Suicide among LGBT youth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Research has found that attempted suicide rates and suicidal ideation among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) youth is significantly higher than among the general population.[1][2]

The passage of laws that discriminate against LGBT people have been shown to have significant negative impacts on the physical and mental health and well-being of LGBT youth; for example, depression and drug use among LGBT people have been shown to increase significantly after the passage of discriminatory laws.[3] By contrast, the passage of laws that recognize LGBT people as equal with regard to civil rights may have significant positive impacts on the physical and mental health and well-being of LGBT youth. A study of nationwide data from across the United States from January 1999 to December 2015 revealed that the recognition of same-sex marriage is associated with a significant reduction in the rate of attempted suicide among children, with the effect being concentrated among children of a minority sexual orientation (LGBT youth), resulting in approximately 134,000 fewer children attempting suicide each year in the United States.[4][5][6][7][8] Comparable findings are observed outside the United States. A study using cross-country data from 1991 to 2017 for 36 OECD countries found that same-sex marriage legalization is associated with a decline in youth suicide of 1.191 deaths per 100,000 youth, with this reduction persisting at least into the medium term.[9]

Bullying of LGBT youth has been shown to be a contributing factor in many suicides, even if not all of the attacks have been specifically regarding sexuality or gender.[10] Since a series of suicides in the early 2000s, more attention has been focused on the issues and underlying causes in an effort to reduce suicides among LGBT youth. Research by the Family Acceptance Project has demonstrated that "parental acceptance, and even neutrality, with regard to a child's sexual orientation" can bring down the attempted suicide rate.[11][12]

The National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention notes that there is no national data (for the U.S.) regarding suicidal ideation or suicide rates among the LGBT population as a whole or for LGBT youth in particular.[13]

Reports and studies[]

Clinical social worker Caitlin Ryan's Family Acceptance Project (San Francisco State University) conducted the first study of the effect of family acceptance and rejection on the health, mental health and well-being of LGBT youth, including suicide, HIV/AIDS and homelessness.[14] Their research shows that LGBT youths "who experience high levels of rejection from their families during adolescence (when compared with those young people who experienced little or no rejection from parents and caregivers) were more than eight times likely to have attempted suicide, more than six times likely to report high levels of depression, more than three times likely to use illegal drugs and more than three times likely to be at high risk for HIV or other STDs" by the time they reach their early 20s.[14][15]

Numerous studies have shown that lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth have a higher rate of suicide attempts than do heterosexual youth. The Suicide Prevention Resource Center synthesized these studies and estimated that between 5 and 10% of LGBT youth, depending on age and sex groups, have attempted suicide, a rate 1.5-3 times higher than heterosexual youth.[16] A U.S. government study, titled Report of the Secretary's Task Force on Youth Suicide, published in 1989, found that LGBT youth are four times more likely to attempt suicide than other young people.[17] This higher prevalence of suicidal ideation and overall mental health problems among gay teenagers compared to their heterosexual peers has been attributed to minority stress.[18][19] "More than 34,000 people die by suicide each year," making it "the third leading cause of death among 15 to 24 year olds with lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth attempting suicide up to four times more than their heterosexual peers."[20]

Parents with higher levels of education or belonging to different ethnicities do not seem to provide significant impact on LGBT+ suicide statistics.[21]

It is impossible to know the exact suicide rate of LGBT youth because sexuality and gender minorities are often hidden and even unknown, particularly in this age group. Further research is currently being done to explain the prevalence of suicide among LGBT youths.[22][23][24]

In terms of school climate, "approximately 25 percent of lesbian, gay and bisexual students and university employees have been harassed due to their sexual orientation, as well as a third of those who identify as transgender, according to the study and reported by the Chronicle of Higher Education."[25] Research has found the presence of gay-straight alliances (GSAs) in schools is associated with decreased suicide attempts; in a study of LGBT youth, ages 13–22, 16.9% of youth who attended schools with GSAs attempted suicide versus 33.1% of students who attended schools without GSAs.[26]

"LGBT students are three times as likely as non-LGBT students to say that they do not feel safe at school (22% vs. 7%) and 90% of LGBT students (vs. 62% of non-LGBT teens) have been harassed or assaulted during the past year."[27] In addition, "LGBTQ students were more likely than heterosexual students to have seriously considered leaving their institution as a result of harassment and discrimination."[28] Susan Rankin, a contributing author to the report in Miami, found that "Unequivocally, The 2010 State of Higher Education for LGBT People demonstrates that LGBT students, faculty and staff experience a ‘chilly’ campus climate of harassment and far less than welcoming campus communities."[28]

The internet is also an important factor for LGBT. An international study found that suicidal LGBT showed important differences with suicidal heterosexuals, in a matched-pairs study. That study found suicidal LGBT were more likely to communicate suicidal intentions, to search for new friends online, and to find more support online than did suicidal heterosexuals.[29]

