Page extended-protected

Democracy in China

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about current state of democracy in China. For the historical and current democracy movement, see Chinese democracy movement. For domestic perceptions about democratic values and governance in China, see Chinese views on democracy. For the album by Guns N' Roses, see Chinese Democracy.

Mao Zedong casting his vote in 1950.

The debate over democracy in China has been a major ideological battleground in Chinese politics since the 19th century. Currently, China is not a democracy. It is an authoritarian state which has been characterized as a totalitarian surveillance state, and a dictatorship.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

The Constitution of the People's Republic of China (PRC) states that its form of government is "people's democratic dictatorship".[7] Modern Chinese leaders state that they run a "socialist democracy" in which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is the central authority that acts in the interest of the people and approves which political parties can run.[8]

During a visit to Europe in 2014, CCP general secretary Xi Jinping said that a multi-party system would not work for China. He said China had experimented in the past with various political systems, including multi-party democracy, warning that copying foreign political or development models could be catastrophic because of its unique historical and social conditions.[9]

Qing dynasty

The first introduction of the concept of modern democracy into China is credited to exiled Chinese writer Liang Qichao. In 1895, he participated in protests in Beijing for increased popular participation during the late Qing dynasty, the last ruling dynasty of China. It was the first of its kind in modern Chinese history. After escaping to Japan following the government's clampdown on anti-Qing protesters, Liang Qichao translated and commented on the works of Hobbes, Rousseau, Locke, Hume, Bentham and many other western political philosophers. He published his essays in a series of journals that easily found an audience among Chinese intelligentsia hungering for an explanation of why China, once a formidable empire of its own, was now on the verge of being dismembered by foreign powers. In interpreting Western democracy through the prism of his strongly Confucian background, Liang shaped the ideas of democracy that would be used throughout the next century. Liang favored gradual reform to turn China into a constitutional monarchy with democracy. The goal of the Hundred Days' Reform was to reform China into such as system, but it was rapidly reversed in the Wuxu Coup.

Liang's great rival among progressive intellectuals was Dr. Sun Yat-sen, a republican revolutionary. Sun felt that democracy would be impossible as long as the Qing monarchy still existed. Democracy was part of his platform, the Three Principles of the People (三民主義) – the principle of the people under 1 nation (nationalism), the principle of the people's rights (democracy), and the principle of the people's livelihood and well-being (civility, decency and respect). Like Liang, Sun agreed that democracy, or at least universal suffrage, could not happen overnight in a country with high illiteracy rates and a lack of political consciousness. Sun's called for a period of "political tutelage" where people would be educated before elections can occur.

Responding to civil failures and discontent, the Qing Imperial Court responded by organizing elections. China's first modern elections were organized by Yuan Shikai for Tianjin's county council in 1907. In 1909, 21 of 22 provinces, with the exception being Xinjiang, held elections for provincial assemblies and municipal councils. Requirements were strict; only those that passed the imperial exams, worked in government or military, or owned 5000 yuan of property may vote or run for office. This essentially limited the electorate to the gentry class. Hundreds of thousands voted and the winners were overwhelmingly constitutional monarchists, followers of Liang Qichao. The provincial assemblies elected half of the 200 member national assembly, the other half was selected by regent Prince Chun. All of these assemblies became hotbeds of dissent against the Qing as they were protected by freedom of speech. In 1909, the Qing government held parliamentary elections.

Republic of China, 1912–present

Main articles: Politics of the Republic of China and Elections in Taiwan

When the 1911 Revolution began, it was the provincial assemblies that provided legitimacy to the rebels by declaring their independence from the Qing Empire. The national assembly also issued an ultimatum to the Qing court. Delegates from the provincial assemblies were sent to Nanjing to publicly legitimize the authority of the provisional government of the Republic of China founded on 1 January 1912. They later also formed the provisional senate. The limited acts passed by this government included the formal abdication of the Qing dynasty and some economic initiatives.

In late 1912, national elections were held with an enlarged electorate, albeit still small proportionally to the national population. Sun's Nationalist Party dominated both houses of the National Assembly. Song Jiaoren, the incoming Nationalist prime minister, was assassinated in March 1913 before the assembly's first session. A police investigation implicated sitting prime minister Zhao Bingjun while popular belief was that provisional president Yuan Shikai was behind it. This led to the failed Second Revolution against Yuan. Victorious, Yuan forced the National Assembly to elect him president for a five-year term then purged it of Nationalists. Without a quorum, the assembly was dissolved.

