Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020
Coat of Arms of the Philippines.svg
Congress of the Philippines
Long title
CitationRepublic Act No. 11479
Territorial extentPhilippines
Enacted bySenate of the Philippines
PassedFebruary 26, 2020
Enacted byHouse of Representatives of the Philippines
PassedJune 5, 2020
SignedJuly 3, 2020
Signed byRodrigo Duterte
EffectiveJuly 18, 2020
Legislative history
Bill introduced in the Senate of the PhilippinesAnti-Terrorism Act of 2020
Bill citationSenate Bill No. 1083
Bill published onSeptember 30, 2019
Introduced byTito Sotto, Ping Lacson, Imee Marcos, et. al.
Bill introduced in the House of Representatives of the PhilippinesAnti-Terrorism Act of 2020
Bill citationHouse Bill No. 6875
Bill published onMay 30, 2020
Introduced byNarciso Bravo Jr. (Masbate–1st), Raul Tupas (Iloilo–5th), et. al.
Repeals
Human Security Act of 2007
Status: Not fully in force

The Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020, officially designated as Republic Act No. 11479, is a Philippine law whose intent is to prevent, prohibit, and penalize terrorism in the Philippines.[1] The law was signed by President Rodrigo Duterte on July 3, 2020, and effectively replaced the Human Security Act of 2007 on July 18, 2020.[2][3]

The law's constitutionality is currently being challenged in the Supreme Court by multiple groups.[4][5][6]

Overview[]

Definition of terrorism[]

The Act defines terrorism as:

  • Engaging in acts intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to any person or endangers a person's life;
  • Engaging in acts intended to cause extensive damage or destruction to a government or public facility, public place, or private property;
  • Engaging in acts intended to cause extensive interference with, damage, or destruction to critical infrastructure;
  • Developing, manufacturing, possessing, acquiring, transporting, supplying, or using weapons; and
  • Releasing dangerous substances or causing fire, floods or explosions when the purpose is to intimidate the general public, create an atmosphere to spread a message of fear, provoke or influence by intimidation the government or any international organization, seriously destabilize or destroy the fundamental political, economic, or social structures in the country, or create a public emergency or seriously undermine public safety[1]

The definition states that "advocacy, protest, dissent, stoppage of work, industrial or mass action, and other similar exercises of civil and political rights" shall not be considered as terrorist acts only if they "are not intended to cause death or serious physical harm to a person, to endanger a person's life, or to create a serious risk to public safety."

Creation of Anti-Terrorism Council[]

The law also creates a presidentially-appointed body, the Anti-Terrorism Council (ATC), which would designate the persons who could be arrested as "terrorists."[7]

Because of other provisions of the law. these persons could be detained for up to 24 days (14 days with a possible 10-day extension),[8] and would not be automatically compensated for wrongful imprisonment as they originally were under the Human Security Act of 2007.[9]

Warrantless arrest[]

The law allows suspects to be detained without a judicial warrant of arrest for 14 days and can be extended by 10 more days, and placed under surveillance for 60 days, that can also be extended by up to 30 days, by the police or military.[8] But an analyst argues that this provision is essential for counterterrorism to "allow more time for investigators to get valuable information from the terror suspect. A longer detention period can also provide ample time to facilitate interrogation. It can also incapacitate the suspected terrorist from wrecking havoc. Most importantly, longer preventive detention can lawfully hold suspect when usual criminal charges cannot be filed for some technical considerations."[10]

Removal of safeguard against wrongful detention[]

The Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 also removes a section under the Human Security Act of 2007 which is meant to safeguard against the wrongful accusation and detention of suspects. Previously, if a person imprisoned under the HSA were found to actually not be guilty, that person would be compensated for wrongful detention, with the cost "automatically charged against the appropriations of the police agency or the Anti-Terrorism Council that brought or sanctioned the filing of the charges against the accused."[9]

Under the new law, a wrongfully detained person would have to file a suit against the government in order to get any remuneration for having been wrongfully accused.[9]

Background[]

Main article: Terrorism in the Philippines

Branding of "rebel groups" in Philippine history[]

Conflicts with ideologically motivated groups, both armed and unarmed have frequently been labeled "terrorists," "rebels," and "bandits" throughout the Philippines' history.[11][12]

Groups branded "insurrectos" during the colonial era and World War II[]

During the colonial era, forces fighting for Filipino independence, such as those under Diego Silang, Andres Bonifacio, Emilio Aguinaldo, and Macario Sakay were intentionally labeled "insurrectos" and "bandits" in order to de-legitimize and downplay their cause.[12][13] In the 1930s, the Hukbalahap of the Partido Komunista ng Pilipinas (PKP-1930) was one of the most active guerrilla forces fighting for Filipino freedom during World War II, but it found itself in conflict with the newly independent Philippine government after the war, until it was effectively defeated in the 1950s.[14]

Opposition groups during the Marcos administration[]

A new communist organization, the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), was formed in 1969, and although it was still small, the Philippine government used its formation to take advantage of the cold war red scare in the United States to increase the influx of defense support funds from the US.[15][16][17]: "43"  A 1968 Philippine senate investigation into the Jabidah massacre, in which Muslim recruits were supposedly massacred in Corregidor to prevent them from blowing the cover on a botched Military operation resulted in the rise of multiple secessionist movements in the Muslim-majority areas in western Mindanao Island, including the Muslim Independence Movement, the Bangsamoro Liberation Organization.[18] President Ferdinand Marcos cited the new communist and moro separatist movements among his reasons for declaring martial law in 1972, but also used his powers to "emasculate all the leaders" of the political opposition, allowing him to hold authoritarian power over the Philippines for more than two decades.[19]

