Art & Language

hideThis article has multiple issues. Please help or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. (July 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may interest only a particular audience. Please help by spinning off or relocating any relevant information, and removing excessive detail that may be against Wikipedia's inclusion policy. (July 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article includes a list of general references, but it remains largely unverified because it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (July 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Scratched photograph of the cover of Art-Language, Vol.3 No.1, 1974.

Art & Language is a conceptual artists' collaboration that has undergone many changes since it was created in the late 1960s. The group was founded by artists who shared a common desire to combine intellectual ideas and concerns with the creation of art. The first issue of the group's journal, Art-Language, was published in November 1969 in England.

First years[]

The Art & Language group was founded around 1967 in the United Kingdom by Terry Atkinson (b. 1939), David Bainbridge (b. 1941), Michael Baldwin (b. 1945) and Harold Hurrell (b. 1940).^[1] The group was critical of what was considered mainstream modern art practices at the time. In their work conversations, they created gallery art and presented these ideas in a journal as part of their discussions.^[2]

Between 1968 and 1982, the group grew to nearly fifty people.^{[citation needed]} Among the first to join were critic and art historian, Charles Harrison, and artist Mel Ramsden.^[3] In the early 1970s, individuals including Ian Burn, Michael Corris, , , Joseph Kosuth, , and Terry Smith joined the group. Two collaborators from Coventry, Philip Pilkington and David Rushton, followed.^{[citation needed]}

The first issue of Art-Language The Journal of conceptual art^[4](Volume 1, Number 1, May 1969) is subtitled The Journal of Conceptual Art. Art-Language had, however, brought to light the beginning of a new art movement. While that community was far from a unanimous agreement as to how to define the nature of conceptual art, the editors and most of its historic contributors shared similar opinions about other art movements. Conceptual art was critical of modernism for its bureaucracy and its historicism, and of minimalism for its philosophical conservatism. The practice of conceptual art, especially in its early years of origin, was primarily based on theory, and its form, predominately textual.^{[citation needed]}

As the distribution of the journal and the teaching practices of the editors and others contributors expanded, the conversation grew to include more people. In England, by 1971, artists and critics including Charles Harrison, Philip Pilkington, David Rushton, , , and had joined. Around the same time in New York, Michael Corris joined, followed by , Mayo Thompson, Christine Kozlov, Preston Heller, and Kathryn Bigelow.^{[citation needed]}

The name "Art & Language" remained precarious due to the various interpretations of both the many pieces of art and the purpose of the group. Its significance, or instrumentality, varied from person to person, alliance to alliance, discourse to discourse, and from those in New York who produced The Fox (1974–1976), for example, to those engaged in music projects and those who continued the Journal's edition. There was disagreement among members, and by 1976, there was a growing sense of divide that eventually led to competing individualities and varied concerns.^{[citation needed]}

Throughout the 1970s, Art & Language dealt with questions about art production and attempted a shift from conventional "nonlinguistic" forms of art, such as painting and sculpture, to more theoretically text-based works. The group often took argumentative positions against such prevailing views of critics like Clement Greenberg and Michael Fried.^[5] The Art & Language group that exhibited in the international Documenta 5 exhibitions of 1972 included Atkinson, Bainbridge, Baldwin, Hurrell, Pilkington, Rushton, and Joseph Kosuth, the American editor of Art-Language.^[6] The work consisted of a filing system of material published and circulated by Art & Language members.^[7]

New York Art and Language[]

Burn and Ramsden co-founded The Society for Theoretical Art and Analysis in New York in the late 1960s. They joined Art & Language in 1970–71.^[8] New York Art & Language became fragmented after 1975 because of disagreements concerning principles of collaboration.^[9] Karl Beveridge and , who had been peripheral members of the group in New York, returned to Canada where they worked with trade unions and community groups. In 1977, Ian Burn returned to Australia and Mel Ramsden to the United Kingdom.^{[citation needed]}

Art & Language, Untitled Painting 1965. The Tate Modern Collection.

