Modal share
United Kingdom transport modal share from 1952 to 2014, Department for Transport
A modal share (also called mode split, mode-share, or modal split) is the percentage of travelers using a particular type of transportation or number of trips using said type.[1] In freight transportation, this may be measured in mass.
Modal share is an important component in developing sustainable transport within a city or region. In recent years, many cities have set modal share targets for balanced and sustainable transport modes, particularly 30% of non-motorized (cycling and walking) and 30% of public transport. These goals reflect a desire for a modal shift, or a change between modes, and usually encompasses an increase in the proportion of trips made using sustainable modes.[2]
Comparability of data[]
Modal share data is usually obtained by travel surveys, which are often conducted by local governments, using different methodologies. Sampling and interviewing techniques, definitions, the extent of geographical areas and other methodological differences can influence comparability. Most typical surveys refer to the main mode of transport used during trips to work.[3] Surveys covering entire metropolitan areas are preferred over city proper surveys which typically cover only the denser inner city.
Modal split of journeys to work[]
The following tables present the modal split of journeys to work. Note that it is better to use a measure of all trips on a typical weekday, but journey to work data is more readily available. It would also be beneficial to disaggregate private motor vehicles figures to car driver, car passengers and motorbikes (especially relevant for Asian cities).
Metropolitan areas with over 1,000,000 inhabitants[]
| Metro area | walking | cycling | public transport | private motor vehicle | year | Survey Area |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Adelaide |
3% | 1% | 11% | 85% | 2016[4] | GCCSA |
 Atlanta
|
1% | 0% | 3% | 86% | 2016[5] | UA |
 Athens |
8% | 2% | 37% | 53% | 2006 [6] | |
 Auckland |
4% | 1% | 9% | 85% | 2011–2014[7] | MUA |
| Baltimore
|
3% | 0% | 7% | 84% | 2016[8] | UA |
 Barcelona |
32% | 2% | 39% | 27% | 2013[9] | |
 Beijing |
21% | 32% | 26% | 21% | 2005/2011[10] | |
 Belgrade |
23% | 1% | 49% | 27% | 2015 | |
 Berlin |
30% | 18% | 27% | 26% | 2018 | |
| Brisbane |
4% | 1% | 14% | 81% | 2016[11] | GCCSA |
 Brussels |
25% | 2.5% | 28% | 43% | 2010[12] | |
 Bogota |
15% | 2% | 64% | 19% | 2008[10] | |
| Boston |
5% | 1% | 14% | 73% | 2016[13] | UA |
 Budapest |
32% | 1% | 47% | 20% | 2011 | |
 Calgary
|
4.7% | 1.5% | 14.4% | 79.4% | 2016 | |
| Chicago |
3% | 1% | 13% | 77% | 2016[14] | UA |
| Cologne |
7% | 15% | 28% | 50% | 2013 | |
| Dallas |
1% | 0% | 2% | 90% | 2016[15] | UA |
 Daejeon |
26% | 2% | 28% | 44% | 2012[16] | |
 Delhi |
21% | 12% | 48% | 19% | 2008/2011[10] | |
| Detroit
|
1% | 0% | 2% | 92% | 2016[17] | |
 Dublin
|
18% | 7% | 15% | 59% | 2020[18] | |
| Edmonton
|
3.7% | 1.0% | 11.3% | 84% | 2016 | |
| Hamburg |
27% | 15% | 22% | 36% | 2017[19] | |
 Helsinki |
29% | 9% | 22% | 39% | 2018[20] | |
 Hong Kong |
11% | 0.5% | 77% | 12% | 2011[21] | |
| Houston |
1% | 0% | 2% | 91% | 2016[22] | UA |
| Indianapolis |
1% | 0% | 1% | 91% | 2016[23] | UA |
 Jakarta |
1% | 0.2% | 20% | 78%* | 2019[24] | UA *67% motorbike |
 Kuala Lumpur |
6.6% | 0.9% | 36.8% | 48.3% | 2019[25] | Taxi 1% |
| Las Vegas |
1% | 0% | 4% | 90% | 2016[26] | UA |
 London |
24% | 2% | 37% | 37% | 2016[27] | |
| Los Angeles |