The black transgender and gender non-conforming community has been found to face discrimination to a higher degree than the rest of the transgender community, which is due to the intersection of racism and transphobia.[30][citation needed] Research has found that this community experiences a higher level of poverty, suicide attempts, and harassment, while the effects of HIV and being refused health care due to transphobia and/or racism are greater as well.[31][citation needed] The National LGBTQ task force conducted a survey to discern these trends among the black transgender non-conforming community in with the overall transgender community.[32]

The survey found that amongst the black respondents 49% reported having attempted suicide.[32] Additional findings were that this group reported that 26% are unemployed and 34% reported an annual income of less than $10,000 per year. 41% of respondents reported homelessness at some point in their lives, which is more than five times the rate of the general US population.[32] Also, the report revealed that the black transgender or gender non-conforming community reported 20.23% were living with HIV and that half of the respondents who attended school expressing a transgender identity or gender non-conformity reported facing harassment.[32] 27% of black transgender youth reported being physically assaulted, 15% were sexually assaulted and 21% left school due to these instances of harassment.[citation needed]

Familial acceptance[]

Familial responses to LGBT youth identities differ from person to person. They range from acceptance to outright rejection of the LGBT individual. "Family connectedness" is important in a LGBT youth's life because it will help establish a positive mental health.[33] One of the negative outcomes of LGBT youth confiding in family members about their sexual identities is the risk of being kicked out of their homes. When these youth don't have the support and acceptance of their family, they are more likely to turn to other riskier sources.

Amongst transgender youth, these effects are even more pronounced. When a transgender youth is supported by their parents, they are 93% less likely to attempt suicide (a 14-fold difference).[34]

Impact of same-sex marriage[]

Across OECD countries, the legalisation of same-sex marriage is associated with reductions in the suicide rate of youth aged 10–24, with this association persisting into the medium term. The establishment of the legal right of same-sex marriage in the United States is associated with a significant reduction in the rate of attempted suicide among children, with the effect concentrated among children of a minority sexual orientation.

OECD Countries[]

A study of country-level data across 36 OECD countries from 1991 to 2017 found that same-sex marriage legalization reduced the suicide rate of youth aged 10–24 by 1.191 deaths per 100,000 youth, equal to a 17.90% decrease.[35] This decline was most pronounced in males for whom the suicide rate fell by 1.993 compared to a decrease of 0.348 for female youth, corresponding to decreases of 19.98% and 10.90%, respectively. The study worked by exploiting common factors in the youth suicide rate across time between the sample countries to econometrically estimate what the suicide rate would have been in the absence of same-sex marriage legalization for the countries and years that same-sex marriage was legal. The impact of same-sex marriage legalization could then be inferred by comparing this estimated counterfactual to the observed data across time, thereby enabling inferences to be interpreted causally. By virtue of this design, the researchers were able to establish that the association persisted at least into the medium term and that countries that recently adopted same-sex marriage (the Netherlands was the first country to legalize same-sex marriage in 2001 and, as of 2017, 18 of the 36 sample countries had followed suit) also experienced declines in youth suicide. These findings indicate that future legalization in other developed countries would also engender a decrease in youth suicide over time.

United States[]

A study of nationwide data from January 1999 to December 2015 revealed an association between states that established same-sex marriage and reduced rates of attempted suicide among all schoolchildren in grades 9–12, with a rate reduction in all schoolchildren (LGB and non-LGB youth) in grades 9–12 declining by 7% and a rate reduction among schoolchildren of a minority sexual orientation (LGB youth) in grades 9–12 of 14%, resulting in approximately 134,000 fewer children attempting suicide each year in the United States. The gradual manner in which same-sex marriage was established in the United States (expanding from 1 state in 2004 to all 50 states in 2015) allowed the researchers to compare the rate of attempted suicide among children in each state over the time period studied. Once same-sex marriage was established in a particular state, the reduction in the rate of attempted suicide among children in that state became permanent. No reduction in the rate of attempted suicide among children occurred in a particular state until that state recognized same-sex marriage. The lead researcher of the study observed that "laws that have the greatest impact on gay adults may make gay kids feel more hopeful for the future".[4][5][6][7][8] Other research shows that while this nationwide study has shown an association between states that established same-sex marriage and reduced rates of attempted suicide among all schoolchildren in grades 9–12, it does not show causation.[36][37]

Developmental psychology perspectives[]