While martial law decimated the leadership of the political opposition, it radicalized otherwise "moderate" young people of the time, leading to the rapid growth of the Communist Party of the Philippines' New People's Army.[20] In western Mindanao, the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) became the dominant voice of Muslim separatism after the burning of Jolo in 1974.[21] In northern Luzon, the murder of Macli-ing Dulag for his opposition to the Marcos administration's Chico River Dam project became a rallying cry which inspired the formation of militant groups such as the Cordillera People's Liberation Army (CPLA).[22]

On the other hand, the martial law saw the creation of human rights advocacy groups across the whole political spectrum, with civil society groups such as the Movement of Concerned Citizens for Civil Liberties and the Free Legal Assistance Group were joined even by church groups such as the National Council of Churches in the Philippines, Association of Major Religious Superiors in the Philippines, and Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines, and by business groups such as the Makati Business Club, in actively fighting the proliferation of human rights abuses during the period.[23]

Conflicts after 1986[]

After Marcos was removed from power through the mostly-peaceful People Power revolution of 1986, the Reform the Armed Forces Movement launched numerous coups to overthrow the government,[24] while conflicts continued with the MNLF, MILF, CCP, and smaller groups like the CPLA. Ideological differences in the CCP resulted in various groups who rejected its adherence to Maoist orthodoxy splitting into more than a dozen smaller groups, including the Revolutionary Workers' Party of the Philippines.[25]

Red-tagging[]

Main article: Red-tagging in the Philippines

In recent years, international organizations including the United Nations,[26] Amnesty International,[27] and Human Rights Watch[28] have called attention to the continued practice of red-tagging as a political tactic to stifle dissent in the Philippines. The practice, under which individuals or groups are labeled "communist" or "terrorist" regardless of their actual beliefs or affiliations,[29] has been noted for frequently targeting human rights organizations,[30] church or religious groups,[31][32] health worker unions,[33] the academe,[34][35] and the mainstream media.[36]

Religious extremist terrorism[]

Brothers Abdurajik Abubakar Janjalani and Khadaffy Janjalani split from the MNLF in 1991 and established their own group, the Abu Sayyaf, which eventually became infamous for bombings, kidnappings, assassinations, extortion,[37] rape, child sexual assault, forced marriage,[38] drive-by shootings, extortion and drug trafficking.[39] On July 23, 2014, Abu Sayyaf leader Isnilon Hapilon swore an oath of loyalty to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).[40] In September 2014, the group began kidnapping people for ransom, in the name of ISIL.[41][42]

However, in the leadup to the passage and signing of the Anti-Terror Act of 2020, President Rodrigo Duterte said that his administration would focus on "communists." He called the Abu Sayyaf "terrorists of no value," saying "Actually the number one threat to the country, hindi Abu Sayyaf, hindi mga terorista of no value. Itong high-value targets itong mga komunista" ("Actually the number one threat to the country is not the Abu Sayyaf Group, not terrorists of no value. The high-value targets are the communists")."[43]

Legislative history[]

Human Security Act of 2007[]

Main article: Human Security Act

The Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 repeals the Human Security Act of 2007, making changes to some of the provisions as well as the definitions under terrorism.[44] Senator Panfilo Lacson, one of the principal authors of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020, said that the Human Security Act of 2007 was a "dead letter law" because it has been "severely underutilized" as it only resulted in a single convicted felon and had only one prescribed organization, the Abu Sayyaf.[45]

Senate Bill No. 1083[]

The bill was prepared by the Committees on National Defense and Security; Peace, Unification and Reconciliation; and Finance with the following as authors:[46]

It was approved by the Senate on February 26, 2020[47] with the following 19 voting in the affirmative:[48]

The following senators dissented:[48]

  • Risa Hontiveros
  • Kiko Pangilinan

House Bill No. 6875[]

The bill was introduced by the following representatives and filed on May 30, 2020.[49] Out of the 71 original authors, 15 members had their names stricken out as the authors of the controversial bill.[50] The bill was approved on final reading on June 3, 2020, as an adoption of the earlier version approved by Senate.[47] An additional 5 withdrew their authorship afterwards.[51]

