealth, and the next 19% owned 50.5%. Thus, the top 20% of Americans owned 85% of the country's wealth and the bottom 80% of the population owned 15% in 2007. Financial inequality measured as the total net worth minus the value of one's home[44] was greater than inequality in total wealth, with the top 1% of the population owning 42.7%, the next 19% of Americans owning 50.3%, and the bottom 80% owning 7% per Forbes in 2011.[45] After the Great Recession started in 2007, the share of total wealth owned by the top 1% of the population grew from 34.6% to 37.1%, and that owned by the top 20% of Americans grew from 85% to 87.7%. Median household wealth dropped by 36.1% compared to a drop of only 11.1% for the top 1%, further widening the gap.[45][46][47] During the economic expansion between 2002 and 2007, the income of the top 1% had grown 10 times faster than the income of the bottom 90% and 66% of total income gains went to the 1%.

According to the Economic Policy Institute as of 2018, all households with incomes less than $737,697 belonged to the lower 99% of wage earners.[1]

Data on the minimum yearly income to be considered among the 1% vary per source,[48] ranging from about $500,000[49] to $1.3 million.[47] This is somewhat below the average compensation range of CEOs whose salaries average $3.9 million according to the AFL-CIO.[citation needed] CEOs salaries average $10.6 million for those whose companies are in the S&P 500 and $19.8 million for companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average.[48]

A chart showing the disparity in income distribution in the United States.[35][50] Wealth inequality and income inequality have been central concerns among OWS protesters.[51][52][53] CBO data shows that in 1980, the top 1% earned 9.1% of all income, while in 2006 they earned 18.8% of all income.[54]

Following the recession of the late 2000s (decade), the economy in the US continued to experience a jobless recovery. New York Times columnist Anne-Marie Slaughter described pictures on the "We are the 99" website as "page after page of testimonials from members of the middle class who took out loans to pay for education, took out mortgages to buy their houses and a piece of the American dream, worked hard at the jobs they could find, and ended up unemployed or radically underemployed and on the precipice of financial and social ruin."[55] With market uncertainty due to fears of a double-dip recession[56] and the downgrade of the US credit rating in the summer of 2011, the topics of how much the rich pay in taxes[57] and how to solve the nation's economic crisis dominated media commentary.[58] When Congress returned from break, proposed policy solutions came from both major parties as the 2012 Republican presidential debates occurred almost simultaneously with President Obama's September 9 proposal of the American Jobs Act. On September 17, 2011 President Obama announced an economic policy proposal for taxing millionaires known as the Buffett Rule. This immediately led to public statements by House Speaker John Boehner,[59] President Obama,[59] and Republican Mitt Romney[60] over whether the Democrats were fomenting "class warfare".[61]

In November 2011 economist Paul Krugman wrote, that the We are the 99% slogan "correctly defines the issue as being the middle class versus the elite and also gets past the common but wrong notion that rising inequality is mainly about the well educated doing better than the less educated." He questioned whether the slogan ought to refer to the 99.9 percent, as a large fraction of the top 1 percent's gains have actually gone to an even smaller group, the top 0.1 percent—the richest one-thousandth of the population. Krugman argued against the idea that the very rich make a special contribution to the economy as "job creators" as few were new economy innovators like Steve Jobs. He quoted a recent analysis having found that 43% of the top 0.1 percent were executives at non-financial companies, 18% in finance, and another 12% are lawyers or in real estate. Commenting on the ongoing economic crisis he wrote, "[the] seemingly high returns before the crisis simply reflected increased risk-taking—risk that was mostly borne not by the wheeler-dealers themselves, but either by naïve investors or by taxpayers, who ended up holding the bag when it all went wrong".[23]

In general, empirical researches have shown the accuracy of this slogan.[62] Per an Oxfam report, just ahead of the 2015 World Economic Forum: "The combined wealth of the world's richest 1 percent will overtake that of everyone else by next year [2016] given the current trend of rising inequality".[63]

Criticism[]

We are the 99% protester at Occupy London

CNBC senior markets writer Jeff Cox reacted negatively to the protest movement,[48] calling the 1% are "the most vilified members of American society" who protesters fail to realize includes not only corporate CEOs (31% of the top earning one percent), bankers and stock traders (13.9%), but also doctors (1.85%), real estate professionals (3.2%), entertainers in arts, media and sports (1.6%), professors and scientists (1.8%), lawyers (1.22%), farmers and ranchers (0.5%), and pilots (0.2%).[64] Cox noted that 1 Percenters pay a disproportionate amount of their incomes to taxes, which later research has confirmed.[65] He stated the phenomenon of wealth concentration among a small segment of the population is a century old, and argued a direct correlation between wealth concentration and the health of the stock market, stating that 36.7% of the United States' wealth was controlled by the 1% in 1922, 44.2% when the stock market crashed in 1929, 19.9% in 1976, and has increased since then. Cox wrote that wealth concentration intensified at the same time that the US changed from a manufacturing leader to a financial services leader. Cox took issue with protesters' focus on income and wealth, and with their embrace of rich allies such as actress Susan Sarandon and Russell Simmons, who are themselves in the 1%.[48] Josh Barro of National Review offered similar arguments, asserting that the 1% includes those with incomes beginning at $593,000, which would exclude most Wall Street bankers.[66]