The diathesis-stress model suggests that biological vulnerabilities predispose individuals to different conditions such as cancer, heart disease, and mental health conditions like major depression, a risk factor for suicide. Varying amounts of environmental stress increase the probability that these individuals will develop that condition. Minority stress theory suggests that minority status leads to increased discrimination from the social environment which leads to greater stress and health problems. In the presence of poor emotion regulation skills this can lead to poor mental health. Also, the differential susceptibility hypothesis suggests that for some individuals their physical and mental development is highly dependent on their environment in a "for-better-and-for-worse" fashion. That is, individuals who are highly susceptible will have better than average health in highly supportive environments and significantly worse than average health in hostile, violent environments. The model can help explain the unique health problems affecting LGBT populations including increased suicide attempts. For adolescents, the most relevant environments are the family, neighborhood, and school. Adolescent bullying - which is highly prevalent among sexual minority youths - is a chronic stressor that can increase risk for suicide via the diathesis-stress model. In a study of American lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents, Mark Hatzenbuehler examined the effect of the county-level social environment.[38] This was indexed by the proportion of same-sex couples and Democrats living in the counties. Also included were the proportions of schools with gay-straight alliances as well as anti-bullying and antidiscrimination policies that include sexual orientation. He found that a more conservative social environment elevated risk in suicidal behavior among all youth and that this effect was stronger for LGB youth. Furthermore, he found that the social environment partially mediated the relation between LGB status and suicidal behaviour. Hatzenbuehler found that even after such social as well as individual factors were controlled for, however, that "LGB status remained a significant predictor of suicide attempts."

Institutionalized and internalized homophobia[]

Institutionalized and internalized homophobia may also lead LGBT youth to not accept themselves and have deep internal conflicts about their sexual orientation.[39] Parents may abandon or force children out of home after the child's coming out.[40]

Homophobia arrived at by any means can be a gateway to bullying which can take many forms. Physical bullying is kicking, punching, while emotional bullying is name calling, spreading rumors and other verbal abuse. Cyber bullying involves abusive text messages or messages of the same nature on Facebook, Twitter, and other social media networks. Sexual bullying is inappropriate touching, lewd gestures or jokes.[41]

Bullying may be considered a "rite of passage",[42] but studies have shown it has negative physical and psychological effects. "Sexual minority youth, or teens that identify themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual, are bullied two to three times more than heterosexuals", and "almost all transgender students have been verbally harassed (e.g., called names or threatened in the past year at school because of their sexual orientation (89%) and gender expression (89%)") according to Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network's Harsh Realities, The Experiences of Transgender Youth In Our Nation’s Schools.[20]

Controversies about sex reassignment surgery[]

The effectiveness of sex reassigning surgery has been debated extensively and statistics show that patients that chose transition had little benefits to their mental health, to the point that some specialists do not consider gender-affirming surgery as a solution anymore, criticizing the methodologies of the studies in favour of surgical or hormonal therapies.[43] Endocrinologist W.J. Malone wrote "The study of transgender individuals by Bränström and Pachankis claims to demonstrate a reduction in mental health treatment utilization after gender-affirming surgery but, in fact, demonstrates no such thing. The only result they present that they claim is statistically significant is that there is an association between years since last gender- affirming surgery and recent mental health treatment [...] This result makes no sense as it stands" [44] Bränström and Pachankis will later publish a correction to their original study and retract their primary conclusion.[45] Under this assumption, the high suicide rate would be strictly tied to the pre-existent causes that caused transition.[46][47] Several trans persons claimed that SRS only worsened their gender dysphoria and that before SRS and hormonal therapies they did not suffer from suicide tendencies.[48][49]

A 2003 study from long follow-up of SRS patients in Sweden concluded that "sex reassignment, although alleviating gender dysphoria, may not suffice as treatment for transsexualism, and should inspire improved psychiatric and somatic care after sex reassignment for this patient group." and that "Persons with transsexualism, after sex reassignment, have considerably higher risks for mortality, suicidal behaviour, and psychiatric morbidity than the general population." [50]

In 2004, the Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility team at the University of Birmingham found no evidence of SRS clinical effectiveness in improving the subjects' mental health, after reviewing a hundred medical studies of post-operative transexual people. The studies scrutinized were described as: “Although the research published generally states that the effects are beneficial, it would be incorrect to say that this finding has been universal […].” The main critics toward the methodologies of the papers were about lack of a good quality, systematic review of the research literature, lack of double-blind and even control groups and high drop-out rates of study participants (some over 50%).[51] The ARIF report also states that: "In the case of gender reassignment the following outcomes would be expected to be important: Immediate success of surgery - complications of surgery, cosmetic/aesthetic effect, requirement for reoperation. Health outcomes for the individual - especially suicide. Psychological outcomes for the individual - measures of adjustment, happiness, regret or satisfaction with the operation. [...] The overall conclusion reached by ARIF was: The degree of uncertainty about any of the effects of gender reassignment is such that it is impossible to make a judgement about whether the procedure is clinically effective."

In 2020 a group of over a hundred independent researchers and specialists "concerned about the lack of quality evidence for the use of hormonal and surgical interventions as first-line treatment for young people with gender dysphoria" founded the SEGM, "Society for evidence-based gender medicine", with the objective of "evaluating current interventions for gender dysphoria, providing balanced evidence summaries, promoting the development of effective and supportive psychosocial approaches for the care of young people with gender dysphoria and generating good, answerable questions for research". "The medical pathway of the Gender- Affirmative model", they explain on their website, "is based on a single Dutch study, with 55 subjects (only 40 completers), [...] Only one year post-surgery follow-up at an average age of under 21, no physical health effects evaluation, no control group"

Projects[]

Several ONGs have started initiatives to attempt a reduction of LGBT youth suicides, as The Trevor Project and the It Gets Better Project. Actions such as Ally Week, Day of Silence, and Suicide intervention have helped to combat both Self-harm and Violence against LGBT people.