  • Raneo E. Abu – Batangas, 2nd District
  • Cyrille "Beng" F. Abueg-Zaldivar – Palawan, 2nd District
  • Maria Fe R. Abunda – Eastern Samar, Lone District, withdrew authorship on June 2, 2020[51]
  • Resurreccion M. Acop – Antipolo, 2nd District
  • Michael Edgar Y. Aglipay – Party List – DIWA
  • Marlyn "Len" B. Alonte – Biñan, Lone District, withdrew authorship on June 2, 2020[51][50]
  • Cristal S. Bagatsing – Manila, 5th District, withdrew authorship on June 2, 2020[51][50]
  • Robert Ace S. Barbers – Surigao del Norte, 2nd District
  • Julienne "Jam" A. Baronda – Iloilo City, Lone District, withdrew authorship on June 3, 2020[51][50]
  • Joseph Sto. Niño B. Bernos – Abra, Lone District
  • Rozzano Rufino B. Biazon – Muntinlupa, Lone District, Principal author, later disowned bill as it "only copied Senate version". Withdrew authorship June 3, 2020[51][50]
  • Lianda B. Bolilia – Batangas, 4th District, withdrew authorship on June 3, 2020[51]
  • Juan Pablo "Rimpy" P. Bondoc – Pampanga, 4th District
  • Narciso "Bong" Recio Bravo, Jr. – Masbate, 1st District
  • Jorge "PATROL" Bustos – Party List – PATROL
  • Argel Joseph T. Cabatbat – Party List – MAGSASAKA, withdrew authorship on June 2, 2020[51][50]
  • Manuel DG. Cabochan III – Party List – MAGDALO, withdrew authorship on June 2, 2020[51][50]
  • Arnold "Noli" D. Celeste – Pangasinan, 1st District
  • Ma. Theresa V. Collantes – Batangas, 3rd District
  • Anthony Peter "Onyx" D. Crisologo – Quezon City, 1st District, withdrew authorship on June 3, 2020[51][50]
  • Manuel Jose "Mannix" M. Dalipe – Zamboanga City, 2nd District
  • Francisco G. Datol Jr. – Party List – SENIOR CITIZENS
  • Presley C. De Jesus – Party List – PHILRECA
  • Adriano A. Ebcas – Party List – AKO PADAYON PILIPINO
  • Evelina G. Escudero – Sorsogon, 1st District, withdrew authorship on June 3, 2020[51][50]
  • Conrad M. Estrella III – Party List – ABONO
  • Ria Cristina G. Fariñas – Ilocos Norte, 1st District, withdrew authorship on June 2, 2020[51][50]
  • Danilo "Dan" S. Fernandez – Laguna, 1st District
  • Lawrence "Law" H. Fortun – Agusan del Norte, 1st District, withdrew authorship on June 2, 2020[51][50]
  • Pablo John F. Garcia – Cebu, 3rd District
  • Ciriaco B. Gato Jr. – Batanes, Lone District
  • Ruwel Peter S. Gonzaga – Davao de Oro, 2nd District
  • Aurelio "Dong" D. Gonzales, Jr. – Pampanga, 3rd District, withdrew authorship on June 3, 2020[51][50]
  • Neptali M. Gonzales II – Mandaluyong, Lone District
  • Michael B. Gorriceta – Iloilo, 2nd District, withdrew authorship on June 3, 2020[51][50]
  • Ferdinand L. Hernandez – South Cotabato, 2nd District, withdrew authorship on June 4, 2020[51]
  • Bernadette "BH" Herrera-Dy – Party List – BH, withdrew authorship on June 4, 2020[51]
  • Wilton "Tonton" Tan Kho – Masbate, 3rd District
  • Loren Legarda – Antique, Lone District, requested name be removed after being "mistakenly" referred to as coauthor[50]
  • Dahlia A. Loyola – Cavite, 5th District
  • Rodante D. Marcoleta – Party List – SAGIP
  • Ruth Mariano-Hernandez – Laguna, 2nd District, withdrew authorship on June 2, 2020[51][50]
  • Francisco Jose "Bingo" F. Matugas II – Surigao del Norte, 1st District
  • John Marvin "Yul Servo" C. Nieto – Manila, 3rd District, withdrew authorship on June 8, 2020[51]
  • Jericho Jonas "Koko" Bendigo Nograles – Party List – PBA
  • Henry S. Oaminal – Misamis Occidental, 2nd District
  • Joseph Stephen "Caraps" S. Paduano – Party List – ABANG LINGKOD
  • Wilter "Sharky" Wee Palma II – Zamboanga Sibugay, 1st District
  • Alberto "Bobby" Dapidran Pacquiao – Party List – OFW FAMILY
  • Eddiebong G. Plaza – Agusan del Sur, 2nd District
  • Roberto "Robbie" Villanueva Puno – Antipolo, 1st District
  • Strike Bautista Revilla – Cavite, 2nd District
  • Michael Odylon L. Romero – Party List – 1-PACMAN
  • Ferdinand Martin Gomez Romualdez – Leyte, 1st District
  • Xavier Jesus D. Romualdo – Camiguin, Lone District
  • Rogelio Neil P. Roque – Bukidnon, 4th District
  • Hector S. Sanchez – Catanduanes, Lone District
  • Vilma Santos-Recto – Batangas, 6th District
  • Edgar Mary S. Sarmiento – Samar, 1st District
  • Deogracias Victor "DV" Savellano – Ilocos Sur, 1st District
  • Rowena "Niña" O. Taduran – Party List – Party List ACT-CIS
  • Samier A. Tan – Sulu, 1st District
  • Sharee Ann T. Tan – Samar, 2nd District, withdrew authorship on June 3, 2020[51][50]
  • Jose "Ping-Ping" I. Tejada – North Cotabato, 3rd District, withdrew authorship on June 7, 2020[51]
  • John Reynald Marcelo Tiangco – Navotas, Lone District
  • Jocelyn P. Tulfo – Party List – Party List ACT-CIS
  • Raul "Boboy" C. Tupas – Iloilo, 5th District
  • Vicente "Ching" S.E. Veloso – Leyte, 3rd District
  • Luis Raymund "LRay" Favis Villafuerte, Jr. – Camarines Sur, 2nd District
  • Camille A. Villar – Las Piñas, Lone District
  • Eric Go Yap – Party List – Party List ACT-CIS

The House of Representatives voted 173–31 in favor of the bill, with 29 abstentions, but was corrected to 168–36 a day after to reflect corrections and retractions from members. The members voted in the plenary and via Zoom and recorded in their "All Members" Viber community[50]

Republic Act No. 11479: Signing of the law[]

The law was signed by President Rodrigo Duterte on July 3, 2020, in the midst of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and comes as part of the Philippines continued fight against terrorism in its borders.[52] Proponents of the law have cited the siege of Marawi in 2017 as well as criminal activities from the Islamic State-linked Abu Sayyaf group, New People's Army Communist Rebels, and other supposed emerging threats to peace and public safety.[53] According to Justice Secretary Menardo Guevarra, the law took effect on July 18, 2020, 15 days after it was published in the website of the Official Gazette.[54][55] The Department of Justice released the law's implementing rules and regulations on October 16, 2020.[56]

Legal challenges in the Supreme Court[]

The law is currently being challenged in the Supreme Court by multiple groups. Oral arguments began on February 2, 2021, after it was initially delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.[57]

37 petitions were filed before the Supreme Court.[58]