After Yuan's death in 1916, the National Assembly reconvened until it was dissolved again the following year by Zhang Xun's coup attempt to restore the Qing. Prime Minister Duan Qirui refused to reconvene the National Assembly, opting instead to hold elections for a new assembly more favorable to him. As a result, a rump of the old assembly moved to Guangzhou to start a rival government in southern China. In northern China, 17 provinces elected a new assembly dominated by Duan's Anfu Club in 1918. This new assembly was dissolved following Duan's defeat in the Zhili–Anhui War of 1920.

President Xu Shichang organized elections for a third assembly in 1921, but with only 11 provinces voting it never had a quorum and thus never convened. That was the last attempt to hold national elections until 1947. All assemblies were dissolved after the Nationalists' Northern Expedition.

The formation of the Nationalist one-party state in 1927 implemented the late Sun's "political tutelage" program, which forbade elections until the people were considered properly educated. All other parties were kept out of government until 1937 when the impending Second Sino-Japanese War led to the United Front and the formation of the People's Political Council which included the smaller parties. In 1940, partly in response to tensions in the United Front, Mao Zedong offered the new CCP doctrine, New Democracy. New Democracy was an intermediary stage unlike western parliamentary, electoral democracy but not yet communism. After the war, the Nationalist's "political tutelage" ended with the promulgation of the Constitution of the Republic of China. The 1947 National Assembly and 1948 legislative elections were boycotted by the Communists which held most of northern China. As a result, the Nationalists and their junior coalition partners, the Chinese Youth Party and China Democratic Socialist Party, won.

Taiwan, 1945–present

See also: Elections in Taiwan

In 1945, after the Surrender of Japan, governance of Taiwan was transferred to the Republic of China. The ceding of Taiwan was formalized under the Treaty of Taipei in 1952.[10][11] After the governmental exodus from mainland China to the island of China in 1949, martial law was imposed following the February 28 Incident in 1947.[12][13] The period of martial law lasted for 38 years and 57 days from 19 May 1949 to 15 July 1987.[14] During this period, The Republic of China was governed as a de facto one-party state under the Kuomintang although it maintained its status as a de jure parliamentary republic.[15]

On 28 September 1986, the Democratic Progressive Party was founded as an alternate party to the Kuomintang.[15][16] Since the lifting of martial law in 1987, the ROC has had two major political parties, the Kuomintang and the Democratic Progressive Party. Since then, smaller parties have split from the two main parties and formed as new groups, largely within the Pan-Blue Coalition and Pan-Green Coalition.[17] Until 1996, the President of the Republic of China was elected by the National Assembly. In 1996, the Republic of China electoral code was amended to allow for direct election of the President via plurality voting.[18][19]

The Pan-Blue Coalition consists of the Kuomintang, the People First Party (PFP), New Party (CNP), and Minkuotang (MKT). The Pan-Blue parties traditionally favor Chinese unification under a democratic China, with some moving towards a position supporting the present status quo with eventual unification with China.[20][21][19]

The Pan-Green Coalition consists of the Democratic Progressive Party, Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU), Taiwan Independence Party (TAIP), and Taiwan Constitution Association (TCA). The Pan-Green traditionally favor Taiwanese independence.[20][19]

People's Republic of China, 1949–present

See also: Politics of the People's Republic of China, Elections in the People's Republic of China, and Chinese democracy movement

The People's Republic of China (PRC) was initially based on Mao's concept of "New Democracy", not the immediate "dictatorship of the proletariat". Soon, however, Mao called for establishing the "people's democratic dictatorship", and it has since been reflected in the Chinese constitution.[7] Starting in the 1980s, in the period of Opening and Reform, the government organized village elections in which several candidates would run. However, each candidate was chosen or approved by the Party. Higher levels of government are indirectly elected, with candidates vetted by the government. As a result, the highest levels of government contain either CCP members, their United Front allies, or sympathetic independents. Opposition parties are outlawed.