Economist Thomas Sowell noted in November 2011 that IRS data shows the majority of those in the top 1% of income are there for a short period, and that age was more associated with wealth concentration than was income. Sowell further argued that analyzing data about abstract categories (like income brackets) should not be confused with analyzing data about individuals (who can move in and out of various abstract categories, like income brackets, throughout their lives):

"It is easier and cheaper to collect statistics about income brackets than it is to follow actual flesh-and-blood people as they move massively from one income bracket to another over the years.
More important, statistical studies that follow particular individuals over the years often reach diametrically opposite conclusions from those reached by statistical studies that follow income brackets over the years."[67]

Economic professor Sean Mulholland argued in 2012 that the idea that the richer have become richer while the poor have become poorer is false because data showing that the richest income earners grew significantly richer over the same period that members of poorer classes maintained a fairly constant income rate does not account for the upward and downward economic mobility of particular households over recent decades.[68]

In the US, Republicans have generally been critical of the movement accusing protesters and their supporters of class warfare. Newt Gingrich called the "concept of the 99 and the one" both divisive and "un-American". Democrats have offered "cautious support", using the "99%" slogan to argue for the passage of President Obama's jobs act, Internet access rules, voter identification laws, mine safety, and other issues. Both parties agree that the movement has changed public debate. In December 2011, the New York Times reported that "Whatever the long-term effects of the Occupy Movement, protesters succeeded in implanting "we are the 99 percent" ... into the cultural and political lexicon."[69]

New Continental Congress[]

After the Occupy movement activists' camps started getting uprooted, the Occupy movement came back online proposing a new United States Declaration of Independence from corporations,[70] along with a new Continental Congress in Philadelphia.[71]