Citation Petition
G.R. No. 252578 Howard Calleja, et al. (includes the De La Salle Brothers led by former Education Secretary Br. Armin Luistro and other civic groups) vs. Executive Secretary, et al.[59]
G.R. No. 252579 Representative Edcel Lagman (Albay's 1st district) vs. Salvador Medialdea, et al.
G.R. No. 252580 Melencio Sta. Maria, et al. (Far Eastern University Institute of Law professors) vs. Salvador Medialdea, et al.
G.R. No. 252585 Carlos Isagani Zarate, et al. (Makabayan Bloc) vs. Rodrigo Duterte, et al.
G.R. No. 252613 Former Office of the Government Corporate Counsel (OGCC) chief Rudolf Jurado vs. Anti-Terrorism Council, et al.
G.R. No. 252623 Center for Trade Union and Human Rights, et al. vs. Rodrigo Duterte, et al.
G.R. No. 252624 Christian Monsod, et al. (with Felicitas Arroyo, Framers of the Constitution with Ateneo and Xavier law professors, the Ateneo Human Rights Center, Jesuit priest Albert Alejo and the labor federation Sentro ng mga Nagkakaisa at Progresibong Manggagawa (SENTRO)) vs. Salvador Medialdea, et al.[60]
G.R. No. 252646 SANLAKAS party-list vs. Rodrigo Duterte, et al.
G.R. No. 252702 Federation of Free Workers (FFW), et al. (labor groups Nagkaisa Labor Coalition (Nagkaisa) and Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU)) vs. Office of the President, et al.[61]
G.R. No. 252726 José Ferrer Jr. vs. Salvador Medialdea, et al.
G.R. No. 252733 Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan), et al. (includes 44 leaders and the National Union of Peoples Lawyers (NUPL), Movement Against Tyranny, and Karapatan) vs. Rodrigo Duterte, et al.[62]
G.R. No. 252736 Retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio Carpio, et al. (Retired Supreme Court Associate Justice and former Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales with University of the Philippines law professors) vs. Anti-Terrorism Council, et al.[63]
G.R. No. 252741 Columnist Ma. Ceres Doyo, et al. (Senators Kiko Pangilinan and Leila de Lima, former senators Serge Osmeña and Bobby Tañada, Quezon City representative Kit Belmonte, former Quezon representative Erin Tañada, framers of the constitution Florangel Braid and Ed Garcia, journalists Maria Ressa, Chay Hofileña, Jo-Ann Maglipon, John Nery, former human rights commissioner Etta Rosales, human rights lawyer Chel Diokno—represented by the Free Legal Assistance Group (FLAG)) vs. Salvador Medialdea, et al.
G.R. No. 252747 National Union of Journalists of the Philippines, et al. (artists and cultural workers) vs. Anti-Terrorism Council, et al.[5]
G.R. No. 252755 Kabataang Tagapagtanggol ng Karapatan, et al. (16 youth groups including student organizations from De La Salle University, Ateneo de Manila University, University of the Philippines Diliman, and University of Santo Tomas, represented by young lawyer Dino de Leon) vs. Executive Secretary
G.R. No. 252759 Algamar Latiph, et al. (Bangsamoro residents) vs. Senate, et al.[64]
G.R. No. 252765 Alternative Law Groups, Inc. (ALG) (a coalition of 18 legal resource non-governmental organizations) vs. Medialdea[65]
G.R. No. 252767 Manila Bishop Broderick Pabillo, San Carlos, Negros Occidental Bishop Gerardo Alminaza, United Church of Christ in the Philippines Bishop Emergencio Padillo and 17 others vs. Duterte, et al.[66]
G.R. No. 252768 Gabriela vs. Duterte, et al.
UDK 1663 Lawrence Yerbo vs. Offices of the Honorable Senate President and Speaker
G.R. No. 252802 Henry Abendan and other University of the Philippines Cebu students vs. Medialdea
G.R. No. 252809 Concerned Online Citizens led by Mark Averilla (popularly known as Macoy Dubs) vs. Medialdea [67]
G.R. No. 252903 Concerned Lawyers For Civil Liberties members including former Vice-President Jejomar Binay and former Senator Rene Saguisag vs. Duterte, et al.
G.R. No. 252904 Int'l Indigenous Peoples Movement for Self-Determination & Liberation global coordinator Beverly Longid, former ARMM Regional Legislative Assembly member Samira Gutoc, et al. vs. Anti-Terrorism Council
G.R. No. 252905 Center for International Law, Inc., Vera Files, Lyceum of the Philippines University College of Law faculty, et al. vs. Senate
G.R. No. 252916 Suspected Abu Sayyaf Group members Main Mohammad, Jimmy Bla and Nazr Dilangalen, and Philippine Alliance of Human Advocates vs. Executive Secretary
G.R. No. 252921 Several Sangguniang Kabataan officials led by Lemuel Gio Cayabyab of Barangay Maglaking, San Carlos, Pangasinan vs. Duterte
G.R. No. 252984 Association of Major Religious Superiors in the Philippines, et al. vs. Medialdea, et al.
G.R. No. 253018 University of the Philippines Faculty Regent Dr. Ramon Guillermo, et al. vs. Rodrigo Duterte et, al.
G.R. No. 253100 Philippine Bar Association Inc. vs. The Executive Secretary, et, al.
G.R. No. 253118 Balay Rehabilitation Center Inc. et, al. vs. Rodrigo Duterte, et, al.
G.R. No. 253124 Integrated Bar of the Philippines et, al. vs, Senate of the Philippines et, al.
G.R. No. 253242 Coordination Council for People's Development and Governance Inc. (CPDG) et, al. vs. Rodrigo Duterte, et al.
G.R. No. 253252 Philippine Misereor Partnership Inc. et, al. vs, Rodrigo Duterte et, al.
G.R. No. 253254 Pagkakaisa ng Kababaihan Para sa Kalayaan (KAISA KA) et, al. vs. Anti Terrorism Council et, al.
UDK 16714 Anak Mindanao Partylist (AMIN) et, al. vs, Medialdea et, al.
G.R. No. 253420 Haroun Alrashid Alonto Lucman, et, al. vs, Medialdea, et, al.