3% | 1% | 5% | 85% | 2016[28] | UA |
| Madrid |
34% | 0.5% | 25% | 40% | 2018 [29] | |
 Manila |
9% | 2% | 44% | 45% | 2019[10] | |
| Melbourne |
4% | 2% | 19% | 76% | 2016[11] | GCCSA |
| Miami
|
2% | 1% | 4% | 87% | 2016[30] | UA |
 Milan |
18% | 10% | 41% | 29% | 2014[31] | |
 Minsk |
13% | 1% | 63% | 20% | 2016 [32] | |
| Montreal |
5% | 2% | 22% | 70% | 2016[33] | CMA |
| Mumbai |
27% | 6% | 52% | 15% | 2008/2011[10] | |
| Munich |
24% | 18% | 24% | 34% | 2017 | |
| New York City |
28% | 3% | 31% | 32% | 2018[34] | UA |
 Osaka |
7% | 19% | 61% | 13% | 2010[35] | |
| Ottawa
|
8% | 2% | 18% | 72% | 2016[36] | CMA |
 Paris |
15% | 5% | 59% | 20% | 2010[37] | |
| Perth |
3% | 1% | 12% | 84% | 2016[11] | GCCSA |
| Philadelphia |
4% | 1% | 10% | 80% | 2016[38] | UA |
| Phoenix |
2% | 1% | 2% | 87% | 2016[39] | UA |
| Portland |
3% | 3% | 7% | 78% | 2016[40] | UA |
 Prague |
22% | 0.4% | 52% | 25% | 2017[41] | |
 Rio de Janeiro |
29% | 3% | 43% | 25% | 2012[42] | UA |
| Rome |
4% | 1% | 29% | 66% | 2014[43] | |
| San Antonio |
2% | 0% | 3% | 90% | 2016[44] | UA |
| San Diego |
3% | 1% | 3% | 85% | 2016[45] | UA |
| San Francisco |
5% | 2% | 20% | 64% | 2016[46] | UA |
| San Jose |
2% | 2% | 5% | 84% | 2016[47] | UA |
| São Paulo |
32% | 1% | 36% | 31% | 2017[48] | UA |
| Seattle |
4% | 1% | 10% | 77% | 2016[49] | UA |
| Seoul
|
N/A | 4% | 66% | 23% | 2014[50] | |
| Shanghai |
27% | 20% | 33% | 20% | 2009/2011[10] | |
 Singapore |
22% | 1% | 44% | 33% | 2011[10] | |
 Sofia
|
N/A | N/A | 73%[a] | 27% | 2010[51] | |
| Sydney |
5% | 1% | 27% | 67% | 2016[11] | GCCSA |
 Taipei |
13% | 4% | 43% | 40% | 2016[52] | |
| Tokyo |
23% | 14% | 51% | 12% | 2008/2009[10] | |
| Toronto |
5% | 1% | 24% | 68% | 2016[53] | CMA |
| Vancouver
|
7% | 2% | 20% | 69% | 2016 | CMA |
 Vienna |
26% | 7% | 39% | 28% | 2014[54] | |
 Warsaw |
18% | 3% | 47% | 32% | 2015[55] | |
| Washington, D.C. |
4% | 1% | 16% | 72% | 2016[56] | UA |
Metropolitan areas with over 250,000 inhabitants[]
| Metro area | walking | cycling | public transport | private motor vehicle | year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Aarhus |
7% | 27% | 19% | 43% | 2004 |
| Alicante |
18% | 0% | 13% | 69% | 2004 |
 Amsterdam |
4% | 40% | 29% | 27% | 2014 |
| Bari |
13% | 1% | 14% | 72% | 2001 |
 Basel |
33% | 17% | 27% | 22% | 2015[57] |
| Bern |
30% | 15% | 32% | 22% | 2015[57] |
| Bilbao |
23% | 0% | 34% | 43% | 2004 |
| Birmingham |
1% | 1% | 25% | 66% | 2001 |
| Bologna |
8% | 4% | 21% | 67% | 2001 |
| Bonn |
29% | 12% | 14% | 46% | 2008 |
 Bratislava |
4% | 0% | 70% | 26% | 2004 |
| Brno |
5% | 2% | 57% | 32% | 2012 [58] |
| Buffalo |
6% | 1% | 14% | 79% | 2012 |
| Bremen |
25% | 23% | 16% | 36% | 2013 |
| Bristol |
19% | 8% | 12% | 55% | 2011 [59] |
| Canberra |
5% | 3% | 8% | 85% | 2016[11] |
| Christchurch |
4% | 5% | 4% | 87% | 2011–2014 [7] |
| Copenhagen |
10% | 30% | 36% | 26% | 2012 |
| Córdoba |
18% | 1% | 10% | 71% | 2004 |
| Dortmund |
19% | 10% | 22% | 49% | 2019 |
| Dresden |
26% | 18% | 20% | 36% | 2018 |
| Dublin |
13.2% | 7.6% | 21.5% | 48.5% | 2016[60] |
| Düsseldorf |
29% | 12% | 19% | 40% | 2013 |
| Edinburgh |
19% | 7% | 30% | 42% | 2009-2010[61] |
| Eindhoven |
3% | 24% | 8% | 65% | 2004 |
| Essen |
19% | 7% | 19% | 55% | 2019 |
| Florence |
8% | 4% | 21% | 69% | 2001 |
| Frankfurt |
11% | 15% | 30% | 44% | 2015 |
| Freiburg im Breisgau |
29% | 34% | 16% | 21% | 2017 |
| Gent |
13% | 33% | 15% | 40% | 2018[62] |
| Gdańsk |
20.8% | 5.9% | 32.1% | 41.2% | 2016[63] |
| Gijón |
24% | 0% | 17% | 59% | 2004 |