Late 1970s[]

By the end of the 1970s, the group was essentially reduced to Baldwin, Harrison, and Ramsden with the occasional participation of Mayo Thompson and his group Red Crayola.^[10][11] The political analysis and development within the group resulted in several members leaving the group to work in more activist-oriented political occupations.^[12] Ian Burn returned to Australia, joining Ian Milliss, a conceptual artist who had begun work with trade unions in the early 1970s, in becoming active in Union Media Services, a design studio for social and community initiatives and the development of trade unions.^[13][14]

At the beginning of the 1970s, there were about thirty members. The Art & Language group emphasized the use of language on the theory that language is the basis from which ideas and concepts are built. Their philosophy was that language permits index words which appear, disappear, and for some even persist, thus allowing viewers and artists alike to analyze the evolution of a word through the proposal of different definitions.^{[citation needed]}

Exhibitions and awards[]

Awards and critics[]

In 1986, Art & Language was nominated for the Turner Prize. In 1999, Art & Language exhibited at PS1 MoMA in New York, with a major installation entitled The Artist Out of Work.^[15] This was a recollection of Art & Language's dialogical and other practices, curated by Michael Corris and Neil Powell. This exhibition closely followed the revisionist exhibition of Global Conceptualism: Points of Origin at the Queens Museum of Art, also in New York. The Art & Language show at PS1 offered an alternative account of the antecedents and legacy of '"classic" conceptual art and reinforced a transatlantic rather than nationalistic version of events from 1968 to 1972. In a negative appraisal of the exhibition, art critic Jerry Saltz wrote, "A quarter century ago, 'Art & Language' forged an important link in the genealogy of conceptual art, but next efforts have been so self-sufficient and obscure that their work is now virtually irrelevant."^[16]

Permanent collections[]

Other exhibits around the world include the works of Atkinson and Baldwin (working as Art & Language) held in the collection of the Tate in the United Kingdom.^[17] Papers and works relating to "New York Art & Language" are held at the Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles.

Theoretical installations[]

Art & Language and the  ^[de] collaborated for the first time in January 1995, during the "Art & Language & Luhmann" symposium, organized by the Contemporary Social Considerations Institute (Institut für Sozial Gegenwartsfragen) of Freiburg. The 3-day symposium saw the intervention of speakers including Catherine David, who prepared the Documenta X, and , artist and curator. There was also a theoretical installation of an Art & Language text produced in playback by the Jackson Pollock Bar.^[19] The installation was interpreted by five German actors playing the roles of Jack Tworkow, Philip Guston, Harold Rosenberg, Robert Motherwell and Ad Reinhardt. Using lip sync, the actors used pre-recorded text for a "New Conceptual" conversation.^[20] Ever since this collaboration, each new Art & Language exhibition has been joined by a Jackson Pollock Bar theoretical installation.^[21][22]

Past members and associates[]

References[]

External links[]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Art & Language.

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Art & Language

• Interview with Michael Baldwin and Mel Ramsden about Art & Language (2011) MP3
• Art & Language: Blurting in A & L online Hypertext version of a complete print work of 1973 by American members of Art & Language, with articles and a discussion forum.
• Thomas Dreher: Intermedia Art: Konzeptuelle Kunst with four German articles on Art & Language and a chronology with illustrated works.
• Artists group page in Artfacts.Net with actual major exhibitions.
• Andrew Hunt, Art & Language, Frieze, October 2005.
• Tom Morton, Art & Language, Frieze, April 2002.
• El análisis crítico de la modernidad de Art & Language
• Works by Art & Language at the Mulier Mulier Gallery
• Art & Language page at Lisson Gallery
• Art & Language at René Schmitt Druckgraphik
• Official site of Taddeus Ropac Gallery Archived 16 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine
• Official site of Kadel Willborn Gallery