Policy responses[]

A number of policy options have been repeatedly proposed to address this issue. Some advocate intervention at the stage in which youth are already suicidal (such as crisis hotlines), while others advocate programs directed at increasing LGBT youth access to factors found to be "protective" against suicide (such as social support networks or mentors).

One proposed option is to provide LGBT-sensitivity and anti-bullying training to current middle and high school counselors and teachers. Citing a study by Jordan et al., school psychologist Anastasia Hansen notes that hearing teachers make homophobic remarks or fail to intervene when students make such remarks are both positively correlated with negative feelings about an LGBT identity.[52] Conversely, a number of researchers have found the presence of LGBT-supportive school staff to be related to "positive outcomes for LGBT youth".[52] Citing a 2006 Psychology in the Schools report, The Trevor Project notes that "lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning (LGBTQ) youth who believe they have just one school staff member with whom they can talk about problems are only 1/3 as likely as those without that support to... report making multiple suicide attempts in the past year."[53]

Another frequently proposed policy option involves providing grant incentives for schools to create and/or support Gay-Straight Alliances, student groups dedicated to providing a social support network for LGBT students. Kosciw and Diaz, researchers for the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, found in a nationwide survey that "students in schools with a GSA were less likely to feel unsafe, less likely to miss school, and more likely to feel that they belonged at their school than students in schools with no such clubs."[54] Studies have shown that social isolation and marginalization at school are psychologically damaging to LGBT students, and that GSAs and other similar peer-support group can be effective providers of this "psychosocial support".[52]

Early interventions for LGBT youth[]

Be proactive and understanding[]

Educators can be proactive in helping adolescents with gender identity and the questions/issues that sometimes come with them. Normalizing education about sexualities and genders can help prevent adolescents from resorting to suicide, drug abuse, homelessness, and many more psychological problems. Van Wormer & McKinney (2003)[55] relate that understanding LGBT students is the first step to suicide prevention. They use a harm reduction approach, which meets students where they are to reduce any continued harm linked with their behaviors. They relate that creating a supportive and culturally diverse environment is crucial to social acceptance in an educational setting.

LGBT role models/resources[]

It is beneficial to hire LGBT teachers to serve as role models and support LGBT students. Many of the resources in the U.S. are crisis-driven- not prevention-driven. In order to prevent suicide for LGBT adolescents, it needs to be the other way around. Furthermore, studies show that counselors and teachers need to be trained in self-awareness, sexuality and sexual diversity with themselves and with students. Researchers also suggest inviting gay/lesbian and bisexual panels from colleges or universities to conduct classroom discussions. Education and resources is key to helping LGBT students and families. According to researcher Rob Cover, role models and resources benefit LGBT youth only if they avoid replicating stereotypes and provide diverse visual and narrative representations to allow broad identification.[56]

Having a PFLAG (Parents Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays) and GSA Club are possible resources to promote discussions and leadership roles to LGBT students. These resources extend outside of school and in the community. (Greytak, E. A., Kosciw, J. G., & Boesen, M. J. 2013) report that when schools have a GSA or Gay Straight Alliance club or a club promoting social awareness and camaraderie of sorts, supportive educators, inclusive curricula, and comprehensive policies that LGBT students were victimized less and had more positive school experiences. Students will feel positive and want to be in school.

Teach tolerance and examine a school's climate[]

Examine a school's climate and teach tolerance – Teaching Tolerance is a movement, magazine and website which gives many tools and ideas to help people be tolerant of one another. It demonstrates that the classroom is a reflection of the world around us. Educators can use Teach Tolerance's website and book to download resources and look up creative ways to learn more about LGBT students and teaching tolerance to their students in the classroom. It helps schools get started with anti-bullying training and professional development and resource suggestions. It even relates common roadblocks and tips to starting a GSA club.

Research shows that a collaborative effort must be made in order to prevent LGBT students from being bullied and/or committing suicide. Teachers, administrators, students, families, and communities need to come together to help LGBT students be confident. Each school has its own individuality, its own sense of "self", whether it be the teachers, administrators, students, or the surrounding community. In order to tackle the issue of bullying for LGBT students it needs to start with understanding the student population and demographic where the school lies. Educating students, faculty, staff, and school boards on LGBT issues and eliminating homophobia and transphobia in schools, training staff on diversity acceptance and bullying prevention, and implementing Gay-Straight Alliances is key to suicide prevention for LGBT students (Bacon, Laura Ann 2011).[57] Adolescents grow and are shaped by many factors including internal and external features (Swearer, Espelage, Vaillancourt, & Hymel, 2010).