China continuously elucidates democracy with "Chinese characteristics", trying to portray itself as a democratic country, just not a liberal democratic one. The Diplomat says that China's leadership wishes the world to acknowledge that China is run by a legitimate system with the aim of improving the well-being of people.[22]

Chinese who supported the CCP or held anti-democratic perspectives had long expressed skepticism towards Western style democracy as incompatible with traditionalist Chinese culture. They hold that government is legitimate not when people influence it but when it represents their higher interests. Leaders of the post-Mao reforms in the 1980s argued that the Party's record under Mao was bad, but that the Party reformed without being forced. The American political scientist Andrew Nathan concluded that "the reforms aimed to change China from a terror-based, totalitarian dictatorship to a 'mature,' administered dictatorship of the Post-Stalinist Soviet or Eastern European type." "Democracy" would not involve elections or participation in decision making but "the rule of law", which was based on procedural regularity in the exercise of power.[23]

In the spring of 1989, student leaders of the Chinese Democracy Movement expressed demands for democracy in terms which deliberately recalled the demands of the May Fourth Movement, which led to the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests. Intellectual leaders such as Liu Xiaobo and Fang Lizhi supported their calls for participation in government and procedures to fight corruption.

Prefecture-level members of the National People's Congress are directly elected by the general public. Higher-level bodies are elected by those from lower-level bodies; the provincial legislature is elected by members of the prefecture bodies, and members of the national congress are elected by provincial level bodies.[24]

Analysts believe that due to the fact that people are more knowledgeable the leaders they choose at local levels. As policy is more straightforward and potential mistakes cause relatively less damage, local elections are encouraged.[25]

In December 2008, more than 350 intellectual and cultural leaders, including Liu Xiaobo, issued Charter 08. The Charter said China remains the only large world power to still retain an authoritarian system that so infringes on human rights, and "This situation must change! Political democratic reforms cannot be delayed any longer!"[26]

After Xi Jinping became CCP general secretary in 2012, Amnesty International said that human rights in China have become worse.[27] Human rights abuses are rejected by the government, which insists the country is run according to law.[27]

Xi Jinping said that the democracy in China is a whole-process democracy; all major legislative decisions are made only after democratic deliberations and thorough procedures to ensure sound and democratic decision-making.[22][28] This concept was announced in the State Council's 2007 “White Paper on China's Political Party System", and was consolidated after the 19th Central Committee's fourth plenary session.[22] This type of democracy, where there is political participation including sortition, consultation and deliberation, and elections at lower levels of government, have been called "political meritocracy" by analysts.[29] This political system aims to select and promote skilled and talented public officials at lower levels of government, instead of a universal electoral democratic method of selecting political leaders at highest levels of government.[29]

China's flexible political system allows easy experimentation at local levels. China's constitution does not expiate strict power divisions between the government hierarchy. Socio-economic experiments are first executed in city and provincial levels, adjustments are made then replicated nationwide.[25] For example, the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone tested market economy policies; this was subsequently extended across China. Recent testing has seen initiatives such as recruiting NGOs to provide elderly healthcare and workers' rights. The standard barometer specifying economic growth above all has been diminished, with things like environmental sustainability and urban-rural income gap indicies in lieu of GDP growth targets implemented in Hangzhou and Chengdu respectively.[25]

The idea of Intra-party democracy has been repeatedly emphasized and expounded by the CCP as an alternative to liberal democratic ideals characterized by multiparty elections and competition.[30]

Electoral reform in Hong Kong was seen as an avenue for political liberalization in China;[31] the universal suffrage reform package which would allow Hongkongers to vote for the chief executive but the chief executive first needed to be approved by a committee. The law failed to pass Hong Kong's legislative council when pan-democrats voted against the package and most of the pro-Beijing members walked out.[32][33]

At the same time, the party has been warning against the harms that "Western constitutional democracy" could bring to China.[34]

Special Administrative Regions, 1997–present

Main articles: Politics of Hong Kong, Elections in Hong Kong, Politics of Macau, and Elections in Macau

As European colonies, both were denied democratic governments until very late in the colonial period. Official memos from CCP leaders, threatening the British government if they were to hold elections in Hong Kong, were repeatedly sent from the 1950s onwards.[35][36] Hong Kong got its first elections in the 1980s, and Macau in the 1990s.