Responses and reactions[]

International[]

United States[]

On July 15, 2020, 50 members of the United States Congress urged Ambassador Jose Manuel Romualdez to request the Government of the Philippines to consider repealing the "oppressive and unnecessary legislation".[68][69] The 50 representatives are:

United Nations[]

On June 30, 2020, at the 44th regular session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland. The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet has criticized the then proposed bill saying it could have a "chilling effect" on human rights work in the country and called for restraint on signing the bill from President Duterte.[70]

Amnesty International[]

Nicholas Bequelin, Amnesty International's Asia-Pacific Regional Director, has said upon hearing news of the law being signed:

"This law's introduction is the latest example of the country's ever-worsening human rights record. Once again, this shows why the UN should launch a formal investigation into ongoing widespread and systematic violations in the country."[71]

Greenpeace[]

The Southeast Asia office of Greenpeace urged the repeal of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 due to its "sweeping definition of terrorism" which it said could be abused to stifle dissent.[72]

Others[]

The Washington Post called the bill's enactment as "another nail in the coffin of the Philippines' waning democracy."[73] The Diplomat has stated that the law "takes aim at dissent."[74] While Al Jazeera notes that the law is "poised to cause more terror."[75] Various international artists have expressed dissent against the legislation, including Taylor Swift.[76][77] Swedish environmental activist Greta Thunberg also joined the petition against anti-terrorism law.[78]

Local[]

Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao[]

On July 2, 2020, the Bangsamoro Parliament passed a resolution urging President Rodrigo Duterte to veto the anti-terrorism bill, arguing that it would lead to abuses and would unfairly target Muslim Filipinos who have historically faced religious discrimination.[79] After the passage of the bill into law, Chief Minister Murad Ebrahim released a statement saying that Bangsamoro regional government fully respects President Duterte's decision to sign the bill into law and that it would seek representation in the Anti-Terrorism Council.[80] In response, presidential spokesperson Harry Roque pointed out that the law does not provide for a council seat for the Bangsamoro regional government although the same law mandates the council to coordinate with the autonomous region's government.[81]

Philippine Independence Day protests[]

More than 1,000 students and human rights activists gathered inside the UP Diliman campus on June 12, 2020, coinciding on 122nd Independence Day from Spanish colonial rule, dubbed it as "Grand Mañanita".[82] They called for the government to "junk" the proposed bill stating fears that it would curtail basic human rights and freedom of speech and dissent. The rally was held despite a government ban on mass gatherings under the general community quarantine in Metro Manila and other parts of the country because of the pandemic. Protesters could be seen wearing masks and practicing social distancing.[83][84] Similar demonstrations were held by activists in various cities such as Baguio, Legazpi, and Cebu City. Demonstrations were also held at other universities such as the De La Salle University in Manila.[84] Activist Mae Paner also present at the event, dressed up like Metro Manila Police Chief Debold Sinas who was faced controversy over his birthday celebration on May 8, 2020, which the police called it "Mananita".[82][85]

Churches and religious organizations[]

The National Council of Churches in the Philippines, a fellowship of ten Philippine Protestant denominations, denounced the bill as "a travesty against God's will as it gives the government, or even just a few persons in the Anti-terrorism Council, the absolute power that determines what course people's lives will take by putting forward a very vague definition of terrorism."[86] The Philippine Council of Evangelical Churches had likewise expressed reservations about the bill, saying "We firmly believe this Act imperils the rights of Filipinos and sense of dignity which, having its origin in God, our laws are called to uphold and protect." The PCEC specifically cited "vague definitions of terrorism, and the extended period of warrantless detention, which opens the way to serious abuses of a person's rights and dignity" as reasons for concern.[87]

Others[]

The National Federation of Peasant Women (Amihan) have said that the rising cases of red-tagging in the country confirm the prevalent criticisms against the controversial legislation.[88] The Association of Major Religious Superiors in the Philippines (AMRSP), which brings together the heads of men and women religious orders in the country, have expressed their dissent against the law, which they say may "assault human dignity and human rights."[89] Various Filipino artists have also expressed disappointment and dissent against the signing of the bill.[90][91] Members of the Filipino art community have also expressed their dissent.[92] But Dr. Rommel C. Banlaoi, Chairman of the Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism[93] defends the need to have a new Philippine anti-terrorism law as threats of terrorism in the Philippines have escalated even during the COVID-19 pandemic.[94] Nonetheless, Dr. Banlaoi encourages those opposed to the anti-terrorism law to continue what they are doing in order to remain vigilant and to ensure human rights protection during the implementation of the said law.[citation needed]

Celebrities, as well as Miss Universe candidates Gloria Diaz, Pia Wurtzbach and Catriona Gray voice their opposition to the bill.[95]

Youth[]

The UP Diliman also took a knee in solidarity with Black Lives Matter and the fight against police brutality[96] after George Floyd was killed by the police officer while being arrested for allegedly using a counterfeit bill in Minneapolis, Minnesota.[97]

Seven protesters from University of the Philippines and one bystander who were condemning the controversial anti-terror bill were arrested in Cebu City for alleged violations of general community quarantine (GCQ) guidelines.[98][99][100] Dubbed as "Cebu 8", the detainees have spent 36 hours in detention.[100] PNP Central Visayas denied the allegations that they used excessive force to disperse the anti-terror bill protests.[101]