The school climate must foster respect. Thus, setting the tone for administration, teachers, professionals who enter the building, parents and most importantly the students. People, in general, need to understand their own misconceptions and stereotypes of what being LGBT is. Unless students and adults are educated on the LGBT community, than stereotypes and negative attitudes will continue to exist (Knotts, G., & Gregorio, D. 2011).[58] The GMCLA (Gay Men's Chorus of Los Angeles) use music and singing as a vehicle for changing the attitudes and hearts of people in schools nationwide. Their goal is to bring music to standards-driven curriculum to youth with the purpose of teaching content in innovative and meaningful ways. They instill in students and staff techniques to foster positive meaning of the social and personal issues dealt with in school and society.

Gay, L. (2009) has generated a guide to helping school safety/climate and fostering positive interpersonal relationships through "The Safe Space Kit".[59] This tool helps teachers create a safe space for LGBT students. One of the most effective ways for an educator to create a safe space is to be a supportive ally to LGBT students. This kit has numerous tools for teachers and schools to utilize to help transgender youth, including: a hard copy of "The Safe Space Kit" includes the "Guide to Being an Ally", stickers and two Safe Space posters. Even utilizing something just to promote awareness, such as using "The Safe Space Kit" could be a good first step for schools to promote responsiveness to LGBT students. Providing some supports rather than none at all can benefit LGBT youth tremendously now and in the future (Greytak, et al. 2013).[60]

OBPP (Olweus Bullying Prevention Program)[]

OBPP is an anti-bullying program designed by psychologist Dan Olweus utilized in schools in Europe, Canada and the U.S. Reductions in bullying were due to parent training, playground supervision, home-school communication, classroom rules, and training videos. Furthermore, Swearer, et al. (2010) discuss a "dosage effect" in which the more positive and consistent elements included in a program, the more the likelihood that bullying would decrease. Success in one school does not guarantee success in another because each school has its own social climate. The OBPP is effective but still needs to be analyzed further, since there are many things to consider when implementing this technique within a large school.[61]

Steps To Respect[]

Steps To Respect is an anti-bullying campaign which can be beneficial in schools as well – it is a comprehensive guide for teachers, administrators, and students utilizing in class lessons and training helping schools foster positive social-emotional skills and conflict resolution. If schools are able to change peer conduct and norms, increase student communication skills, and maintain adult prevention and intervention efforts, the positive effects of their work will strengthen over time (Frey, Edstrom & Hirschstein 2005)[62] and continue to grow as each class progresses through the school system.

Make curriculum changes[]

According to Russell, S. T., McGuire, J. K., Laub, C., & Manke, E. (2006),[63] it is imperative for educators to make subject and age appropriate lessons with LGBT issues incorporated into the curriculum on a consistent basis utilizing current events, history, literature, or social sciences. Teachers should be trained each year on new practices to employ in their classrooms and in school in general. They should be taught how to handle situations they may face with LGBT students, so that if a problem should arise, they will be confident in their own understandings of the LGBT community and know how to handle any question or situation professionally and empathetically. Russell, et al. (2006) report that state policy and government officials need to be mindful of the ever-changing culture we live in by enforcing and including material appropriate in schools to educate educators on LGBT people in the world.[63]

Burdge, H., Sinclair, K., Laub, C., Russell, S. T. (2012)[64] relate numerous lessons, which each subject area teacher can teach to enforce LGBT inclusivity and school safety. They report that lessons, which promote LGBT inclusivity, can have the greatest impact on school safety. Physical education, health, history, and social studies teachers can educate all students to have more social awareness and create a positive school climate. They continue to note that inviting parents, teachers, administrators and other key stakeholders to identify and/or participate in the development of age-appropriate LGBT-inclusive lessons that teachers can use in their classrooms is most beneficial.

Educators must continue to try new trends, constantly assessing the environment of their school. The best policies and interventions are those, which show positive growth across grade levels. Research should continue to see which programs suit the needs of different schools over a period of time. Since each school varies in many ways, it may be hard to report positive trends. One technique that works in one school may or may not work for another. Therefore, taking pieces of one technique and making it into something that molds best to each school and environment is key.[citation needed]