Both Hong Kong and Macau have legislatures; 35 of Hong Kong's 70 legislators are directly elected, as are 14 of Macau's 33. Also, like grassroots elections in China, Hong Kong does hold elections for the district councils, which act as consultants to the government. Following electoral reforms implemented by the Mainland government, the legislature of Hong Kong following the 2021 general election will only have 20 out of 90 members directly elected.

Hong Kong

Main article: Democratic development in Hong Kong

The first Chief Executive election saw the Chief Executive elected by a 400-member Selection Committee in 1996, then by 800-member Election Committee in 2002, 2005, 2007, and then 1200-member Election Committee in 2012 and 2017.

The Legislative Council of Hong Kong from 1997 to 2004 had 60 seats with 24 were directly elected, six elected from an 800-member electoral college known as the Election Committee of Hong Kong, and 30 elected from FCs. Elections in 2004 and 2008, had 30 members were directly elected by universal suffrage from geographical constituencies (GCs) and 30 were elected from functional constituencies (FCs). From 2012 onwards, The Legislative Council consists of 70 elected members, 35 members were directly elected by universal suffrage from geographical constituencies and 35 were elected from functional constituencies.

There have been many attempts with many different ideas to introduce universal suffrage since the handover.

In 2014, Hong Kong experienced massive protests against the Chinese government's universal suffrage reform package, as the candidates would have to "love the country, and love Hong Kong" and would "protect the broad stability of Hong Kong now and in the future" to be able to stand for election.[37] The universal suffrage reform package failed to pass Hong Kong's legislative council when the majority voted against the package.[32]

Macau

The first Macao Legislative Council in 1996 had 23 members: eight of whom were directly elected (GC), eight indirectly (FC), and seven nominated by the Chief Executive. Its second Legislative Council (2001) had four more members: two more directly elected and two more indirectly. Its third and fourth (2005 and 2009) legislative councils had 29 members, and the fifth (2013) and sixth (2017) have 33.[38][unreliable source?]

The first Chief Executive of Macau was elected by the 200-member Chief Executive Selection Committee in 1999, 2004 and 2009 saw the Chief Executive elected by 300-member Election Committee, and 400-member Election Committee in 2014 and 2019.

Popular support

Very few comprehensive surveys have been done to understand the popular support for or against democracy.[39]

A 1990 survey from Andrew Nathan and Tianjian Shi reported that 55% of people surveyed agree that "China needs more democracy now", but 76% agreed that Chinese democracy depends on the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party.[40] They also reported that a sizeable proportion feared the negative aspects of democracy, 36% agreed that too many parties would "cause political chaos."

Surveys done with the World Values Survey and the East Asia Barometer in 2001 and 2002 shows high explicit support for democracy.[41] In the survey, 96% answered either "fairly good" or "very good" to the question "Do you think having a democratic political system is....". Moreover, 81% of respondents agreed with the statement "democracy may have problems but it is better than any form government." When asked to compare authoritarianism or democracy, only 5% of respondents said that an authoritarian government can be preferable, with 20% saying it doesn't matter. When chosen to rate out of 10 how suitable democracy is for China, only 2% gave a rating lower than 5, 96% gave a 6 or higher, 76% giving an 8, 9 or 10. Nevertheless, 60 to 70% of respondents feared some democratic practices may cause negative effects. 26% agreed or strongly agreed with the statements "in democracy the economic systems runs badly." 35% agreed with that statement "democracies are indecisive and have too much quibbling." 18% agreed with the statement "democracies aren't good at maintaining order."

An Asian Barometer survey from 2014 to 2016 had 76% of Chinese respondents agreeing that democracy was capable of solving the problems in their society. However, when asked to rate the level of democracy in their own government on a 10-point scale, they gave an overall rating of 6.5 (the 7th highest percentage out of 14 different regions surveyed).[42]

Zhengxu Wang of Fudan University in Shanghai wrote in a report in 2007: "It is clear that public support for democracy is high in China. Public opinion surveys show that more than 90% of Chinese citizens believe that having a democracy is good. But the majority is not yet ready for a major effort towards democratization because they still see economic growth and social stability as more important than freedom of speech, political participation, and other democratic rights."[39]