Following the protests against the controversial anti-terrorism bill, several cloned Facebook accounts have been created on the platform. It started with University of the Philippines Cebu on June 6, 2020, who have been targeted by the newly created, duplicated Facebook accounts of themselves.[102] It later targeted the residents in Metro Manila, Iloilo, Dumaguete, and Cagayan de Oro City, and other areas, who have engaged in protests against the bill.[102][103][104] As a result, the hashtag #HandsOffOurStudents trended on Twitter, which the netizens condemned the creation of fake accounts.[105] Department of Justice Secretary Menardo Guevarra expressed concern over the matter and ordered the agency's cybercrime division to coordinate with the NBI and the PNP to investigate the matter.[106][107]

See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ Jump up to: a b "Republic Act No. 11479". Philippine Gazette. July 3, 2020. Retrieved July 3, 2020. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  2. ^ "Statement On Republic Act No. 11479". Office of the Presidential Spokesperson – Republic of the Philippines. July 3, 2020. Retrieved July 3, 2020.
  3. ^ Esguerra, Darryl John (July 3, 2020). "BREAKING: Duterte signs anti-terror bill into law". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  4. ^ "16 Supreme Court petitions seek to void anti-terrorism law". CNN Philippines. July 23, 2020.
  5. ^ Jump up to: a b Buan, Lian (July 23, 2020). "Senators, journalists, Moros follow suit: Petitions vs. anti-terror law now 15". Rappler.
  6. ^ Torres-Tupas, Tetch (July 23, 2020). "Petitions against anti-terror law swamp SC". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  7. ^ "Philippines: New Anti-Terrorism Act Endangers Rights". hrw.org (Human Rights Watch). June 5, 2020. Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  8. ^ Jump up to: a b Geducos, Argyll Cyrus B. (June 24, 2020). "Palace: Duterte backs 14-day detention of terror suspects". Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  9. ^ Jump up to: a b c Lischin, Luke (October 9, 2019). "The Trouble with the New Anti-Subversion Act Push for the Philippines". The Diplomat. Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  10. ^ Banlaoi, Rommel. "The Philippines New Anti-Terrorism Law: Fighting Terrorism With Justice". Eurasia Review. Eurasia Review. Retrieved July 5, 2020.
  11. ^ Banlaoi, Rommel (2020). The Marawi Siege and Its Aftermath: The Continuing Terrorist Threats (First ed.). London: Cambridge Scholars Publishers. ISBN 978-1-5275-3824-5. Retrieved July 5, 2020.
  12. ^ Jump up to: a b Ocampo, Ambeth R. (December 19, 2018). "Samar, the 'howling wilderness'". The Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  13. ^ "The War of 1898 and the U.S.-Filipino War, 1899–1902". United States Foreign Policy History and Resource Guide. Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  14. ^ "A Short History of the Partido Komunista ng Pilipinas". Partido Komunista ng Pilipinas-1930. Archived from the original on November 7, 2017. Retrieved November 5, 2017.
  15. ^ Celoza, Albert F. (1997). Ferdinand Marcos and the Philippines: The Political Economy of Authoritarianism. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 9780275941376.
  16. ^ Schirmer, Daniel B. (1987). The Philippines reader : a history of colonialism, neocolonialism, dictatorship, and resistance (1st ed.). Boston: South End Press. ISBN 978-0896082762. OCLC 14214735.
  17. ^ Kessler), Richard J. (1989). Rebellion and repression in the Philippines. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300044065. OCLC 19266663.
  18. ^ George, T. J. S. (1980). Revolt in Mindanao: The Rise of Islam in Philippine Politics. Oxford University Press. pp. 130–134.
  19. ^ Romero, Paolo (October 26, 2018). "Enrile apologizes to Martial Law victims, blames 'unlucid intervals'". The Philippine Star. Archived from the original on October 31, 2018. Retrieved October 31, 2018.
  20. ^ "A History of the Philippine Political Protest". Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. Archived from the original on July 5, 2017. Retrieved December 10, 2018.
  21. ^ "ARMM gov: Martial Law killings a 'painful part of our history as Moros'". The Philippine Star. September 24, 2018. Archived from the original on September 24, 2018. Retrieved October 6, 2019.
  22. ^ Aureus, Leonor J., ed. (1985). The Philippine Press Under Siege II.
  23. ^ Claudio, Lisandro E. (2013). Taming people's power : the EDSA revolutions and their contradictions. Quezon City. ISBN 978-971-550-655-7. OCLC 864093220.
  24. ^ The final report of the Fact-Finding Commission : pursuant to R.A. No. 6832. Makati, Metro Manila, Philippines: Bookmark. 1990. ISBN 971-569-003-3. OCLC 23880806.
  25. ^ (November 8, 2016). "A Brief History of OPAPP and the Peace Process". PeaceGovPH. Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  26. ^ Robles, Nathalie (May 3, 2019). "UN experts urge PH gov't to stop red-tagging".
  27. ^ "Philippines: Stop 'Red-Tagging', Investigate Killings of Journalists". www.amnesty.org.
  28. ^ "Human Rights Watch expresses 'deep concern' over red-tagging in Cagayan de Oro". Rappler.
  29. ^ "Religious, rights groups fight 'red tagging' in Philippines". ucanews.com.
  30. ^ News, Mike Navallo, ABS-CBN. "SC grants rights groups' bid for protection from 'red-tagging'". ABS-CBN News.
  31. ^ Orellana, Faye. "Religious leaders slam government for red-tagging missionaries". newsinfo.inquirer.net.
  32. ^ II, Paterno Esmaquel. "Christian group slams red-tagging of Aglipayan bishops". Rappler.
