1378 papal conclave

Papal conclave April 1378
Dates and location
7–9 April 1378 Old St. Peter's Basilica, Papal States
Key officials
Dean	Ange de Grimoard
Sub-dean
Protodeacon
Elected pope
Bartolomeo Prignano Name taken: Urban VI
← 1370 1389 →

The 1378 papal conclave which was held from April 7 to 9, 1378, was the papal conclave which was the immediate cause of the Western Schism in the Catholic Church. The conclave was one of the shortest in the history of the Catholic Church.^[1] The conclave was also the first since 1159 held in the Vatican and in Old St. Peter's Basilica (the elections and conclaves in Rome prior to the Avignon Papacy having been held mostly in the Basilica of St. John Lateran).^[2]

Pope Gregory XI died on March 26, 1378, in Rome, having returned from Avignon to pursue his territorial interests in the Papal States during the War of the Eight Saints. Although the French cardinals constituted a majority of the College of Cardinals due to the preceding Avignon Papacy, they succumbed to the will of the Roman mob, which demanded the election of an Italian pontiff. They elected Bishop Bartolommeo Prignano, who took the name Pope Urban VI. This was the last time a non-cardinal was elected pope.^[3]

Proceedings[]

This section's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on Talk:1378 papal conclave. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (July 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

The conclave was the first held in Old St. Peter's Basilica.^[4]

Before his death, Gregory XI substantially loosened the laws of the conclave: he instructed the cardinals to begin immediately after his death (rather than waiting the nine days prescribed by the ) to prevent "factional coercion", he gave the cardinals permission to hold the conclave outside of Rome and move it as many times as necessary, and also seemingly suspended the two-thirds requirement, replacing it with "the greater part" (an ambiguous statement, in the original).^[5]

The cardinals were divided into three factions: the first constituting the four Italian cardinals (two Romans, one Florentine, and one Milanese), the second constituting the seven "Limoges" cardinals (referred to individually as "Limousins"^[4]), and the third constituting the five remaining French cardinals.^[1] The conclave was delayed one day because of a violent storm, and thereafter the seven Limoges cardinals wishing to leave Rome as Gregory XI had authorized them to were persuaded by the others that such an act would place the College in even more danger.^[4] It was midnight on the second day before the servants of the cardinals succeeded in clearing the Old Basilica of those not permitted to remain in the conclave.^[4]

According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, even Robert of Geneva (future Antipope Clement VII) and Pedro Martínez de Luna y Gotor (future Antipope Benedict XIII)—the two claimants of the Avignon line during the ensuing Schism—were among those who voted for Prignano.^[1] Prignano had previously lived in France, which may have softened the blow of his election to many of his French electors.^[6] The selection was supposedly "unanimous", with the exception of Giacomo Orsini, who claimed that he was not "free" enough to vote.^[1]

Prignano was accompanied by several other prelates (to conceal the identity of the selected candidate) to the Vatican to accept his election.^[1] To further the confusion, Orsini gave the Habemus Papam without identifying Prignano.^[1]

Upon the conclusion of the election, the Roman mob entered the site of the conclave, under the impression that an aged Roman cardinal Tebaldeschi (who had been left in possession of the papal insignia^[1]) had been elected, an impression that the remaining cardinals did not disabuse them of as they fled to their personal quarters.^[7] The remaining cardinal informed the crowd of the election of Prignano who was hiding in the "most secret room" until his election could be announced.^[8]

Cardinal electors[]

Sixteen of the twenty-three active cardinals took part in the conclave. Two possible other cardinals— and —were not accepted into the ranks of the College for the election. Six more cardinals remained in Avignon, and Jean de la Grange was absent as well.^[3]

Absentee cardinals[]

Aftermath[]

This section's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on Talk:1378 papal conclave. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (February 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (February 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Map showing support for Avignon (red) and Rome (blue) during the Western Schism; this breakdown is accurate until the Council of Pisa (1409), which created a third line of claimants.
Caution: this map is highly inaccurate in some regions and borders, see its talk page.

The following September, the French cardinals reunited in Avignon, moved to Fondi, and elected Antipope Clement VII, who gained the support of all thirteen of his electors (at the time the entire College numbered twenty-two due to the death of ).^[3]

Sources[]

Inquisitor Nicholas Eymerich witnesses the conclave, and then went on to write one of the first tracts against Urban VI, (1383), which argued in favor of the legitimacy of the Avignon line of papal claimants.^[9] Several other eyewitnesses record the chant of the Roman crowd: "We want a Roman or at least an Italian" (Italian: Romano lo volemo, o al manco Italiano).^[7] The contemporary curial document attests to the general atmosphere of confusion, fear, and panic.^[8] For example, canonist recounts removing his clerical garb for fear of the mob and the constant ringing of bells.^[8]

Pro-Urban sources—such as , the confessor of Bridget of Sweden, her daughter Catharine, and Dietrich of Nieheim—claim that the situation in Rome was less restless.^[8] The marked discrepancy between the classes of sources can be explained by the fact that the alleged duress of the mob became the primary argument in favor of the legitimacy of the Avignon claimants.^[8]

Notes[]

References[]

• Theodericus de Nyem [Dietrich Niem]: Georg Erler (editor), Theoderici de Nyem de scismate libri tres (Lipsiae 1890).
• Gayet, Louis. 1889. Le grand schisme d'Occident Les Origines 2 volumes (Paris-Florence-Berlin 1889).
• Valois, Noël. 1890. "L' élection d'Urbain VI. et les origines du Grand Schisme d'Occident," Revue des questions historiques 48 (1890), 353-420.
• Valois, Noël. 1896. La France et le Grand Schisme d'Occident Tome premier (Paris: Alphonse Picard 1896).
• Ullmann, Walter. 1948. The Origins of the Great Schism: A Study in Fourteenth-Century Ecclesiastical History (London 1948; Hamden CT: Archon Books 1967).
• Heimann, C. 2001. Nicolaus Eymerich (Münster, 2001).
• Baumgartner, Frederic J. 2005. Behind Locked Doors. Macmillan. ISBN 0-312-29463-8.
• Blumenfeld-Kosinski, Renate . 2006. Poets, Saints, and Visionaries of the Great Schism, 1378-1417. Penn State Press. ISBN 0-271-02749-5.
• J. P. Adams, Sede Vacante 1378 retrieved 02/26/2016.
• J. P. Adams, Sede Vacante 1378: List of some important Contemporary Documents. retrieved 02/26/2016.