See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ Jump up to: a b years, Full Bio Follow Linkedin Julia Kagan has written about personal finance for more than 25; Reports, for Investopedia since 2014 The former editor of Consumer; Credit, She Is an Expert in; debt; Planning, Retirement; Ownership, Home; Issues, Employment; College, insurance She is a graduate of Bryn Mawr; Kagan, has an MFA in creative nonfiction from Bennington College Learn about our editorial policies Julia. "How Much Income Puts You in the Top 1%, 5%, 10%?". Investopedia. Retrieved 2021-04-06.
  2. ^ "Who exactly are the 1%?". The Economist : United Kingdom. January 21, 2012. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved September 17, 2019.
  3. ^ Erik Kain (October 12, 2011). "Outside of Wonkland, 'We are the 99%' Is a Pretty Good Slogan". Forbes.
  4. ^ "Occupy Prescott protesters call for more infrastructure investment". The Daily Courier. Prescott, Arizona: Western News&Info, Inc. Archived from the original on August 30, 2012. Retrieved November 17, 2011. The "99 percent" phrase has become the slogan of the Occupy Wall Street movement that has spread throughout the United States.
  5. ^ Daniel Indiviglio. "Most Americans Aren't Occupy Wall Street's '99 Percent'". The Atlantic, May 10, 2011.
  6. ^ "We Are the 99 Percent - We are the 99 Percent". Wearethe99percent.tumblr.com. August 23, 2011. Retrieved August 23, 2012.
  7. ^ Adam Weinstein. ""We Are the 99 Percent" Creators Revealed". Mother Jones and the Foundation for National Progress. Retrieved November 17, 2011. It began as a simple little idea, just another blog among millions. The Occupy Wall Street protest was scheduled to begin on September 17, and launching We Are the 99 Percent on Tumblr seemed like a good way to promote it.
  8. ^ "The World's 99 Percent". Foreign Policy. October 18, 2011. Retrieved November 17, 2011.
  9. ^ Jeff Sharlet (November 10, 2011). "Inside Occupy Wall Street". Rolling Stone. Retrieved August 23, 2012.
  10. ^ Cain, Sian (3 September 2020). "David Graeber, anthropologist and author of Bullshit Jobs, dies aged 59". The Guardian. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  11. ^ Kenworthy, L. (August 20, 2010) "The best inequality graph, updated" LaneKenworthy.net
  12. ^ Gerard Hastings; Christine Domegan (December 21, 2013). Social Marketing: From Tunes to Symphonies. Routledge, second edition. ISBN 978-0415683739.
  13. ^ Joseph Stiglitz (May 2011). "Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%". Vanity Fair.
  14. ^ John Reed (Sep 2001). "Faith-Based Economics". The Tech.
  15. ^ "Gore Vidal". Playboy magazine. December 1987.
  16. ^ "The USA: Who Owns It? Who Runs It?" (PDF). Black Liberation Month News. Chicago, Illinois: People's College. Feb 1984.
  17. ^ Zinn, Howard (1980). A people's history of the United States. Internet Archive. New York : Harper & Row. ISBN 978-0-06-090792-1.
  18. ^ "The Coming Revolt of the Guards". www.historyisaweapon.com. Retrieved 2021-09-03.
  19. ^ Pages 10-11 of Three Aces: A Nero Wolfe Omnibus (1971) NY: The Viking Press
  20. ^ https://repository.duke.edu/dc/broadsides/bdsla60738
  21. ^ Melissa Bell. "Occupy Wall Street protests get support of the one percent". Washington Post, October 13, 2011.
  22. ^ Amanda Walgrove. "Occupy Tumblr: We Are the 153 Percent". Archived October 16, 2011, at the Wayback Machine The Faster Times, October 13, 2011.
  23. ^ Jump up to: a b Krugman, Paul (November 24, 2011). "We Are the 99.9%". The New York Times.
  24. ^ Suzy Khimm (October 1, 2011). "Conservatives launch "We are the 53 percent" to criticize 99 percenters". Washington Post. Retrieved October 11, 2011.
  25. ^ Mark Memmet. For Those Who Aren't Fans Of The '99 Percent,' There's The '53 Percent', NPR, posted October 11, 2011, accessed October 11, 2011
  26. ^ De Cruz, Helen (December 16, 2016). "We are the 48% - what passionate Remainers think and do". Medium.
  27. ^ Bell, Chris (September 25, 2017). "German election: 'We are the 87%'". BBC News.
  28. ^ Rugaber, Christopher S.; Boak, Josh (January 27, 2014). "Wealth gap: A guide to what it is, why it matters". AP News. Retrieved January 27, 2014.
  29. ^ Apps, Peter (October 11, 2011). "Wall Street action part of global Arab Spring?". Reuters. Retrieved November 24, 2011. What they all share in common is a feeling that the youth and middle class are paying a high price for mismanagement and malfeasance by an out-of-touch corporate, financial and political elite...they took on slogans from U.S. protesters who describe themselves as the "99 percent" paying the price for mistakes by a tiny minority.
  30. ^ "Wall Street protests spread". CBS News. Archived from the original on November 5, 2011. Retrieved November 17, 2011.
  31. ^ "US Census Bureau. (2001). Historical Income Tables—Income Equality". Archived from the original on July 10, 2009. Retrieved June 20, 2007.
  32. ^ Weinberg, D. H. (June 1996). "A Brief Look At Postwar U.S. Income Inequality. US Census Bureau" (PDF).
  33. ^ Burtless, G. (January 11, 2007). "Has U.S. Income Inequality Really Increased?". The Brookings Institution. Retrieved June 20, 2007.
  34. ^ Johnston, D (March 29, 2007). "Income Gap Is Widening, Data Shows". The New York Times.
  35. ^ Jump up to: a b c d "Tax Data Show Richest 1 Percent Took a Hit in 2008, But Income Remained Highly Concentrated at the Top". Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved September 3, 2016.
  36. ^ Gilbert, Dennis (2002). American Class Structure in an Age of Growing Inequality. Wadsworth.