  33. ^ News, Jire Carreon, ABS-CBN. "Stop red-tagging of health workers". ABS-CBN News.
  34. ^ "Xavier University slams red-tagging of its faculty, immersion program". Rappler.
  35. ^ "UST condemns AFP's 'red-tagging'". varsitarian.net.
  36. ^ "Against "Red-tagging": Media Provide Needed Context | CMFR". cmfr-phil.org. Archived from the original on September 5, 2019.
  37. ^ Rommel C. Banlaoi (2006). "Abu Sayyaf Group: From Mere Banditry to Genuine Terrorism". Southeast Asian Affairs. 2006 (1): 247–262. doi:10.1355/SEAA06O.
  38. ^ Barbara Mae Dacanay (April 21, 2002). "Abducted nurse marries Abu Sayyaf leader". Gulf News. Retrieved April 3, 2016.
  39. ^ Martin, Gus (2012). Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues. Sage Publications. p. 319.
  40. ^ "Senior Abu Sayyaf leader swears oath to ISIS". Rappler. Retrieved July 18, 2015.
  41. ^ Philip Oltermann (September 24, 2014). "Islamists in Philippines threaten to kill German hostages". The Guardian. Retrieved July 18, 2015.
  42. ^ Sherwell, Philip (May 23, 2016). "How Abu Sayyaf makes a business of beheadings as Islamist terror gang releases 'final message' hostage video". The Telegraph. Retrieved June 14, 2016.
  43. ^ "Duterte: Terrorism, communists top threat to PH". Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  44. ^ Santos, Ana P. (June 8, 2020). "Philippine anti-terrorism law triggers fear of massive rights abuses". Deutsche Welle (www.dw.com). Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  45. ^ Moaje, Marita (June 17, 2020). "Lacson, Esperon cite weaknesses of Human Security Act". Philippine News Agency. Archived from the original on July 12, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2020.
  46. ^ "Senate S. No. 1083" (PDF). Republic of the Philippines Senate. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  47. ^ Jump up to: a b "PHILIPPINES: REJECT DANGEROUS ANTI-TERROR LAW" (PDF). Amnesty International. Amnesty International. June 4, 2020.
  48. ^ Jump up to: a b Press Release (February 26, 2020). "Senate OKs bill repealing the Anti-Terrorism Law". Senate of the Philippines.
  49. ^ "Eighteenth Congress, First Regular Session, House Bill No. 6875" (PDF). Republic of the Philippines House of Representatives. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  50. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Yap, DJ (June 8, 2020). "20 lawmakers step back from terror bill". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  51. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Go to http://congress.gov.ph, do search for "6875", click 18th Congress, click "History"
  52. ^ Banlaoi, Rommel (July 4, 2020). "The New Philippine Anti-Terrorism Law: Fighting Terror to Protect Human Rights". Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research. Retrieved July 5, 2020.
  53. ^ News, Arianne Merez, ABS-CBN. "Duterte signs anti-terror bill into law despite growing opposition". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  54. ^ Pulta, Benjamin (July 17, 2020). "Anti-terror law takes effect July 18: DOJ". Philippine National Agency. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  55. ^ Aning, Jerome (July 18, 2020). "Antiterror law takes effect today without IRR". Cebu Daily News. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  56. ^ Hallare, Katrina (October 17, 2020). "DOJ releases IRR of anti-terror law". Inquirer. Retrieved August 22, 2021.
  57. ^ "LISTEN: Oral arguments on Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 at Supreme Court". GMA News Online. Retrieved February 2, 2021.
  58. ^ "G.R. Nos. 252578, et al". Supreme Court of the Philippines.
  59. ^ News, Mike Navallo, ABS-CBN. "Anti-terror law faces first Supreme Court challenge". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  60. ^ Buan, Lian (July 8, 2020). "Constitution framers, Ateneo professors file 6th petition vs. anti-terror law". Rappler.
  61. ^ Buan, Lian (July 16, 2020). "Labor groups file 9th petition vs. anti-terror law, slam 'guilt by association'". Rappler.
  62. ^ Talabong, Rappler (July 19, 2020). "10th petition vs. anti-terror law assails violation of right to bail". Rappler.
  63. ^ Nonato, Vince (July 23, 2020). "Unlimited Warrantless Arrests: Carpio, Morales, UP Law Ask SC To Nullify Anti-Terrorism Act". One News.
  64. ^ Nonato, Vince (July 27, 2020). "Muslim Stereotypes Lead To Mistaken Identity: Why Bangsamoro Lawyers Oppose The Anti-Terrorism Act". One News.
  65. ^ Patag, Kristine Joy (July 24, 2020). "Law groups file 17th legal challenge vs. anti-terrorism law". The Philippine Star.
  66. ^ Lagrimas, Nicole-Anne C. (July 24, 2020). "Religious groups to Supreme Court: Declare anti-terror law unconstitutional". GMA News Online.
  67. ^ Buan, Lian (July 29, 2020). "TikToker, viral angry Aling Marie file 21st petition vs. anti-terror law". Rappler.
  68. ^ "Letter to Philippines Ambassador re Anti-Terrorism Law" (PDF). Communications Workers of America. Washington DC: Congress of the United States. July 15, 2020. Retrieved August 5, 2020.
  69. ^ Manahan, Jervis. "'We stand with Filipinos': US lawmakers urge PH to repeal anti-terror law", ABS-CBN. July 16, 2020. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  70. ^ Ramos, Christia Marie (June 30, 2020). "UN human rights chief urges Duterte: 'Refrain from signing' anti-terror bill". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  71. ^ "Philippines: Dangerous anti-terror law yet another setback for human rights". www.amnesty.org. Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  72. ^ "Greenpeace statement on the signing into law of the Anti-Terror Bill". Greenpeace Philippines.