See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ Haas, Ann P.; Eliason, Mickey; Mays, Vickie M.; Mathy, Robin M.; Cochran, Susan D.; D'Augelli, Anthony R.; Silverman, Morton M.; Fisher, Prudence W.; Hughes, Tonda; Rosario, Margaret; Russell, Stephen T.; Malley, Effie; Reed, Jerry; Litts, David A.; Haller, Ellen; Sell, Randall L.; Remafedi, Gary; Bradford, Judith; Beautrais, Annette L.; Brown, Gregory K.; Diamond, Gary M.; Friedman, Mark S.; Garofalo, Robert; Turner, Mason S.; Hollibaugh, Amber; Clayton, Paula J. (30 December 2010). "Suicide and Suicide Risk in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Populations: Review and Recommendations". Journal of Homosexuality. 58 (1): 10–51. doi:10.1080/00918369.2011.534038. PMC 3662085. PMID 21213174.
    Proctor, Curtis D.; Groze, Victor K. (1994). "Risk Factors for Suicide among Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Youths". Social Work. 39 (5): 504–513. doi:10.1093/sw/39.5.504. PMID 7939864.
    Remafedi, Gary; Farrow, James A.; Deisher, Robert W. (1991). "Risk Factors for Attempted Suicide in Gay and Bisexual Youth". Pediatrics. 87 (6): 869–875. PMID 2034492.
    Russell, Stephen T.; Joyner, Kara (2001). "Adolescent Sexual Orientation and Suicide Risk: Evidence From a National Study". American Journal of Public Health. 91 (8): 1276–1281. doi:10.2105/AJPH.91.8.1276. PMC 1446760. PMID 11499118.
    Hammelman, Tracie L. (1993). "Gay and Lesbian Youth". Journal of Gay & Lesbian Psychotherapy. 2 (1): 77–89. doi:10.1300/J236v02n01_06.
    Johnson, R. B.; Oxendine, S.; Taub, D. J.; Robertson, J. (2013). "Suicide Prevention for LGBT Students" (PDF). New Directions for Student Services. 2013 (141): 55–69. doi:10.1002/ss.20040.
  2. ^ Smalley, K. Bryant; Warren, Jacob C.; Barefoot, K. Nikki (2017-10-28). LGBT Health: Meeting the Needs of Gender and Sexual Minorities. Springer. pp. 181–193. ISBN 978-0-8261-3378-6.
  3. ^ Hatzenbuehler, M. L.; McLaughlin, K. A.; Katherine Keyes; Hasin, D. S. (2010-01-14). "The Impact of Institutional Discrimination on Psychiatric Disorders in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations: A Prospective Study by Mark L. Hatzenbuehler, MS, MPhil, Katie A. McLaughlin, PhD, Katherine M. Keyes, MPH and Deborah S. Hasin, PhD". American Journal of Public Health. Ajph.aphapublications.org. 100 (3): 452–459. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.168815. PMC 2820062. PMID 20075314.
  4. ^ Jump up to: a b Raifman, Julia; Moscoe, Ellen; Austin, S. Bryn; McConnell, Margaret (2017). "Difference-in-Differences Analysis of the Association Between State Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Adolescent Suicide Attempts". JAMA Pediatrics. 171 (4): 350–356. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4529. PMC 5848493. PMID 28241285.
  5. ^ Jump up to: a b "Same-Sex Marriage Legalization Linked to Reduction in Suicide Attempts Among High School Students". Johns Hopkins University. February 20, 2017. Retrieved September 3, 2021.
  6. ^ Jump up to: a b Solis, Steph (February 20, 2017). "Study: Teen suicide attempts fell as same-sex marriage was legalized". USA Today. Retrieved September 3, 2021.
  7. ^ Jump up to: a b Segal, Corinne (February 20, 2017). "Same-sex marriage laws linked to fewer youth suicide attempts, new study says". PBS. Retrieved September 3, 2021.
  8. ^ Jump up to: a b Seaman, Andrew M (February 23, 2017). "Same-sex marriage laws tied to fewer teen suicide attempts". Reuters. Retrieved September 3, 2021.
  9. ^ Kennedy, Andrew; Genç, Murat; Owen, P. Dorian (2021). "The Association Between Same-Sex Marriage Legalization and Youth Deaths by Suicide: A Multimethod Counterfactual Analysis". The Journal of Adolescent Health. 68 (6): 1176–1182. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.01.033. ISSN 1879-1972. PMID 33812751.
  10. ^ Savin-Williams, Ritch C (1994). "Verbal and physical abuse as stressors in the lives of lesbian, gay male, and bisexual youths: Associations with school problems, running away, substance abuse, prostitution, and suicide". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 62 (2): 261–269. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.62.2.261. PMID 8201062.
  11. ^ Shapiro, Joseph (December 29, 2008). "Study: Tolerance Can Lower Gay Kids' Suicide Risk". National Public Radio. Retrieved September 3, 2021.
  12. ^ Bagley, Christopher; Tremblay, Pierre (2000). "Elevated rates of suicidal behavior in gay, lesbian, and bisexual youth". Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention. 21 (3): 111–117. doi:10.1027//0227-5910.21.3.111. PMID 11265836.
  13. ^ National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention Tackles LGBT Suicide, April 26, 2012, Kellan Baker and Josh Garcia. Baker, Kellan; Garcia, Josh (April 26, 2012). "National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention Tackles LGBT Suicide". National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention. Retrieved September 3, 2021.