References

  1. ^ Truex, Rory (28 October 2016). Making Autocracy Work. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-17243-2.
  2. ^ Mattingly, Daniel C. (5 December 2019). The Art of Political Control in China. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-316-99791-8.
  3. ^ Tang, Wenfang (4 January 2016). Populist Authoritarianism: Chinese Political Culture and Regime Sustainability. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-049081-2.
  4. ^ Nathan, Andrew J.; Diamond, Larry; Plattner, Marc F. (1 September 2013). Will China Democratize?. Johns Hopkins University Press+ORM. ISBN 978-1-4214-1244-3.
  5. ^ Teets, Jessica C. (9 June 2014). Civil Society under Authoritarianism: The China Model. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-03875-2.
  6. ^ Heurlin, Christopher (27 October 2016). Responsive Authoritarianism in China: Land, Protests, and Policy Making. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-10780-8.
  7. ^ a b "The National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China". npc.gov.cn. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  8. ^ Wong, Alan (10 September 2018). "Is China a democracy? A long (and better) answer". Inkstone News. Archived from the original on 9 December 2018. Retrieved 7 December 2018.
  9. ^ "Xi says multi-party system didn't work for China". Reuters. 2 April 2014. Archived from the original on 7 August 2019. Retrieved 25 December 2019.
  10. ^ "Far East (Formosa and the Pescadores)". Hansard. 540 (cc1870–4). 4 May 1955. Archived from the original on 18 October 2017. Retrieved 1 September 2010. The sovereignty was Japanese until 1952. The Japanese Treaty came into force, and at that time Formosa was being administered by the Chinese Nationalists, to whom it was entrusted in 1945, as a military occupation.
  11. ^ Charney, Jonathan I.; Prescott, J. R. V. (2000). "Resolving Cross-Strait Relations Between China and Taiwan". American Journal of International Law. 94 (3): 453–477. doi:10.2307/2555319. JSTOR 2555319. S2CID 144402230. After occupying Taiwan in 1945 as a result of Japan's surrender, the Nationalists were defeated on the mainland in 1949, abandoning it to retreat to Taiwan.
  12. ^ 三、 台灣戒嚴令 [III. Decree to establish martial law in Taiwan] (in Chinese). National Archives Administration, National Development Council. 2 October 2009. Archived from the original on 10 October 2012. Retrieved 23 May 2012.
  13. ^ Rubinstein, Murray A. (2007). Taiwan: A New History. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe. p. 302. ISBN 9780765614957.
  14. ^ Huang, Tai-lin (20 May 2005). "White Terror exhibit unveils part of the truth". Taipei Times. p. 2. Archived from the original on 20 December 2019. Retrieved 25 May 2020.
  15. ^ a b Lu, Lu Hsin-hui; Kuo, Chung-han (28 September 2016). "DPP should clarify its cross-strait policy: founding member". Central News Agency. Archived from the original on 29 September 2016. Retrieved 29 September 2016.
  16. ^ Chung, Li-hua; Chin, Jonathan (30 September 2016). "DPP members say party must discuss core values". Taipei Times. Archived from the original on 30 September 2016. Retrieved 30 September 2016.
  17. ^ Kuo, Lily (9 January 2020). "'We need more dreams': Taiwan's 'Squad' rallies youth ahead of election". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 April 2020. Retrieved 3 May 2020.
  18. ^ Copper, John Franklin (1998). "The 1996 Elections". Taiwan's Mid-1990s Elections: Taking the Final Steps to Democracy. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 9780275962074.
  19. ^ a b c "Taiwan's 2020 presidential elections: who are the contenders?". Hong Kong Free Press. 4 January 2020. Retrieved 3 May 2020.
  20. ^ a b Zhu, Yunhan (2005). "Taiwan's Year of Stress". Journal of Democracy. 16 (2): 43–57. doi:10.1353/jod.2005.0023. ISSN 1086-3214. S2CID 143483622.
  21. ^ "New Party vows to sign peace treaty". Taipei Times. 21 August 2017. Archived from the original on 14 November 2019. Retrieved 3 May 2020.
  22. ^ a b c Kim, Jo. "Exploring China's New Narrative on Democracy". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 10 April 2020.
  23. ^ Andrew J. Nathan. Chinese Democracy. (New York: Knopf : Distributed by Random House, 1985). ISBN 039451386X. pp. 227–228.