  73. ^ Regino, Alec. "Opinion | Another nail in the coffin of the Philippines' waning democracy". Washington Post.
  74. ^ Aspinwall, Nick. "The Philippines' Broad Anti-Terrorism Law Takes Aim at Dissent". thediplomat.com.
  75. ^ Batac, Marc. "The Philippines' anti-terror bill is poised to cause more terror". www.aljazeera.com.
  76. ^ News, ABS-CBN. "Taylor Swift lends voice to #JunkTerrorBill cause in PH". ABS-CBN News.
  77. ^ Lino, Cha (June 5, 2020). "Darren Criss, Bretman Rock, other international celebs oppose anti-terror bill". INQUIRER.net.
  78. ^ News, Weblyf. "Greta Thunberg Joins the Petition Against the "Anti-Terrorism Law" in the Philippines #JunkTerrorLaw". Weblyf.
  79. ^ "Bangsamoro Parliament appeals to President Duterte to veto Anti-Terrorism bill". Mindanao Daily Mirror. July 2, 2020. Retrieved July 10, 2020.
  80. ^ Arguilas, Carolyn (July 5, 2020). "After rejecting anti-terror bill, Bangsamoro now wants to be part of Anti-Terrorism Council". MindaNews. Retrieved July 10, 2020.
  81. ^ "No seat for Bangsamoro leaders in Anti-Terrorism Council – Roque". CNN PHilippines. July 6, 2020. Retrieved July 10, 2020.
  82. ^ Jump up to: a b "LOOK: Activist Mae Paner dresses up as Sinas for 'Grand Mañanita' protest". CNN Philippines. Retrieved June 13, 2020.
  83. ^ "Philippine protesters rally over controversial anti-terror bill". Reuters. June 13, 2020. Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  84. ^ Jump up to: a b "Today's Paper: June 13, 2020". Inquirer.net. Retrieved July 4, 2020.
  85. ^ "Sinas may not be sacked as NCRPO chief despite controversial birthday feast – PNP spox". CNN Philippines. Retrieved June 13, 2020.
  86. ^ Aquino, Leslie Ann (July 5, 2020). "NCCP says Anti-Terrorism Law against God's will". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved July 10, 2020.
  87. ^ Sy Cua, Aric John (June 5, 2020). "Church group urges Duterte to veto terror bill". The Manila Times. Archived from the original on July 2, 2020. Retrieved July 10, 2020.
  88. ^ "Constant red-tagging of activists confirms critiques of anti-terror law – peasant group". philstar.com.
  89. ^ "Philippine religious orders urge 'stay order' on controversial anti-terror law – Vatican News". www.vaticannews.va. July 7, 2020.
  90. ^ "'Dear Duterte, may paki ka ba sa amin?': Celebrities, artists react to anti-terror law". Rappler.
  91. ^ Malasig, Jeline (June 10, 2020). "#ArtistsFightBack: Ely Buendia, Saab Magalona and other artists urge performers to oppose anti-terror bill".
  92. ^ "BenCab and 100 more of CCP's 13 Artist awardees issue statement against Anti-Terror Law". ABS-CBN News.
  93. ^ "Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research". Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research. July 22, 2020. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  94. ^ Erwin, Colcol (June 14, 2020). "Security analyst defends anti-terror bill, says terrorism threat rises during pandemic". GMA News Online. Retrieved July 21, 2020.
  95. ^ "Showbiz personalities sanib-puwersa sa pagtutol sa anti-terror bill | TV Patrol". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved June 5, 2020.
  96. ^ Lo, Barnaby (June 4, 2020). "Protest against "urgent" anti-terror bill in Philippines gets a boost from Taylor Swift". CBS News. Retrieved June 5, 2020.
  97. ^ "George Floyd: What happened in the final moments of his life". BBC News. May 30, 2020. Archived from the original on June 5, 2020. Retrieved June 1, 2020.
  98. ^ "7 Anti-Terror Bill protesters held in Cebu". ABS CBN News. June 5, 2020. Retrieved June 5, 2020.
  99. ^ "7 protesters arrested in Cebu City". GMA News. June 5, 2020. Retrieved June 5, 2020.
  100. ^ Jump up to: a b "8 arrested in Cebu anti-terror bill rally ordered released without bail". Rappler. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
  101. ^ "PNP denies using excessive force, violating U.P. agreement in Cebu dispersal". Rappler. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
  102. ^ Jump up to: a b "Users report duplicate, dummy Facebook accounts in PH". Rappler. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
  103. ^ "Government probes 'cloned' Facebook accounts". The Philippine Star. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
  104. ^ "Fake Facebook accounts ng ilang estudyante, alumni at faculty ng U.P. naglabasan | TV Patrol". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved June 9, 2020 – via YouTube. "Naglabasan ang mga fake at duplicate accounts ng ilang mga UP Cebu students at mga alumni, pati miyembro ng faculty. Ikinabahala ito ng universidad; tiniyak naman ng pamunuan ng UP na nakipag-ugnayan na sila sa Philippine National Privacy Commission para tulungan ang mga na-biktima ng fake at dummy accounts. Mino-monitor umano ng National Privacy Commission ang nagsulputan pekeng accounts at ipina-abot sa pamunuan ng Facebook. Pati si Department of Justice Secretary Menardo Guevarra, nabahala rin sa pangyayari ito. Ayon sa kalihim, agad niyang aatasan ng DOJ Office of Cybercrime na nakipag-ugnayan sa NBI at PNP Cybercrime Units para agad itong maimbestigahan."
  105. ^ "#HandsOffOurStudents trends as Filipinos call out fake accounts swarming Facebook". Rappler. Archived from the original on June 9, 2020. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
  106. ^ "DOJ cybercrime office to probe dummy Facebook accounts". Rappler. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
  107. ^ "DOJ to probe sudden surge of fake Facebook accounts". CNN Philippines. Retrieved June 9, 2020.
Retrieved from ""