  14. ^ Jump up to: a b "Helping LGBT youth, others learn to cope". April 27, 2012.
  15. ^ "The Impact of Family Rejection or Acceptance among LGBT+ Millennials in the Seventh-day Adventist Church" (PDF). Social Work and Christianity.
  16. ^ "Preventing Suicide among Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgendered, and Questioning Youth and Young Adults" (PDF). Retrieved 2011-08-21.
  17. ^ "Report of the Secretary's Task Force on Youth Suicide". Eric.ed.gov. Retrieved 2011-08-21.
  18. ^ "Definition of Bisexual suicide risk". Medterms.com. October 27, 1999. Archived from the original on December 8, 2011. Retrieved August 21, 2011.
  19. ^ Meyer, IH (September 2003). "Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence". Psychological Bulletin. 129 (5): 674–97. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674. PMC 2072932. PMID 12956539.
  20. ^ Jump up to: a b "Additional Facts about Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth". Thetrevorproject.org. Retrieved 2011-08-21.
  21. ^ Toomey, Russell B.; Syvertsen, Amy K.; Shramko, Maura (2018). "Transgender Adolescent Suicide Behavior". Pediatrics. 142 (4): e20174218. doi:10.1542/peds.2017-4218. PMC 6317573. PMID 30206149.
  22. ^ Remafedi, Gary (October 6, 1999). "Sexual Orientation and Youth Suicide". MSJAMA. 282: 1291–1292. Archived from the original on January 4, 2005. Retrieved September 3, 2021.
  23. ^ Rutter, Philip A; Soucar, Emil (2002). "Youth suicide risk and sexual orientation - Statistical Data Included". Find Articles. Archived from the original on July 11, 2004. Retrieved September 3, 2021.
  24. ^ "Articles Relating to Suicide by GLB Youth". Retrieved September 3, 2021.
  25. ^ Wienerbronner, Danielle (2010-09-15). "LGBT Students Harassed At Colleges Nationwide, New Report Says". Huffington Post.
  26. ^ Walls, N. Eugene; Wisneski, Hope; Kane, Sarah (March 2013). "School climate, individual support, or both? Gay straight alliances and the mental health of sexual minority youth". School Social Work Journal. 37 (2): 88–111.
  27. ^ "Additional Facts About Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth". Thetrevorproject.org. Retrieved 2011-08-21.
  28. ^ Jump up to: a b Rothaus, Steve (2010-09-15). "Steve Rothaus' Gay South Florida". Miamiherald.typepad.com. Retrieved 2011-08-21.
  29. ^ Harris, K. M. (2013). "Sexuality and suicidality: Matched-pairs analyses reveal unique characteristics in non-heterosexual suicidal behaviors". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 42 (5): 729–737. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0112-2. PMID 23657812. S2CID 11639529.
  30. ^ Jefferson K, Neilands TB, Sevelius J (2013). "Transgender women of color: discrimination and depression symptoms". Ethnicity and Inequalities in Health and Social Care. 6 (4): 121–136. doi:10.1108/EIHSC-08-2013-0013. PMC 4205968. PMID 25346778.
  31. ^ "Approved Requests for USTS Data". Resource Center for Minority Data.
  32. ^ Jump up to: a b c d "New analysis shows startling levels of discrimination against Black transgender people", A look at Black respondents in the national transgender discrimination survey, National LGBTQ Task Force, 16 September 2011, archived from the original on 2021-04-29, retrieved 2021-05-07
  33. ^ Schmitz, Rachel M.; Tyler, Kimberly A. (May 2018). "The Complexity of Family Reactions to Identity among Homeless and College Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Young Adults". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 47 (4): 1195–1207. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-1014-5. ISSN 0004-0002. PMID 28687895. S2CID 4729356.
  34. ^ "Impacts of Strong Parental Support for Trans Youth" (PDF). Trans Pulse Project. October 2, 2012. Retrieved September 3, 2021.
  35. ^ Kennedy, Andrew; Genç, Murat; Owen, P. Dorian (June 2021). "The Association Between Same-Sex Marriage Legalization and Youth Deaths by Suicide: A Multimethod Counterfactual Analysis". The Journal of Adolescent Health. 68 (6): 1176–1182. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.01.033. ISSN 1879-1972. PMID 33812751.
  36. ^ Kamtchum-Tatuene, Joseph; Noubiap, Jean Jacques; Fogang, Yannick F. (2017). "Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage and Drop in Adolescent Suicide Rates: Association but Not Causation". JAMA Pediatrics. 171 (9): 915. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1955. PMID 28738125.
  37. ^ Raifman, Julia; Moscoe, Ellen; Austin, S. Bryn (2017). "Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage and Drop in Adolescent Suicide Rates: Association but Not Causation—Reply". JAMA Pediatrics. 171 (9): 915–916. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1958. PMID 28738123.
  38. ^ Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2011), "The Social Environment and Suicide Attempts inLesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Youth", Pediatrics, 127 (5): 896–903, doi:10.1542/peds.2010-3020, PMC 3081186, PMID 21502225