 Gothenburg |
12% | 14% | 21% | 52% | 2004 |
| Graz |
19% | 19% | 20% | 42% | 2018 [64] |
| Halifax |
8% | 1% | 12% | 78% | 2016[65] |
| Hamilton |
4% | 1% | 10% | 84% | 2016[66] |
| Hanover |
26% | 19% | 19% | 36% | 2017 |
| Helsinki |
37% | 10% | 30% | 22% | 2016 |
| Las Palmas |
12% | 0% | 24% | 64% | 2004 |
 Lisbon |
10% | 0% | 46% | 40% | 2001 |
| Málaga |
12% | 0% | 11% | 77% | 2004 |
| Malmö |
6% | 25% | 18% | 51% | 2011 |
| Murcia |
18% | 1% | 7% | 74% | 2004 |
| Naples |
13% | 0% | 26% | 60% | 2001 |
| Nuremberg |
24% | 14% | 23% | 39% | 2019 |
 Oslo |
29% | 6% | 30% | 34% | 2013 |
| Palermo |
12% | 1% | 9% | 78% | 2001 |
| Quebec City |
2% | 6% | 11% | 80% | 2016[67] |
| Rotterdam |
5% | 14% | 25% | 56% | 2004 |
| Stockholm |
15% | 7% | 43% | 33% | 2004 |
 Tel Aviv |
16% | 13% | 28% | 43% | 2015[68] |
| The Hague |
5% | 22% | 30% | 43% | 2004 |
| Seville |
13% | 7% | 18% | 62% | 2014 |
| Stuttgart |
26% | 5% | 24% | 45% | 2010 |
 Tallinn |
11% | 2% | 35% | 48% | 2017[69] |
| Turin |
12% | 3% | 5% | 79% | 2004 |
| Utrecht |
25.3% | 48.4% | 5.4% | 18.7% | 2018[70] |
| Valencia |
16% | 1% | 21% | 62% | 2004 |
| Valladolid |
22% | 1% | 20% | 57% | 2004 |
| Vigo |
19% | 0% | 13% | 68% | 2004 |
 Vilnius |
36% | 0% | 26% | 38% | 2011[71] |
| Wellington |
10% | 1% | 23% | 62% | 2011–2014[7] |
| Victoria (CMA)
|
10% | 7% | 11% | 70% | 2016 |
| Winnipeg |
5% | 2% | 14% | 79% | 2016[72] |
| Zaragoza |
45.91% | 2.90% | 23.71% | 26.88% | 2017 [73] |
| Zürich |
33% | 12% | 32% | 21% | 2015[57] |
| Mean ± SD | 13±8% | 8±9% | 24±13% | 55±17% |
Notes: European data is based on the Urban Audit[74]
[]
The Charter of Brussels, signed by 36 cities including Brussels, Ghent, Milan, Munich, Seville, Edinburgh, Toulouse, Bordeaux, Gdansk, and Timișoara, commits the signatories to achieve at least 15% of bicycling modal share by 2020, and calls upon European institutions to do likewise.[75] The cycling modal share is strongly associated with the size of local cycling infrastructure[76]
The Canadian city of Hamilton adopted a similar modal share target plan in 2005.[77]
[]
The modal share differs considerably depending on each city in the developing world.[78][79][80]
According to UNECE, the global on-road vehicle fleet is to double by 2050 (from 1,2 billion to 2,5 billion,[81] see introduction), with most future car purchases taking place in developing countries. Some experts even mention that the number of vehicles in developing countries will increase by 4 or 5-fold by 2050 (compared to current car use levels), and that the majority of these will be second-hand.[11][82]
[]
Through legislation (i.e. taxing and conditions on new car purchases), ... car ownership can be discouraged. This could help in achieving a modal shift.[83]
See also[]
- Car ownership
- Circulation plan
- Phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles
- Intermodal passenger transport
- Mode choice (the decisions that determine Modal share, especially in traffic analysis and forecasting)
- Mode of transport
- Rail usage statistics by country
- Road reallocation
- Environmental aspects of the electric car
- Smart mobility
External links[]
- Epomm – Modal share data for more than 300 Cities with more or less than 100,000 inhabitants, mostly in Europe
- [3] – Modal share data and trends over the past 20 years for Australian cities (unpublished paper by David Ashley)
Notes[]
- ^ Result achieved using the percentage of commuters using PT (63%) plus Taxi (3%) and additionally marshrutkas (7%).