  24. ^ "2 people showed up to a county poll in China. So officials voted instead". South China Morning Post. 4 January 2019. Archived from the original on 7 April 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  25. ^ a b c Bell, Daniel A. (29 May 2015). "Chinese Democracy Isn't Inevitable". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 14 May 2018. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  26. ^ Macartney, Jane (10 December 2008). "Leading Chinese dissident, Liu Xiaobo, arrested over freedom charter". London: Times Online. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 10 December 2008.
  27. ^ a b "Human rights in China under Xi Jinping 'worst since Tiananmen crackdown': Amnesty". South China Morning Post. Amnesty International. 17 November 2017. Archived from the original on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
  28. ^ "Xi says China's democracy is whole-process democracy – Xinhua | English.news.cn". www.xinhuanet.com. Archived from the original on 6 November 2019. Retrieved 7 April 2020.
  29. ^ a b "China's political meritocracy versus Western democracy". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 19 May 2020. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  30. ^ Guo, Dingping (June 2009). "The Growth of Intra-party Democracy and Its Implications for China's Democratic Future". Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 7: 1–19. doi:10.1007/s40647-013-0001-z. S2CID 154985939.
  31. ^ Buckley, Chris; Forsythe, Michael (31 August 2014). "China Restricts Voting Reforms for Hong Kong". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 27 January 2015. Retrieved 10 April 2020.
  32. ^ a b "Hong Kong reform package rejected as pro-Beijing camp walk out in 'miscommunication'". South China Morning Post. 18 June 2015. Archived from the original on 28 April 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
  33. ^ "HK lawmakers shun Beijing poll plan". BBC News. 18 June 2015. Retrieved 30 September 2020.
  34. ^ Buckley, Chris (19 August 2013). "China Takes Aim at Western Ideas". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 24 August 2013. Retrieved 10 April 2020.
  35. ^ Guilford, Gwynn (10 October 2014). "The secret history of Hong Kong's stillborn democracy". Quartz. Archived from the original on 10 June 2019. Retrieved 10 June 2019.
  36. ^ Jacobs, Andrew (27 October 2014). "Hong Kong Democracy Standoff, Circa 1960". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 29 December 2016. Retrieved 4 December 2018.
  37. ^ Buckley, Chris; Forsythe, Michael (31 August 2014). "China Restricts Voting Reforms for Hong Kong". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 27 January 2015. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
  38. ^ Lei, Want (18 September 2017). "HK can learn national security from Macao". China Daily. People's Republic of China. Archived from the original on 19 September 2017. Retrieved 10 June 2019.
  39. ^ a b Wang, Zhengxu (November 2007). "Public Support for Democracy in China". Journal of Contemporary China. 16 (53): 561–579. doi:10.1080/10670560701562283. S2CID 153972558.
  40. ^ Nathan, Andrew; Shi, Tianjian (1993). "Cultural requisites for democracy in China: some findings from a survey". Daedalus. 122 (2): 95–123.
  41. ^ "Social Change and Social Attitudes Survey". WVS China 2001, EAB China 2002. 2002.
  42. ^ Chu Yun-han. "How Asians View Democracy: Three Puzzles (pages 10 and 13)" (PDF). Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. Asian Barometer Survey. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 2021.

Further reading

Library resources about
Democracy in China
  • Nathan, Andrew (1985). Chinese Democracy. New York, USA: Knopf. ISBN 978-0-394-51386-7.
  • Daniel Bell, East Meets West: Human Rights and Democracy in East Asia (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000).
  • Daniel Bell, Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2006).
  • Edmund S. K. Fung, In Search of Chinese Democracy: Civil Opposition in Nationalist China, 1929–1949 (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Cambridge Modern China Series). xviii, 407p. ISBN 0-521-77124-2
  • Hu, Shaohua. Explaining Chinese Democratization (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2000).
  • Liu Jianfei (刘建飞), Democracy and China (Beijing: New World Press, 2011). 178 p. ISBN 9787510412240
  • Holbig, Heike, und Günter Schucher (2016), "He who says C must say D"—China's Attempt to Become the "World's Largest Democracy", GIGA Focus Asia, 02, June, 2016
Retrieved from ""