  37. ^ Beeghley, Leonard (2004). The Structure of Social Stratification in the United States. Boston, MD: Pearson, Allyn & Bacpn.
  38. ^ Congressional Budget Office (October 2011). "Trends in the Distribution of Household Income Between 1979 and 2007".
  39. ^ During the same time period, income grew 65% for the next highest 19 percent of earners, just under 40% for the middle 60 percent, and 18% for the bottom 20 percent.
  40. ^ Dave Gilson; Carolyn Perot (March 2011). "It's the Inequality, Stupid". Mother Jones.
  41. ^ Luhby, Tami (October 29, 2011). "Who are the 1 percent?". CNN.
  42. ^ Robert Pear (October 25, 2011). "Top Earners Doubled Share of Nation's Income, Study Finds". New York Times.
  43. ^ Norton, M. I., Ariely, D. (January 6, 2011). "Building a Better America—One Wealth Quintile at a Time". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 6 (1): 9–12. doi:10.1177/1745691610393524. PMID 26162108. S2CID 2013655.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  44. ^ "Financial wealth" is defined by economists as "total net worth minus the value of one's home," including investments and other liquid assets.
  45. ^ Jump up to: a b Deborah L. Jacobs (November 1, 2011). "Occupy Wall Street And The Rhetoric of Equality". Forbes.
  46. ^ Edward N. Wolff (March 2010). "Recent Trends in Household Wealth in the United States: Rising Debt and the Middle-Class Squeeze—an Update to 2007" (PDF). Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.
  47. ^ Jump up to: a b G. William Domhoff (February 2013). "Wealth, Income, and Power". UC-Santa Barbara Sociology Department.
  48. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Cox, Jeff (October 19, 2011). "Protests Target 'One Percent,' But Who Exactly Are They?". CNBC.
  49. ^ Izzo, Phil (October 19, 2011). "What Percent Are You?". The Wall Street Journal.
  50. ^ "By the Numbers". Demos.org. Archived from the original on February 1, 2012. Retrieved September 3, 2016.
  51. ^ Alessi, Christopher (October 17, 2011). "Occupy Wall Street's Global Echo". Council on Foreign Relations. Archived from the original on May 2, 2014. Retrieved October 17, 2011. The Occupy Wall Street protests that began in New York City a month ago gained worldwide momentum over the weekend, as hundreds of thousands of demonstrators in nine hundred cities protested corporate greed and wealth inequality.
  52. ^ Jones, Clarence (October 17, 2011). "Occupy Wall Street and the King Memorial Ceremonies". HuffPost. The reality is that 'Occupy Wall Street' is raising the consciousness of the country on the fundamental issues of poverty, income inequality, economic justice, and the Obama administration's apparent double standard in dealing with Wall Street and the urgent problems of Main Street: unemployment, housing foreclosures, no bank credit to small business in spite of nearly three trillion of cash reserves made possible by taxpayers funding of TARP.
  53. ^ Chrystia Freeland (October 14, 2011). "Wall Street protesters need to find their 'sound bite'". The Globe and Mail. Toronto. Retrieved October 17, 2011.
  54. ^ Michael Hiltzik (October 12, 2011). "Occupy Wall Street shifts from protest to policy phase". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved October 17, 2011.
  55. ^ Anne-Marie Slaughter. "Occupied Wall Street, Seen From Abroad". The New York Times, June 10, 2011.
  56. ^ R.B. (June 3, 2011). "America's jobless recovery: Not again". The Economist. Retrieved October 20, 2011.
  57. ^ "Does a secretary pay higher taxes than a millionaire?". PolitiFact. Retrieved September 3, 2016.
  58. ^ Schuman, Michael. "Global Stock Selloff: Is another financial crisis coming?". Time. ISSN 0040-781X. Retrieved September 3, 2016.
  59. ^ Jump up to: a b Jim Kuhnenn (September 19, 2011). "Obama Unveils Deficit Reduction Plan, 'Buffett Rule' Tax On Millionaires". HuffPost. Associated Press.
  60. ^ Boxer, Sarah B. (October 4, 2011). "Romney: Wall Street Protests 'Class Warfare' - Sarah B. Boxer". National Journal. Retrieved October 20, 2011.
  61. ^ "Obama Unveils Deficit Reduction Plan, 'Buffett Rule' Tax On Millionaires". HuffPost. September 19, 2011.
  62. ^ Torija, P. (March 2013). "Do Politicians Serve the One Percent? Evidence in OECD Countries" (PDF). CITYPERC Working Paper Series. Retrieved November 4, 2013.
  63. ^ "WEALTH: HAVING IT ALL AND WANTING MORE" (PDF). Oxfam. January 2015. pp. 1–12. Retrieved January 20, 2015.
  64. ^ Jon Bakija; Adam Cole; Bradley T. Heim. (2010). "Jobs and Income Growth of Top Earners and the Causes of Changing Income Inequality: Evidence from U.S. Tax Return Data" (PDF). Williams.edu. Data from 2005, found on table 2
  65. ^ "The top 1 percent of taxpayers pay more in federal income taxes than the bottom 90 percent." Andrew Lundeen. The Top 1 Percent Pays More in Taxes than the Bottom 90 Percent The Tax Foundations, Jan 7, 2014
  66. ^ Josh Barro. "We Are the 99 Percent—Even Rich People". National Review Online, October 5, 2011.
  67. ^ Thomas Sowell (November 8, 2011). Who’s in the Top 1 Percent? National Review, accessed 17 May 2020
  68. ^ Sean Mulholland (2012). Is there Income Mobility in America?. Retrieved February 24, 2013.
  69. ^ Stelter, Brian (November 30, 2011). "Camps Are Cleared, but '99 Percent' Still Occupies the Lexicon". The New York Times.
  70. ^ Burnett, Tom (November 4, 2011). "A New Declaration of Independence". HuffPost.
  71. ^ "New Continental Congress Meets in Philadelphia the Week of July 4, 2012". marketwatch.com. April 2, 2012.

Further reading[]

External links[]

Retrieved from ""