References[]
- ^ Glossary (Engineering Services – Transportation, City of Vancouver website. Accessed 2009-06-04.) Archived June 3, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Page cannot be found - Ramblers". www.ramblers.org.uk. Archived from the original on 2016-03-07. Retrieved 2021-08-31.
- ^ "Singapore Land and Transport Authority: Journeys, issue 7, November 2011" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-14. Retrieved 2014-07-11.
- ^ "Trends in journey to work mode shares in Australian cities to 2016 (second edition)". Charting Transport. 2017-10-24. Archived from the original on 2018-07-19. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
- ^ "Census profile: Atlanta, GA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-08-22. Retrieved 2016-08-12.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^ Jump up to: a b c "New Zealand Household Travel Survey: Travel to work, by main urban area results (3-year moving average)". nzdotstat.stats.govt.nz. Archived from the original on 2013-10-29. Retrieved 2013-10-25.
- ^ "Census profile: Baltimore, MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-12-26. Retrieved 2016-12-25.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h "Passenger Transport Mode Shares in World Cities" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-15. Retrieved 2014-07-11.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Charting Transport Archived 2017-10-26 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 27 October 2017
- ^ Camille Thiry (ed.). "Cahiers de l'Observatoire de la mobilité de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale: Les pratiques de déplacement à Bruxelles" (PDF) (in French). Bruxelles mobilité. p. 49. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 25 November 2013.
- ^ "Census profile: Boston, MA--NH--RI Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Census profile: Chicago, IL--IN Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Census profile: Dallas--Fort Worth--Arlington, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ [KOTI, "2013 National Transportation DB Report" 2013], retrieved 2013-12-31
- ^ "Census profile: Detroit, MI Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Deloitte City Mobility Index 2020" (PDF). Deloitte Insights. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-06-07. Retrieved 2021-06-07.
- ^ "Page 9 in Mobilität in Deutschland: Kurzreport Hamburg und Metropolregion" (PDF).
- ^ "Page 61: Kulkutapajakauma Helsingin seudulla" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-02-27. Retrieved 2020-02-27.
- ^ "Transport Department - Travel Characteristics Survey 2011 - Final Report *Free copy can only be downloaded from this website". www.td.gov.hk. Archived from the original on 2020-11-05. Retrieved 2020-11-02.
- ^ "Census profile: Houston, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Census profile: Indianapolis, IN Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Badan Pusat Statistik". www.bps.go.id. Archived from the original on 2020-09-28. Retrieved 2020-02-06.
- ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2021-07-22. Retrieved 2021-07-22.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^ "Census profile: Las Vegas--Henderson, NV Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ Transport for London: "Travel in London" Report 10 Archived 2018-05-16 at the Wayback Machine, 2017
- ^ "Census profile: Los Angeles--Long Beach--Anaheim, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Encuesta de movilidad de la Comunidad de Madrid 2018 - Documento de síntesis" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-12-01. Retrieved 2020-06-02.
- ^ "Census profile: Miami, FL Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Piano Urbano per la Mobilità Sostenibile (PUMS) della Città metropolitana di Milano" (PDF). cittametropolitana.mi.it. Città metropolitana di Milano. p. 150. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2021.
- ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-09-22. Retrieved 2016-09-22.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^ Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census – Montréal [Census metropolitan area], Quebec and Quebec [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-03-09. Retrieved 2021-03-09.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^ "大阪市における人の動き：平成 22 年 第５回近畿圏パーソントリップ調査集計結果から" (PDF). 第5回パーソントリップ調査. Osaka City Hall. p. 8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 June 2021. Retrieved 7 April 2021.
- ^ Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census – Ottawa – Gatineau [Census metropolitan area], Ontario/Quebec and Ontario [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-02-02. Retrieved 2016-04-30.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^ "Census profile: Philadelphia, PA--NJ--DE--MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Census profile: Phoenix--Mesa, AZ Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Census profile: Portland, OR--WA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ The yearbook of transportation Prague 2009 Archived 2011-07-26 at the Wayback Machine, page 5, retrieved 2011-03-23
- ^ "Page 41 in Monografia UFRJ 2015" (PDF). João Victor Costa. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-12-04. Retrieved 2020-05-15.