  39. ^ Gibson, P. (1989), "Gay and Lesbian Youth Suicide", in Fenleib, Marcia R. (ed.), Report of the Secretary's Task Force on Youth Suicide, United States Government Printing Office, ISBN 0-16-002508-7
  40. ^ Adler, Margot (November 20, 2011). "Young, Gay And Homeless: Fighting For Resources". NPR.
  41. ^ Habuda, Janice L. (2010-10-29). "Students learn about bullying". Buffalonews.com. Retrieved 2011-08-21.
  42. ^ Levinson, David (2002). Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment, Volumes 1-4. p. 137. ISBN 9780761922582.
  43. ^ Van Mol, Andrew; Ladilaw, Micheal K.; Grossman, Miriam; McHugh, Paul (2020). "Gender-Affirmation Surgery Conclusion Lacks Evidence". American Journal of Psychiatry. 177 (8): 765–766. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19111130. PMID 32741284. Retrieved 17 June 2021.
  44. ^ Malone, William J.; Roman, Sven (2020). "Calling Into Question Whether Gender-Affirming Surgery Relieves Psychological Distress". American Journal of Psychiatry. 177 (8): 766–767. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19111149. PMID 32741278. Retrieved 17 June 2021.
  45. ^ "Correction to Bränström and Pachankis". American Journal of Psychiatry. 177 (8): 734. 2020. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.1778correction. PMID 32741280.
  46. ^ DHejne, Cecilia; Lichtenstein, Paul; Boman, Marcus; Johansson, Anna L. V.; Langstrom, Niklas; Landen, Mikael (2011). "Long-Term Follow-Up of Transsexual Persons Undergoing Sex Reassignment Surgery: Cohort Study in Sweden". PLOS ONE. 6 (2): e16885. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...616885D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016885. PMC 3043071. PMID 21364939.
  47. ^ "Transgender Surgery Provides No Mental Health Benefit". 13 September 2020.
  48. ^ Chu, Andrea Long (24 November 2018). "My New Vagina Won't Make Me Happy". The New York Times.
  49. ^ "When sex-change is a mistake: Some transsexuals suffer bitter regrets. Sarah Lonsdale reports". The Independent. 22 October 2011.
  50. ^ Dhejne, C.; Lichtenstein, P.; Boman, M.; Johansson, A. L.; Långström, N.; Landén, M. (2011). "Long-term follow-up of transsexual persons undergoing sex reassignment surgery: cohort study in Sweden". PLOS ONE. 6 (2): e16885. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...616885D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016885. PMC 3043071. PMID 21364939.
  51. ^ "Sex changes are not effective, say researchers". The Guardian. 30 July 2004.
  52. ^ Jump up to: a b c "Hansen, Anastasia. "School-Based Support for GLBT Students: A Review of Three Levels of Research." Psychology in the Schools. 44.8(2007). 839-848". Eric.ed.gov:80. Retrieved 2011-08-21.
  53. ^ "EDUCATOR RESOURCE GUIDE" (PDF). The Trevor Project. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 7, 2012.
  54. ^ "2005 NSCS Final v6.pdf" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-06-18. Retrieved 2011-08-21.
  55. ^ Van Wormer, K; McKinney, R (2003). "What schools can do to help gay/lesbian/bisexual youth: A harm reduction approach". Adolescence. 38 (151): 409–420.
  56. ^ Cover, Rob. (2012). Queer Youth Suicide, Culture and Identity: Unliveable Lives? Ashgate, ISBN 9781409444473
  57. ^ Bacon, Laura Ann, "A Study of Effective Strategies, Programs, and Policies for School Leaders in Protecting Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth from Peer Victimization" (2011). Electronic Theses & Dissertations. Paper 380.
  58. ^ Knotts, G.; Gregorio, D. (2011). "Confronting homophobia at school: High school students and the gay men's chorus of Los Angeles". Journal of LGBT Youth. 8 (1): 66–83. doi:10.1080/19361653.2011.519193. S2CID 144391118.
  59. ^ Gay, L. (2009). The Safe Space Kit: Guide to Being an Ally to LGBT Students. Gay, Lesbian And Straight Education Network (GLSEN)
  60. ^ Greytak, E. A.; Kosciw, J. G.; Boesen, M. J. (2013). "Putting the "T" in "Resource": The Benefits of LGBT-Related School Resources for Transgender Youth". Journal of LGBT Youth. 10 (1–2): 45–63. doi:10.1080/19361653.2012.718522. S2CID 144399587.
  61. ^ Limber, Susan P.; Olweus, Dan; Wang, Weijun; Masiello, Matthew; Breivik, Kyrre (August 2018). "Evaluation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: A large scale study of U.S. students in grades 3–11". Journal of School Psychology. 69: 56–72. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2018.04.004. PMID 30558754.
  62. ^ Steps to Respect (Frey, Edstrom and Hirschstein 2005; Frey et al. 2005; Hirschtein et al. 20070; category 6
  63. ^ Jump up to: a b Russell, S. T., McGuire, J. K., Laub, C., & Manke, E. (2006). LGBT Student Safety: Steps Schools Can Take.(California Safe Schools Coalition Research Brief No. 3) San Francisco, CA: California Safe Schools Coalition
  64. ^ Burdge, H., Sinclair, K., Laub, C., Russell, S. T. (2012). Lessons That Matter: LGBTQ Inclusivity and School Safety. (GayStraight Alliance Network and California Safe Schools Coalition Research Brief No. 14). San Francisco, CA: Gay-Straight Alliance Network.

Further reading[]

Retrieved from ""