- ^ FGM-AMOR. "ENDURANCE :: Countries/Cities". www.epomm.eu. Archived from the original on 2018-04-28. Retrieved 2018-04-27.
- ^ "Census profile: San Antonio, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Census profile: San Diego, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Census profile: San Francisco--Oakland, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Census profile: San Jose, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Page 39 in Pesquisa OD 2017". Metrô. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-06-06. Retrieved 2020-05-15.
- ^ "Census profile: Seattle, WA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Public Transport in Seoul Metropolitan – K-Developedia" (PDF). K Developedia. 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 January 2021. Retrieved 16 August 2019.
- ^ "The World Bank | Fare Collection Systems - Sofia, Bulgaria". www.ssatp.org. Archived from the original on 2021-08-13. Retrieved 2021-08-13.
- ^ Taipei City Hall. "市政統計週報". Archived from the original on 20 October 2018. Retrieved 19 October 2018.
- ^ Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics (2017-02-08). "Census Profile, 2016 Census – Toronto [Census metropolitan area], Ontario and Toronto, Census division [Census division], Ontario". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2020-11-26. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ [1] Archived 2015-02-10 at the Wayback Machine, (German) retrieved 2015-02-10
- ^ [2] Archived 2016-08-17 at the Wayback Machine, (Polish) retrieved 2016-01-20
- ^ "Census profile: Washington, DC--VA--MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Archived from the original on 2018-04-16. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c "Städtevergleich Mobilität Vergleichende Betrachtung der Städte Basel, Bern, Luzern, St.Gallen, Winterthur und Zürich im Jahr 2015" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-06-14. Retrieved 2020-06-14.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-09-23. Retrieved 2017-09-02.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-24. Retrieved 2013-12-04.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^ "How We Travelled - CSO - Central Statistics Office". Archived from the original on 2019-11-15. Retrieved 2020-01-29.
- ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2020-12-22.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^ "Verplaatsingsgedrag van de Gentenaar in 2018 2018". Archived from the original on 2019-12-25. Retrieved 2019-12-25.
- ^ "Gdańskie Badania Ruchu 2016". Archived from the original on 2017-10-20. Retrieved 2017-10-20.
- ^ "Verkehrsmittelaufteilung - Modal Split". Archived from the original on 2020-10-01. Retrieved 2020-07-08.
- ^ Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (2017-02-08). "Census Profile, 2016 Census - Halifax [Census metropolitan area], Nova Scotia and Nova Scotia [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2020-08-05.
- ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2020-08-04.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^ Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (2017-02-08). "Census Profile, 2016 Census - Québec [Census metropolitan area], Quebec and Quebec [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2020-08-05.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-06-27. Retrieved 2018-07-05.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^ url=https://www.tallinn.ee/eng/g2677s113615[permanent dead link]
- ^ CBS. "Verplaatsingen in de gemeente Utrecht naar vervoerwijze, 2018" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-01-26. Retrieved 2020-12-14.
- ^ Naujų transporto rūšių diegimo Vilniaus mieste specialusis planas Archived 2013-12-03 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 2013-07-03
- ^ Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census – Winnipeg [Census metropolitan area], Manitoba and Manitoba [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
- ^ "Revisión del plan de movilidad urbana sostenible Zaragoza" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2020.
- ^ Urban Audit Archived 2009-02-06 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 2009-10-03
- ^ Charter of Brussels Archived 2009-07-31 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 2009-10-03
- ^ Mueller, N (2018). "Health impact assessment of cycling network expansions in European cities". Preventive Medicine. 109: 62–70. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.011. hdl:10230/42143. PMID 29330030.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-01-24. Retrieved 2019-01-23.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^ "Figure 9.9 | Passenger transport modal shares of several cities in..." ResearchGate. Archived from the original on 2021-08-31. Retrieved 2020-09-21.
- ^ "Energy End Use Transport report".
- ^ "How do people move around?" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-07-07. Retrieved 2020-09-21.
- ^ "Used vehicle background overview" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-01-21. Retrieved 2020-09-21.
- ^ "Regulation for 2nd hand vehicles" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-10-24. Retrieved 2020-09-21.
- ^ "Green light for sustainable mobility". Archived from the original on 2020-10-24. Retrieved 2020-09-12.
Categories:
- Low-carbon economy
- Transportation planning
- Transport systems
- Transport by mode